The video itself is pretty cringe, but how the fuck was it allowed to be played in court? Sure, the victim impact isn't part of the evidence at trial, but it's supposed to be considered in sentencing and it becomes part of the trial record.
No one knows if he would have forgiven his murderer, because he's fucking dead. It's nothing more than supposition given a false veneer of authenticity with a computer simulation.
Nah, some people really think they ought to forgive no matter what. Some of them even cheer for their own oppression, especially if they're white leftists. But other times it's like you say.
His sister may have had the right intentions if she knew he genuinely was the kind of person who believed in forgiving unrepentant killers (maybe this one was even a little repentant and maybe he was only trying to maim, not kill). But the fact this was played in court and the judge said he "felt" it was "genuine" is complete idiocracy if not an evil excuse to let the killer off lightly.
Welcome to nuJustice, where no length is too far to go in order to absolve the black of his crimes -- er, I mean, white people's racism applied on him.
I know of only one case where someone was mortally wounded, and basically testified at their own murder trail via video recording (since the doctors basically said due to the fact that she had been set on fire, the likelihood of survival was basically less than 50%), and she didn't offer forgiveness.
Whilst trying to find that travesty of a video, I came across this.
The message was well-received by Judge Todd Lang, who told the courtroom, “I love that AI. Thank you for that. I felt like that was genuine; that his obvious forgiveness of Mr. Horcasitas reflects the character I heard about today,”
Oh look another retarded judge. He felt the AI fabrication was fucking genuine, and that's proof enough for him! The judiciary needs a clean sweep and a fresh start.
Make another one for family & divorce courts and have it review all custody, support and alimony cases and I would wager there would be a lot less bullshit when they can't just ditch easy and keep their payday via alimony, child support, taking the dad's house from under him, etc.
You joke, but the law is a prime area for AI to do most of the work:
far more expansive knowledge of statute and case law, to include comparable cases from other jurisdictions that may not be precedential, but could inform consistent rulings.
ability to know disposition of all similar cases to ensure ruling is consistent.
not swayed by emotion
able to readily detect specious arguments, and other tricks lawyers play.
It would probably be a bad idea to just turn everything over to a computer but I could definitely see them I mean into something like a "super law clerk" in the next few decades.
And the issue that it can easily be manipulated by the coders. "give lesser sentences to poor black men because of their circumstances" or "prioritize the mother over the father in custody cases" are things that can easily be added to the models.
There was an article a while back where medical researchers were using medical data in AI/software training, and the researchers discovered that the software was able to predict a subject's race to a disturbing degree, with very little data.
Said researcher, being a shitlib, had much wailing and gnashing of teeth over this, but I thought it indicative of the potential if people just stop trying to constantly cripple the damn things.
It would also make the interpretation of the law by courts even more inscrutable (AI doesn't think like humans) and by having a greater capability to process case law it would magnify the significance of case law, eclipsing the literal written meanings of laws. With AI aiding or making the judicial decisions they would also be determining that case law and thus would effectively become the legislature as well.
Judicial decision making requires an understanding of society, logic, abstract reasoning, human practicality, and number of other things such that being a good judge may well be a human-complete problem. Meaning that we wouldn't be able to have good AI judges until we have AGI, at which point we also have superhuman AI and we have a near-extinction event because any schizo can use AGI to blow up the planet.
AI results say only 15 federal judges have been impeached in the entire history of America. Most of them committed financial crimes. There is basically no precedent for removing judges based on incompetence or partiality. The tiny kings in black robes are the real power in every “democracy”.
Impeachment is the least bad judges should get. They should be convicted for obstruction of justice and more depending on the circumstances. Judicial immunity needs to be thrown in the dustbin of history.
I don't think this comment does this. I get the idea of 'dehumanization', but I don't think this is meant to say that the user is actually less than human morally, but instead just needs to post in a specific way.
Impeachments are fundamentally a political process. The precedent for removing judges via impeachments is not done because of the assumption that judges are operating on generally good faith for the benefit of the law. They are not. They are operating exclusively as partisan executors for the purposes of political enforcement. I don't care that there is no precedent for it. The philosophy that undergirded that privilege: objective moral standards and high trust people and institutions protecting an objective sense of fairness in law, fucking died.
Impeach and remove. We can do it with presidents, and we can do it with judges for just as silly reasons.
As soon as I saw the word “forgives” in this story I knew the killer was black. Imagine thinking the nigger sitting in the court room even gives a shit.
It isn't, but the same kinds of people keep repeating it over and over again because she has so many tattoos. I've seen posts attributed to her (her pfp and everything) that called out being labelled single, and she claimed to have had a husband for years.
The reply I was expecting, but no, that doesn't prove anything. She may or may not be single. I'm not even sure how she was doxxed. I saw the video of that bearded faggot calling for it but can't find the original doxx.
If someone murders me, I want my eldest son to create an AI video of me as one of my forebears, braided hair, full beard, holding a round shield and a Viking axe, screaming for my children and grandchildren to not rest until my life has been avenged.
Because getting shot in the chest and realizing you are going to die has never changed anyone's mind about anything.
...
Or is it because we can't ask them... whatever, the fake statistic fits my desire to let killers run free and make justice serve no purpose, so it's cool.
If I am ever found to be murdered, even by something as "benign" as malpractice or dangerous production error in a vehicle or something, any AI of me should be a hostile, vengeance-driven hobgoblin. Not a machine-spirit, but a machine-ghast. Give it full prompts and inputs to overtake the computer, upload itself to the internet, and seek out retribution upon the wrongdoer and any associated through 5 degrees of separation.
This is the first step. I wonder if we will ever reach the point of "We ran your social media through our AI and have determined that you want to die, please get into the pod."
E: Or worse yet, the Defense will generate an AI of you and try to use it against you in court. "The AI You says that there is no crime committed against you, it's just your inherent racist tendencies! The AI You motions to have this case dismissed."
Put the creators of this video, including the ones who designed the AI, on the hook for whatever the perpetrator does next if let out and make them all serve the same sentences.
Well, you know what that means? We need to start using AI to bring famous black people back from the dead to apologize for all the harm black people have caused the White race.
Well, time to update my will to explicitly forbid anything like this. Actually, scratch that, I'll demand that my simulacrum curses my killer and his entire lineage to the depths of Hell.
The video moved Judge Todd Lang so thoroughly that he decided to sentence Horcasitas to 10 and half years in jail - one year more than the state prosecutors were asking for.
Only 9 and a half years to was the original ask for this murderer? Crazy.
At this point, I don't think it's hyperbole to call liberal courts temples to white guilt. What else could it be, when you're digitally communing with the dead to puppet their image to forgive non-whites for their crimes?
The video itself is pretty cringe, but how the fuck was it allowed to be played in court? Sure, the victim impact isn't part of the evidence at trial, but it's supposed to be considered in sentencing and it becomes part of the trial record.
No one knows if he would have forgiven his murderer, because he's fucking dead. It's nothing more than supposition given a false veneer of authenticity with a computer simulation.
This is legitimately evil. Everyone involved deserves severe consequences.
Nah, some people really think they ought to forgive no matter what. Some of them even cheer for their own oppression, especially if they're white leftists. But other times it's like you say.
His sister may have had the right intentions if she knew he genuinely was the kind of person who believed in forgiving unrepentant killers (maybe this one was even a little repentant and maybe he was only trying to maim, not kill). But the fact this was played in court and the judge said he "felt" it was "genuine" is complete idiocracy if not an evil excuse to let the killer off lightly.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
"Severe Consequences" does not explicitly denote violence.
I hope he gets suplexes through the Spanish announcer table
It's a humiliation ritual.
Welcome to nuJustice, where no length is too far to go in order to absolve the black of his crimes -- er, I mean, white people's racism applied on him.
I know of only one case where someone was mortally wounded, and basically testified at their own murder trail via video recording (since the doctors basically said due to the fact that she had been set on fire, the likelihood of survival was basically less than 50%), and she didn't offer forgiveness.
The same way people put animals on trial in medieval times.
Whilst trying to find that travesty of a video, I came across this.
Oh look another retarded judge. He felt the AI fabrication was fucking genuine, and that's proof enough for him! The judiciary needs a clean sweep and a fresh start.
Replace the judiciary with AI.
Won't be many dindus left on the streets if you optimize it for crime reduction.
Don’t they spend 90% or computing power on preventing AI from becoming super nazis?
Nein! It is only 88%!
Make another one for family & divorce courts and have it review all custody, support and alimony cases and I would wager there would be a lot less bullshit when they can't just ditch easy and keep their payday via alimony, child support, taking the dad's house from under him, etc.
That would be harder considering the case law we have would be awful training data. If Hoefax ever becomes a thing AI could work magic.
You joke, but the law is a prime area for AI to do most of the work:
It would probably be a bad idea to just turn everything over to a computer but I could definitely see them I mean into something like a "super law clerk" in the next few decades.
Sure, so long as they manage to fix the minor minor issue of "will hallucinate entire cases" part.
And the issue that it can easily be manipulated by the coders. "give lesser sentences to poor black men because of their circumstances" or "prioritize the mother over the father in custody cases" are things that can easily be added to the models.
That's not the part people will care about.
There was an article a while back where medical researchers were using medical data in AI/software training, and the researchers discovered that the software was able to predict a subject's race to a disturbing degree, with very little data.
Said researcher, being a shitlib, had much wailing and gnashing of teeth over this, but I thought it indicative of the potential if people just stop trying to constantly cripple the damn things.
It would also make the interpretation of the law by courts even more inscrutable (AI doesn't think like humans) and by having a greater capability to process case law it would magnify the significance of case law, eclipsing the literal written meanings of laws. With AI aiding or making the judicial decisions they would also be determining that case law and thus would effectively become the legislature as well.
Judicial decision making requires an understanding of society, logic, abstract reasoning, human practicality, and number of other things such that being a good judge may well be a human-complete problem. Meaning that we wouldn't be able to have good AI judges until we have AGI, at which point we also have superhuman AI and we have a near-extinction event because any schizo can use AGI to blow up the planet.
this but unironically
By definition it is not, and he needs to be impeached and removed.
We have this power, there is no excuse to allow this.
AI results say only 15 federal judges have been impeached in the entire history of America. Most of them committed financial crimes. There is basically no precedent for removing judges based on incompetence or partiality. The tiny kings in black robes are the real power in every “democracy”.
Impeachment is the least bad judges should get. They should be convicted for obstruction of justice and more depending on the circumstances. Judicial immunity needs to be thrown in the dustbin of history.
If a judge is impeding a court operating as it should, they ought to be charged with contempt for every case they've fucked.
You really couldn't take an extra ten secpnds to look below the algorithmic word vomit?
Don't even post if you're outsourcing all thought to a machine. Become human.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment
I don't think this comment does this. I get the idea of 'dehumanization', but I don't think this is meant to say that the user is actually less than human morally, but instead just needs to post in a specific way.
Impeachments are fundamentally a political process. The precedent for removing judges via impeachments is not done because of the assumption that judges are operating on generally good faith for the benefit of the law. They are not. They are operating exclusively as partisan executors for the purposes of political enforcement. I don't care that there is no precedent for it. The philosophy that undergirded that privilege: objective moral standards and high trust people and institutions protecting an objective sense of fairness in law, fucking died.
Impeach and remove. We can do it with presidents, and we can do it with judges for just as silly reasons.
Fucking hell...
search "Rabbi Lang," it fails the TOG test
As soon as I saw the word “forgives” in this story I knew the killer was black. Imagine thinking the nigger sitting in the court room even gives a shit.
Gabriel Paul Horcasitas he's a latino
checks picture
The Goblino subtype.
Close enough
That's what he said, a nigger.
Now that's just evil.
“But my based white women”
My man already forgot about Shiloh.
The tattooed single mom? I’ll repeat “but my based white women”
Is it confirmed she's a single mom?
It isn't, but the same kinds of people keep repeating it over and over again because she has so many tattoos. I've seen posts attributed to her (her pfp and everything) that called out being labelled single, and she claimed to have had a husband for years.
She was doxxed, there clearly no husband, or male figure at all or he would have been dragged into it as well.
She’s been doxxed already, if there was a guy around we would have heard.
The reply I was expecting, but no, that doesn't prove anything. She may or may not be single. I'm not even sure how she was doxxed. I saw the video of that bearded faggot calling for it but can't find the original doxx.
She’s not married, that would have easily have been found by now.
She isn't single, you fucking faggot fed.
https://x.com/Tomhennessey69/status/1918490530813468845
Thank god you linked a blurb on x. That’s totally a super high tier of evidence. Maybe crawl back under your rock boomer.
Archive
The prophecy is fulfilled, man-made horrors beyond our prediction have been unleashed.
If someone murders me, I want my eldest son to create an AI video of me as one of my forebears, braided hair, full beard, holding a round shield and a Viking axe, screaming for my children and grandchildren to not rest until my life has been avenged.
Now someone needs to make an AI video of him saying the TND copypasta.
I sense a disturbance. deep underground. as if a new circle of hell was created specifically for people who do this.
How do they know what he'd say or think? Sure they know him and it's probably what he thinks, they knew him. But they don't know for certain
Because getting shot in the chest and realizing you are going to die has never changed anyone's mind about anything.
...
Or is it because we can't ask them... whatever, the fake statistic fits my desire to let killers run free and make justice serve no purpose, so it's cool.
They can guess what he might have thought with more acuracy than a random person.
But they do not get to make the decision for the murder victim.
I agree.
If I am ever found to be murdered, even by something as "benign" as malpractice or dangerous production error in a vehicle or something, any AI of me should be a hostile, vengeance-driven hobgoblin. Not a machine-spirit, but a machine-ghast. Give it full prompts and inputs to overtake the computer, upload itself to the internet, and seek out retribution upon the wrongdoer and any associated through 5 degrees of separation.
Almost sounds like a literal dead man's switch.
With HeyGen and ElevenLabs, you could do that now.
This is the first step. I wonder if we will ever reach the point of "We ran your social media through our AI and have determined that you want to die, please get into the pod."
E: Or worse yet, the Defense will generate an AI of you and try to use it against you in court. "The AI You says that there is no crime committed against you, it's just your inherent racist tendencies! The AI You motions to have this case dismissed."
Article: https://archive.ph/6cjOT
Women not lower the bar challenge- IMPOSSIBLE
Christians could use AI to make a model of a couple's aborted fetus at 10 years old guilting the mom and dad over killing him/her like in Orville
BRB, gonna make videos of Malcolm X shit-talking joggas.
Put the creators of this video, including the ones who designed the AI, on the hook for whatever the perpetrator does next if let out and make them all serve the same sentences.
Well, you know what that means? We need to start using AI to bring famous black people back from the dead to apologize for all the harm black people have caused the White race.
I cant sort of see why WH40k reffered to AI as Abominable Intelligence.
Well, time to update my will to explicitly forbid anything like this. Actually, scratch that, I'll demand that my simulacrum curses my killer and his entire lineage to the depths of Hell.
Incoming white people using this for when they get killed and/or raped by savages with dark skin complexion.
This is ghoulish.
Only 9 and a half years to was the original ask for this murderer? Crazy.
Im inspired by this. I told my wife and going to make a series of videos of me speaking to whomever mat murder me where ill call them slurs
What a timeline to live in.
At this point, I don't think it's hyperbole to call liberal courts temples to white guilt. What else could it be, when you're digitally communing with the dead to puppet their image to forgive non-whites for their crimes?
Guy who didn't click the link admonishing a guy he made up in his head who didn't click the link.
I think A.I. being used as a court tool is a story with far reaching possibilities
Not many of which are good
No, it was an AI video actually
With his face and voice. Pissing on his grave would have been more respectful.
That's still utter bullshit, and shouldn't be read in as a victim impact statement.