Except they do. Men are allowed to have standards. If I'm looking for a good family building woman, opening her legs for every cylinder shaped piece of flesh that comes along is a red flag. I need someone willing to raise a family with good moral character. Why would I test drive a used up old whore? It's a waste of my time
The biggest problem now IMO is the inbalance of standards. Woman have really high standards but many average and above-average men are forced to get the lowest quality women if not no women. This is a cultural problem that has been made much worse due to social media
It's like buying a brand new Toyota for $20k vs buying a used Subaru with 200k miles for $30k. And when you inevitably choose the Toyota, the person selling the Subaru sends you hate mail.
I remember for years the media would trot out articles about some study that showed something like 5% of male bottoms became incontinent over time whenever they wanted gay rage bait. They'd have all these other doctors who'd tell us how flawed the studies were, but they were mostly just hysterical raging with almost no complaints.
Oddly enough, more and more women are becoming incontinent as anal sex becomes more common.
I've never understood anal sex, homo or otherwise. It strikes me as the archetypical "I really shouldn't put my penis in that. However...."
...I guess in that sense, I can understand it. It still seems like a really stupid and disgusting thing to do, for all parties involved, no matter how you present it.
you know a woman is really into you if she'll do anal with you, even though it's presumably less pleasure, more pain, and arguably humiliating for her.
Yes, people in relationships feel more loved and secure if their partner makes willing sacrifices for them and, as long as it doesn't permanently damage them, the more painful the sacrifice the more loved they feel.
This is why even normal men want to have anal sex with their wives/GFs every so often, and why normal women want men to buy them expensive shit for no reason like $30 for flowers that do nothing but die and waste money or $3000 rocks. All the time is weird and fucked up and destructive (either gifts or anal), but every so often its a good barometer for the relationship.
But only if he's a good little cuck who has the "emotional maturity" to understand that her wild sex days are behind her, and that she's totally not getting railed by random alphas on her "girl's nights".
The fact that this is an article tells me one thing, A LOT of women are starting to realise they were lied to that they could party hard, sleep around then easily settle down latter as they're hitting late 30s early 40s.
Everyone, prepare by buying stocks in ice cream, cat litter and buy lots of ear plugs for the whining as it's only going to get louder..
They've already have had big investors say to invest in cat food and box wine because it's coming.
Anecdotely I went to a major college a few years back and even in the 100s of people I know and still follow, I can count the number of relationships on one hand. The girls I know are reaching 30 and they have no long term relationships, no kids, and literally the most interesting thing in their lives is going to a Taylor Swift concert.
What's interesting is I went to college older, so my older friends like the ones I went to high school with are all married, have kids, etc. It's only a 4-5 year difference but it's a stark to see the difference.
Even more relevant, no one should care about a man’s lack of experience. But I’m sure a slut with a high body count will still disparage a guy for being a virgin while insisting her record shouldn’t matter.
In that recent dumpster fire of a Marvel production, She-Hulk - an admitted self-insert fantasy for the writer - She-Hulk makes fun of Captain America for being a virgin, and it's supposed to be a joke you laugh along with. It was obviously just the middle-aged writer putting a random thought she had into the script.
Ever since Elon Musk’s lackeys began fiddling with the algorithms of X (formerly Twitter), I have noticed a distinct shift in the content that is pushed onto users. My “For you” tab is now a nest of tradwives, shoplifting videos, and that guy who has strong opinions on trouser creases. It is also home to the kind of old-fashioned misogyny that I once thought was on the decline.
Your "for you" page is like that because you went looking for that content and kept clicking on it and engaging.
Posts like that from normal people were suppressed under the old Twitter moderators, the combination of the jannies being fired and their autojanny protocol being changed + spiritual jannies fleeing to Mastodon sites made it possible for the things she's complaining about to be visible.
Men do. It is a measure of character judgement and paternal assurance which is a key factor in men's preferences. The biggest dealbreakers for men according to a recent survey all had the same theme - large numbers of male attention and activity.
One the reverse side, women also care about body count too - mostly if your count is below one for a period of time or longer. Because for women, their biggest dealbreaker in the same survey is the unknown quantity and anti-social individual because women value safety as a key factor and a lack of pre-selection/experience because it means you haven't got attention from other women and haven't been picked for providing, protecting, looks and social status.
Just an argument for normalizing thoughtcrime from an insecure neolib state wife. Married to the establishment because no one with standards will take her.
My “For you” tab is now a nest of tradwives, shoplifting videos, and that guy who has strong opinions on trouser creases.
I think that reflects on her weird browsing habits rather than Twatter. And just a hint, Helen. Anyone calling themselves a "trad wife" is 99.9999% of the time just another onlyfans grifter changing up their pitch. Stop p0rn surfing and maybe the algorithm will shift for you.
Proper addendum: The woman should care. Her partners (and prospective partners) should care. Her family should care, but only to the extent that she should care. Everyone else should fuck off, but those people should definitely care, since there's a lot of medical science showing the body count has a significant impact on their long-term quality of life in a very real medical sense.
Except they do. Men are allowed to have standards. If I'm looking for a good family building woman, opening her legs for every cylinder shaped piece of flesh that comes along is a red flag. I need someone willing to raise a family with good moral character. Why would I test drive a used up old whore? It's a waste of my time
It's not even harsh. It's neither unfair nor unnecessarily mean spirited. All it is, is a form boundary.
Just don't be a whore.
It really is that simple.
Men have to spend a lifetime building their value to become good, resourceful providers.
Women simply have to spend a lifetime not ruining their value to maintain their value.
Let me add that fornication is a sin for both sexes and men should also be chaste.
Yeah I would definitely apply the logic to men too.
The biggest problem now IMO is the inbalance of standards. Woman have really high standards but many average and above-average men are forced to get the lowest quality women if not no women. This is a cultural problem that has been made much worse due to social media
A not insignificant number of men are. Not by choice, obviously, but the sex-gap is real.
It is but people should also be getting married in their teens and early 20s and not waiting until they hit their wall.
I don't know. Getting married before 20 was never actually common in history.
Yes it was and having kids by the time you were 18 was expected. Rapid population growth in the past bears witness to this.
I think people have a lot of false ideas about how things worked in the past.
It's like buying a brand new Toyota for $20k vs buying a used Subaru with 200k miles for $30k. And when you inevitably choose the Toyota, the person selling the Subaru sends you hate mail.
I skimmed the article and there is not even a hint of substance, just kvetching.
I remember for years the media would trot out articles about some study that showed something like 5% of male bottoms became incontinent over time whenever they wanted gay rage bait. They'd have all these other doctors who'd tell us how flawed the studies were, but they were mostly just hysterical raging with almost no complaints.
Oddly enough, more and more women are becoming incontinent as anal sex becomes more common.
I've never understood anal sex, homo or otherwise. It strikes me as the archetypical "I really shouldn't put my penis in that. However...."
...I guess in that sense, I can understand it. It still seems like a really stupid and disgusting thing to do, for all parties involved, no matter how you present it.
Small dick problems
Degenerates. No matter the country or era they're all the same.
Yes, people in relationships feel more loved and secure if their partner makes willing sacrifices for them and, as long as it doesn't permanently damage them, the more painful the sacrifice the more loved they feel.
This is why even normal men want to have anal sex with their wives/GFs every so often, and why normal women want men to buy them expensive shit for no reason like $30 for flowers that do nothing but die and waste money or $3000 rocks. All the time is weird and fucked up and destructive (either gifts or anal), but every so often its a good barometer for the relationship.
Porn has normalized it.
This. I don't even know what's being said throughout that whole thing.
A sloot trying to normalize sluttiness to appear higher value for Chad.
Or the beta she's trying to con into paying her bills when Chad moves on to younger and prettier women.
Yeah and despite fucking half the town her entire fertile years, she'll reward this beta with starfish sex once a month, at best.
But only if he's a good little cuck who has the "emotional maturity" to understand that her wild sex days are behind her, and that she's totally not getting railed by random alphas on her "girl's nights".
Spoiler alert. She's not. "Helen" hit the wall long ago and that's what this spew of an article is about.
Chads wont marry them either when theyre used up
Hoes mad: The article
Lol didn't even have to read it to assume that
The fact that this is an article tells me one thing, A LOT of women are starting to realise they were lied to that they could party hard, sleep around then easily settle down latter as they're hitting late 30s early 40s.
Everyone, prepare by buying stocks in ice cream, cat litter and buy lots of ear plugs for the whining as it's only going to get louder..
They've already have had big investors say to invest in cat food and box wine because it's coming.
Anecdotely I went to a major college a few years back and even in the 100s of people I know and still follow, I can count the number of relationships on one hand. The girls I know are reaching 30 and they have no long term relationships, no kids, and literally the most interesting thing in their lives is going to a Taylor Swift concert.
What's interesting is I went to college older, so my older friends like the ones I went to high school with are all married, have kids, etc. It's only a 4-5 year difference but it's a stark to see the difference.
No one should care about a man's height or bank balance. But here we are
Even more relevant, no one should care about a man’s lack of experience. But I’m sure a slut with a high body count will still disparage a guy for being a virgin while insisting her record shouldn’t matter.
In that recent dumpster fire of a Marvel production, She-Hulk - an admitted self-insert fantasy for the writer - She-Hulk makes fun of Captain America for being a virgin, and it's supposed to be a joke you laugh along with. It was obviously just the middle-aged writer putting a random thought she had into the script.
There's nothing more feminist than wifing up the town bicycle.
A man needs a woman like a fish needs a bicycle?
Your "for you" page is like that because you went looking for that content and kept clicking on it and engaging.
Posts like that from normal people were suppressed under the old Twitter moderators, the combination of the jannies being fired and their autojanny protocol being changed + spiritual jannies fleeing to Mastodon sites made it possible for the things she's complaining about to be visible.
Stop trying to hide it then
Men do. It is a measure of character judgement and paternal assurance which is a key factor in men's preferences. The biggest dealbreakers for men according to a recent survey all had the same theme - large numbers of male attention and activity.
One the reverse side, women also care about body count too - mostly if your count is below one for a period of time or longer. Because for women, their biggest dealbreaker in the same survey is the unknown quantity and anti-social individual because women value safety as a key factor and a lack of pre-selection/experience because it means you haven't got attention from other women and haven't been picked for providing, protecting, looks and social status.
sounds like something a sloot would say
They should.
They do.
Lying to women about this basic reality does them a disservice.
yeah no being a whore is shameful
Just an argument for normalizing thoughtcrime from an insecure neolib state wife. Married to the establishment because no one with standards will take her.
I think that reflects on her weird browsing habits rather than Twatter. And just a hint, Helen. Anyone calling themselves a "trad wife" is 99.9999% of the time just another onlyfans grifter changing up their pitch. Stop p0rn surfing and maybe the algorithm will shift for you.
Proper addendum: The woman should care. Her partners (and prospective partners) should care. Her family should care, but only to the extent that she should care. Everyone else should fuck off, but those people should definitely care, since there's a lot of medical science showing the body count has a significant impact on their long-term quality of life in a very real medical sense.
"Nobody should care how many miles are on a used car!"
Same reality-defying logic.
They know they can’t win this argument. So they use a bunch of non-sensible examples that makes them look even worse.
hot dog in a hallway.
Roasties mad
It still freaks me out that "body count" refers to sex and not killing. Maybe for some people that could be soul-killing.
Many of these same women have "body counts" of unborn babies disposed of as well.
Since the author is a woman, let me translate the title: Nobody should care about my 'body count'
Cum-dumpster self-back-pat article.
"Nobody should care about [reality]."
The American people are tired of women.
Everybody should
For how gung-ho they are about standards for women, they don't seem to like standards for men.
leftism is an eternal sustained assault on reality.
Ok that is a pretty sick burn.
No one should care how much someones fucked, but holy shit this is a poorly written article.
Not in the slightest? If a persons fucked a lot, they fucked a lot. Doesn't go further than that. Maybe of you were fucked once, you'd get it
A partner count greater than 5 correlates to a divorce rate many times higher than a woman with no bodycount.
High bodycount does measurable psychological damage to a woman's ability to pair bond / have a succesful relationship.
This applies to men as well, but not as extreme.
That's straight up bogus my dude. Bad dick resulted in a 70% divorce rate. Learn to fuck, and your partner won't leave you.
Well you engage in gay so...
Lol
Lol, and this is why you get zero pussy
Or just a simp.
First name is Helen. Article is about her projecting her own insecurities. All women write like this
Is a Helen a femcel Karen?