Why shouldn't I? If a person has fucked a lot, it means their standards are low and their long-term loyalty is low, they're more likely to have STDs, and there are more exes for any future partner to have to measure up against. I know it may seem strange that I mentioned both low standards and measuring up against many past partners, but this is because of a difference in how those standards are applied. What I mean is that they will mentally be comparing their partner to an amalgamation that has all the things they liked about each of their exes. The barrier to get this person's attention is low (we know because they have many, many exes), but the requirement to hold their attention is that you always come out favorably against nostalgia for the best parts of dozens of other relationships and the intrigue and possibility of whatever other person their low standards has allowed them to notice.
We can argue about whether or not more partners is worse in women than men—I think it's probably slightly worse, but that a high body-count is a red flag on either sex—but it seems obvious that there are strong reasons to prefer a partner with fewer past relationships.
No one should care how much someones fucked, but holy shit this is a poorly written article.
Why shouldn't I? If a person has fucked a lot, it means their standards are low and their long-term loyalty is low, they're more likely to have STDs, and there are more exes for any future partner to have to measure up against. I know it may seem strange that I mentioned both low standards and measuring up against many past partners, but this is because of a difference in how those standards are applied. What I mean is that they will mentally be comparing their partner to an amalgamation that has all the things they liked about each of their exes. The barrier to get this person's attention is low (we know because they have many, many exes), but the requirement to hold their attention is that you always come out favorably against nostalgia for the best parts of dozens of other relationships and the intrigue and possibility of whatever other person their low standards has allowed them to notice.
We can argue about whether or not more partners is worse in women than men—I think it's probably slightly worse, but that a high body-count is a red flag on either sex—but it seems obvious that there are strong reasons to prefer a partner with fewer past relationships.
Not in the slightest? If a persons fucked a lot, they fucked a lot. Doesn't go further than that. Maybe of you were fucked once, you'd get it
"Can't refute any of his points, better imply he's a virgin." I guess you must be one of those high body count gals?
A partner count greater than 5 correlates to a divorce rate many times higher than a woman with no bodycount.
High bodycount does measurable psychological damage to a woman's ability to pair bond / have a succesful relationship.
This applies to men as well, but not as extreme.
That's straight up bogus my dude. Bad dick resulted in a 70% divorce rate. Learn to fuck, and your partner won't leave you.
She's doing a January 6th style larp, I half-expected her to write about GamerGate like it was 9/11.
Well you engage in gay so...
Lol
I'll care about whatever I want, fuck u
Lol, and this is why you get zero pussy
This would be hurtful if my girl wasn't next to me in bed while I read it.