Well, they did hire a tranny that was an outspoken pedophile supporter, defended him against any criticism with rampant banning and only let him go after the Streisand Effect hit them with full force.
Reddit has been deliberately turned into a breeding ground of degeneracy, of course they won't allow dissent.
I'm just glad the post went through given the wall of text it turned into. There was another long post I made in reply to something a while back and checking my post history and the mod logs shows it never went through ;_;
They're preparing to censor any information that will show how rigged the midterm election is going to be. It's going to be absolutely blatant. Expect Dems to get 100% of the vote in counties that have been red for decades.
Unfortunate, but the sub wasn't as good as it used to be. The last year or two it had way too many alphabet people trying to justify their degeneracy by complaining about worse degeneracy.
The man hating TERFs migrated to TIA and SJIA when the GC subs got purged. I appreciated the willingness to take on troonery but the threads had a weird mixture of "Muh misogyny" and based comments.
all the arguments against transgenderism also apply to homosexuality
No they don't. Gay culture is fucked, but "ethical homosexuality" isn't an oxymoron. An adult feeling romantic or sexual love for someone of their own sex isn't inherently the product of a lie, and apart from being unable to raise children the resulting lifestyle isn't inherently harmful. A gay man doesn't have to be a promiscuous sodomite.
Depends on what the standard for morality is and if it even exists at all. Problem is, for most of all the situations where there is actual objective morality then it does actually contradict it and it is an oxymoron. But once again, you gotta define your basis for morality to claim that in either direction.
I am not even making an opinion on this topic in this post. Just saying that it isn't as simple as you are acting.
However, I would take issue with that second to last sentence on a separate point but I don't really care enough to argue it lol. That is too long of a discussion to have for this.
all the arguments against transgenderism also apply to homosexuality
Lol all of them, huh?
Straight guys are so pathetic. So constantly desperate to put your deadened circumcised scar tissue inside a woman - sometimes she lets you, sometimes she doesn't, it's her decision and she can and will use it against you.
Then you see other men having sexual pleasure you can't even imagine during male homosexual intercourse, a capability of the male body that any objective analysis (you know, if aliens were studying us or something) would conclude is a product of evolution and a fundamental aspect of male sexuality.
But women don't date bisexual men, so you're even too terrified to take a shower at the gym. So you come online and reassure each other that those grapes are really sour and anyone who eats the sour grapes is a bad person and circumcised PIV sex (at her discretion) is the best.
And don't get me started on the hypocrisy blaming Pride and puberty blockers on homosexual men while straight people kill a million babies every year.
I'm with you on the troons, but most of them are heterosexual men these days. Troons, abortions, incels, simps, you guys are doing just fine as long as you don't fool around with your bros! Lol so sad
Homosexuality does have an evolutionary purpose. The evolutionary "value" of homosexuals is providing for their heterosexual siblings. That is, evolution deemed you unfit for replication, and thus you exist to enhance the chances of survival of non-defective elements of your genetic line. In the modern context, with the massively reduced risk of child death, that makes you and yours effectively worthless.
Homophobia, like most stigmatization, has evolutionary roots too. Stigmatization exists to avoid associations that negatively impact survival. Disgust, the sentiment most commonly associated with male homosexuality, is an adaptive survival mechanism. It exists to enable disease and pathogen avoidance. Even without the historical context of male homosexuality being deemed unclean and associated with disease for thousands of years, the disgust that enables homophobia is a natural, evolutionary response in the same way that avoiding stepping in dogshit is. Furthermore, avoidance of people who seemingly do not have this adaptive mechanism is itself inline with evolutionary stigmatization.
Nice whataboutism on the abortion though. Most are capable of taking issue with more than one societal ill at a time.
Wait, wait, wait... You're a video game developer? Your success, your contribution to society is measured in the hours you distract young men from actually gainful activities like athletics, entrepreneurship, learning an instrument or a language... And you're going to lecture me on what's good for men. Haha hahahaha ha! Is this real life?!??
You know, when I realized that the left is full of coping retards whose worldview is just confirmation bias, I was hoping that the other side would be different. Instead it's turned out to be exactly the same, with different prejudices.
You are partially correct: I enjoy being able to provide my nieces and nephews with opportunities that their parents can't afford. Statistically my genes are already represented in the new generation.
You are quite retarded, though, to imply that a man's worth is based on reproductive success. If that's the case then some Jamal getting a DNA test on Maury is a better man than you.
Childless men are one of humanity's greatest evolutionary strategies. From the monks who preserved classical knowledge for centuries, to men like Isaac Newton, Nicola Tesla and the Wright brothers. If you type "Western civilization" into Wikipedia, the image for the article is a naked man drawn by a homo, lol. Vitruvian man. I actually expected the 17-foot naked man carved out of marble by the other homo. Let me know if you ever create anything as monumental and enduring as that.
Your evo psych gibberish is hilarious cope. You're talking about evolution based on the obviously false assumption that aversion to homosexuality is a human universal. No research, no critical thought, you literally just made it up to go with what you already believe. So stupid.
Homosexual behavior, not aversion, was commonplace among the ancient Greeks, Romans, Celts, Slavs, etc. Sparta and Thebes based their militaries on it. The universal disgust you describe never existed. You literally made something up and then explained human evolution in terms of the thing you made up. And other retards gave you upvotes for it. The fact that you think statist conditioning to control male sexuality is natural, and spend your precious time defending it, is really sad.
When I was talking about evolution, I wasn't even talking about phenotypic "homosexuality". I was talking about the actual act.
I guess you don't know much about your butt, but you should know that your body doesn't store waste right next to your anus. That section is indeed a conduit for waste some of the time, a much smaller proportion of time than the place where you put your dick is a conduit for bloody chunks of uterine lining.
You can easily learn to voluntarily relax your anus to have anal sex. I know you use the friction against your scar tissue to achieve orgasm; having receptive anal sex is like having an orgasm for the entire time, followed by ten orgasms at once.
If you had a subscription to the right website, I could show you hundreds of examples of men paid to have sex with women on camera, and then paid to gradually explore sex with men. I'll tell you what, straight guys often compare their job to getting fucked in the ass, but I don't think they mean that they had a boner leaking precum the whole time. Then they take money to have sex with women again. It doesn't turn them gay.
There are homosexual men, but the proportion of men capable of enjoying sex with men is much larger. As we've already discussed, you're obviously capable of rationalizing anything you want to believe, so I'm sure you will find reasons to deny yourself sexual pleasure that your ancestors evolved to be capable of. And if that's the case, I guess it's not a big deal that your parents had a doctor cut half the nerve endings off your dick and let the rest turn into a callus.
And it's really fucking funny that we have this global elite, known for psyops and gaslighting, and you think they're glorifying heterosexual men in dresses and drag queen story hour in order to get you to accept homosexual behavior... instead of the opposite.
"Whataboutism" - that's just what hypocrites say when called out, right? If Pride reflects on me, then abortion reflects on you. I'd rather we treat each other as individuals, though.
Homosexual behavior, not aversion, was commonplace among the ancient Greeks, Romans, Celts, Slavs, etc. Sparta and Thebes based their militaries on it. The universal disgust you describe never existed...
And it's really fucking funny that we have this global elite, known for psyops and gaslighting, and you think they're glorifying heterosexual men in dresses and drag queen story hour in order to get you to accept homosexual behavior... instead of the opposite.
The notion that homosexuality was accepted was popularized by idle 18th century aristocrats. A similar trend exists today, with modern sentiments being projected onto select sources to defend the notion of social constructivism. The advocates in ancient times where the elites of both Greek and Roman society - ritualistic pederasts; I guess some things just don't change. In Sparta it was proliferated by the oligarchy as to maintain hierarchy - domination. Given literacy rates, the selectivity of sources seldom speak to common sentiment. As is seen in the very different sentiments of some Athenian democratic scholars, who despite their concern of offending those in power, at least cautiously referenced perspectives of the vox populi.
That said, even by pederast standards, homosexual acts where considered the destruction of masculinity - a fairly universal sentiment in the west. The limited tolerance was clearly defined and to be practiced on slave boys not yet men. For any freeman to freely engage in such acts was thought disgusting. For any slave to enjoy the act was shameful/impudent. The notion of homosexual union was absurd. So much of what people regard as "acceptance" was prison rape enabled by social status. Literary treatments considered homosexuality with the same gravity as adultery, which is to say severe. That the limited instances of recorded disdain of the elite, by the commonage, frequently include derogatory references to pederasty is telling. As is the fact that being called a "passive homosexual" was regarded as the gravest of insults. You cite the Sacred band of Thebes. When they fought fearlessly to the last man in defense of their people, they earned the respect of Phillip. So much so that he built a monument and issued a decree to preclude their mockery. Such a death was regarded as the highest honor, yet such protections were necessary because of how poorly homosexuals where regarded by the commonage. And yes, the mentions of a disease, now understood to be Syphilis, are inseparable from the pederasty.
With all that said, I was referring to societal norms that don't celebrate fucking children so long as they don't yet have facial hair - that is, after the arrival of Christianity. I appreciate the irony of that statement given the incidence of pederasty in organized religion. I simply regard a belief system that forbids pedophilia and shuns its proponents as a net win. Finding sources of contempt and disgust from that point onwards shouldn't be hard; Both in regards to its deviation from the "natural order", and in regards to the act itself.
You literally made something up and then explained human evolution in terms of the thing you made up
Disgust as an adaptive evolutionary response is established. As is the evolutionary motivation of stigmatization. As are the studies reporting similar alpha-amylase activation when straight men are shown pictures of homosexual couples and rotting corpses. Or that syphilis was one of the leading causes of stigmatization in early Europe. The stigmatization wasn't limited to homophobia, but also xenophobia, see "The French disease." Not universal, but consistent.
If Pride reflects on me, then abortion reflects on you.
I don't support abortion - outside of severe medical complications.
I'd rather we treat each other as individuals
If the content of your post is anything to go by, I doubt that doing so would change anything.
They had the same problem as half-KiA. Wow, it's all leftists and fags doing this shit? NOOOOO YUO CANT KNOW THAT THERE'S GOOD GAY LEFTISTS REEEEEEEEEEE
I normally don’t give a shit about something like this, but tumblrinaction getting banned feels like the end of an era. I remember when it was created. Looking back on it, in many ways its creation marked the start of the current culture war that we are in.
I haven’t used TiA in like 5 years, so this doesn’t affect me at all, but it does make me feel nostalgic.
Were they right-leaning? Last I went there it was a bunch of "we're fine with all the degeneracy that was forced on people up until about 2014, but this new wave of degeneracy goes too far!" leftists.
It makes me think that giving in on anything is a really bad idea, because it only moves the ball further down the field and shrinks the Overton Window further.
That's been my take as well. I went solidly from pro-gay marriage and pro-choice to being against both.
Gay marriage has normalized degeneracy and led to exactly what the religious-right warned us of. If it stopped at "live and let live", then I wouldn't give a fuck.
Abortion as a rare last option, has become "stab the baby in the face on its way out of the womb at 9 months".
That's been my take as well. I went solidly from pro-gay marriage and pro-choice to being against both.
I am still pro-choice, but I'll be damned if I don't experience some pleasure if my side loses - simply because some of the worst people are on my side.
Gay marriage has normalized degeneracy and led to exactly what the religious-right warned us of.
I think if we told them at the time what would happen, they would tell us to stop being melodramatic, and that it's bad but nowhere nearly this bad.
See, Australia watched you guys do all that. We saw the slippery slope become a well-oiled cliff. And then we had an insanely rigged, social media lynch mob-impacted public vote, in order to give them their “rights”, i.e. give in to this shit, a couple of years after you did…
And it followed the same exact path. In everything…
I actually personally know one of the national organizers of that campaign. Not well, but I know him. He’s gone so off his fucking rocker since they won that I’ve had to cut him out of my life, despite just being a “camp fag”, and distinctly not a troon…
He’s like, at least 20 years older than me, and yet, since they “won”, he is acting like a fucking petulant spoiled child. I really… Don’t know. It’s like the arrogance and “power” has gone to their collective heads, with all that entails. It really, really is…
You're behind the times. California is passing a bill that gives 'pregnant persons' a month to kill their babies after birth, and if it dies they can't be charged criminally or civilly and they can't be investigated by the police. Note this protection applies to mothers only, of course.
It's supposed to protect against prosecution if you get a late term abortion or something, but the actual wording of the law basically legalizes infanticide.
Partial birth abortion doesn't involve stabbing a baby in the face. They have it come part way out and suck the brains out through the back of the skull with a sharpened vacuum tube.
Legalizing gay marriage was a huge mistake. Have you ever read Obergefell v Hodges? It's all nonsense. There's no rational justification for legalizing gay marriage at any level, much less legislating gay marriage from the bench at the federal level. It is Roe v. Wade version 2.0; a garbage ruling by predominantly Leftist judges in order to advance the agenda, with no legitimate consideration given to the US Constitution whatsoever... all just abstractions of abstractions and "penumbras" to interpret it however is most convenient to them.
Beyond the legality of gay marriage, there's no rational or common sense argument for gay marriage either. I'm sorry, but no matter how you consider the topic, gay relationships are NOT comparable to heterosexual relationships in any way that actually matters. We conceded that feelings and emotions are more important than truth in the case of gay marriage, and it's only gone downhill from there.
The point is that there’s no rational argument for it beyond appealing to peoples feelings and emotions.
Even if there were a rational argument for supporting gay marriage, the slippery slope is a real threat and would override all but the strongest arguments, a fact that should be obvious to everyone at this point.
Remember ShortFatOtaku? His "cohost" is a train - Lilith Lovett, and although these two speak out against SJWs (SFO was a GG OG) they're both fairly staunchly leftists. They're the "I'm not a far leftist BUUUT" types and are "enlightened centrist" types.
All this stuff the left was doing is bad, but look at the right wing, they're bad too!
"Marxism is bad but, to make sure I'm "balanced and centrist" I'll also call out the so-called far right!"
It's infuriating why so many of these Bernie Bro types do not fucking GET it. I'll borrow a left wing phrase.
It's not enough to be "against SJWs", you have to be anti-leftist, including SJWs and all the fuckers that are around on that side of the spectrum. THe Overton window has moved too far left and it must be dragged back, trying to stop it where it is will NOT help.
That line about Bernie Bros is too true. I know way too many who consider themselves "moderates", yet still support support Bernie & every other democrat and leftist-liberal agenda.
Exactly, Friended and PSA Stitch, both GG OGs, also are like this. They hate Trump and wish we could go back to the "good old days" of being BernieBros and advocating for single payer healthcare and high tax brackets, etc.
It's like they don't get, the echoes of marxism that fuels the far left idpol shit. It's the SAME shit that fuels your demands for "democratic socialism".
That's an interesting notion now that I try and think about it. What was my own journey into becoming the stair muffin moving shitlord I am today I wonder? 🤔
Probably Mass Effect 3 tbh and how fans of the series were attacked after criticising the police nsing. I played 1 and 2 when they originally released so had the full years long experience going in to 3 and after completing it managed to go through all 5 stages of grief in the just the end credits.
Then the shit really hit the fan when the hit pieces came out against the players.
If they autobanned GC, I wouldn't have been able to spend my free time pointing out to radfems that they're reduced to hanging out in conservative subs because their own ideology ran away from them.
I liked having a couple of the cat ladies in TIA, it was occasionally hilarious to watch them have meltdowns over 'misogynistic' posts.
But yeah, at a certain point they started taking over, and the whole place became a lot less fun after that.
On the plus side, watching every place they skitter to being jannie hammered is magnificent. It's like watching the mob (half the mob anyway) turning on J.K.
These two subs were full of "I'm not an SJW BUT" types.
It was fucking irritating - all these people spoke out against "woke" shit but they never understood what fuels it and why there was shit that was far worse than this woke shit and there's ((( something else ))) possible fueling it (I'm using the echoes semi-ironically, but basically these people couldn't think outside the box).
Folks in these subs were basically like ex-GG "leaders" who turned into left wing shills (Chris Ray Gun, Shoe, etc)
Although TiA still held to some of its core values, the banning of /r/gendercritical brought a wave of TERF refugees which came to increasingly dominate.
Well the admins are all likely troons, that's the problem
Well, they did hire a tranny that was an outspoken pedophile supporter, defended him against any criticism with rampant banning and only let him go after the Streisand Effect hit them with full force.
Reddit has been deliberately turned into a breeding ground of degeneracy, of course they won't allow dissent.
Spez's troon harem probably threatened to go on strike if he didn't ban those subs.
most powermods are.
kia1 probably only survived because of their "don't mention troons" policy.
And it is generous though to say that it "survived" :P but yeah haha.
Yeah I got my perma-ban commenting in a thread about trannies in that subreddit.
I got perma banned for stating biological men are men.
You monster!
Defining terms? What are you, a biologist?
There's no other type of man. All men are biological men.
In my case it was talking about the pedotroon admin scandal.
OOTL ... is this the Gallowboob thing, or after it? I've not been in or around that toxic shithole for over 2 years.
Might be the Aimee Knight thing (not his real name obviously, but can't be arsed searching his actual name)
Hat already had a backup set over on Saidit. He made it late last year: https://saidit.net/s/TumblrInAction/
There's also this: https://saidit.net/s/SocialJusticeInAction/ but I don't know GuyLeDouche.
There's also a win
https://communities.win/c/TumblrInAction
Also true.
BTW, great write-up on the realities of an AGP being pregnant.
I'm just glad the post went through given the wall of text it turned into. There was another long post I made in reply to something a while back and checking my post history and the mod logs shows it never went through ;_;
Midterms are looming. Shareblue is putting pressure on their minions to clamp on anything that doesn't conform with the DNC playbook.
They're preparing to censor any information that will show how rigged the midterm election is going to be. It's going to be absolutely blatant. Expect Dems to get 100% of the vote in counties that have been red for decades.
I fully expect many counties to be 120% or more in their voting turnout.
Unfortunate, but the sub wasn't as good as it used to be. The last year or two it had way too many alphabet people trying to justify their degeneracy by complaining about worse degeneracy.
The man hating TERFs migrated to TIA and SJIA when the GC subs got purged. I appreciated the willingness to take on troonery but the threads had a weird mixture of "Muh misogyny" and based comments.
No they don't. Gay culture is fucked, but "ethical homosexuality" isn't an oxymoron. An adult feeling romantic or sexual love for someone of their own sex isn't inherently the product of a lie, and apart from being unable to raise children the resulting lifestyle isn't inherently harmful. A gay man doesn't have to be a promiscuous sodomite.
Depends on what the standard for morality is and if it even exists at all. Problem is, for most of all the situations where there is actual objective morality then it does actually contradict it and it is an oxymoron. But once again, you gotta define your basis for morality to claim that in either direction.
I am not even making an opinion on this topic in this post. Just saying that it isn't as simple as you are acting.
However, I would take issue with that second to last sentence on a separate point but I don't really care enough to argue it lol. That is too long of a discussion to have for this.
No, but that's the way the community develops
Lol all of them, huh?
Straight guys are so pathetic. So constantly desperate to put your deadened circumcised scar tissue inside a woman - sometimes she lets you, sometimes she doesn't, it's her decision and she can and will use it against you.
Then you see other men having sexual pleasure you can't even imagine during male homosexual intercourse, a capability of the male body that any objective analysis (you know, if aliens were studying us or something) would conclude is a product of evolution and a fundamental aspect of male sexuality.
But women don't date bisexual men, so you're even too terrified to take a shower at the gym. So you come online and reassure each other that those grapes are really sour and anyone who eats the sour grapes is a bad person and circumcised PIV sex (at her discretion) is the best.
And don't get me started on the hypocrisy blaming Pride and puberty blockers on homosexual men while straight people kill a million babies every year.
I'm with you on the troons, but most of them are heterosexual men these days. Troons, abortions, incels, simps, you guys are doing just fine as long as you don't fool around with your bros! Lol so sad
Cope
Homosexuality does have an evolutionary purpose. The evolutionary "value" of homosexuals is providing for their heterosexual siblings. That is, evolution deemed you unfit for replication, and thus you exist to enhance the chances of survival of non-defective elements of your genetic line. In the modern context, with the massively reduced risk of child death, that makes you and yours effectively worthless.
Homophobia, like most stigmatization, has evolutionary roots too. Stigmatization exists to avoid associations that negatively impact survival. Disgust, the sentiment most commonly associated with male homosexuality, is an adaptive survival mechanism. It exists to enable disease and pathogen avoidance. Even without the historical context of male homosexuality being deemed unclean and associated with disease for thousands of years, the disgust that enables homophobia is a natural, evolutionary response in the same way that avoiding stepping in dogshit is. Furthermore, avoidance of people who seemingly do not have this adaptive mechanism is itself inline with evolutionary stigmatization.
Nice whataboutism on the abortion though. Most are capable of taking issue with more than one societal ill at a time.
Wait, wait, wait... You're a video game developer? Your success, your contribution to society is measured in the hours you distract young men from actually gainful activities like athletics, entrepreneurship, learning an instrument or a language... And you're going to lecture me on what's good for men. Haha hahahaha ha! Is this real life?!??
Dilate.
You know, when I realized that the left is full of coping retards whose worldview is just confirmation bias, I was hoping that the other side would be different. Instead it's turned out to be exactly the same, with different prejudices.
You are partially correct: I enjoy being able to provide my nieces and nephews with opportunities that their parents can't afford. Statistically my genes are already represented in the new generation.
You are quite retarded, though, to imply that a man's worth is based on reproductive success. If that's the case then some Jamal getting a DNA test on Maury is a better man than you.
Childless men are one of humanity's greatest evolutionary strategies. From the monks who preserved classical knowledge for centuries, to men like Isaac Newton, Nicola Tesla and the Wright brothers. If you type "Western civilization" into Wikipedia, the image for the article is a naked man drawn by a homo, lol. Vitruvian man. I actually expected the 17-foot naked man carved out of marble by the other homo. Let me know if you ever create anything as monumental and enduring as that.
Your evo psych gibberish is hilarious cope. You're talking about evolution based on the obviously false assumption that aversion to homosexuality is a human universal. No research, no critical thought, you literally just made it up to go with what you already believe. So stupid.
Homosexual behavior, not aversion, was commonplace among the ancient Greeks, Romans, Celts, Slavs, etc. Sparta and Thebes based their militaries on it. The universal disgust you describe never existed. You literally made something up and then explained human evolution in terms of the thing you made up. And other retards gave you upvotes for it. The fact that you think statist conditioning to control male sexuality is natural, and spend your precious time defending it, is really sad.
When I was talking about evolution, I wasn't even talking about phenotypic "homosexuality". I was talking about the actual act.
I guess you don't know much about your butt, but you should know that your body doesn't store waste right next to your anus. That section is indeed a conduit for waste some of the time, a much smaller proportion of time than the place where you put your dick is a conduit for bloody chunks of uterine lining.
You can easily learn to voluntarily relax your anus to have anal sex. I know you use the friction against your scar tissue to achieve orgasm; having receptive anal sex is like having an orgasm for the entire time, followed by ten orgasms at once.
If you had a subscription to the right website, I could show you hundreds of examples of men paid to have sex with women on camera, and then paid to gradually explore sex with men. I'll tell you what, straight guys often compare their job to getting fucked in the ass, but I don't think they mean that they had a boner leaking precum the whole time. Then they take money to have sex with women again. It doesn't turn them gay.
There are homosexual men, but the proportion of men capable of enjoying sex with men is much larger. As we've already discussed, you're obviously capable of rationalizing anything you want to believe, so I'm sure you will find reasons to deny yourself sexual pleasure that your ancestors evolved to be capable of. And if that's the case, I guess it's not a big deal that your parents had a doctor cut half the nerve endings off your dick and let the rest turn into a callus.
And it's really fucking funny that we have this global elite, known for psyops and gaslighting, and you think they're glorifying heterosexual men in dresses and drag queen story hour in order to get you to accept homosexual behavior... instead of the opposite.
"Whataboutism" - that's just what hypocrites say when called out, right? If Pride reflects on me, then abortion reflects on you. I'd rather we treat each other as individuals, though.
The notion that homosexuality was accepted was popularized by idle 18th century aristocrats. A similar trend exists today, with modern sentiments being projected onto select sources to defend the notion of social constructivism. The advocates in ancient times where the elites of both Greek and Roman society - ritualistic pederasts; I guess some things just don't change. In Sparta it was proliferated by the oligarchy as to maintain hierarchy - domination. Given literacy rates, the selectivity of sources seldom speak to common sentiment. As is seen in the very different sentiments of some Athenian democratic scholars, who despite their concern of offending those in power, at least cautiously referenced perspectives of the vox populi.
That said, even by pederast standards, homosexual acts where considered the destruction of masculinity - a fairly universal sentiment in the west. The limited tolerance was clearly defined and to be practiced on slave boys not yet men. For any freeman to freely engage in such acts was thought disgusting. For any slave to enjoy the act was shameful/impudent. The notion of homosexual union was absurd. So much of what people regard as "acceptance" was prison rape enabled by social status. Literary treatments considered homosexuality with the same gravity as adultery, which is to say severe. That the limited instances of recorded disdain of the elite, by the commonage, frequently include derogatory references to pederasty is telling. As is the fact that being called a "passive homosexual" was regarded as the gravest of insults. You cite the Sacred band of Thebes. When they fought fearlessly to the last man in defense of their people, they earned the respect of Phillip. So much so that he built a monument and issued a decree to preclude their mockery. Such a death was regarded as the highest honor, yet such protections were necessary because of how poorly homosexuals where regarded by the commonage. And yes, the mentions of a disease, now understood to be Syphilis, are inseparable from the pederasty.
With all that said, I was referring to societal norms that don't celebrate fucking children so long as they don't yet have facial hair - that is, after the arrival of Christianity. I appreciate the irony of that statement given the incidence of pederasty in organized religion. I simply regard a belief system that forbids pedophilia and shuns its proponents as a net win. Finding sources of contempt and disgust from that point onwards shouldn't be hard; Both in regards to its deviation from the "natural order", and in regards to the act itself.
Disgust as an adaptive evolutionary response is established. As is the evolutionary motivation of stigmatization. As are the studies reporting similar alpha-amylase activation when straight men are shown pictures of homosexual couples and rotting corpses. Or that syphilis was one of the leading causes of stigmatization in early Europe. The stigmatization wasn't limited to homophobia, but also xenophobia, see "The French disease." Not universal, but consistent.
I don't support abortion - outside of severe medical complications.
If the content of your post is anything to go by, I doubt that doing so would change anything.
Lmao what a gay faggot
Seethe
They had the same problem as half-KiA. Wow, it's all leftists and fags doing this shit? NOOOOO YUO CANT KNOW THAT THERE'S GOOD GAY LEFTISTS REEEEEEEEEEE
Funny how it didn't save them
Damn, RIP
I normally don’t give a shit about something like this, but tumblrinaction getting banned feels like the end of an era. I remember when it was created. Looking back on it, in many ways its creation marked the start of the current culture war that we are in.
I haven’t used TiA in like 5 years, so this doesn’t affect me at all, but it does make me feel nostalgic.
Right leaning troons harping against left leaning troons?
Were they right-leaning? Last I went there it was a bunch of "we're fine with all the degeneracy that was forced on people up until about 2014, but this new wave of degeneracy goes too far!" leftists.
Being pro gay marriage but anti-trans is basically Nazi ideology, according to reddit.
It makes me think that giving in on anything is a really bad idea, because it only moves the ball further down the field and shrinks the Overton Window further.
That's been my take as well. I went solidly from pro-gay marriage and pro-choice to being against both.
Gay marriage has normalized degeneracy and led to exactly what the religious-right warned us of. If it stopped at "live and let live", then I wouldn't give a fuck.
Abortion as a rare last option, has become "stab the baby in the face on its way out of the womb at 9 months".
I am still pro-choice, but I'll be damned if I don't experience some pleasure if my side loses - simply because some of the worst people are on my side.
I think if we told them at the time what would happen, they would tell us to stop being melodramatic, and that it's bad but nowhere nearly this bad.
See, Australia watched you guys do all that. We saw the slippery slope become a well-oiled cliff. And then we had an insanely rigged, social media lynch mob-impacted public vote, in order to give them their “rights”, i.e. give in to this shit, a couple of years after you did…
And it followed the same exact path. In everything…
I actually personally know one of the national organizers of that campaign. Not well, but I know him. He’s gone so off his fucking rocker since they won that I’ve had to cut him out of my life, despite just being a “camp fag”, and distinctly not a troon…
He’s like, at least 20 years older than me, and yet, since they “won”, he is acting like a fucking petulant spoiled child. I really… Don’t know. It’s like the arrogance and “power” has gone to their collective heads, with all that entails. It really, really is…
You also lost your gun rights.
I'm still pro-choice up to 1st trimester, maybe part way through second trimester. Which makes me a nazi woman hater, apparently.
Nah, it makes you an immoral faggot.
''Muh slippery slope!'' was the cry.
You're behind the times. California is passing a bill that gives 'pregnant persons' a month to kill their babies after birth, and if it dies they can't be charged criminally or civilly and they can't be investigated by the police. Note this protection applies to mothers only, of course.
It's supposed to protect against prosecution if you get a late term abortion or something, but the actual wording of the law basically legalizes infanticide.
Partial birth abortion doesn't involve stabbing a baby in the face. They have it come part way out and suck the brains out through the back of the skull with a sharpened vacuum tube.
Enjoy your breakfast with that mental image.
Legalizing gay marriage was a huge mistake. Have you ever read Obergefell v Hodges? It's all nonsense. There's no rational justification for legalizing gay marriage at any level, much less legislating gay marriage from the bench at the federal level. It is Roe v. Wade version 2.0; a garbage ruling by predominantly Leftist judges in order to advance the agenda, with no legitimate consideration given to the US Constitution whatsoever... all just abstractions of abstractions and "penumbras" to interpret it however is most convenient to them.
Beyond the legality of gay marriage, there's no rational or common sense argument for gay marriage either. I'm sorry, but no matter how you consider the topic, gay relationships are NOT comparable to heterosexual relationships in any way that actually matters. We conceded that feelings and emotions are more important than truth in the case of gay marriage, and it's only gone downhill from there.
You can support homosexual marriage without approving of Obergefell, just like you can approve of legal abortion while opposing Roe (as I do).
The point is that there’s no rational argument for it beyond appealing to peoples feelings and emotions.
Even if there were a rational argument for supporting gay marriage, the slippery slope is a real threat and would override all but the strongest arguments, a fact that should be obvious to everyone at this point.
Sigh It was. Hindsight is December 20/20, and such…
But yeah, it was. This is, I’m afraid, very much the correct take.
All those people got replaced by women after they won.
Same year it suddenly became LGBT, which coincidentally put women first.
Remember ShortFatOtaku? His "cohost" is a train - Lilith Lovett, and although these two speak out against SJWs (SFO was a GG OG) they're both fairly staunchly leftists. They're the "I'm not a far leftist BUUUT" types and are "enlightened centrist" types.
All this stuff the left was doing is bad, but look at the right wing, they're bad too!
"Marxism is bad but, to make sure I'm "balanced and centrist" I'll also call out the so-called far right!"
It's infuriating why so many of these Bernie Bro types do not fucking GET it. I'll borrow a left wing phrase.
It's not enough to be "against SJWs", you have to be anti-leftist, including SJWs and all the fuckers that are around on that side of the spectrum. THe Overton window has moved too far left and it must be dragged back, trying to stop it where it is will NOT help.
That line about Bernie Bros is too true. I know way too many who consider themselves "moderates", yet still support support Bernie & every other democrat and leftist-liberal agenda.
Exactly, Friended and PSA Stitch, both GG OGs, also are like this. They hate Trump and wish we could go back to the "good old days" of being BernieBros and advocating for single payer healthcare and high tax brackets, etc.
It's like they don't get, the echoes of marxism that fuels the far left idpol shit. It's the SAME shit that fuels your demands for "democratic socialism".
I mean, you’re not wrong.
That subreddit was the genesis of my journey into GG.
RIP
same
That's an interesting notion now that I try and think about it. What was my own journey into becoming the stair muffin moving shitlord I am today I wonder? 🤔
Probably Mass Effect 3 tbh and how fans of the series were attacked after criticising the police nsing. I played 1 and 2 when they originally released so had the full years long experience going in to 3 and after completing it managed to go through all 5 stages of grief in the just the end credits.
Then the shit really hit the fan when the hit pieces came out against the players.
Yeah, it’s funny - Peddit is rapidly killing any reason I ever actually had to WANT to go on there (as I’m sure it is for many of us, lol)…
Which is fine, because I waste way, way too much time on forums like (parts of) that site, especially local subs/skeptic subs, etc, aaaand also here.
Here is much, much better, most of the time. Even if we do get DDOS’d, still, occasionally. 🤷🏻♂️
Countdown to the banning of detrans
Fuck TiA, I warned them a million times to autoban GC like TwoX does to MensRights.
They never did, and when GC died, they colonized it.
If they autobanned GC, I wouldn't have been able to spend my free time pointing out to radfems that they're reduced to hanging out in conservative subs because their own ideology ran away from them.
I'll miss that.
Did you also point out to them that they created the troon phenomenon?
Why waste time arguing with subhumans?
Debate is not about convincing your opponent, it's about convincing your audience.
Supporting censorship and shilling for troons, as alwyas.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/15IElsqzis/x/c/4OZpSe7k8px
I'll let u/dagthegnome speak for me here. I'd just say the same thing but with more anger and accusations of sadism.
you're one to talk after your stunt with kiameta.
Yes.
You know full fucking well what would happen if they did that.
Nothing, because GC wasn't a friend of Reddit admins either.
I liked having a couple of the cat ladies in TIA, it was occasionally hilarious to watch them have meltdowns over 'misogynistic' posts.
But yeah, at a certain point they started taking over, and the whole place became a lot less fun after that.
On the plus side, watching every place they skitter to being jannie hammered is magnificent. It's like watching the mob (half the mob anyway) turning on J.K.
To many TERFs there anyway. Good riddance.
FUCK REDDIT.
That's it, that's the message.
These two subs were full of "I'm not an SJW BUT" types.
It was fucking irritating - all these people spoke out against "woke" shit but they never understood what fuels it and why there was shit that was far worse than this woke shit and there's ((( something else ))) possible fueling it (I'm using the echoes semi-ironically, but basically these people couldn't think outside the box).
Folks in these subs were basically like ex-GG "leaders" who turned into left wing shills (Chris Ray Gun, Shoe, etc)
RIP my Trainkin flair. My pronouns were: choo/choo/motherfucker 🚂
Although TiA still held to some of its core values, the banning of /r/gendercritical brought a wave of TERF refugees which came to increasingly dominate.
A haiku of farewell, titled Goin' All In:
•
Kiwi farms and lolcow anon board.