1
dnile1000bc 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think this is a good thing. Trans as a protected class is the only way to equality for men since conversavtives have utterly caved to the feminist religion.

1
dnile1000bc 1 point ago +1 / -0

All feminists (JK Rowling is a rabid one) deserve what they're getting. They promoted a society where immutable features are valued over content of character. That's why in the war between TERFs and TRAs, I fully support TRAs. It's about time feminists get a taste of their own medicine.

2
dnile1000bc 2 points ago +2 / -0

It should be the opposite. Estrogen AND testoterone should be legal to anyone who wants it. At the moment only estrogen is freely available. Why isn't testoterone freely available?

3
dnile1000bc 3 points ago +3 / -0

They are also a gender and a race and a sexual preference and a diet and a disability ...

10
dnile1000bc 10 points ago +10 / -0

I mean, we can accept feminist rhetoric like "men are oppressors and women are oppressed" to justify special rights for women. We completely cancel and ignore the truth whenever it is presented. It's not that far fetched that lying about other things would get people to vote against their self interest.

11
dnile1000bc 11 points ago +11 / -0

The entire basis for TERFs hating on TRAs lies in their hatred of men. Fuck that cancerous shite.

Not once did she talk about walking back the law and policy that feminists put in place to discriminate against men.

3
dnile1000bc 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know whether you noticed, but the majority of the left's supporters are women (however you define this). The right's basic ideology is gynocentric.

When your basic tenants are based around how women are wonderful and they must be protected there is no defence when women start demanding extra rights.

20
dnile1000bc 20 points ago +20 / -0

And yet the elites are flying huge number of planes to Glasgow, Paris, Copenhagen etc etc ..

When you have to take away other people's human rights to make your point, maybe your point is shit to begin with.

3
dnile1000bc 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm a stronk independant womyn who need no man. Except when trying to defy woke ideology. Now I have no choice but to give in to "pressure" to have sex with someone I don't like.

I love it when feminism is hurting their primary beneficiaries.

7
dnile1000bc 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because feminism can never create only corrupt or destroy.

1
dnile1000bc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thankfully I didn't pay to watch a HD rip of the movie. I hate woke shit like this. It's like seeing a worm in your otherwise gourmet food.

1
dnile1000bc 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's been in feminist discourse since the 1950s.

Women are being oppressed because sexy women sets too high expectations for young girls. Patriarchy sees women as nothing more than objects to be posessed and finally women are defined more by their looks than their intelligence because of sexy women.

If you've ever heard of any of the these phrases above. They are the feminists arguments for making women ugly.

I actually don't have any issues with artists making women ugly. That's their choice but I have a big problem with society accepting the feminist rationale as sane and not completely stupid and irrational. Female delusion of behaviour straight jacketted by social constructs should not be taken seriously yet they are.

2
dnile1000bc 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem is that banks (unelected, undemocratic, given monopoly powers) are dictating what private citizens can do with their money.

If a private company wants to invest in hydrocarbons and the ability for the private company to cover their debt is acceptable then banks should not have the ability to deny funds to that said private company.

This is what is happening now world wide.

16
dnile1000bc 16 points ago +16 / -0

Feminism is cancer. It takes the downfall of western society for people to realise this. Sad.

4
dnile1000bc 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can we weaponise this to help push for "financial neutrality" legislation? After all financial institutions are major recipients of government money.

17
dnile1000bc 17 points ago +17 / -0

I don't know why she can't just wait until he passes. He's going to automatically vote Democrat thereafter.

0
dnile1000bc 0 points ago +3 / -3

I agree with #1 at least. Biden will win. It will be a new low for American society that I do not think we will recover. Everyone will accept that the USA is at least as corrupt as China and no one will act with honor and integrity. I mean why should you? The left does not and they get away with it.

4
dnile1000bc 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think it originates from feminism. In feminist dogma, words speak into reality. This is because feminism decided to adopt the post modernist concept of everything is a social construct and thus if you repeat a concept often and enough people believe it, it becomes reality.

This is why they are so hung up on "representation" and "inherent bias" in all our entertainment including games, RPGs etc. Because a "representation" of a group of people means that group of people is that. (see Orcs and black people).

If coyotes are meant to represent brown people then it means brown people are animals and thus can be killed animals.

We've reach 11/10 mental gymnastics in the oppression olympics.

view more: Next ›