Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

99
Nick Kyrgios - hasn't played in yrs - is ranked outside the top 500 - played against a visibly smaller court - clearly wasn't trying - wasn't allowed 2 serves . . . - still destroyed the female number 1 (twitter.com)
posted 177 days ago by SophiesBoyfriend 177 days ago by SophiesBoyfriend +99 / -0
47 comments share
47 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (47)
sorted by:
▲ 26 ▼
– Kienan 26 points 177 days ago +26 / -0

...a visibly smaller court...wasn't allowed 2 serves...

For fucking real?!

And she was allowed standard serve rules? Why the fuck would she have let herself be embarrassed like that? That's so much worse than just losing. (EDIT: She was also allowed only one serve, but that's still a massive advantage to her, as a man's first serve is massively more threatening than a woman's. Not having a second serve shuts that down.)

Holy shit, I'm pissed off.

We all knew he'd win, that fact that they wouldn't even let it happen fair and square is actually pretty enraging. What an actual abomination.

I guess the only saving grace for her is that she didn't win, that would have actually been more embarrassing.

I don't even regularly watch tennis, but for some reason this is really fucking pissing me off.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– ernsithe 14 points 177 days ago +14 / -0

a man's first serve is massively more threatening than a woman's. Not having a second serve shuts that down

I had to look this up to understand it. For anyone else confused: if you fault on your first serve, you get a second. If you fault again, you lose the point. So people go all out on the first one. If they get a fault, they do a more careful one because of the risk of losing the point. For this match they changed it to fault once and lose the point. This change to the rules made them both rein in their ONLY serves but obviously he's going to be sacrificing way more power between all-out and precision.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 176 days ago +4 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– CaptainTrouble 10 points 177 days ago +10 / -0

You ask why she allowed herself to be embarrassed? It's probably because she thought without his first serve she had a chance. I bet she didn't think she'd lose.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 9 points 177 days ago +9 / -0

It's probably because she got paid a fuckload of money by Emirates NBD.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 177 days ago +3 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– Kienan 9 points 177 days ago +9 / -0

I'M MAD!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– dzonatan 8 points 177 days ago +8 / -0

Desired effect. Be aware that the point of that contest was never to prove some silly liberal point but because both the organizers and spectators are so far gone in their snark, nihilism and cynicism that watching humiliation rituals is the only thing that makes them feel anything. Then there are those who watch you watch them and derive pleasure from seeing your angry comments.

I suggest you check out from gentle society and go build a shack in the woods. Better way to channel your energy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Euphemism 4 points 176 days ago +4 / -0

Yep, I'm somewhat ashamed to admit it took me this long, and to my credit I stayed off twitter/x until the last couple of years...but..

It dawned on me after some article got me enraged, that THAT was the point of it. Its all for engagement, ragegagment if you will.

Why engage with something designed and engineered to make you feel bad emotions? Although its a great test to see how centered you are.

Feel calm? Just check out X. Still calm? You're a buddha.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dzonatan 2 points 176 days ago +2 / -0

I dont blame you. I finally caught on myself when I saw those "my daily routine as X in Y company" videos that looked more like a adult daycare than anything else.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 1 point 176 days ago +1 / -0

All that rage-bait's profitable now, but it's gonna backfire when it pisses people off enough that we start getting death squads.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Euphemism 2 points 175 days ago +2 / -0

Commoditizing emotions.. younger me would be in awe, older me thinks we haven't thought this through as you point out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PM-Melania-feet-pics 1 point 175 days ago +1 / -0

In 2 more weeks right?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 1 point 175 days ago +1 / -0

We have two countries living inside the same borders, both growing continually less interested in diplomacy, constantly spurred on to hate and underestimate each other. When a situation is unsustainable, collapse is inevitable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– Sneak_King 26 points 177 days ago +26 / -0

I like the #5 vs. #203 game in 1998 for this quote:

described by one journalist as "a man whose training regime centered around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple of bottles of ice cold lager"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Sexes_(tennis)#1998:_Karsten_Braasch_vs._the_Williams_sisters

See also: https://boysvswomen.com/#/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Maskurbator 7 points 177 days ago +7 / -0

That's hilarious

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– Ahaus667 24 points 177 days ago +24 / -0

Women facing the reality of their physical limitations is never going to happen, this the exact same as women actually taking accountability or being honest about how they compare to other women. It’s physically impossible for ~70-80% of women to do this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– Kienan 24 points 177 days ago +24 / -0

Imagine if we did away with segregated sports, taxation, and the police protocols and courts that give unequal favor to women.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– Sneak_King 21 points 177 days ago +21 / -0

I like this kind of anti-feminist posting. I bet a guy could pretty reliably rake in fake internet points by just being anti-women's-lib here. I can't imagine how retarded you'd have to be to screw up a gimmick like that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Kienan 13 points 177 days ago +13 / -0

Whomstsoever could you be talking about, I wonder?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– LauriThorne 8 points 177 days ago +8 / -0

Trannies always screw it up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 4 points 177 days ago +4 / -0

Yes, of course. Meaningless platitudes are the only kind of anti-feminism you'd accept.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 3 points 177 days ago +3 / -0

Imagine if we didn't have a dickless right that actually had the chance to do that and instead decided to take single men's healthcare away because fuck you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LauriThorne 6 points 176 days ago +6 / -0

Who's we Eurofag?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 2 points 176 days ago +2 / -0

At the time the retards did this, I hadn't left America.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 6 points 176 days ago +6 / -0

Dual citizen subversives aren't part of "we" either, so you still wouldn't count. And our current right is dickless because they have been corrupted by the likes of you. The right that is coming to replace them, however, will be whipping out an 18 inch dong and dropping it on the table right in front of all of you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 2 points 176 days ago +2 / -0

If it's your right, that dong is a strap-on and you're presenting it to your female handler to use on you. Nazism is literally the least masculine politics there is, the only ideology that couldn't win elections without dramatic skew in the electorate to make women's voice louder.

We need an anti-feminist, fiscally conservative and pro-freedom right. What was promised to us in Agenda 47.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TallestSkil 7 points 177 days ago +7 / -0

Women facing the reality of their physical limitations is never going to happen

It happens the moment any woman is pinned on the ground by the man raping her. It’s just that nothing else will cause it to happen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Kienan 14 points 177 days ago +14 / -0

Here's some highlights.

This is PAIN.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Filo76 8 points 176 days ago +8 / -0

He wins a point: Polite Applause

She wins a point: Raucous cheering

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 5 points 177 days ago +5 / -0

I watched it live, I genuinely believed he was going to throw it to get the bag. Sometimes it looked like he was trying to.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Kaarous 7 points 176 days ago +7 / -0

You know this might be the first time you aren't telling a lie in every sentence.

Because I absolutely believe that you watch tennis live.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 3 points 176 days ago +3 / -0

You know I can't resist an opportunity to see women's sports and the shills like you who defend them forced to eat shit.

If it wasn't in a Muslim craphole, I'd have gone in person.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Kaarous 8 points 176 days ago +8 / -0

Ah yes, me. Stolid defender of *checks notes

Women's tennis.

Nah dude you missed the point on this one lol.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 1 point 176 days ago +1 / -0

You defend the government obsessed with "muh women's sports", that cancer is your responsibility.

You think nobody saw you snuck extra funding for women's sports facilities into the "keep trannies out" bill, you scum?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Kaarous 6 points 176 days ago +6 / -0

Ah yes, I defend the UK government lol. As if I haven't said more than once that we ought to invade Britain just to rid them of the mohammadans.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 1 point 176 days ago +1 / -0

They fuck kids like you do, they ban porn like you do, they support suppressing speech like you do, they want a world built around families like you do.

How long before Project 2025 makes you one of their layoffs, I wonder.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– ernsithe 14 points 177 days ago +14 / -0

A visibly smaller court

I assumed you meant the entire court was smaller. Maybe midway between the two so they were both equally off their game. Nope. Her side was smaller Some shots that would be in-bounds for him would now be out. Some shots that would be out-of-bounds for her will now be in. That's nuts.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– SophiesBoyfriend [S] 11 points 177 days ago +11 / -0

Why does she already have career earnings 3x more than him?

Time for equality

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ZeroPercentCamoIndex 6 points 176 days ago +6 / -0

And I thought nobody could make feminism any more comedic for me. I thought the needle was already at 11. You described a simple reality in front of my eyes and pushed it to ????/infinity

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– dnile1000bc 13 points 177 days ago +13 / -0

TERFs are navigating very treacherous waters. If they say this demonstrates men are better than women and thus shouldn't be in women's sport then all their gender pay gap arguments fall apart. If they continue to support women can do everything a man can do if not better then their argument to keep men out of women's sport falls apart.

I hope nobody interrupts them whilst they twist themselves into knots trying to reason this out using feminist religious doctrines.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Impishdesire 10 points 177 days ago +10 / -0

We just won’t have consistent logic sucker!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 3 points 177 days ago +3 / -0

MAGA will bail them out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ZeroPercentCamoIndex 6 points 176 days ago +6 / -0

WE'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO COMPETE

fuck feminism and fuck this currybitch on comm immediately running interference

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 176 days ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 1 point 176 days ago +1 / -0

even in gaming (still requiring quick reaction and quick thinking).. an average ranked male can beat a higher ranked female. only time females have a presence in high ranked gaming is if the participant are troons or the female is a autistic savant. basically, super super rare case.

or being support like healer.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 1 point 175 days ago +1 / -0

Don't fall into petty stereotypes...

All the best support mains in the competitive scenes are, or were, men, too.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy