5
Euphemism 5 points ago +5 / -0

I certainly hope so.. and that they're loud enough, and disgruntled enough to give it with both barrels to Trump, Trump Jr., Pam, Dan, Kash....

Let them all know this isn't acceptable, and by doing this they are explicitly showing the American people there is no political solution anymore so we can just get to the dividing lines and shooting stage.

Enough of this kayfabe dog and pony show.

11
Euphemism 11 points ago +11 / -0

likely, which is why this has to be wholesale rejected, and Trump his admin, his sons, etc all need to know this isn't acceptable to the base, isn't acceptable to Americans, and sure as fuck isn't acceptable for the return of law and order.

They must think we're all morons.

15
Euphemism 15 points ago +15 / -0

that is what this is. A test.

If the public/MAGA accepts it then great they're morons and the Cabal wins.

If the public/MAGA freak the fuck out at Trump over this and cause holy-blue murder then, well, they'll have to move on to plan d?

7
Euphemism 7 points ago +9 / -2

how many war mongering psychopaths are still within Trumps orbit it would seem.

0
Euphemism 0 points ago +1 / -1

Definitely did not stop because of nukes.

  • It sure did stop because of that. War was escalating until then, and immediately dropped to proxy and regional. To say otherwise is simply not true, after watching what the US did to Japan, the cost of those wars were too high, and thus... gone.

As for Israel already having them - thats a cop out, and further means that Israel can, and should do it on their own, without any US involvement seeing as they attacked first... Right? Of course its right.

If you want war - go fight. If you want to fight Israel's war - go to Israel. Not hard.

Everyone see's what's happening, and who is promoting it. Again.

1
Euphemism 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you truly believe that, then why not start with Israel?

Also, Nukes have arguably been the biggest weapon for peace. Recall prior to it, we had wars every decade. Not really anymore.

Iran, Syria, Libya, North Korea, etc.... all were equal "bad guys", but 1 wasn't fucked with. So, please smarten up.

Again, Iran even if they had the weapons, and even if they wanted to attack the US, just like with Iraq before, it doesn't matter what they want, as they have no method of getting anything here. FFS, again, smarten up.

Someone screaming at you from across the world isn't a threat to you - stop being a coward.

1
Euphemism 1 point ago +1 / -0

So are Iranian nukes, or really any weapon as long as the US stays out of the region which they have no reason to be in, other than to protect the nation that has attacked as of now 3 or 4 unprovoked directly... but here we are, right?

It isn't how big or bad they are - even the H.S missiles brought Israel down to their knees, but Iran refused to use them until attacked. Re-read that paragraph again if you're not hearing what I am saying.

The claim that Iran can't have this weapon as they'll use it - has been proven false. Why don't you see that simple logic?

1
Euphemism 1 point ago +1 / -0

We're defenseless against those missiles, and Israel turned into a crybaby the second they started to land.

IF Iran was 1/10th the country we've been told they would have used them in an aggressive manner, not just after they've been attacked. Since they've shown they're not willing to start shit for no reason - where does this "we DO need to stop them" come from?

Again, even if they did have them - they're still no threat to the US. That is simply a fact, further backed up by Iran's own actions in not starting shit.

The same can not be said about Israel, right? Again, IF the logic against Iran was correct, it is infinitely more correct in regards to Israel, thankfully for all, there is no logic in the notion.

6
Euphemism 6 points ago +6 / -0

Iranians have been the much more adult group in the room in the M.E over the last little while.

Not that how you charactorise them is untrue, its just that Israel has been SOOO much worse - and that is the elephant in the room.

Yes, Iran is horrible, mean, vile and looking for world domination.

But...

Israel is horrible, mean, vile and has been using the worlds super power clearing the way for world domination.

Americans can't stop Iran from being Iran, but we can stop Israel from using us like its barbarian shocktroops.

38
Euphemism 38 points ago +40 / -2

I find it heart breaking, but no longer unexpected that so many are so easy to fool so soon after the Iraq war, Afganistan invasion, etc. Heck, many are using the same terminology in slandering those speaking out against the hawks.

IDGAF about either Israel or Iran, but I find it very weird how fast MAGA turned into MIGA right before my eyes.

6
Euphemism 6 points ago +6 / -0

And my guess is if you asked for a further breakdown of "the british", you'd find something really interesting...like the entire list is made of of "British men", the same as the main group but have been in Britain long enough for the media to hide it.

You know, like they did in Germany.

17
Euphemism 17 points ago +17 / -0

When he was posting all the time he had a documentary style thing where he showed how bad international charity is to the poor people of the world, how its just human nature for people in that stage to use any excess resources to produce more children - and thus our helping them is actually creating more of the problem.

I think it was a couple of weeks after he was banned.

6
Euphemism 6 points ago +6 / -0

As soon as White people stop worrying about words being hurled at them from lesser people, then we can start to remove these lesser people from our lands..

1
Euphemism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, I guess we're going to have to see.

Apparently despite having all the candidates ready, at the very last second 70 of them withdrew.... Weird, huh?

I suspect it is more that people are morons willing to vote for people that were OK with locking them down, because the idiot box told them to.

A- It sure is, for those with a memory better than a goldfish.

B- Pierre just released the platform, which is almost a carbon(see what I did there) copy of the Liberals with a different timeline. As per usual.

c- National polling isn't tell tell what people are thinking, but to convince people to think a certain way. Surely in 2025, this hasn't been lost on you?

d - Much like the 70 dropped candidates, how the CPC/Libs worked to exclude the PPC from the debates, if you look into the election you start to see a pattern.

Never forget...

https://x.com/Asht10n/status/1915844558539157789

7
Euphemism 7 points ago +7 / -0

As a PPC member, An avid Canadian Nationalist. A long time 'conspiracy theorist' ..

Who really didn't see that coming?

https://imgur.com/a/iRpIvgh

2
Euphemism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just spoke the truth... which is verboten now.

3
Euphemism 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, whenever you see someone that is a freak.... they've been broken. Its sad.

Hurt people, hurt people.

7
Euphemism 7 points ago +7 / -0

Who is going to do that? The CPC?

With all due respect, the CPC aren't going to do shit about the globalist agenda - they've signed us up for 1/2 of it.. the Liberals the other half - and all of Canada thinks one of these party's is the solution to the other one. Insanity.

CPC = Globalists.

Liberals = Globalists.

NDP = Globalists.

Greens = Globalists.

PPC = Nationalists.

One of these things is not like the others, one of these things isn't allowed on the stage..

11
Euphemism 11 points ago +11 / -0

and yet 1000's of anti-White remarks from the pos or his friends will be laughed away as without merit, or just words...

8
Euphemism 8 points ago +8 / -0

Isn't that entire bug eating stuff all part of the globalist treaties and SDG's that go along with it... that the CPC signed us up for, and have refused to leave?

Sure is..

Whether we call it the UNiParty, the Two Party Illusion, Globalists, etc... it doesn't matter, we all know and have seen how this works

Either the Liberals or the CPC and Canada will be handed to the globalists.

22
Euphemism 22 points ago +22 / -0

its gone completely farcical at this stage.

i have to assume its a movie. Right? It has to be. Like we're all in a mass Truman's show.

view more: Next ›