Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

85
The Epstein Files can be unredacted supposedly (twitter.com)
posted 181 days ago by AlfredicEnglishRules 181 days ago by AlfredicEnglishRules +85 / -0
34 comments share
34 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (34)
sorted by:
▲ 24 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 24 points 181 days ago +24 / -0

Incompetence, or based saboteur? I hope it's the latter and that there are people tearing down the swamp from the inside. It's more likely the former, but our enemies being incompetent isn't the worst thing either.

Either way, when you include the thousands of pages they unintentionally released, this whole thing has been pretty hilarious.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 12 points 181 days ago +12 / -0

The government is overwhelmingly staffed by incompetents and non-Whites. It is almost certainly a case of incompetence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 181 days ago +7 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 6 points 181 days ago +6 / -0

here's a theory, since the information is technically there can they say that they did in fact release the full Epstein files? therefore complying with the Congressional mandate?

several ways to read this:

  1. Trump wanted things redacted, Bondi fix redaction

  2. Trump wanted things unpredicted, Bondi attempts to redact, subordinates disobey

  3. they really are just incompetent as fuck

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– TheMafia 10 points 181 days ago +10 / -0

I'd bet subordinates disobey. They also left the files ready on the server but unlinked at an obvious URL.

The law required their release without redactions. Whoever did this broke no laws. They may have been insubordinate in doing so and may be fired but they'd be fairly difficult to actually prosecute.

How congress ever managed to pass this law in the first place is beyond me. It was absolutely the right thing to do and created results where there would have been none. Usually the opposite of their game.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– dnile1000bc 12 points 181 days ago +12 / -0

Anything interesting in the unredacted portions?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 8 points 181 days ago +8 / -0

Why is that redacted? It seems utterly mundane (relatively speaking, it's alluding to some court bribery and casting shame on Epstein alone, who is already dead and kind of not well liked by anyone).

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– rentfREEEE_since2016 7 points 181 days ago +7 / -0

Are we all so fucking retarded now that we’re willing to overlook that this could have been generated with 10 minutes of ChatGPT prompts?

Guys. This is the internet. Everything is fake and gay until proven otherwise.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– tralbolh 7 points 181 days ago +7 / -0

Not BS. It's true.

Download it and archive it while you can.

My dumbass closed the tab (or maybe my browser did when I hit download). But I hand typed that long ass URL and have the PDF. I'll paste it as a reply if I can get it right again.

edit:

https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Matter%20of%20the%20Estate%20of%20Jeffrey%20E.%20Epstein,%20Deceased,%20No.%20ST-21-RV-00005%20(V.I.%20Super.%20Ct.%202021)/2022.03.17-1%20Exhibit%201.pdf

Another example of something they had no reason to redact

In November 2017, Indyke signed a Foundation check made payable to the immigration lawyer in New York who was involved in one or more forced marriages arranged among Epstein’s victims to secure a victim’s immigration status. The check’s memo line references the former Russian model’s last name.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– tralbolh 3 points 181 days ago +3 / -0

Definitely a mixed bag.

Found a few more censored ones. PITA to download because they make you answer "are you a robot" periodically.

Found a few more but nothing interesting to me in them, other than the fact that it one, some redactions were just spoiler tags like the above and others weren't, which is interesting in and of itself

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– 83671R18 7 points 181 days ago +7 / -0

Those "hur durr Epstein files will never be released" guys got real quiet all of a sudden.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– hilboggins 9 points 181 days ago +9 / -0

I believe the correct response is. "Thank you."

and you are welcome, those guys threw enough of a fit they were forced to respond.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 2 points 181 days ago +2 / -0

The Epstein files that directly show what Epstein's ideology was will never be released.

Natalism was the foundation of the Epstein pedo ring.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– 83671R18 17 points 181 days ago +17 / -0

You missed that release about his ideology, it was in 2011.

And his ideology was blackmailing powerful American politicians for his owners. But since you're so eager to run defense for him, I'll just mark you as a stupid mossad asset.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 2 points 181 days ago +2 / -0

He met Elon in 2014.

"Muh joos" - exactly the narrative of the people Elon unbanned, why? If he was being blackmailed to support Israel, why did he free the retards when he bought X? The story doesn't check out, he freed the stormfaggots because he wanted them to cover for the actual motive of Epstein allies, which is and will always be natalism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– 83671R18 8 points 181 days ago +8 / -0

Muh joos

You JIDFtards brought this upon yourself. Why are you complaining after you lot made the effort to BE Noticed?

the actual motive of Epstein allies, which is and will always be natalism.

Incorrect. Children that are eaten alive and their organs harvested cannot grow up and give birth to new children. You are simply afraid of the White race organizing against forces that want them dead and gone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 1 point 181 days ago +1 / -0

There's nothing to notice. The fact you retards were freed by Elon to speak proves that whatever you say is what he wants said. He revived white nationalism. He propped up MAGA and Project 2025's coup. He was the one pulling all the strings. Everything happening now from the war on porn, the attacks on the childless to this Epstein Files release was the will of child rapist Elon Musk, and would not have happened if it did not benefit him and his fellow infant fuckers.

The redactions are protecting natalism.

You are simply afraid of the White race organizing against forces that want them dead and gone.

Which is code for "give us your money, because it's a crisis!". You're just a more retarded version of the climate cult. At least they can claim scientific research can be funded to develop new technologies. Your excuse is giving retards money will magically make women better people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 83671R18 3 points 181 days ago +3 / -0

you retards were freed by Elon

Your ignorance is both amusing and a testament to the strength of the opsec of those who dared fight against White genocide in the darkest hour of free speech worldwide.

You're just a more retarded version of the climate cult. At least they can claim scientific research can be funded to develop new technologies. Your excuse is giving retards money will magically make women better people.

Nah, that's your side demanding gibs, you silly nigger.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TallestSkil 5 points 181 days ago +5 / -0

[buzzwords only jews have ever said]

OY VEY GOYIM IT’S NOT US

lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TallestSkil 2 points 181 days ago +2 / -0

Judaism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SophiesBoyfriend 3 points 181 days ago +3 / -0

Fuck me - how are these legitimate redactions?

I hope pam bondi spends the rest of her life in a DC prison for this

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ShadistIsACuck 2 points 181 days ago +2 / -0

Sadly it seems even unredacted it's just a nothingburger. The real juicy information will never be released or has been destroyed long ago

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– KeeperOfTheGate 2 points 181 days ago +2 / -0

It's amazing that the government is still making these mistakes (assuming it's not deliberate).

This kind of error is as old as PDFs. The text is there, it's just covered with a black blob.

Policy at CIA, NSA, etc. was to NEVER use PDF or electronic features for redacting text. While it can be done correctly, it's easy to mess up. Physical masking or physical removal (better) of the redacted text, then rescanning documents into fresh electronic format. I would think with today's technology, even physical masking is defeatable in many situations.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 1 point 181 days ago +1 / -0

>Doge cancels adobe acrobat pro subscriptions

>Redaction is a pro feature

>Interns use black highlighter instead

>mfw Elon released the epstein files

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– norwegianwikin 1 point 181 days ago +1 / -0

I remember back in the day when someone FOIAd a TSA training manual and whoever did the redactions did this.

They revealed/compromised a bunch of CIA programs that were active to bypass customs and immigration, the routines used and samples photos of various CIA credentials.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 181 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– tralbolh 2 points 181 days ago +2 / -0

No but paying a crooked lawyer to make fraudulent immigration claims so you can traffic girls into the United States is a crime, and that is what is underneath some of the redactions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 181 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– MattTheBlack 1 point 181 days ago +1 / -0

Hmmm Epstein had enough pull to release fake news stories about those who opposed them. I bet most people will then go on to keep listening to the media anyway.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 1 point 181 days ago +1 / -0

Anything about Elon?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– enevold 13 points 181 days ago +13 / -0

yes. there was a video of him admitting to destroying fortnite. something about natalism and imps, could'nt quite make it out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 1 point 181 days ago +1 / -0

Yawn. When the files drop implicating Elon, then everyone has to face why "birth crisis" was ever a narrative.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– 83671R18 10 points 181 days ago +10 / -0

You losers were saying the Epstein files wouldn't drop, but here we are.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DresdenFirebomber 1 point 181 days ago +1 / -0

Let me know when any naming people we didn't already have named drop.

Pictures of Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew mean fuck all. We need Muskrat to be exposed before the first trillionaire is forever a pedophile.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy