Just like the D&D rainbow hair crowd decided depictions of orcs were actually "coded black" and therefore racist. Self-aware black folks should have paused a moment and said to them: "you see us like that?"
Most of those who did were on the conservative side of 'you ain't black.'
Blacks do speak out against this shit all of the time but they're always dismissed as "uncle toms" or "internalized racism". Literally non-blacks telling them to sit down and shut up. 🤣
Sure, okay, so we're just going to stop you from promoting your degeneracy to kids. Since you're born this way, this will have absolutely zero impact on you.
Nah, the only people who are mad about this kinda shit are those who want to turn your kids into communist revolutionaries (well, that and the useful idiots who passively absorb what they're told). Use CRT to make the black kids hate the white kids and the white kids hate themselves. The white kids who don't get converted by CRT and told that "all their sins can be absolved" by turning into a fag/tranny.
Ummm, no one was associating groomers with the gays until the Alphabet Queers themselves started calling it the "don't say gay" bill.
Everyday I'm moving towards the idea that these people (racial-, sexual-, and faggotry-activists) are pushing for a race war by making their respective groups seem so insufferable that self-respecting normies start to feel they have no choice but to take action against them.
Gays were always associated with pedophilia. In the 70s and 80s the "Gay rights" groups all included NAMBLA and similar other groups. The people who are considered gay "civil rights" icons were all pedos, Harvey Milk, Richard Hays, John Money, etc.
Gays are less than 1% of the population but commit sexual abuse of children at a rate that's 30-40x higher than normal people. The stereotype is just a rational response to observable pattern of behavior
The 70s and 80s also saw a lot of "indoctrination" of younger men by older ones and was considered "the culture" until the 90s and 2000s called it for what it was, abuse.
This is where the gay term, Bears come from. It was referring to larger, older, gay men who had "younger" boyfriends... Much younger.
Call Me By Your Name came out (heh) in 2017. It's about an adult faggot fucking a teenager and it was highly celebrated by the faggot community.
This behavior never went away, they just stopped talking about it except when you're meant to celebrate it. When the wrong person talks about it (Milo Yiannowhatever), it's cancel time. When the right person talks about it, it's stunning and brave, bigot.
Oh yeah wasn't saying it ever went away. Just that they called it abuse and for those decades atleast they had to hide the degenerate behaviour of grooming.
Read up on one of the prominent faggot French piece of shit that led to Critical Theory, Michel Foucault.
The prick was so ass-blasted that society wouldn't condone him fucking boys that he came up with a philosophical recipe that led to the poison that is modern critical theory and queer theory.
It was so flagrant that even Cuckopedia still allows a short paragraph describing the fucker's degeneracy.
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
13/50 is read as 13% (black population) do 50% (of the crime).
1/40 would then read as 1% (gay male population) do 40% (of the pederasty)
Don't think those numbers are right though, and this is the best source of numbers I could find. It puts (homo/bi)sexuals at ~16x the abuse rate (100x for teachers) and about a third of the acts. So that would be 2/33; two percent does thirty-three percent
1/4000 doesn't fit the pattern; one percent does four thousand percent?
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
They had plausible deniability until that point. Major corporations and organizations coming out against the Florida law revealed for everyone the link that was merely a poorly kept secret.
this. only alphabet people are equating alphabet people with pedos. the law only prohibits teaching sex to children. any alphabet people who aren't pedos have nothing to worry about.
Stereotypes exist for a reason. To deny it is to deny basic pattern recognition. Can you name a single major figure in the history of queer theory and sexual revolution that condemns pedos? Someone of a similar level of prominence as these people:
Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:
These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal, but somehow in bad taste. On the evening news, one sees handcuffed teachers, priests and Boy Scout leaders hustled into police vans. Therapists call them maladjusted, emotionally immature. But beauty has its own laws, inconsistent with Christian morality. As a woman, I feel free to protest that men today are pilloried for something that was rational and honorable in Greece at the height of its civilization.
-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae
any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate sit in somebody's lap or engage in sexual activity... Instead of condemning pedophiles for their involvement with lesbian and gay youth, we should be supporting them. They need us badly.
Naked kids have been a staple of delight for centuries, for both parents and onlookers. So to label pedophilia as criminal is ridiculous.
-Allen Ginsberg, The Liberation is the Word, literary author, gay activist and founding member of NAMBLA
This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love... When we say that children are 'consenting' in these cases, all we intend to say is this: in any case, there was no violence, or organized manipulation in order to wrench out of them affective or erotic relations.
-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory
But pederasty is probably historically the most common form of homosexuality in Western culture, as well as many other cultures. It exists in all cultures, and in some is considered the norm, even today (e.g., Iran, among the Pashtuns). To label it 'child abuse' or 'child molestation' is preposterous and stupid.
-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"
It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.
If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not call it pathological in any way.
-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.
But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Suppression of the natural sexuality in the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, good and adjusted in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. Initially, the child has to submit to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family, which process makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and anxiety.
-Wilhem Reich, The Mass Psychology of Fascism
Other notable globohomo clergy:
Judge Brett Blomme, organizer of Drag Queen Story hour, made child porn in his home.
Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.
Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.
Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".
Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.
Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:
Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.
Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:
Rodney Reedraped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.
So does he “fight” in the mens or womens division in his sub amateur wrestling promotion….. and are there eyewash stations available for people unaware of what they were about to see.
You know, it would be easier to believe that you weren't a bunch of groomers if you stopped trying to nail yourself to the cross we set up for the perverts who are grooming children. It's like if Florida passed the same law and all the Muslims came out of the woodwork claiming it was Islamophobic.
This is their call to violence. They merely need to frame the situation as good people threatening them. The "words are violence" phenomena resulted in violent situations from antifa groups and because of the framing it was seen as self defense.
The fact that LGBTQ+ members refuse to separate themselves from proved groomers tells us everything we need to know. Even if it's 0.1% of their group, they should be saying "This is not okay and we don't want them in our group". Until you act against them, we have no choice but to put you in their category.
Seems to me, people who identify as queer are either one of two things, straights desperately seeking attention or degenerate faggots who fully embrace that lifestyle for attention. This is because most LGBT people don't really want to be called a slur that's been used against them their entire lives, and, you know, just want to be left alone.
Considering the kinda people who are filthy degenerates that desperately seek attention are usually the ones promoting shit like pedophilia. I'm going to get some popcorn for this fight.
Disneys are going to find their magical kingdom was all just a fantasy land.
I had a discussion over the weekend with a couple of gay friends (who are completely disgusted with LGB-faggotry; won't even go to pride).
I told them I'm taking back the word "queer" to use as a slur, specifically against people who insist on shoving their faggotry into the public square and they're totally down.
I have a dream, where gays and lesbians, as well as straights, call queers as we see them, and groomers all get the wall.
Or, you know... It's a natural response to the LGBT lobby continuously trying to gain more and more opportunities to present sex, kink and perversion to children who are too young to have any need to know about it, and telling those kids to keep it secret from their parents..
Let me put it in a simple way that he probably will not understand because he is a rabid extremist:
We are calling Regressive Leftists groomers because they are trying to radicalize children into a self-destructive ideology, and several of these extremist bastards are predators anyway, therefore it's ok to put them on the same level of people who trick/intimidate children for the purposes of sexual exploitation.
He will probably just screech "transphobe" and have his few remaining fans who happen to be regressive leftists mass report you if tell him this.
What was it again? Gamers are garbage, gamers are over, we need to start bullying? Where were you when this shit came up? Oh, right: on their side. Fuck of Jim, you will never be a woman.
This faggot went completely off the deep end. He used to have some good videos on how the gaming industry has become a corporate cesspool of greed mongering, but he's totally lost his fucking mind in the past couple years.
Yes, it is a call to violence. Against those who deserve it. I have long said that Jim Sterling is a pedophile, seems like he's happy to confirm it for the rest of us.
This recent uptick in calling groomers "groomers" is goinbg to end in violence.
It's the worst kind of rhetoric designed to make bigots feel justified in assaulting, and potentially killing, groomers.
It's a call to violence and they know it.
OK groomer
That's the jist of it.
Filthy fucking disney.
How is the SAR K2, anyway? I saw one at my FLGS recently.
Just like the D&D rainbow hair crowd decided depictions of orcs were actually "coded black" and therefore racist. Self-aware black folks should have paused a moment and said to them: "you see us like that?"
Most of those who did were on the conservative side of 'you ain't black.'
The D&D thing was even weirder when you consider that black people are literally already in the game
Blacks do speak out against this shit all of the time but they're always dismissed as "uncle toms" or "internalized racism". Literally non-blacks telling them to sit down and shut up. 🤣
"We were born this way!"
Sure, okay, so we're just going to stop you from promoting your degeneracy to kids. Since you're born this way, this will have absolutely zero impact on you.
"NOOOOO YOU'RE LITERALLY KILLING US!!"
Nah, the only people who are mad about this kinda shit are those who want to turn your kids into communist revolutionaries (well, that and the useful idiots who passively absorb what they're told). Use CRT to make the black kids hate the white kids and the white kids hate themselves. The white kids who don't get converted by CRT and told that "all their sins can be absolved" by turning into a fag/tranny.
Ummm, no one was associating groomers with the gays until the Alphabet Queers themselves started calling it the "don't say gay" bill.
Everyday I'm moving towards the idea that these people (racial-, sexual-, and faggotry-activists) are pushing for a race war by making their respective groups seem so insufferable that self-respecting normies start to feel they have no choice but to take action against them.
Gays were always associated with pedophilia. In the 70s and 80s the "Gay rights" groups all included NAMBLA and similar other groups. The people who are considered gay "civil rights" icons were all pedos, Harvey Milk, Richard Hays, John Money, etc.
Gays are less than 1% of the population but commit sexual abuse of children at a rate that's 30-40x higher than normal people. The stereotype is just a rational response to observable pattern of behavior
The 70s and 80s also saw a lot of "indoctrination" of younger men by older ones and was considered "the culture" until the 90s and 2000s called it for what it was, abuse.
This is where the gay term, Bears come from. It was referring to larger, older, gay men who had "younger" boyfriends... Much younger.
Yes and no.
Bears are hairy men.
When you live in Denver, you become versed.
Yes but you seem to have gotten to the bottom of the culture.
More like on top of it.
Call Me By Your Name came out (heh) in 2017. It's about an adult faggot fucking a teenager and it was highly celebrated by the faggot community.
This behavior never went away, they just stopped talking about it except when you're meant to celebrate it. When the wrong person talks about it (Milo Yiannowhatever), it's cancel time. When the right person talks about it, it's stunning and brave, bigot.
Oh yeah wasn't saying it ever went away. Just that they called it abuse and for those decades atleast they had to hide the degenerate behaviour of grooming.
Read up on one of the prominent faggot French piece of shit that led to Critical Theory, Michel Foucault.
The prick was so ass-blasted that society wouldn't condone him fucking boys that he came up with a philosophical recipe that led to the poison that is modern critical theory and queer theory.
It was so flagrant that even Cuckopedia still allows a short paragraph describing the fucker's degeneracy.
So 1/40?
13/50 (or whatever it is at) is based on percentages.
So, it would have to be 1/4000
Yes, 40x the rate is 4000%
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
13/50 is read as 13% (black population) do 50% (of the crime).
1/40 would then read as 1% (gay male population) do 40% (of the pederasty)
Don't think those numbers are right though, and this is the best source of numbers I could find. It puts (homo/bi)sexuals at ~16x the abuse rate (100x for teachers) and about a third of the acts. So that would be 2/33; two percent does thirty-three percent
1/4000 doesn't fit the pattern; one percent does four thousand percent?
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
No, 1/40 is correct. 1% does 40%. Like 13/50 is 13% does 50%.
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
They had plausible deniability until that point. Major corporations and organizations coming out against the Florida law revealed for everyone the link that was merely a poorly kept secret.
this. only alphabet people are equating alphabet people with pedos. the law only prohibits teaching sex to children. any alphabet people who aren't pedos have nothing to worry about.
... and when that action is taken it will be used as justification for the tyranny to come. The victims will cry as they strike back at you.
That's not a problem if normal people have actually made up their minds. The Anti-Groomer bill is actually a great example of action.
Stereotypes exist for a reason. To deny it is to deny basic pattern recognition. Can you name a single major figure in the history of queer theory and sexual revolution that condemns pedos? Someone of a similar level of prominence as these people:
The Father of the Sexual Revolution, Alfred Kinsey, and creator of the Kinsey Scale of sexuality, conducted infant rape and documented it in his 1946 work Sexual Behavior In The Human Male. Bill de Blasio put pedos next to elementary schools. The Tavistock Clinic was doing mass medical tranny experimentation on children, but was fortunately slapped down recently by reactionary judges. In Germany, Dr Kentler gave foster kids to pedos, and green movement founder Daniel Cohn-Bendit bragged about a child sex daycare. A high school in Ohio included child porn as part of it's curriculum, and a high school in Texas was caught giving kids pedo fan fic.
Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:
-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae
-Pat Califia, The Aftermath of the Great Kiddy-Porn Panic of '77
-Allen Ginsberg, The Liberation is the Word, literary author, gay activist and founding member of NAMBLA
-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory
-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.
-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
-Wilhem Reich, The Mass Psychology of Fascism
Other notable globohomo clergy:
Judge Brett Blomme, organizer of Drag Queen Story hour, made child porn in his home.
Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.
Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.
Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".
Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.
Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:
Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.
Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:
Rodney Reed raped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.
Plebbit is run by tranny pedos.
tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.
Last updated 18 September 2021
help, I can't stop 👃ticing
You guys have turned me into an anti-semite
Thanks for the info
I'll have drinks and snacks when you get here. BYOA.
Jim is a tranny now?
And probably a groomer now
He used to be a groomer. He still is, but he used to be, too.
he would be, if it weren't for the fact no children would willingly get near that disgusting fat blob
So you think he'll detrans in the future? That's interesting, I have yet to see any public trans figure walk it back.
Has he cut it off yet? If not, whats he waiting for
41%?
He can't find it
Somehow better looking than his girlfriend/wife(?)
So is the average dog.
Who also has a Y chromosome.
So does he “fight” in the mens or womens division in his sub amateur wrestling promotion….. and are there eyewash stations available for people unaware of what they were about to see.
Yep. It's all kinds of fucked up. Some of his videos feature him dressing up like little school girls and shit.
Something went wrong in his brain. Don't know if he can come back from this.
You know, it would be easier to believe that you weren't a bunch of groomers if you stopped trying to nail yourself to the cross we set up for the perverts who are grooming children. It's like if Florida passed the same law and all the Muslims came out of the woodwork claiming it was Islamophobic.
This is their call to violence. They merely need to frame the situation as good people threatening them. The "words are violence" phenomena resulted in violent situations from antifa groups and because of the framing it was seen as self defense.
I’m so sick of this “not affirming or celebrating my lifestyle 24/7 is literal violence” mentality
Is he holding back his neck fat to take that picture in his profile?
The fact that LGBTQ+ members refuse to separate themselves from proved groomers tells us everything we need to know. Even if it's 0.1% of their group, they should be saying "This is not okay and we don't want them in our group". Until you act against them, we have no choice but to put you in their category.
Seems to me, people who identify as queer are either one of two things, straights desperately seeking attention or degenerate faggots who fully embrace that lifestyle for attention. This is because most LGBT people don't really want to be called a slur that's been used against them their entire lives, and, you know, just want to be left alone.
Considering the kinda people who are filthy degenerates that desperately seek attention are usually the ones promoting shit like pedophilia. I'm going to get some popcorn for this fight.
Disneys are going to find their magical kingdom was all just a fantasy land.
I had a discussion over the weekend with a couple of gay friends (who are completely disgusted with LGB-faggotry; won't even go to pride).
I told them I'm taking back the word "queer" to use as a slur, specifically against people who insist on shoving their faggotry into the public square and they're totally down.
I have a dream, where gays and lesbians, as well as straights, call queers as we see them, and groomers all get the wall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqgoXVB20W4 Begin clip at 1:20
Or, you know... It's a natural response to the LGBT lobby continuously trying to gain more and more opportunities to present sex, kink and perversion to children who are too young to have any need to know about it, and telling those kids to keep it secret from their parents..
Don't want to be called a groomer?
Stop trying implementing institutionalized grooming.
tl;dr version:
Ok, groomer.
terms: acceptable
And?
This needs to be the common response. The evidence is solid, and you won't find many better justifications.
It's very simple: don't groom children and we don't have any beef. Let the children figure this shit out for themselves.
Let me put it in a simple way that he probably will not understand because he is a rabid extremist:
We are calling Regressive Leftists groomers because they are trying to radicalize children into a self-destructive ideology, and several of these extremist bastards are predators anyway, therefore it's ok to put them on the same level of people who trick/intimidate children for the purposes of sexual exploitation.
He will probably just screech "transphobe" and have his few remaining fans who happen to be regressive leftists mass report you if tell him this.
What was it again? Gamers are garbage, gamers are over, we need to start bullying? Where were you when this shit came up? Oh, right: on their side. Fuck of Jim, you will never be a woman.
This shit is why I knew I had to post it here the moment I saw it elsewhere.
OK, Disney.
This faggot went completely off the deep end. He used to have some good videos on how the gaming industry has become a corporate cesspool of greed mongering, but he's totally lost his fucking mind in the past couple years.
Chad yes
Hes a groomer and a cuck
Yes, it is a call to violence. Against those who deserve it. I have long said that Jim Sterling is a pedophile, seems like he's happy to confirm it for the rest of us.
"Ok groomer" is the best internet ops since "It's okay to be white" and you can't convince me otherwise.
This recent uptick in calling groomers "groomers" is goinbg to end in violence.
It's the worst kind of rhetoric designed to make bigots feel justified in assaulting, and potentially killing, groomers.
It's a call to violence and they know it.
Fixed this for him.
From cuck to troon lmao
Everything I hate is racist. Racist should die. Punch a racist. Bye bye job racist.
When is Jim going to join the elite 42% ?
Perhaps when his wife(?) decides it's time to cash in her investment by divorcing him and taking half his stuff for life.
But calling people 'Nazis' and 'racists' is A-okay...
"Stephanie fucking Sterling daughter" doesn't have the same ring to it
Who groomed you, Jim?