Jim Sterling, 2022
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (120)
sorted by:
Gays were always associated with pedophilia. In the 70s and 80s the "Gay rights" groups all included NAMBLA and similar other groups. The people who are considered gay "civil rights" icons were all pedos, Harvey Milk, Richard Hays, John Money, etc.
Gays are less than 1% of the population but commit sexual abuse of children at a rate that's 30-40x higher than normal people. The stereotype is just a rational response to observable pattern of behavior
The 70s and 80s also saw a lot of "indoctrination" of younger men by older ones and was considered "the culture" until the 90s and 2000s called it for what it was, abuse.
This is where the gay term, Bears come from. It was referring to larger, older, gay men who had "younger" boyfriends... Much younger.
Yes and no.
Bears are hairy men.
When you live in Denver, you become versed.
Call Me By Your Name came out (heh) in 2017. It's about an adult faggot fucking a teenager and it was highly celebrated by the faggot community.
This behavior never went away, they just stopped talking about it except when you're meant to celebrate it. When the wrong person talks about it (Milo Yiannowhatever), it's cancel time. When the right person talks about it, it's stunning and brave, bigot.
Oh yeah wasn't saying it ever went away. Just that they called it abuse and for those decades atleast they had to hide the degenerate behaviour of grooming.
Read up on one of the prominent faggot French piece of shit that led to Critical Theory, Michel Foucault.
The prick was so ass-blasted that society wouldn't condone him fucking boys that he came up with a philosophical recipe that led to the poison that is modern critical theory and queer theory.
It was so flagrant that even Cuckopedia still allows a short paragraph describing the fucker's degeneracy.
So 1/40?
13/50 (or whatever it is at) is based on percentages.
So, it would have to be 1/4000
Yes, 40x the rate is 4000%
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
13/50 is read as 13% (black population) do 50% (of the crime).
1/40 would then read as 1% (gay male population) do 40% (of the pederasty)
Don't think those numbers are right though, and this is the best source of numbers I could find. It puts (homo/bi)sexuals at ~16x the abuse rate (100x for teachers) and about a third of the acts. So that would be 2/33; two percent does thirty-three percent
1/4000 doesn't fit the pattern; one percent does four thousand percent?
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
No, 1/40 is correct. 1% does 40%. Like 13/50 is 13% does 50%.
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
They had plausible deniability until that point. Major corporations and organizations coming out against the Florida law revealed for everyone the link that was merely a poorly kept secret.