For what it's worth, I agree that knee-jerk purchasing based on initial controversy isn't a good idea-- for the exact reason you mention: many people will initially oppose woke, until the full force of cancellation and harassment comes to bear. Then they fold, leaving you having 'bought in' to someone who folded.
Nope. He's referring to this: https://archive.ph/OIIYf It's a post by a random Czech user, the existence of which proves the Polish dev promotes faggotry, apparently.
I guess a solo indie dev has to police steam forums for any threads which advocate save editing to adhere to leftism. Otherwise they 'bent the knee' according to u/MrGiggles
At this moment? Dune Spice Opera by Master Boot Record, on loop.
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=ifgDDOWH_pk
I blame that on listening to Keygen Church's Tenebere Russo Sanguine earlier. Woke a taste for crunchy synth organ that wouldn't quit.
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=L5q4uYj-gyg
Earlier, Not Our Day to Die by Karliene:
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=12xQJ1Gn3pk
Which brought me back to Colm McGuinness's rendition of Foggy Dew:
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=tKCPkYxFw8E
Honorable mention: Glow by APOC
There was a culture war flareup around the lineage system in the game not catering to faggotry back at the end of August. Have our thread on it.
(P)reddit being radicalized is... well.. look at the place.
This, this 1000 times, this.
Trans coddling is enabling. Trans "rights" are coddling, which is enabling.
We wouldn't enable someone who identifies as blind to blind themselves.
We shouldn't enable someone with Gender Dysphoria to castrate themselves.
Adventurer Conqueror King is what you want. Have a link: https://autarch.co/adventurer-conqueror-king/
The argument uses anti-trust language, so I believe so.
My primary issue at this point is that it's in arbitration, per the old Subscriber agreement, so while I'm in general against arbitration, agreeing to court proceedings all the way across the country from the jurisdiction I live in is not in my best interest.
The argument is that Valve's exceedingly large market share in the digital marketplace has increased prices of third party publishers, notably via the clause that obliges third parties to not undercut steam if they want to be listed there. Valve's 30% cut then becomes a markup which injures its end users.
Steam functions normally, but the way I'm reading it, if I keep using steam on Nov 1st, that constitutes agreement. And if I want to make another purchase prior to then, I will be obliged to agree.
My lawyer has advised to not agree, and not make purchases.
I read it. Disputes are required to go to court-- in a court in Washington, which I would bet is in Valve's backyard. By agreeing, you waive all rights to hold trial in different jurisdictions. It's similar to the boilerplate that forces RV buyers to sue the RV manufacturer in a the jurisdiction where they're based. Whether that jurisdiction is compromised/biased is an open question.
Considering I am part of a class action against valve at the moment, I am not amused.
NYC clamped down on busses from Texas, so it's certainly an option. Tit-for-tat.