I'm talking taught by jews themselves. Where did jews (the ones who reject Jesus, otherwise the others would be Christians) try to enforce Christianity? Nowhere. Did jews go out of their way to make Asian countries Christians? Or Africa? Or even Europe? No they didn't. So claiming this is a jew psyop, when jews did nothing at all to popularize Christianity, and in fact, do everything to suppress it, is just plain stupid.
That was literally the law of all Christian nations for centuries.
The law was for Catholicism, not Christianism. There's a difference, and it's an important one. Protestants were originally excluded, because they didn't abide to the Catholics' laws (where most are completely non-Biblical).
It only changed after the new psyop
You think Christianty was enforced up until WW2? What about the rise of atheism in the 19th Century?
If this was even just a tiny bit remotely true, then Christianity would be taught everywhere and never questioned or allowed to be questioned (just like a certain event, for instance). Islam would have been destroyed hundreds of years ago as well, to make sure all their neighbours behave and protects the country of Israel under any circumstance.
Rabbi Jonathan Cahn admits:
The most likely reason behind this, is that he's a little smarter than the others, and just doing some reverse psychological trick. "Those antisemite guys always do the opposite of what we want, so I'll tell them to become Christian, so that they stray away from Jesus"
This is just the equivalent of Space Marine 2. A somewhat decent product at best, but many people are acting like it's the best thing in decades because they have been starved off actually good entertainments.
"everyone stand and have a conversation before shooting" I mean, there's the exact same thing in that movie. He talks for 5 minutes to a judge that's barely conscious, talk about mold to a hooker, the same TV-tape part is repeated like 3 or 4 times, and it does the "Look, I'm so smart, I do the story out of order so you have to piece stuff together on your own, it's deep and complex"
Meanwhile, all the bad guys are still white men, no female gets any repercussion for their wrong behaviour while the boys get their wrists destroyed. If you purely look at the body count, it's like 50 dead white men (the SWAT team) compared to what, 10 raping immigrants at most? Wow we sure defeated the white replacement theory guys /s.
Uwe Boll has profited off video games for decades, and abused the German system to spend millions (of tax-payers money) to make his movies. He's an incredibly fitting definition of grifter and system abuser, so him criticising the justice system is ironic. Maybe he truly cares about the white replacement and out of control immigration, but for now, I'll assume he's doing what he always did: Use the latest trend to make profits out of this, while being as controversial as possible.
Playing Forza + vtuber -> opinion discarded. The avatar is also right in the middle of the screen, what the hell is that.
Also I don't think the Paw Patrol belongs to the government, considering the mayor also has to request their help but can't enforce them to. You could argue the show teach that a 10 years old boy with a few dogs is more useful and capable than an entire city ruled by a female mayor, so 1-1?
"We don't have X-Men, but we have a totally unique idea, it's called Team X"
"We don't have Megaman, but we have a totally new unique character called Super-robot, a blue android with a cannon for an arm"
Everything done just because it removes one more "Men".
I hate this "They don't represent the whole group!1!!1".
Have we seen any Sikh actually say "That was horrible, put this murderer in jail for life, and let's organise a charity for this family who lost their son / brother" or anything similar? No, not a single one. Therefor, they are either indifferent to a white guy getting murdered, or they would have done the same thing.
Replace God with a fake one.
Like this, for instance: https://www.christianpost.com/news/israeli-futurist-predicts-ai-will-soon-write-a-new-bible.html
Ah the classic "You must either hate one or the other, but it can't be both".
Nah, I can simply dislike Pragmata's story because it's yet another "dad-slop" game made to emotionally manipulate you through your instincts, where you babysit a child that's not even yours, and in this case, not even human.
I find it hilarious that they keep saying "We need more UE 5 because it helps make games faster" "We need more AI" "We need more [...]", when in reality, games have never taken longer to make, even when games had to be made in Assembly, and artists had to draw literally pixel by pixel.
At the same time they do the most barebone gameplay possible, but on the other side, they will spend 2 years on a single map because they need to add every prop in existence.
I played Burnout Revenge not too long ago. Upscaled, it looked amazing, and if you only improve the car models, it would look just fine nowadays.
On top of being more artistic, older games are also much easier to read. Most modern games are just throwing so many VFXs and polygons everywhere, it's impossible to see what's actually important, hence why they rely on yellow paint so much, for instance. Even when kids were playing games (sometimes they couldn't even really speak or read), they were still able to get around and find what to do.
Lack of improvements is one thing, but if you look at the overall picture, we've lost many things.
-
New PVP games don't come with bots anymore, when it was the case for the vast majority in the 90s / 2000s.
-
Community servers are gone. Now it's all matchmaking. No more bonding with the same people every night, statistically, you'll never find the same player twice in your life.
-
Basic features like Quick save / load are almost non-existent anymore.
-
Remember couch co-op? Barely any game has a splitscreen feature anymore, even though almost any game ever created is better in multiplayer than singleplayer. Even a terrible game is better, cause you at least make fun of the game with your friend and try to break it as much as you can.
-
Remember stuff that you unlocked simply by playing? As if, it's the devs giving you a gift because they're happy you enjoy the game and keep playing?
Play a few more games from the golden era, and you'll realise how much we've actually fallen.
Matthew 5:44: "But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you"
Proverbs 6:16-19: "There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers."
You're right in the way this exact sentence isn't written in the Bible, but if you bring pieces together, this is essentially a true statement.
We now know that, contrary to most games, the majority of the loading time in Helldivers 2 is due to level-generation rather than asset loading.
Quite unbelievable. Not a single dev thought about putting any debug to check any timer. Not a single one, just by curiosity, wanted to see which part of the loading was the longest, see if there could be any potential bug or issues.
Writing good code in the first place REMOVES the need for optimization.
No, those are different. Look up the famous Quake 3 root optimisation, technically it's immensely faster, but not considered good code, because it's full of "magic numbers" and incredibly hard to understand while the code nor the comments don't provide any info on what's it's doing at all. It generally take a 15mn video to understand those 3 last lines.
This is the studio that forced an anti-cheat in their entirely coop game, because they couldn't figure a way to stop people from giving 9999 lab points in Helldivers 1.
Instead of just coding "Hey, there's a max of 17 points in this map, you shouldn't be able to get 9999", or instead of following the golden rule "Don't trust the client", they went the easy way and put an anti-cheat.
Why would there have a need to make 2 different religions? Haivng one is easier to control. Furthermore, Islam teaches that all non-Islam (including jews) are enemies who should be destroyed. If the goal of jews is to use religions to make themselves above all others, that seems highly counter-productive.
Come on lol, country of Israel is constantly at wars with everyone around them.
What's the most likely scenario?
Jews modified our history, because they have control over most if not all big institutions, to hide what our ancestors did to them.
Jews developed out of nowhere Christianism, creating a big division among themselves, with people up in arms because they made profits out of everything, and knowing they would have to, simultaneously, make it world-wide, but also always try to keep it under control