Why am I wasting my time explaining self-evident reality to a disingenuous lying j-boy again, but here goes...
It's almost like if you didn't have these people in your country, you wouldn't have an over abundance of the problems they bring with them?! Wow! That's a pretty easy solution and very logical! See how quickly & easily your moronic contentions are proven to be retarded?
If none of them were here, you wouldn't have one crime from a non-White invader. Because even one is too many when there's absolutely zero reason for there to be any. Get it?! That's it. That is the only reason we as White people need to express for not wanting them here.
Oh, and we have expressed that desire multiple times. All across Western Civilization everytime there's been a vote, poll or referendum on immigration for the past 50 years or more the native populations are always against! Yet, the mudflood still keeps happening...
Now, add on top of that the irrefutable reality that disproportionately most groups of non-Whites globally (no matter where they are and their circumstances) are well documented to commit more crimes per capita... It then becomes a question of why is this person making an argument against White people wanting their homelands to be more safe and homogenous? But in your case... I'd hope most here already know why... Judenschwein.
I know you won't listen... But dont waste time responding. Everything I said is 100% factual self-apparent reality and nothing that comes from the sewer mouth of a lying scumbag shlomo changes any of it.
You are arguing with a j-boy who hates White people. You could explain to him the vast disproportionately in crimes against Whites perpetrated by blacks and he'd still just repeat his same old bullshit over & over again. I know because I've seen him do it for years.
The more I argued with them, the more I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn’t help they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes, which if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know what you were talking about.
Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn’t help but agree, and if you believed this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn’t remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
This Modeler guy has existed on here for years to be a gas lighting shit-stirring nig-nog loving faggot.
He's one of those asswipes who likes to pretend that he doesn't understand your point. Or just pretends to not acknowledge the common sense reality right in front of his face. It's very tiresome and intentional.
This faggot gives Impossible1 a run for his money in striving to be a disingenuous bad faith arguing j-boy troll.
The central pillar of your argument is assuming that others, like yourself, are unable to distinguish representational art from real people.
I don't see how this matters in regard to creating pornographic images of children? Whether the child is real or not doesn't change the purpose of the imagery. Which is to produce sexual arousal towards children.
"You thought about hurting a kid! That is the same as hurting a kid! Prison for you!"
Wrong. I already addressed this point in my other reply here. Once you create pornographic images of children (anime or otherwise) that has the sole purpose of sexual arousal for pedophiles, you are no longer in the realm of thought, intangibles or inaction. It's extremely suspect that so many here cannot make this distinction and are fervoursly defending the creation and distribution of pedophilic imagery.
I also never said they should be in jail for this act alone. Although if it were up to me, I probably would just put a bullet in their head as you suggested. I said they should be looked at more closely. Because rarely is this a behavior that exists in a vacuum, that doesn't escalate into further interest and/or action.
Yep. Not much nuance required when discussing someone being guilty of creating and distributing child pornography.
These apologists here are speaking as if what you are saying isn't true?
"Drawings aren't people." "It's policing thought crime."
Both are retarded arguments that ignore the reality of the situation. If you create pornographic sexualized images of children (that are anime/cartoon or otherwise) you are no longer in the realm of intangibles or hypotheticals.
You knowingly created a now existing product or material that serves the purpose of stimulating sexual arousal towards images of children. That's not happening just in your mind anymore.. It has now become something tangible by your actions.
I'm not saying we should lock people up for that alone. But yes, those caught distributing & creating it for the use of pedophiles should be at the very least taken a closer look at.
Also, as you said if anything this is proliferating the problem not keeping it in check. Rarely does behavior like this deescalate of it's own volition.
In my opinion, the people defending anime of this kind so fiercely need to be on a pedo watch list. Children presented in an overtly sexualized way in any context is wrong. The fact that some are trying say there is some degree of nuance to the argument (like that makes a difference) says a lot about the people making it.
I know that the "developer" Josef Fares is a Lebanese immigrant to Sweden. That responded to his choice of two lead female protagonists for the game by using his not even grade school age children as a shield for criticism. Saying that the characters were based on his daughters. Which doesn't even make sense to me. How can 2 adult female characters with backgrounds be based on children under the age of 5?
I briefly played his other games 'Brothers, A Tale of Two Sons' and 'A Way Out' (I think they were free on PSN) and was not impressed. Very simple couch co-op game mechanics & storytelling that were boring over a decade ago. Yet, for some reason Fares is promoted as a huge success? Probably because he's an astroturfed example of the "benefits" of multicultural immigration to Sweden. I wouldn't be surprised if his company Hazelight studios has received ESG funding.
Personally, I think Fares looks like a mudslime chomo, that I wouldn't allow around children.. I also wouldn't play this game even if you gave it to me for free.
Blacks are really good at saying stupid shit they think sounds profound.
He's an oil drilling race traitor cuck.
I love a story with a happy ending.
The difference here is a have a modicum of respect for the Hooters waitress because she is actually doing a job, instead of just being a whore.
Only Grans.
you're probably attacking the wrong person anyway
The irony. We aren't attacking anyone in simply choosing not to buy the garbage you create to attack us and our culture.
Your terms are acceptable. Now get to the back of the bus.
Elon can't get enough Khazar milkers it seems.
Some foreigner dies.
Me: Oh, no! Well.. Anyways.
Bull shit there was a long ass love fags and immigration ad that tried to use Jesus for their gay message.
That one made me leave the room.
not to the mention the Snoop and Brady one.
Yep. I love being preached at on morality by a crack dealing criminal nigger pornographer and a guy who makes out with his son.
Does this mean men will be granted conception paternity rights on a child in the womb? Something tells me it doesn't..
Mark Twain quote. Nice.
Vavra the sodomy enjoyer is at least getting eviscerated in the replies. Good to see.
They should have called that second movie ZenDuneya 2 Girl Boss Boogaloo. She was in it so much, I thought it was about her and not Paul Atreides. And, yes. She is a terrible actress.
Yeah. John Krasinski would have been better than Pedro Pascal, who I thought was just from Spain. On Wikipedia it says his paternal grandmother was Castillian Basque, but it looks like he and his parents are Chilean. I'd bet he's got some Mapuche Indian in him.
Also, a couple interesting facts (if unsurprising) about him from his Early Life. His family were part of the socialist regime in Chile before Pinochet came to power. They became enemies of the state and fled to Venezuela when he was 9 months old.
Pascal also has a younger brother who is "trans actor & activist." It's always the same filth with these Hollywood degenerates.
I told you not to bother. I'm not ready one word of your pilpul response, rabbi. Fuck off!