Are Democrats ideologically incapable of being honest about anything?
A sperm cell isn't even a full human genetic code. It's half a it.
Life begins when the spermatozoid fertilizes the egg, creating a unique life ( which may or may not split into two+ developping embryos ) with its own DNA, at which point its chromosomal sex is also determined.
If this legislature is so dedicated to regulating women's bodies and their access to contraceptives then let's start policing men in the same way," Somani said in the video.
Abortion isn't a contraceptive, it's killing a baby that has already being concieved.
But let's agree with you : men should not be allowed to kill babies. They aren't allowed to though, unless they are a certified baby-killing abortion doctor.
Otherwise just call their bluff, vote yes, and put your ''intentional discharge'' inside the freezer for later fertilization.
Democrats just can't help themselves though : this mock-law will be so woke it will include a mock-exception for gay men.
If the democrats actually bring this bill, the republicans need to respond with an amendment it in the name of gender equality to punish women every time an egg/ovum is passed from their body without being fertilized.
I never saw myself as a liar when I was a lib. I saw myself as smarter because I would get so pedantic as to breakdown or blur any distinctions I could, reductio ad absurdum.
I made this same argument at 15 as these dems here are.
Somani currently works as an obstetrician-gynecologist.
She’s an abortion profiteer and is pissed her golden goose is getting strangled, the fact she considers abortion and ejaculation equivalent would be enough to immediately yank her medical license in a sane society.
Tried? At this rate he will be elected governor next election. He's way ahead in the early polls and I have zero reason to believe anyone will surface who can beat him.
It is a fair law, so long as it applies equally across genders: any half-human meiosis-bourne cells being shed is criminal, including periods. Everyone in Ohio is a criminal if they're over, like, 12.
I'd have at least some respect for these losers if they could at least be funny with their obvious troll bills. Something that would get a chuckle even if I disagreed with it on every level.
These weak ass "no u!" things are just so boring that it offends me more on that front than the perceived ideology.
I'm pretty sure, but not 100% certain, corpses can't actually get an errection after the heart stops because an errection is hydraulic rather than muscular, so it doesn't work like rigor mortis, and there's no blood flow.
But I am sure that that one story about the pregnant mortician has been admitted to being a hoax.
Well there you go I guess. Didn't think pooled and congealed blood would be enough to have a mechanical effect without some actual back pressure, but if it is it is, I'll yield to experience.
Are Democrats ideologically incapable of being honest about anything?
A sperm cell isn't even a full human genetic code. It's half a it.
Life begins when the spermatozoid fertilizes the egg, creating a unique life ( which may or may not split into two+ developping embryos ) with its own DNA, at which point its chromosomal sex is also determined.
Abortion isn't a contraceptive, it's killing a baby that has already being concieved.
But let's agree with you : men should not be allowed to kill babies. They aren't allowed to though, unless they are a certified baby-killing abortion doctor.
Otherwise just call their bluff, vote yes, and put your ''intentional discharge'' inside the freezer for later fertilization.
Democrats just can't help themselves though : this mock-law will be so woke it will include a mock-exception for gay men.
Of course they're capable of it. It's that being spiteful is far FAR more important than something like honesty or morality.
If the democrats actually bring this bill, the republicans need to respond with an amendment it in the name of gender equality to punish women every time an egg/ovum is passed from their body without being fertilized.
I never saw myself as a liar when I was a lib. I saw myself as smarter because I would get so pedantic as to breakdown or blur any distinctions I could, reductio ad absurdum.
I made this same argument at 15 as these dems here are.
The USAID revelation should answer your initial question.
She’s an abortion profiteer and is pissed her golden goose is getting strangled, the fact she considers abortion and ejaculation equivalent would be enough to immediately yank her medical license in a sane society.
A sane society would never have allowed her to have one.
One thing is sure: She knows nothing of men.
What do you mean? Abortion is legal in Ohio.
Pajeetas really infested the Democrat party apparatus didn't they, even fucking Ohio gets one as their rep.
Vivek tried to do the same on the right, also for ohio
Tried? At this rate he will be elected governor next election. He's way ahead in the early polls and I have zero reason to believe anyone will surface who can beat him.
JD Vance's wife as well
I'm sure they are very pleased with themselves by making literally no point.
No one is regulating women's arousal.
It's why you're all childless anyway.
why are they wasting time on this when i assume east palestine still looks like a bomb went off there?
Ha, democrats don't care about their constituents. Have you seen the absolute mess that is commiefornia?
Does this mean men will be granted conception paternity rights on a child in the womb? Something tells me it doesn't..
You know it won't. Even the most overt "bodily autonomy" bills didn't apply to the draft, let alone circumcision.
Even the title is dishonest an erection doesn't mean an automatic discharge of semen.
By this standard, every period is an abortion.
It is a fair law, so long as it applies equally across genders: any half-human meiosis-bourne cells being shed is criminal, including periods. Everyone in Ohio is a criminal if they're over, like, 12.
That pedo spammer is going to tie his brain in knots over that one.
USAID is dead. Tax leech's gonna starve lol.
I'd have at least some respect for these losers if they could at least be funny with their obvious troll bills. Something that would get a chuckle even if I disagreed with it on every level.
These weak ass "no u!" things are just so boring that it offends me more on that front than the perceived ideology.
Ah yes, unlike now, where men can just say "sayonara bitch" and never have to deal with the cost of an unwanted child ever again.
Tyrone does that every day, to be fair
Vague reminder corpses can get erect for non arousal reasons and a mortician once became pregnant after fucking someone who was deceased.
I'm pretty sure, but not 100% certain, corpses can't actually get an errection after the heart stops because an errection is hydraulic rather than muscular, so it doesn't work like rigor mortis, and there's no blood flow.
But I am sure that that one story about the pregnant mortician has been admitted to being a hoax.
Having emptied the heart from a prepared cadaver of solidified blood it can work that way.
Well there you go I guess. Didn't think pooled and congealed blood would be enough to have a mechanical effect without some actual back pressure, but if it is it is, I'll yield to experience.
This is the dumbest shit I've heard today.
If this insanity passes, soon it'll be conception starts at looking in the general direction of a woman.
Up until someone asks what a woman is and the whole proceeding trips over its own bureaucracy.
I see you are familiar with one of the many feminist hysterias : stare rape.
Should have just passed it. How would it possibly be enforced?
If that's true, than I've murdered Septillions of potential baby's