Because I mostly frequent other communities? Even after finding out what the acronym stands for I have no idea what the point of this sub group is as I’ve never browsed it directly. Like I said, I saw this post in the main feed and decided to click into it. Simple as.
Well we already have video of him on the roof so accessing it won’t add anything to this discussion. And the point still stands that the footage even at his closest point to the camera is so blurry and hard to make out that people have actually argued over whether or not he had a gun with him when he climbed down. If you move him back hundreds more feet away from the camera and have him crouched / laying down it would only verify that he was in that position (something we already know from the student video and the video from within the other building). So it wouldn’t add anything there either. It’s highly unlikely that we’d be able to see exactly what he was doing or the shot itself since again people argue over whether or not you can see the gun when he’s climbing down or if the gun is disassembled or not.
So with that footage we wouldn’t have unassailable proof of anything. Some people have proposed multiple shooters or that he was up there with a gun but didn’t actually take the shot. This would not be enough to prove or disprove either of those conspiracy theories so hence my statement it wouldn’t matter all that much.
Again given how ambiguous and blurry the closest possible footage from that camera is I don’t know what you’d possibly expect to see in the furthest possible footage.
As for frequenting KiA2, I don’t. I was browsing broader trending feeds and just happened to see this post and was curious what the comments said. I actually had to look up what KiA2 stood for.
Oh thanks I hadn’t see that wider view before. So I stand corrected on that and my assumptions as to where the camera was angled. As for why it wasn’t released I’m guessing it simply doesn’t show much.
We’ve all seen how grainy and blurry the footage is of him hopping down off the roof when he’s at the closest point to the camera and with how small and blurry he’d be all the way on the other side of the building I’m guessing that it would be useless for any attempts at making an identification (which was the explicit stated purpose of the FBl in the footage the released).
Hopefully the full video will be released in the trial (or after) but I guess I’m not even sure what you’d hope to see in it. He did leave behind the screwdriver he used to assemble the rifle up on the roof and based on the video from the student he appeared to have been lying down so it’s hard to say what could or couldn’t be seen from that camera.
If you’re talking about the footage in this clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36GGQjHYv_E then I think if you look at this image https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/09/12/multimedia/2025-09-10-kirk-shooting-spatial-index/2025-09-10-kirk-shooting-spatial-index-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg you’ll see that the camera was actually set up to capture the parking lot behind the building Tyler was on. In that top down shot, location 7 is where he got set up and took the shot and location 8 all the way on the other side is where he was seen running across and jumping down.
So if that’s the parkinglot camera it’s highly unlikely that it captured the far left corner of the building’s roof sadly and we’re lucky the too right area of the footage happened to overlap with that bottom right corner of the roof so we could see his escape.
But if you’re referring to some other footage let me know. I know a student or visitor or someone on the ground captured some additional footage of him running across the roof to what appears to be his set up location but they didn’t keep filming so there’s no additional footage of that angle.
Well I think the first question to be asked is do we actually know for sure that the exact portion of the roof he was on was under video surveillance? I’ve worked at multiple places before where rooftops have minimal surveillance so blind spots on top of a building wouldn’t actually be super suspicious imho. The grounds and interiors are typically far more valuable for monitoring after all.
But I think there’s other things to take into account too. For example the audio of the shot itself from bystander videos has a sonic crack sound which means the round was traveling faster than 1,125 ft/s. So that right there eliminates a lot of potential guns from use.
Obviously we could argue that the guy on the roof volunteered to be the fall guy and just randomly shot high while some covert more silent weapon was deployed nearby. But then we’d have to come up with a theory to explain why a bullet matching the rifle on the roof was found fragmented inside Charlie’s body and the real bullet wasn’t. I guess we could argue that Charlie’s security was giving hand signs to coordinate the attack and hide the evidence, the doctor was in on it and did surgery not to save his life but to swap the bullet out and the FBI was in on it to hide contrary evidence and ensure Tyler got the blame or something… but that raises lots of other questions…
In my mind the simplest answers are often the correct answers and if it’s at least possible that the shot came from Tyler and the math works out showing the bullet starting out with 1,748 Joules of energy, dropping to 1,296 J prior to impact, 964 J after the first bone and then to 723 J, 542 J, 406 J, 304 J, and finally breaking apart at 228 J without enough kinetic energy to further penetrate bone… and if the Tyler has motivation, a confession, a weapon matching the bullet, dna evidence from the roof, was seen coming and going on camera, the audio matches the type of weapon used and even the rough distance, the angle of entry of the wound is correct, etc… I don’t see the need to assume it’s not accurate I guess.
Personally I’m far more interested in how the other trans people online seemed to know what was coming and if the roommate knew before hand or how things were leaked. Personally I’d assume that if this was an intelligence backed hit there wouldn’t have been so many loose lips prior to the event. And I’d assume that such a group would have arranged for him to die after so he couldn’t out them. At the very least they could have given him a weapon that wouldn’t have immediately made his grandfather start asking where his gun was and let him run free long enough to get caught. Tyler being alive is probably the single biggest reason to believe he’s not working with people who… don’t like loose ends shall we say.
I think the problem is that you’re not taking the angles into account. Due to the combined effect of the shooter’s elevation and the slouching/leaning forward of Charlie as he was hit the angle of the spine relative to the bullet would have been much closer to 45 degrees.
The leaked reports show that the bullet initially grazed the C2 and C3 vertebrae and then shattered the C4, C5 and C6 vertebrae and grazed the C7 and C8 vertebrae. So like you said… the bullet did easily pierce spine. But after striking 6 vertebrae in a row it finally shattered and lost too much energy to leave the body.
Again we’re not talking about a ricochet or a straight on hit but a shot that already lost about 26% of its kinetic energy due to air drag over the first 430 feet and stuck at a pretty significant angle losing a large chuck of energy with each successive bone impact.
Had this been point blank or had the bullet hit his spine straight on you be 100% correct in either case. But when you look at everything together the model is viable and consistent with the autopsy findings.
Well from what’s been reported, since the shooter was elevated and to the side; the bullet was traveling down and at an angle. It pierced his neck and struck his spine where it deflected down into his abdomen. It struck 6 vertebrae and shattered with the bulk of it ending up in his shoulder just below the skin. But other fragments went through his lungs, heart, intestines and so on.
So not having an exit wound is not physically impossible and in fact does happen in regular hunting depending on where the bullet hits and the angle of entry.
If the democrats actually bring this bill, the republicans need to respond with an amendment it in the name of gender equality to punish women every time an egg/ovum is passed from their body without being fertilized.
Yeah I remember when Alex jones was crying in his car over the utter betrayal. Then a week later he was out there saying that Trump was playing 4D chess and was using the material to blackmail the world’s elites into doing his bidding and wilding the ring of power for good and that he (Alex jones) was the first person to figure that out. And then 2 months later he was saying that Trump was being mislead by those around him and didn’t actually know what was going on but fortunately he was well connected with the Trump team and that they would hear and respond to his messages and that he was urging Trump to fire everyone and get to the bottom of it. He started posting all these videos and labeling them as messages to Trump only for it to turn out that he didn’t have quite the influence and access he thought. Then a month after that he was saying that it was all Trump and he was right all along and was totally blackpilled and depressed.
I guess the advantage of taking all sides of an issue is that in the future you’re going to have sound clips to show that you were right about everything that happened. Of course there’s also sound bytes showing that you’re wrong about everything too but we don’t talk about that as that’s not as impressive.