Well we already have video of him on the roof so accessing it won’t add anything to this discussion. And the point still stands that the footage even at his closest point to the camera is so blurry and hard to make out that people have actually argued over whether or not he had a gun with him when he climbed down. If you move him back hundreds more feet away from the camera and have him crouched / laying down it would only verify that he was in that position (something we already know from the student video and the video from within the other building). So it wouldn’t add anything there either. It’s highly unlikely that we’d be able to see exactly what he was doing or the shot itself since again people argue over whether or not you can see the gun when he’s climbing down or if the gun is disassembled or not.

So with that footage we wouldn’t have unassailable proof of anything. Some people have proposed multiple shooters or that he was up there with a gun but didn’t actually take the shot. This would not be enough to prove or disprove either of those conspiracy theories so hence my statement it wouldn’t matter all that much.

Again given how ambiguous and blurry the closest possible footage from that camera is I don’t know what you’d possibly expect to see in the furthest possible footage.

As for frequenting KiA2, I don’t. I was browsing broader trending feeds and just happened to see this post and was curious what the comments said. I actually had to look up what KiA2 stood for.