The Charlie Kirk Assassination is Now Officially A Coverup
(www.banned.video)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
Oh thanks I hadn’t see that wider view before. So I stand corrected on that and my assumptions as to where the camera was angled. As for why it wasn’t released I’m guessing it simply doesn’t show much.
We’ve all seen how grainy and blurry the footage is of him hopping down off the roof when he’s at the closest point to the camera and with how small and blurry he’d be all the way on the other side of the building I’m guessing that it would be useless for any attempts at making an identification (which was the explicit stated purpose of the FBl in the footage the released).
Hopefully the full video will be released in the trial (or after) but I guess I’m not even sure what you’d hope to see in it. He did leave behind the screwdriver he used to assemble the rifle up on the roof and based on the video from the student he appeared to have been lying down so it’s hard to say what could or couldn’t be seen from that camera.
Climbing up on the roof, assembling the gun, shooting Kirk and disassembling the gun isn't 'much'? Unassailable proof of Kirk being shot from that roof isn't 'much'?
I have a hard time believing anyone could be this naive and frequent KiA2 at the same time.
Well we already have video of him on the roof so accessing it won’t add anything to this discussion. And the point still stands that the footage even at his closest point to the camera is so blurry and hard to make out that people have actually argued over whether or not he had a gun with him when he climbed down. If you move him back hundreds more feet away from the camera and have him crouched / laying down it would only verify that he was in that position (something we already know from the student video and the video from within the other building). So it wouldn’t add anything there either. It’s highly unlikely that we’d be able to see exactly what he was doing or the shot itself since again people argue over whether or not you can see the gun when he’s climbing down or if the gun is disassembled or not.
So with that footage we wouldn’t have unassailable proof of anything. Some people have proposed multiple shooters or that he was up there with a gun but didn’t actually take the shot. This would not be enough to prove or disprove either of those conspiracy theories so hence my statement it wouldn’t matter all that much.
Again given how ambiguous and blurry the closest possible footage from that camera is I don’t know what you’d possibly expect to see in the furthest possible footage.
As for frequenting KiA2, I don’t. I was browsing broader trending feeds and just happened to see this post and was curious what the comments said. I actually had to look up what KiA2 stood for.
But your account dates back 5 years? How would you not be a regular and have no idea what KIA2 is?
Because I mostly frequent other communities? Even after finding out what the acronym stands for I have no idea what the point of this sub group is as I’ve never browsed it directly. Like I said, I saw this post in the main feed and decided to click into it. Simple as.