My nonagenarian grandparent (who doesn't have the Internet btw) busted out of nowhere the other day that she believes Trump hired someone to shoot himself.
I mean, I hate to give any benefit of the doubt to someone making such absurd claims, but the concept makes more sense to someone completely unfamiliar with guns. You could say that's still retarded, sure, but not everyone has been around guns, and all some people know are things from movies where everyone is a superhuman sharpshooter.
Trump getting shot was absolutely good for him. If you don't know about guns, and are already Trump deranged, it's not a reach to claim he set it up himself. So that conspiracy theory sounds wild to us, because we probably all trend toward more gun knowledge. Hell, you could have convinced me to at least consider the idea that Trump was involved...if he hadn't actually been shot.
I believe two officers committed suicide afterwards, citing their atrocities committed in Jan6 against regular Americans, regret for being part of the authoritarian machine, as their reason. So those could technically also be included in the number.
I think there were atleast 4. And they didn't off themselves but they were gonna honestly testify before some court hearing how there was no insurrection and they received orders from above to open the gates, unlock doors and the ''insurrectionists'' behaved better than tourists - hence they ''suiceded''.
And, potentially, three or four others. Everyone forgets that four or five protestors died that day. "Heart attacks," which may or may not have been that. I know people were thrown from the stairs, and I know people were beaten with batons by incompetent DEI police thugs. I wouldn't be shocked if the person who got brutally batonned was one of the dead; that looked fucking gnarly.
I don't think I've seen so much projection that even the largest IMAX in the world couldn't keep up.
Are we sure this isn't satire?
Journalists are butchers
lol, lmao that can't have been drawn without someone pointing out the sheer absurdity of it, right? Aren't they also the same idiots clamoring for everyone to give up meat? The levels of stupidity and hypocrisy from this are astounding.
red baseball cap
Because of course.
entire lineup of social media users are white
Racist comic for not including any black people, obviously.
Watergate literally redefined journalism as a profession. Now every reporter on the face of the planet thinks they are the next Woodward & Bernstein, the reporters that broke the Watergate "scandal."
The problem is, they will only look for scandal with Republicans, not Democrats, and they have a hard time finding anything scandalous, so they just make shit up, or try to provoke the Republican into a juicy quote they can use.
Combine this with collapsing advertising revenues, and you get stupid, gullible people willing to sell their souls for the next Big Scoop.™
The entire MSM is a gay op. They used to call it Operation Mockingbird, back when the CIA revealed the program's existence to Congress in the Church Committee hearings. And then nobody faced any consequences at all for the various illegal and unethical government programs that had been revealed and the Mockingbird Media swept it all under the rug by moving on to the next big story.
Barry Goldwater's response to Watergate was galling, but true.
He basically said, and I'm paraphrasing, "This is normal for DC. Everyone's spying on each other. Why is this even news?" He basically went through way worse during his presidential campaign.
Truth is many Americans had no idea how insane it was in DC with espionage, so the media played it off like this was the worst thing that any president had ever done. Americans didn't really recognize that it wasn't just Nixon who was pulling this cloak and dagger bullshit, but the entire US government via the Church Commission. They're the ones who revealed shit like MK-ULTRA and all sorts of other shit. Hence why the media never utters it's fucking name under any circumstance.
And a reminder that it was a sensationalist clickbaity rag that broke the story, because the "respectable" mainstream media refused to run the Watergate story when it first came up. So even in that theoretical example, the Social Media on-the-ground 3rd party reporters are the good guys and the MSM are STILL the bad guys.
Honestly mystery meat could be a good way to describe new media taken as a whole, but it ignores that the butcher has been selling you prime cuts that are rotten and laced with rat poison for decades. Actually a better analogy for old vs. new media might be The Cathedral and The Bazaar by the old commie Eric S. Raymond. You're gonna find some weird shit at the bazaar, but people eventually find out which news merchants they like and which ones are BSing them and should be ignored.
I’m smart enough to think for myself. I can sort real from fake, I can spot a phony pandemic or a bullshit vaccine or a rigged election or a false flag. I don’t need a bunch of condescending, credentialed liars to do my thinking for me. Especially when they’re clearly dumb as pigshit, and just spewing whatever their shitbag editors tell them to say. Fuck all of them
There's also the fact he's announcing he views you as an idiot pleb that needs to be ordered what to do, and beaten for falling out of line. But we know that post-Covid.
Just about every 5th or 6th article on news sites now is something like "People tell us the 10 things they hate most about X" and the "article" is just a collection of random social media posts like "I hate getting up for work- Joe from Nebraska". At least filler used to be news, maybe not the best news, but written to some standard. now it's just an aggregation of random people's thoughts.
They have to keep up the charade. No one will pay them to lie if nobody trusts them anymore, and it's not like any of them are capable of doing anything else well enough to get paid for it.
They forgot what their yellow forebears knew: The most important part of being a conman is keeping someone's confidence, lose that and you lose your grift.
“Journalist” is a meaningless title. There are no certifications or qualifications required to be a journalist. Anyone can declare himself a journalist at any time, and no one can deny it.
Considering the stuff that just came out with the recent defamation case against CNN, I really dont think they do. They really do think that they havent lied, if they did it was necessary for the greater good, and that anyone who attempts to but in is a terrible person who should know their place. And of course, all of this is what makes "democracy" great and stable.
Meanwhile, they are rocking that sub-Congressional approval rating, having people tell them that journalist are actors (and Rome was right about actors), and they blame everyone but themselves for this state of affairs.
John Stewart had a point about "Mount Bullshit", but he pretended it was only Fox News and the Neo-Con establishment deluding themselves. In reality, it's the whole media.
Mr. Lebowitz asking "Don't you think it's possible that the coronavirus may have come from the lab with the name coronavirus in it?" on Colbert's show was an infuriating act, not because it was wrong, but because no one could silence him for saying something that people were killed for.
If he was never anti-establishment, he wouldn't have said anything about the lab leak to begin with. He did, and he got slapped down for it. I don't know why you are so adamant that it didn't happen. It's obvious that it did.
They're especially bad with headline photos. Sometimes it's stock footage, other times it doesn't even have to do with the story; they just post it to make the readers feel a certain way and they're just fine with that. Heaven forbid they send someone out on location.
Don't get me started on murder stories where the headline photo is of the victim because the perp was black or Hispanic.
Fact checked and sourced? That's a laugh. Let me know when it is actually fact checked (not just "my friends said it is correct") and your sources are more than Mr. "Anonymous Source" and tweets.
At first I thought it was the journos lining up for their ration of lazy, crowdsourced goyslop from social media for their next article instead of portraying themselves as the heckin' wholesome good guy butcher.
The journo sign would be more truthful if it read "Artificial Lab-Grown Soy "Meat™"". But then again, they wouldn't know the meaning of truth if it bit them in the ass.
Wasn’t it journalists who told gave us “fiery but mostly peaceful”?
Trump bleeding from ear after loud noise heard at rally
After falling down, no less.
My nonagenarian grandparent (who doesn't have the Internet btw) busted out of nowhere the other day that she believes Trump hired someone to shoot himself.
You don't hate journos enough.
.... I don't know how to tell you this, so I'm just gonna full send it. your grandparent is kind of retarded, regardless of the News.
She's an excellent bellwether that NPCs trust their idiot box more than their loving family.
I mean, I hate to give any benefit of the doubt to someone making such absurd claims, but the concept makes more sense to someone completely unfamiliar with guns. You could say that's still retarded, sure, but not everyone has been around guns, and all some people know are things from movies where everyone is a superhuman sharpshooter.
Trump getting shot was absolutely good for him. If you don't know about guns, and are already Trump deranged, it's not a reach to claim he set it up himself. So that conspiracy theory sounds wild to us, because we probably all trend toward more gun knowledge. Hell, you could have convinced me to at least consider the idea that Trump was involved...if he hadn't actually been shot.
''Five police officer died from January six.''
( Real number of officer killed : zero. Actual victim : an unarmed female protestor. The cop who killed her : pardonned by Joe Biden's handlers. )
Granny unfortunately parroted this hoax the other day as well.
Your grandma fucking sucks, bro.
What did you say to her?
I just let all the globohomo TV programming slide.
She's deaf and just wants to rant and monologue.
Trying to deprogram her is futile.
But it's frightening how effective their lies are.
I've noticed their lies are most effective with "defective" people. Fear of the strong butchering the weak is a core leftoid stance
She is very old, which cuts her some slack.
But watching her unquestioningly swallow every globohomo talking point weekly really casts doubt on the "aged wisdom" trope.
I believe two officers committed suicide afterwards, citing their atrocities committed in Jan6 against regular Americans, regret for being part of the authoritarian machine, as their reason. So those could technically also be included in the number.
I think there were atleast 4. And they didn't off themselves but they were gonna honestly testify before some court hearing how there was no insurrection and they received orders from above to open the gates, unlock doors and the ''insurrectionists'' behaved better than tourists - hence they ''suiceded''.
Two unarmed female protestors.
Don't forget Roseanne Boyelin. Who was beaten to death while collapsed on the ground by a black capitol police woman.
Diversity is our strength.™
And, potentially, three or four others. Everyone forgets that four or five protestors died that day. "Heart attacks," which may or may not have been that. I know people were thrown from the stairs, and I know people were beaten with batons by incompetent DEI police thugs. I wouldn't be shocked if the person who got brutally batonned was one of the dead; that looked fucking gnarly.
You forget Rosanne Boyland... beaten unconscious, dragged into a tunnel and left to die.
"Summer of love".
They're also the ones who keep telling us to stop eating meat.
They were literally crediting themselves for a campaign to keep Trump out of the White House.
Vote for the prosecutor not the felon!
Also, ACAB!
Exactly
I don't think I've seen so much projection that even the largest IMAX in the world couldn't keep up.
Are we sure this isn't satire?
lol, lmao that can't have been drawn without someone pointing out the sheer absurdity of it, right? Aren't they also the same idiots clamoring for everyone to give up meat? The levels of stupidity and hypocrisy from this are astounding.
Because of course.
Racist comic for not including any black people, obviously.
Watergate literally redefined journalism as a profession. Now every reporter on the face of the planet thinks they are the next Woodward & Bernstein, the reporters that broke the Watergate "scandal."
The problem is, they will only look for scandal with Republicans, not Democrats, and they have a hard time finding anything scandalous, so they just make shit up, or try to provoke the Republican into a juicy quote they can use.
Combine this with collapsing advertising revenues, and you get stupid, gullible people willing to sell their souls for the next Big Scoop.™
Wasn't Watergate a gay op
the gayest and glowest
The entire MSM is a gay op. They used to call it Operation Mockingbird, back when the CIA revealed the program's existence to Congress in the Church Committee hearings. And then nobody faced any consequences at all for the various illegal and unethical government programs that had been revealed and the Mockingbird Media swept it all under the rug by moving on to the next big story.
Barry Goldwater's response to Watergate was galling, but true.
He basically said, and I'm paraphrasing, "This is normal for DC. Everyone's spying on each other. Why is this even news?" He basically went through way worse during his presidential campaign.
Truth is many Americans had no idea how insane it was in DC with espionage, so the media played it off like this was the worst thing that any president had ever done. Americans didn't really recognize that it wasn't just Nixon who was pulling this cloak and dagger bullshit, but the entire US government via the Church Commission. They're the ones who revealed shit like MK-ULTRA and all sorts of other shit. Hence why the media never utters it's fucking name under any circumstance.
And a reminder that it was a sensationalist clickbaity rag that broke the story, because the "respectable" mainstream media refused to run the Watergate story when it first came up. So even in that theoretical example, the Social Media on-the-ground 3rd party reporters are the good guys and the MSM are STILL the bad guys.
Honestly mystery meat could be a good way to describe new media taken as a whole, but it ignores that the butcher has been selling you prime cuts that are rotten and laced with rat poison for decades. Actually a better analogy for old vs. new media might be The Cathedral and The Bazaar by the old commie Eric S. Raymond. You're gonna find some weird shit at the bazaar, but people eventually find out which news merchants they like and which ones are BSing them and should be ignored.
This is the crux of it right here.
I’m smart enough to think for myself. I can sort real from fake, I can spot a phony pandemic or a bullshit vaccine or a rigged election or a false flag. I don’t need a bunch of condescending, credentialed liars to do my thinking for me. Especially when they’re clearly dumb as pigshit, and just spewing whatever their shitbag editors tell them to say. Fuck all of them
There's also the fact he's announcing he views you as an idiot pleb that needs to be ordered what to do, and beaten for falling out of line. But we know that post-Covid.
Fact-checked propaganda sources from experts who call you ''conspiracy theorists'' for being 2 weeks ahead of them.
CIA just admitted that a lab leak is the most likely source of covid 19.
So about 5 years too late.
admitted publically. they've known since the day someone sneezed.
The sneeze came from inside the
CIAhouse!Just about every 5th or 6th article on news sites now is something like "People tell us the 10 things they hate most about X" and the "article" is just a collection of random social media posts like "I hate getting up for work- Joe from Nebraska". At least filler used to be news, maybe not the best news, but written to some standard. now it's just an aggregation of random people's thoughts.
It's like they saw social media getting popular and copied the worst aspect, one which we see everyday on social media already.
We've seen who "checks the facts" and what you consider a "source."
At least the mystery might be something useful, or at least give me something to think on even if I reject it.
But the journalism brings me straight up nothing but an exercise is dismantling lies and still getting brainrotted from the journey.
They have to keep up the charade. No one will pay them to lie if nobody trusts them anymore, and it's not like any of them are capable of doing anything else well enough to get paid for it.
They forgot what their yellow forebears knew: The most important part of being a conman is keeping someone's confidence, lose that and you lose your grift.
“Journalist” is a meaningless title. There are no certifications or qualifications required to be a journalist. Anyone can declare himself a journalist at any time, and no one can deny it.
My feelings identify as facts!
At least journalists know they’re bad actors.
Considering the stuff that just came out with the recent defamation case against CNN, I really dont think they do. They really do think that they havent lied, if they did it was necessary for the greater good, and that anyone who attempts to but in is a terrible person who should know their place. And of course, all of this is what makes "democracy" great and stable.
Meanwhile, they are rocking that sub-Congressional approval rating, having people tell them that journalist are actors (and Rome was right about actors), and they blame everyone but themselves for this state of affairs.
John Stewart had a point about "Mount Bullshit", but he pretended it was only Fox News and the Neo-Con establishment deluding themselves. In reality, it's the whole media.
Mr. Lebowitz asking "Don't you think it's possible that the coronavirus may have come from the lab with the name coronavirus in it?" on Colbert's show was an infuriating act, not because it was wrong, but because no one could silence him for saying something that people were killed for.
They did silence him. Stewart hasn't made a peep against the establishment ever since. Someone got to him.
He currently hosts The Daily Show.
Yeah, going after establishment approved targets like the old days. He is on their leash again.
He's on a leash because he's the guard dog.
He was never anti-establishment.
If he was never anti-establishment, he wouldn't have said anything about the lab leak to begin with. He did, and he got slapped down for it. I don't know why you are so adamant that it didn't happen. It's obvious that it did.
They're especially bad with headline photos. Sometimes it's stock footage, other times it doesn't even have to do with the story; they just post it to make the readers feel a certain way and they're just fine with that. Heaven forbid they send someone out on location.
Don't get me started on murder stories where the headline photo is of the victim because the perp was black or Hispanic.
Fact checked and sourced? That's a laugh. Let me know when it is actually fact checked (not just "my friends said it is correct") and your sources are more than Mr. "Anonymous Source" and tweets.
Journalism consists of either painstakingly researching stories or writing whatever people tell them.
Both approaches pay the same.
There's also Option C: copy and paste some banal hot takes you found on social media.
MSM is the enemy of the people
I will take mystery meat over something I know is radio-active human shit. Journalists lie about shit that is observably false.
suffer not the journo to live
At first I thought it was the journos lining up for their ration of lazy, crowdsourced goyslop from social media for their next article instead of portraying themselves as the heckin' wholesome good guy butcher.
The journo sign would be more truthful if it read "Artificial Lab-Grown Soy "Meat™"". But then again, they wouldn't know the meaning of truth if it bit them in the ass.
Major fedora-wearing "Nice Guy" energy.
Nerds.