Family court is the biggest gynocentric shitshow in America. She could have written how she just wanted to trans his son out of spite and this would still be happening. Family and divorce court needs to be destroyed with egregious contempt.
Everyone knows why: the judge, the investigators, and everyone who saw it on TV. The investigators just said that to cover their ass (couldn’t give him a high five since they were being recorded and they didn’t even really wrestle him. Just took the gun and held him upright.)
Only someone who believes in the justice system would and, since they already had the guy in custody, believed that it would be the proper way to let the story end.
Ironically, the Gary Plauche case is one of the few times the justice system did end up working, as he basically got a slap on the wrist for what he did.
Also, worth mentioning this was the case all the leftists lied about for years, and claimed they weren't going to chemically/physically "transition" the kid.
Given some of the outrageous family court rulings and how they casually ruin men's lives, I've always been surprised that these sorts of talks aren't a regular occurrence.
Judge isn't the (primary) issue here. His son is the prime issue. Anything that doesn't save his son is something that should at the very least be put on the back burner.
Talking to the judges would save everybody's sons. They are the ones taking the kids away from their parents in the first place. I would also be talking to the ex, but I would start with the judge.
So I see a lot of thoughts not written out. I'm not sure what everyone is thinking. So I'll just say what I'm thinking.
I'm not thinking of murdering the exwife or the judge. I AM thinking kidnap the kid, buy a boat if he has access to enough money to do so (if not at least find smugglers who can smuggle you out), and flee to Argentina (or whatever country doesn't allow extradition to the US). Start a new life there.
Well, we can't outright call for violence, but I think some people are definitely thinking it. But I agree with you, and that was kind of my point; anything that doesn't work toward saving your son, and might land you in jail, should not be attempted until, at the very least, you save your son. And if you do, you probably don't do the other stuff, because your son needs his father.
So, yeah, we're in complete agreement; saving the son comes first. If you can't...well, then I can see how you might resort to other actions. As the top comment in this chain implies, a man with nothing to lose is a dangerous prospect. If you no longer have the modulating influence or the goal of saving your son, some other options might seem more appealing in comparison.
Family comes first. Revenge, if you still have the chance to save your family, is counterproductive, and just means you're giving up on your family instead of helping them.
And to this day some people insist there is no agenda. “What we do behind closed doors is none of your business”. I was fine with that but then the activists insisted that a small percent of the population needed massive over representation
the activists have lost support of the "closed door" supporters as well. you'll notice that the vast majority of the people claiming to be alphabet are trans. the gays are gone, the lesbians are gone, even the bisexuals are gone. all they have left are trannies and furries.
A Dallas county judge annulled his marriage at his wife's request; making his children “illegitimate” and revoking his custody rights. His prenup was thrown out
How the fuck do you annul a marriage after 5 years with children? Annulments are supposed to be reserved for cases of fraud, e.g. the marriage was never legal because of bigamy, incest, lack of consent by one of the parties, etc.
His ex-wife then took the boys to California — on the eve of it becoming a “transgender sanctuary state”. She filed to have James chemically castrated, to get around the Texas court order prohibiting it in 2021
Isn't this a federal "full faith in credit" issue? States can't just ignore court orders from other states. Regardless, couldn't Texas just charge her with contempt and issue an arrest warrant, and then California would have to extradite her based on existing agreements between the states on law enforcement matters?
Didn't Russia offer to take refugees from this nonsense? The consulates probably have a few pipe hitters on standby who could help with the extraction.
On the other hand, if you got there, I bet they'd be happy to keep you. How much you'd like it, I don't know. Cuz they could just use you as a hostage.
He should apply, his Twitter is fairly large and visible. Someone can try to connect the relevant authorities in Russia with him. He could also flee to the Arab countries but most of them are in the US pockets so maybe..Iran.
This is a case where other people can act, but the father cannot. Jeff Younger will be under constant surveillance, but other people could get close to the demons.
One person can never stand against the system, but a group can.
I'm not a fan of the phrase "man up", but it applies here. He has options, even if they aren't pleasant. A subset of those options are moral, but they aren't legal.
Hopefully Trump will follow through on his vow to ban chemical castration and genital mutilation on children before any irreparable damage is done to the poor kid.
Dr. Georgulas actually admitted in court that she is not the biological mother of James and his twin brother Jude. She used in-vitro fertilization with a donor egg.
LEGALLY.
He should start considering the other options
At this point? Yes? What else would are you supposed to do when they basically destine your child to future suicide?
He just needs a good friend with an older car (no telematics) who leaves his cell phone at home while he's verifiably at some other location.
Walk alone.
Plant a tree.
Tell no one.
Hypothetically, what happens when she goes off on a random indefinite world cruise without the child? Would the state still enforce her wants?
He probably will be better of with a random person than her
Family court is the biggest gynocentric shitshow in America. She could have written how she just wanted to trans his son out of spite and this would still be happening. Family and divorce court needs to be destroyed with egregious contempt.
Just saying that there's still one thing left he can do. And depending on the sons future, he might want to take it
[Gary Plauche has entered the chat]
Why Gary!? Why!?
Why not. I can't believe anyone would seriously ask that question.
Everyone knows why: the judge, the investigators, and everyone who saw it on TV. The investigators just said that to cover their ass (couldn’t give him a high five since they were being recorded and they didn’t even really wrestle him. Just took the gun and held him upright.)
Only someone who believes in the justice system would and, since they already had the guy in custody, believed that it would be the proper way to let the story end.
Ironically, the Gary Plauche case is one of the few times the justice system did end up working, as he basically got a slap on the wrist for what he did.
Based Cadiens are much-needed.
Too many groomers go unchecked.
Also, worth mentioning this was the case all the leftists lied about for years, and claimed they weren't going to chemically/physically "transition" the kid.
Some fuckers have hell to pay. Literally.
I would once again like to point out the elephant in the room.
It's always the mother.
This is going to go well 🙄
He should talk to the judge when she is off the clock to change her mind.
Given some of the outrageous family court rulings and how they casually ruin men's lives, I've always been surprised that these sorts of talks aren't a regular occurrence.
The public at large doesn't care about men's issues.
Judge isn't the (primary) issue here. His son is the prime issue. Anything that doesn't save his son is something that should at the very least be put on the back burner.
Talking to the judges would save everybody's sons. They are the ones taking the kids away from their parents in the first place. I would also be talking to the ex, but I would start with the judge.
His son might be gone already. The point is to ensure it doesn't happen again
So I see a lot of thoughts not written out. I'm not sure what everyone is thinking. So I'll just say what I'm thinking.
I'm not thinking of murdering the exwife or the judge. I AM thinking kidnap the kid, buy a boat if he has access to enough money to do so (if not at least find smugglers who can smuggle you out), and flee to Argentina (or whatever country doesn't allow extradition to the US). Start a new life there.
Just wondering what others are actually thinking.
Well, we can't outright call for violence, but I think some people are definitely thinking it. But I agree with you, and that was kind of my point; anything that doesn't work toward saving your son, and might land you in jail, should not be attempted until, at the very least, you save your son. And if you do, you probably don't do the other stuff, because your son needs his father.
So, yeah, we're in complete agreement; saving the son comes first. If you can't...well, then I can see how you might resort to other actions. As the top comment in this chain implies, a man with nothing to lose is a dangerous prospect. If you no longer have the modulating influence or the goal of saving your son, some other options might seem more appealing in comparison.
Family comes first. Revenge, if you still have the chance to save your family, is counterproductive, and just means you're giving up on your family instead of helping them.
It was self D-FENS.
THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT
And to this day some people insist there is no agenda. “What we do behind closed doors is none of your business”. I was fine with that but then the activists insisted that a small percent of the population needed massive over representation
Live and let live is supposed a two-way street. But of course, tolerance is just the camel's nose for acceptance and then tyranny.
the activists have lost support of the "closed door" supporters as well. you'll notice that the vast majority of the people claiming to be alphabet are trans. the gays are gone, the lesbians are gone, even the bisexuals are gone. all they have left are trannies and furries.
You are seriously telling me a young child brought up, "puberty blockers,” estrogen, and “bottom surgery."
The mother has been grooming the boy since he was a toddler.
It's the only way the boy would mention that shit, if he did it all. I think the lgtbq+ counselor probably made it up
Kill the bitch.
Sorry if that offends, but it’s the only option they’ve left him. Kill her and save your son’s life.
The judge and her lawyer as well
Lots of legal fuckery in this:
How the fuck do you annul a marriage after 5 years with children? Annulments are supposed to be reserved for cases of fraud, e.g. the marriage was never legal because of bigamy, incest, lack of consent by one of the parties, etc.
Isn't this a federal "full faith in credit" issue? States can't just ignore court orders from other states. Regardless, couldn't Texas just charge her with contempt and issue an arrest warrant, and then California would have to extradite her based on existing agreements between the states on law enforcement matters?
Copypasta
A spouse was under the age of 18 when they got married.
A spouse was under the influence of alcohol or narcotics when they got married.
A spouse is permanently impotent.
A spouse only got married because of fraud, duress, or force.
A spouse did not have the mental capacity to agree to get married.
A spouse concealed the fact that they had been divorced before.
The marriage happened less than 72 hours after the spouses got the marriage license.
Didn't Russia offer to take refugees from this nonsense? The consulates probably have a few pipe hitters on standby who could help with the extraction.
In a way, yes: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17txtHrpF0/russian-news-agency-tass-russia-/c/
I don't know that they would be willing to extract people to make it happen.
On the other hand, if you got there, I bet they'd be happy to keep you. How much you'd like it, I don't know. Cuz they could just use you as a hostage.
He should apply, his Twitter is fairly large and visible. Someone can try to connect the relevant authorities in Russia with him. He could also flee to the Arab countries but most of them are in the US pockets so maybe..Iran.
This is a case where other people can act, but the father cannot. Jeff Younger will be under constant surveillance, but other people could get close to the demons.
One person can never stand against the system, but a group can.
I'm not a fan of the phrase "man up", but it applies here. He has options, even if they aren't pleasant. A subset of those options are moral, but they aren't legal.
bring back asylums.
also, not even Disney could imagine an evil stepmother this horrible.
There is a reason the evil step-mother trope exists.
Obligations with no rights is slavery.
He should just take him and go to mexico, change identities and flee to another country.
At some point, Law Abiding Citizen has to become a reality.
I believe everyone involved in this story should die.
You are almost out of options, my friend. Almost.
Something odd about this.
She's a girlboss pediatrician.
I'm sure her ovaries were shriveled up like prunes when she was finally ready to "settle down".
Oh you would think a pediatrician would understand how to have children.
It's probably not her eggs they used for ivf
Hopefully Trump will follow through on his vow to ban chemical castration and genital mutilation on children before any irreparable damage is done to the poor kid.
So they legalized Munchausen by Proxy...
When the pawn fears consequences from towing the line they will stop towing the line.
She’s not the mother!?
Gateway pundit archive
There seriously needs to be a better system to put the screws to these evil judges.