Given some of the outrageous family court rulings and how they casually ruin men's lives, I've always been surprised that these sorts of talks aren't a regular occurrence.
Judge isn't the (primary) issue here. His son is the prime issue. Anything that doesn't save his son is something that should at the very least be put on the back burner.
Talking to the judges would save everybody's sons. They are the ones taking the kids away from their parents in the first place. I would also be talking to the ex, but I would start with the judge.
So I see a lot of thoughts not written out. I'm not sure what everyone is thinking. So I'll just say what I'm thinking.
I'm not thinking of murdering the exwife or the judge. I AM thinking kidnap the kid, buy a boat if he has access to enough money to do so (if not at least find smugglers who can smuggle you out), and flee to Argentina (or whatever country doesn't allow extradition to the US). Start a new life there.
Well, we can't outright call for violence, but I think some people are definitely thinking it. But I agree with you, and that was kind of my point; anything that doesn't work toward saving your son, and might land you in jail, should not be attempted until, at the very least, you save your son. And if you do, you probably don't do the other stuff, because your son needs his father.
So, yeah, we're in complete agreement; saving the son comes first. If you can't...well, then I can see how you might resort to other actions. As the top comment in this chain implies, a man with nothing to lose is a dangerous prospect. If you no longer have the modulating influence or the goal of saving your son, some other options might seem more appealing in comparison.
Family comes first. Revenge, if you still have the chance to save your family, is counterproductive, and just means you're giving up on your family instead of helping them.
He should talk to the judge when she is off the clock to change her mind.
Given some of the outrageous family court rulings and how they casually ruin men's lives, I've always been surprised that these sorts of talks aren't a regular occurrence.
The public at large doesn't care about men's issues.
Judge isn't the (primary) issue here. His son is the prime issue. Anything that doesn't save his son is something that should at the very least be put on the back burner.
Talking to the judges would save everybody's sons. They are the ones taking the kids away from their parents in the first place. I would also be talking to the ex, but I would start with the judge.
His son might be gone already. The point is to ensure it doesn't happen again
So I see a lot of thoughts not written out. I'm not sure what everyone is thinking. So I'll just say what I'm thinking.
I'm not thinking of murdering the exwife or the judge. I AM thinking kidnap the kid, buy a boat if he has access to enough money to do so (if not at least find smugglers who can smuggle you out), and flee to Argentina (or whatever country doesn't allow extradition to the US). Start a new life there.
Just wondering what others are actually thinking.
Well, we can't outright call for violence, but I think some people are definitely thinking it. But I agree with you, and that was kind of my point; anything that doesn't work toward saving your son, and might land you in jail, should not be attempted until, at the very least, you save your son. And if you do, you probably don't do the other stuff, because your son needs his father.
So, yeah, we're in complete agreement; saving the son comes first. If you can't...well, then I can see how you might resort to other actions. As the top comment in this chain implies, a man with nothing to lose is a dangerous prospect. If you no longer have the modulating influence or the goal of saving your son, some other options might seem more appealing in comparison.
Family comes first. Revenge, if you still have the chance to save your family, is counterproductive, and just means you're giving up on your family instead of helping them.