Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

50
Don't use the term Pureblood, it offends people. (twitter.com)
posted 3 years ago by Socalwackjob 3 years ago by Socalwackjob +50 / -0
98 comments share
98 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (98)
sorted by:
▲ 64 ▼
– deleted 64 points 3 years ago +64 / -0
▲ 57 ▼
– deleted 57 points 3 years ago +57 / -0
▲ 41 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 41 points 3 years ago +41 / -0

It's offensive because it is a reminder of your moral failure. The pain it causes is there to ensure the mistake is not repeated.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 37 ▼
– AccountWasFree 37 points 3 years ago +37 / -0

Wiping your fuck up under the rug isn't anyone's responsibility. You fucked up. Work on fixing that rather than bitching because you get reminded about it occasionally. Use it as a reminder to not let it happen again.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– IfThatIsWhatYouThunk 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

The real issue for them is all the potential side effects that aren't known. Something that anyone who wasn't completely ignorant of how pharmaceutical companies should've seen coming. They realize that there are a lot of people dying from "mysterious causes" and they subconsciously make the connection, so being reminded of their failings terrifies them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– AccountWasFree 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

I'm not even sure if it's that deep. I think they just don't want to be reminded of their fuckup, when ultimately they should use that reminder to (at the very least try to) never let a fuckup like that happen again. Yes, there are those elements as well, but I don't think that quite ties in with use of "pure blood" as a specific term.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– 83671R18 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0

Porky there keeps telling people to 'define' terms.

My response, if I had a twitter account would be "SHUT THE FUCK UP CLOTBLOODED MURDERER SCUM."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Well, aren't you a reasonable and charming young man.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 28 ▼
– 83671R18 28 points 3 years ago +28 / -0

Yeah, you're completely right. I was trying to be reasonable when they rolled this poison out.

Well, not anymore.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

If you like to embarrass yourself, suit yourself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– 83671R18 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

I have no need to reason with their kind. Why you would claim that's 'embarrassing' is nothing short of baffling.

Edit: And now my curiosity is piqued; are you a clotshot-pusher?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– throwawayaccount2037 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16ZXaFpyZn/x/c/4ToiD2ye7Aj

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Why you would claim that's 'embarrassing' is nothing short of baffling.

Screaming "CLOTBLOODED MURDERER SCUM" at people for taking a vaccine is beyond parody, even by the standards of the pathologically vaccine-obsessed.

are you a clotshot-pusher?

Define your terms.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 83671R18 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Perhaps your focus on attaining an amnesty made you miss the fact that I called her a clotblooded murderer scum only after she started behaving like an uppity worm instead of properly apologizing. The fact you try to weasel the word 'vaccine' (it's not) into this entire argument does make it look like you're a clotshot pusher.

Now, I will ask again; are you a clotshot-pusher? A yes or no answer will suffice.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Perhaps your focus on attaining an amnesty

Having gotten everything right, I don't need any. You, on the other hand...

you miss the fact that I called her a clotblooded murderer scum only after she started behaving like an uppity worm instead of properly apologizing.

So... you embarrassed yourself totally because she... told you not to embarrass yourself instead of apologizing for nothing?

The fact you try to weasel the word 'vaccine' (it's not)

Not a vaccine! I'm sure you have some blog posts you believe blindly that told you that.

Now, I will ask again; are you a clotshot-pusher? A yes or no answer will suffice.

Sorry, I don't speak retard. Define your terms.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 11 ▼
– SR388-SAX 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Oh hey look, a vax pusher is adopting a holier-than-thou attitude. Who could have possibly predicted that?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Oh hey look, a vax pusher

Based on?

is adopting a holier-than-thou attitude. Who could have possibly predicted that?

You must have missed the part of the conversation where an "anti-vaxxer" (according to you) called people murderers for taking the vaccine.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– 83671R18 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

And you must've missed the part when I called lardface lardy a clotblooded murderer when she tried to avoid apologizing to people. Secondly, you purposefully twisted the part where I called clotshot pushers murderers to make up an argument.

This level of dishonesty is par the course for your kind.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

And you must've missed the part when I called lardface lardy a clotblooded murderer

I knew anti-vaxxers are not known for their intelligence, but to insult a fellow anti-vaxxer because you lack reading comprehension is rich. Or has it still not dawned on you that the lady calling the vaccine 'the wrong choice' is... against the vaccine?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 25 ▼
– RandomFurryDude 25 points 3 years ago +25 / -0

It feels great to wake up every morning and remember that I didn't fall for the biggest psyop in human history.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

Archive you faggots: https://archive.is/eH02H

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– J_Darnley 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

alternatively a nitter link https://nitter.pussthecat.org/molsjames/status/1609063045887856640 but that doesn't prevent it being deleted

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

The entire point of archiving is to safeguard against it being deleted.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– IfThatIsWhatYouThunk 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

It makes them feel guilt, for having been too chickenshit to say no. They could've and should've refused. I wonder how many of these are the same ones to say things like "I value my life over my job", but got the jab for fear of being fired? Should've forced them to fire you, if you really cared that is. Their cowardice played a huge part in allowing things to get as bad as they are, so fuck them for feeling regrets now.

I'd never gotten the jab, because I know the reputation these pharmaceutical companies have and how granting them legal immunity would only exacerbate their usual behaviors. I hadn't personally used the term "pure bloods", but I've always kind of liked it and It's not too late to start.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kush28 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I held out. I haven't been in my office in years now. But now they will allow me in if I submit a covid test result, for 6 whole days of clearance! Thise vaxxed sheep have no restrictions, obviously.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– freespeechsquid 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

I feel for you, but no. Political correctness is the chief cause of our societal decline. The worship of 'kindness' over rationality, the surrender of speech and expression to the pathologically offended, the refusal to state or even acknowledge truth in the name of protecting the feelings of others - it all has to go. All of it.

I don't want to alienate allies who were bullied and coerced. We are on the same side. But ignoring the truth is not an option anymore. Use your pain and embarrassment to feed your fury against those who have wronged you and caused you irreparable damage,

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Sneak_King 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

Absolute kike-blooded take.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– lapalapa 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

Harry Potter, racial mixing, blood donations... I don't know what this is about.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

Vaxxes, I believe.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– realerfunction 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

good i hope you're offended, it means i'm doing the lord's work.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– deleted 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0
▲ 14 ▼
– Socalwackjob [S] 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

So it finally happens what I wrote while back alluding to this scenario. Some people are even talking about making another blood donation just for people who didn't take the jab for very obvious reason. Boy do I ever feel very vindicated for choosing to not take the jab and keeping a very low profile these last 2 years.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– FrozeInFear 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Was that perhaps the wrong comment linked?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

please stop using the term "able bodied". It offends the crippled people who jumped off a cliff when their betters told them to.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– HusbandsLead 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

No refunds, mud bloods!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Bottle_of_Memes 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

"Stop it it's offensive!"

Insults are supposed to be offensive

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

You got jabbed, and now regret it, and this is what you're offended by?

Not the government, media, medical associations, etc that told you they knew what you should do and actually just lied to you?

If all of your reserves of offense aren't used up by ire and outrage directed at the true purveyors of misinformation, you have no moral standing to be offended.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Constipatriot 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

If you choose to use a vague emoji instead of using words that matter to you, I have no interest in whatever neanderthal thought you just farted out. We have a whole generation of people so basic they'd communicate only in pictograms if only someone else would come up with a complete library for them, and they're all convinced their thoughts and opinions must be taken very seriously.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Smith1980 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

What does pure blood mean? In the context they are talking about?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

No jab.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Smith1980 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Ohh. Thanks.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– APDSmith 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Ohh, this another call for a vaccine amnesty, isn't it?

I'll re-iterate my previous point: When we've had some accountability, you can have your forgiveness.

To detail my own position on it - yeah, I did get the vaccine. I'm asthmatic. Seemed like a good choice for me - but I have not and will not force others to abide by my own personal choices in this matter.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Norenia 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

With the bad decisions people have been making, they deserve to be offended. That'll be what reminds them to think again before trusting the wrong people.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kienan 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I love seeing normies spin out.

Note she's actually anti-mandate herself. She just doesn't understand the internet, I guess. Or how politically correctness and tone-policing isn't productive in the slightest. And is just going to get you attacked by a bunch of people who are a tad upset about being ostracized from society.

So, she's not saying anything about the vaccines being good - actually the opposite - she's just sort of clueless and is now making a clown of herself.

She also goes on to say "To be clear, I refuse to use the term “unvaxxed” either."

Yeah, good luck with that. I don't care which "side" she's on, she's being retarded.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– bloodguard 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I wasn't using it but now that I know it upsets the coof-bedwetters I'm going to start every sentence with:

As a pure blood I believe...

  • You need to go two blocks up and take a right
  • It probably won't rain until later tonight
  • I need to make a stop at the store to pick up some hamburger for the BBQ
  • ...
permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– GeneralBoobs 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

We all agreed my father needed the clotshot back in December 2020. He was part of the first round with the PFizer because it was told to us that it wasn't the Maderna experimental bullshit. He is on warfarin, so it was decided that any chance of ending up like the rats was a chance he could live with.

Turns out, the rats were only the first sign and it got worse. Thankfully, he is one of the lucky ones and his being on rat poison means it won't kill him before the Parkinsons does.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– OmegaBird 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I am proud to be a pure blood and have no sympathy for anyone who is not, including friends and family. They made their choice, I made mine. There is no reason to sympathize with those who made bad decisions. And if my purity offends them, that is telling of THEIR weakness.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– Socalwackjob [S] 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Not taking an experimental jab doesn't instantly make you an ubermensch

Uh, it probably does when the authority uses every methods to nudge you to take the jab and also intentionally making you a pariah for choosing an informed decision.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Most people I knew who did take the vaccine didn't do it because authorities trying to push them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

What do you call a three year wall of non-stop propaganda coupled with government mandates and edicts if not "the authorities trying to push you to do something"?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I expect a little reading comprehension when you come out that aggressively.

I said this was not the reason why most people took the vaccine.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Dear god you really do have a room temperature IQ don't you?

Why did they take it then? Let me hazard a guess. It was because they thought it was the right thing to do. They thought it would help them and/or their community in terms of health outcomes. Now why did they think that? Because of the aforementioned wall of propaganda.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Dear god you really do have a room temperature IQ don't you?

Mine is in Fahrenheit, yours in Celsius - which is why you are a Stormfag.

Why did they take it then? Let me hazard a guess. It was because they thought it was the right thing to do. They thought it would help them and/or their community in terms of health outcomes. Now why did they think that? Because of the aforementioned wall of propaganda.

Do keep up, we were talking of 'coercion'. Propaganda, whatever, is not 'coercion'.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Cute Tony, very cute.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– Hutter 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

But what you are saying doesn't make any sense.

Vaccine propaganda intensified a year before covid pandemic happened, same propaganda that has been around for a very long time.

If anyone took vaccine without knowing that people sometimes do actually die from them and get completely rekt by them and they could very well be next in ''extremely rare occurrence'' then yes most people took vaccine because authorities were pushing them.

Its just you actually don't realize the scope of the push, brainwashed into thinking its their own informed choice, when they actually have 0 information on it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

If anyone took vaccine without knowing that people sometimes do actually die from them and get completely rekt by them and they could very well be next in ''extremely rare occurrence'' then yes most people took vaccine because authorities were pushing them.

Those people, you mean. Even in those cases, I doubt your claim. I don't know anyone who thought that there are literally zero risks to taking a vaccine. It's just a question of the cost-benefit.

Here in Europe, there's different attitudes. There in America it seems that you have two camps, one that says everyone should get a vaccine, from babies to 95-year-olds, and as often as possible. And people who say that the vaccines are pure evil because Fauci liked them. Here, there's more rationality. The consensus position is something like: people who are gravely at risk might benefit from more vaccines, but not the general population.

Its just you actually don't realize the scope of the push, brainwashed into thinking its their own informed choice, when they actually have 0 information on it.

You could say that some people took the vaccine with insufficient information. But my only point was that for most, it was a consideration (whether you agree or not) of what is good for their health.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Hutter 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Im in Europe, everyone took the vaccine as government push and propagandas intensified.

Actually in Europe i have to say i can't find a single person that knows what vaccines are, or anything at all about them, they don't even know the mainstream definition of it, absolutely nothing.

The anti vax movement, the anti covid vax movement, fucking non existent. Nobody is putting anything together.

Everyone keeps taking booster shots and getting sick with covid twice a year, while they have few who didn't take it, also getting or not getting sick with covid. Europe has all restrictions being absolutely insane when 1000 people are sick per day and last time they all got cancelled as 50 - 100k people were getting sick per day.

Nobody is putting any 2+2 together, nothing what so ever. They will trust everything they hear on news and everything that is coming out of their governments.

it was a consideration (whether you agree or not) of what is good for their health.

And what they believe to be good for their health is propaganda, i am saying you don't realize the scope of it. There were many studies that went against mainstream, very possible even regarded scientists from your own country made them, you possibly never heard about them on news, from politicians or anyone ever. Authoritarian propaganda never had place for any of that.

Heck Europe is not even legally receiving the actual Pfizer vaccine. So everything they ever heard about it is fake. You were promised ton of things and benefits, but you never got the product that promised that rofl.

Not to talk about that covid passports, not being able to shop, get a job, go outside, use public transport if a person is not vaccinated that happened in over half the Europe literally disproves your entire point.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 7 ▼
– SR388-SAX 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Your immediate acquaintances don't sound very smart.

That, or like most people, you are incapable of articulating the rationale of those who disagree with you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Your immediate acquaintances don't sound very smart.

One might even say that they sound vaccinated.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Your immediate acquaintances don't sound very smart.

On the contrary, you would not be smart if you take health decisions based on government force. On the other hand, if you consider that you are 70 and are at risk of the virus, and take the vaccine for your health, that makes more sense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Socalwackjob [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

That doesn't make sense at all considering how Trump at first recommended Hydrochloroquine with iron supplements and then Ivermectin. There were ample chances to make your own choice to take those but they all listened to MSM and ignored the actually safe vaccine. Don't try to act like you have the correct rationale, you just willfully ignore the full story of the vaccine debate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

You think the elderly should have taken hydroxochloroquine rather than the vaccine?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Socalwackjob [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Unironically yes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Adamrises 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

this kind of terminology is what turns people off from the growing anti-vaxx movement.

Good. If a meanie word is enough to make you take an experimental and seemingly incredibly dangerous medical shot you don't need then the world is literally improved by you dying from it. We are all better off by more stupid people getting vaxxed and dying out young before they breed much.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– 83671R18 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

It's not just about refusing to take the clot shot. It's also about having the critical thinking capability to discern a psyop, conduct their own research, making their own decisions against the wishes of a multi-faceted media and influence campaign and knowing what kind of a shitbag corpo Pfizer is even when the mainstream media does their damndest to elevate them to modern-day sainthood.

By right of sapience, they have earned the right to stand tall as humanity's finest.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– freespeechsquid 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

this kind of terminology is what turns people off from the growing anti-vaxx movement.

I don't think it does. It creates sore feelings yes, but the picture it's painting and the awareness it's creating is useful. 'Pureblood' is a valuable concept even if it offends people. Anger, bitterness, jealousy and offense are acceptable outcomes - ignorance and complacency are the true enemies, and that's what we need to fight.

If they are angry at us but aware of the truth, that's a better outcome than letting them sink into denial.

It's human nature to seek the comfortable path, and that's what this is. They want to pretend this didn't happen. But if they do that nothing will change. The sad truth is, if we were faced with a similar scenario tomorrow, many of these people would make the exact same mistakes all over again.

They need to get angry for what was done to them, not be protected from the reality of it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Humans are emotional creatures, so engaging people on an emotional level is crucial to any effort to better our society.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– freespeechsquid 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I'm saying it's better they have an emotional reaction to this than sink into denial and pretend it didn't happen. Sometimes honey is the answer, but sometimes we need some vinegar too. It doesn't matter if they're angry at us for the 'pureblood' thing as long as they're awake - and angrier at the people who did this

I will say, they are still allies and we shouldn't be too hostile to them. Don't go out of your way to rub it in or anything. We've spent a couple of years having each other's backs and forming a group identity around our oppression, and that's normal, but we should recognize any vax-dissenters as friends & allies, and as victims of propaganda & murderous malpractice - rather than as enemies.

I don't even use the word 'pureblood' I just hate this 'don't use it, it's offensive!' shit. Stop trying to wipe away truth and expression with political correctness, that's why things are so bad in the first place

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

They failed the intelligence test. They're already dead and they don't even know it.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 3 more comments
▲ 20 ▼
– deleted 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– OldBullLee 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

a fair bit of cajoling and insulting

I vote for this as understatement of the new year.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy