Don't use the term Pureblood, it offends people.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
Having gotten everything right, I don't need any. You, on the other hand...
So... you embarrassed yourself totally because she... told you not to embarrass yourself instead of apologizing for nothing?
Not a vaccine! I'm sure you have some blog posts you believe blindly that told you that.
Sorry, I don't speak retard. Define your terms.
I asked for a yes or a no answer. You could have answered 'no', and that would have been the end of that. Instead, your pathetic grousing only marks you guilty, Especially so when you continue to pretend to act that Pfizer, J&J et al's mRNA product is a vaccine, when it's not.
So this must be how trannies believe their own delusions. You were clearly wrong, given your past posts, yet you refuse to acknowledge that. At least porky there did that - until she tried to police speech online.
Maybe it's not clear to you, but I don't care about the opinion of a clotshot pusher.
What a practiced line from a corporate shill, when evidence exists to prove that their so-called vaccines don't even provide the correct threshold of immunization necessary to be called a vaccine. If you are truly remorseful, then go read up on the concept of leaky vaccines.
And I don't negotiate with criminal scum. Enjoy your myocarditis.
No, a meaningless question does not have an answer. Try not speaking Retard next time, and you may receive an answer.
Oh dear, the genius who calls his fellow anti-vaxxers "murderers" thinks that I am GUILTY! Of what, one asks? Some more terms you cannot even define?
Still waiting for you to DEFINITIVELY PROVE your claim by posting a link to some blog post, but you may not even have that.
Then it would be easy for you to show what I was "clearly wrong" about. Be specific. No comments that ironically make you sound like you just had a stroke.
More insults for your fellow anti-vaxxer. Not the brightest bunch.
You meant to say that you don't care about reality.
EVIDENCE EXISTS
Ah, so you're parroting Dr. Robert Malone.
I don't think you have the skills to negotiate anyone. Making a total fool of yourself is more your thing.
You've answered my question quite well with your pitiful nitpicking, clotshot pusher.
Maybe the spike proteins in your brain are disrupting your short-term memories? I asked you whether you were a clotshot pusher or not, and here you are - simply answering my question in a rather amusing manner.
See how you termed that? You're expecting me to post links to "some blog post" as evidence when what I have are scientific resources, investigation results and national statistics proving that the mRNA chems don't even provide immunity and spread protection.
I don't need to post links to some blog post. And besides, your kind just change dictionary definitions for it, then pretend otherwise.
'Comments that ironically make you sound like you just had a stroke' is what happens when you pluck word sequences and ignore my full argument. What a pathetic cope.
That would be you. The fact you're reduced to pushing your own vices on others is further proof that you're just a pathetic corporate shill.
Thank you for acknowledging the fact that the SARS-COV2 virus continues to spread even in the so-called "vaccinated".
Ah, this terror as you speak a "heretical" Bad Man's name... Oh I'm sorry, perhaps the concept of leaky vaccines are forbidden knowledge to your kind. In that case, try to read about the marek virus and its evolution.
You don't think. Of course. Your kind simply gobble up whatever trash so-called 'experts' claim, and then pretend to be better than everyone else.
One more delusion? Suits you.
And I told you I don't speak retard. Define your terms, if your meager capabilities allow you to.
I did expect you to post links to some blog posts, but you were incapable of even that. And don't think I didn't catch your attempt to shift the goalposts here. I'd like you to show me that whatever vaccine(s) you hate are "not even vaccines". Thanks.
Fortunately, we have archives, but you're not linking any... and it's obvious why.
"SHUT THE FUCK UP CLOTBLOODED MURDERER SCUM."
Crap! What to do when confronted with this height of intellect? Which definitely is an argument!
Laughing at you for your imbecilic sperging is definitely something only corporate shills would do.
Tell you what, you go and approacha 10 random people, tell them that you call people who took the vaccine "SHUT THE FUCK UP CLOTBLOODED MURDERER SCUM."
And see if you regard you as the genius you think you are, or as a dangerously unhinged lunatic who sounds like he is having a stroke, mkay?
That was not your claim though. This was: "when evidence exists to prove that their so-called vaccines don't even provide the correct threshold of immunization necessary to be called a vaccine." I note that even you were roundly mopcked for being unable to present any evidence, you still were unable to do so. Surprising!
There is none, nor do I regard him as a 'Bad Man'. I have in fact defended his free speech. That said, you are not someone who thinks for himself, or is able to make such judgments for himself. That is what I am mocking.
It is fairly boring when your mouth moves and other people's opinions exit. Can yoiu do better?
You can only argue against a strawman. The Branch Covidians, although they are slightly less loony than you are. That is why you have to scream "MURDERER" at anyone who disagrees with you, cause your batty ass cannot hold his own in an actual argument.