You 'remember' all sorts of things that never happened. Your blog posts were exactly that, but I bet you cannot produce any comment of mine "calling them conspiracy theories" or "encourag[ing] people to get the jab".
Not quite "conspiracy theory" but you called people "right-wing loons" for pointing out the dangers of the vaccines:
To quote...
Like your fellow nutjobs on the left, who call everything 'right-wing' and 'Nazi', right-wing loons call everything sensible that they do not like 'left-wing' and 'communist'.
I'll post this for now and when I find your comments about the vaccine not being bad or "safe" for old people, I'll edit the comment and add it later. Interestingly enough, a lot of the "pro vaccine" comments from various users have been deleted now that I'm going back through the comment threads and noticing a lot of the people I replied to deleted their posts. Funny that.
EDIT: Here we go, here's one of the comments...
He's old. Cost-benefit ratio will be pretty good for him even if he already had been infected.
How exactly are they destroying themselves? Even if you take all claims about side-effects at face value, it's infinitesimal compared to the number of vaccinations.
Well AOV certainly lives up to my expectation as someone willfully ignorant but love to pretend that he's well-informed by pulling that appeal to authority fallacy. Amused that he came here just to gaslight you like a typical left-wing zealot.
EDIT: You encouraging old people to get the vaccine...
Hah. So you lied when you claimed that I "encouraged" everyone to get the vaccine. Figures for someone who does get his views from blog posts he views online.
Not quite "conspiracy theory" but you called people "right-wing loons" for pointing out the dangers of the vaccines:
OK, so you lied about that as well. Or maybe I'll be charitable and say that you just misremembered. For all your faults, you do sound like a somewhat sincere (if fanatical) fellow.
Yes, some people are right-wing loons. And yes, people who claim that old people died because of the vaccine are insane. This wasn't "pointing out the dangers of the vaccine", which your own post shows that it's not about.
And you're foremost among them. Your lunacy is demonstrated by the fact that you think the vaccine is a net negative for even older people, even ages that have a double-digit death rate from the coronavirus.
Here you are saying that people asking for treatments of mRNA poisoning are "posting crap":
And it still is.
I'll post this for now and when I find your comments about the vaccine not being bad or "safe" for old people, I'll edit the comment and add it later.
You don't need to. I only ask you to provide evidence when it's something that I never said (and do note that you failed to demonstrate any of your claims which you misremembered).
But that was not your claim to begin with, and while I never called anything 'safe' as I think that's stupid, the benefits definitely outweigh the costs for old people.
He's old. Cost-benefit ratio will be pretty good for him even if he already had been infected.
This is plain common sense, but you lack not just common sense, but any sense whatsoever. Like I said: anti-vaccine loons gonna loon.
How exactly are they destroying themselves? Even if you take all claims about side-effects at face value, it's infinitesimal compared to the number of vaccinations.
Not in that particular comment, in that comment you called the medical research...
The mere fact that mainstream sources have shown themselves to be bankrupt, does not mean that I have to accept any form of nuttery that comes from your no-name websites.
Not sure how medical research on one of the most respected medical journals is considered a "no-name website".
Hah. So you lied when you claimed that I "encouraged" everyone to get the vaccine. Figures for someone who does get his views from blog posts he views online.
Link to my comment where I said "everyone".
And yes, people who claim that old people died because of the vaccine are insane.
Your lunacy is demonstrated by the fact that you think the vaccine is a net negative for even older people, even ages that have a double-digit death rate from the coronavirus.
It is, since there is no peer reviewed data showing it is a net positive in any capacity.
the benefits definitely outweigh the costs for old people.
Where's the longitudinal phase III data that shows that?
You would have looked like even more of a clown if you had said, breathlessly, HE SAID 90-YEAR-OLDS SHOULD TAKE THE VACCINE.
Even you understood this. So you spun mightily.
That literally happened...
"COVID GENOCIDE MURDER"
You'll believe literally anything based on an internet video or blog post. Quite amusing. And that calls itself an independent thinker.
It is, since there is no peer reviewed data showing it is a net positive in any capacity.
If you are proudly stupid, then be honest next time, and cry that "Antonio said that NINETY YEAR OLDS should take the vaccine. THIS IS MURDER AND GENOCIDE!"
You 'remember' all sorts of things that never happened. Your blog posts were exactly that, but I bet you cannot produce any comment of mine "calling them conspiracy theories" or "encourag[ing] people to get the jab".
This is not a blog post: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm
(Link to the original comment: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jJZKgI0O/x/c/4JAfTvdsXkn)
EDIT: You encouraging old people to get the vaccine...
(Link to the comment: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12kFGQVyin/x/c/4JDFe28GdM6)
Not quite "conspiracy theory" but you called people "right-wing loons" for pointing out the dangers of the vaccines:
To quote...
(Link to the comment: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jJZKgI0O/x/c/4JAfmbVNhEC)
(Link to the comment: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jJZKgI0O/x/c/4JAfTvchfOR)
Your comments were actually worse than calling it conspiracy theories.
Also, hilariously the guy you were defending in this thread who was defending the MRNA vaccines went back and deleted all his comments: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jJZKgI0O/x/c/4JAfmgAsLiC?d=50
Here you are saying that people asking for treatments of mRNA poisoning are "posting crap": https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jcY73iE7/x/c/4JBvq3mzUtn
Here you are defending the vaccines again.
(Link to the comment https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jvuDxGTu/x/c/4JByL4STNgI)
I'll post this for now and when I find your comments about the vaccine not being bad or "safe" for old people, I'll edit the comment and add it later. Interestingly enough, a lot of the "pro vaccine" comments from various users have been deleted now that I'm going back through the comment threads and noticing a lot of the people I replied to deleted their posts. Funny that.
EDIT: Here we go, here's one of the comments...
(Link to the comment: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jwCxUgQ5/x/c/4JDE5K0Wvu3)
And another....
(Link to the comment: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jwCxUgQ5/x/c/4JDE5K0WfBf)
And another...
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jwQwwHUS/x/c/4JDEhxVO0JE
Well AOV certainly lives up to my expectation as someone willfully ignorant but love to pretend that he's well-informed by pulling that appeal to authority fallacy. Amused that he came here just to gaslight you like a typical left-wing zealot.
Yep, you nailed it.
There's no mention of 'blog post' there.
Hah. So you lied when you claimed that I "encouraged" everyone to get the vaccine. Figures for someone who does get his views from blog posts he views online.
OK, so you lied about that as well. Or maybe I'll be charitable and say that you just misremembered. For all your faults, you do sound like a somewhat sincere (if fanatical) fellow.
Yes, some people are right-wing loons. And yes, people who claim that old people died because of the vaccine are insane. This wasn't "pointing out the dangers of the vaccine", which your own post shows that it's not about.
And you're foremost among them. Your lunacy is demonstrated by the fact that you think the vaccine is a net negative for even older people, even ages that have a double-digit death rate from the coronavirus.
And it still is.
You don't need to. I only ask you to provide evidence when it's something that I never said (and do note that you failed to demonstrate any of your claims which you misremembered).
But that was not your claim to begin with, and while I never called anything 'safe' as I think that's stupid, the benefits definitely outweigh the costs for old people.
This is plain common sense, but you lack not just common sense, but any sense whatsoever. Like I said: anti-vaccine loons gonna loon.
Still unanswered by you, despite your ravings.
Not in that particular comment, in that comment you called the medical research...
Not sure how medical research on one of the most respected medical journals is considered a "no-name website".
Link to my comment where I said "everyone".
That literally happened...
It is, since there is no peer reviewed data showing it is a net positive in any capacity.
Where's the longitudinal phase III data that shows that?
So you're trying to move the goalposts?
Not sure why that would be 'one of the most respected medical journals', but I do know that you posted three links.
It is understood. By posting an unqualified claim of "encouragement", you did say everyone. https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16ZXaFpyZn/x/c/4ToiCotUKhz
You would have looked like even more of a clown if you had said, breathlessly, HE SAID 90-YEAR-OLDS SHOULD TAKE THE VACCINE.
Even you understood this. So you spun mightily.
"COVID GENOCIDE MURDER"
You'll believe literally anything based on an internet video or blog post. Quite amusing. And that calls itself an independent thinker.
If you are proudly stupid, then be honest next time, and cry that "Antonio said that NINETY YEAR OLDS should take the vaccine. THIS IS MURDER AND GENOCIDE!"