Don't use the term Pureblood, it offends people.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
Most people I knew who did take the vaccine didn't do it because authorities trying to push them.
What do you call a three year wall of non-stop propaganda coupled with government mandates and edicts if not "the authorities trying to push you to do something"?
I expect a little reading comprehension when you come out that aggressively.
I said this was not the reason why most people took the vaccine.
Dear god you really do have a room temperature IQ don't you?
Why did they take it then? Let me hazard a guess. It was because they thought it was the right thing to do. They thought it would help them and/or their community in terms of health outcomes. Now why did they think that? Because of the aforementioned wall of propaganda.
Mine is in Fahrenheit, yours in Celsius - which is why you are a Stormfag.
Do keep up, we were talking of 'coercion'. Propaganda, whatever, is not 'coercion'.
But what you are saying doesn't make any sense.
Vaccine propaganda intensified a year before covid pandemic happened, same propaganda that has been around for a very long time.
If anyone took vaccine without knowing that people sometimes do actually die from them and get completely rekt by them and they could very well be next in ''extremely rare occurrence'' then yes most people took vaccine because authorities were pushing them.
Its just you actually don't realize the scope of the push, brainwashed into thinking its their own informed choice, when they actually have 0 information on it.
Those people, you mean. Even in those cases, I doubt your claim. I don't know anyone who thought that there are literally zero risks to taking a vaccine. It's just a question of the cost-benefit.
Here in Europe, there's different attitudes. There in America it seems that you have two camps, one that says everyone should get a vaccine, from babies to 95-year-olds, and as often as possible. And people who say that the vaccines are pure evil because Fauci liked them. Here, there's more rationality. The consensus position is something like: people who are gravely at risk might benefit from more vaccines, but not the general population.
You could say that some people took the vaccine with insufficient information. But my only point was that for most, it was a consideration (whether you agree or not) of what is good for their health.
Your immediate acquaintances don't sound very smart.
That, or like most people, you are incapable of articulating the rationale of those who disagree with you.
One might even say that they sound vaccinated.
On the contrary, you would not be smart if you take health decisions based on government force. On the other hand, if you consider that you are 70 and are at risk of the virus, and take the vaccine for your health, that makes more sense.
That doesn't make sense at all considering how Trump at first recommended Hydrochloroquine with iron supplements and then Ivermectin. There were ample chances to make your own choice to take those but they all listened to MSM and ignored the actually safe vaccine. Don't try to act like you have the correct rationale, you just willfully ignore the full story of the vaccine debate.
You think the elderly should have taken hydroxochloroquine rather than the vaccine?