Perhaps your focus on attaining an amnesty made you miss the fact that I called her a clotblooded murderer scum only after she started behaving like an uppity worm instead of properly apologizing. The fact you try to weasel the word 'vaccine' (it's not) into this entire argument does make it look like you're a clotshot pusher.
Now, I will ask again; are you a clotshot-pusher? A yes or no answer will suffice.
I asked for a yes or a no answer. You could have answered 'no', and that would have been the end of that. Instead, your pathetic grousing only marks you guilty, Especially so when you continue to pretend to act that Pfizer, J&J et al's mRNA product is a vaccine, when it's not.
Having gotten everything right, I don't need any.
So this must be how trannies believe their own delusions. You were clearly wrong, given your past posts, yet you refuse to acknowledge that. At least porky there did that - until she tried to police speech online.
So... you embarrassed yourself totally because she
Maybe it's not clear to you, but I don't care about the opinion of a clotshot pusher.
Not a vaccine! I'm sure you have some blog posts you believe blindly that told you that.
What a practiced line from a corporate shill, when evidence exists to prove that their so-called vaccines don't even provide the correct threshold of immunization necessary to be called a vaccine. If you are truly remorseful, then go read up on the concept of leaky vaccines.
Sorry, I don't speak retard. Define your terms.
And I don't negotiate with criminal scum. Enjoy your myocarditis.
I asked for a yes or a no answer. You could have answered 'no',
No, a meaningless question does not have an answer. Try not speaking Retard next time, and you may receive an answer.
Instead, your pathetic grousing only marks you guilty
Oh dear, the genius who calls his fellow anti-vaxxers "murderers" thinks that I am GUILTY! Of what, one asks? Some more terms you cannot even define?
Especially so when you continue to pretend to act that Pfizer, J&J et al's mRNA product is a vaccine
Still waiting for you to DEFINITIVELY PROVE your claim by posting a link to some blog post, but you may not even have that.
You were clearly wrong
Then it would be easy for you to show what I was "clearly wrong" about. Be specific. No comments that ironically make you sound like you just had a stroke.
At least porky there did that - until she tried to police speech online.
More insults for your fellow anti-vaxxer. Not the brightest bunch.
Maybe it's not clear to you, but I don't care about the opinion of a clotshot pusher.
You meant to say that you don't care about reality.
when evidence exists to prove that their so-called vaccines don't even provide the correct threshold of immunization necessary to be called a vaccine.
EVIDENCE EXISTS
If you are truly remorseful, then go read up on the concept of leaky vaccines.
Ah, so you're parroting Dr. Robert Malone.
And I don't negotiate with criminal scum.
I don't think you have the skills to negotiate anyone. Making a total fool of yourself is more your thing.
No, a meaningless question does not have an answer. Try not speaking Retard next time, and you may receive an answer.
You've answered my question quite well with your pitiful nitpicking, clotshot pusher.
Oh dear, the genius who calls his fellow anti-vaxxers "murderers" thinks that I am GUILTY! Of what, one asks? Some more terms you cannot even define?
Maybe the spike proteins in your brain are disrupting your short-term memories? I asked you whether you were a clotshot pusher or not, and here you are - simply answering my question in a rather amusing manner.
Still waiting for you to DEFINITIVELY PROVE your claim by posting a link to some blog post, but you may not even have that.
See how you termed that? You're expecting me to post links to "some blog post" as evidence when what I have are scientific resources, investigation results and national statistics proving that the mRNA chems don't even provide immunity and spread protection.
I don't need to post links to some blog post. And besides, your kind just change dictionary definitions for it, then pretend otherwise.
Then it would be easy for you to show what I was "clearly wrong" about. Be specific. No comments that ironically make you sound like you just had a stroke.
'Comments that ironically make you sound like you just had a stroke' is what happens when you pluck word sequences and ignore my full argument. What a pathetic cope.
You meant to say that you don't care about reality.
That would be you. The fact you're reduced to pushing your own vices on others is further proof that you're just a pathetic corporate shill.
EVIDENCE EXISTS
Thank you for acknowledging the fact that the SARS-COV2 virus continues to spread even in the so-called "vaccinated".
Ah, so you're parroting Dr. Robert Malone.
Ah, this terror as you speak a "heretical" Bad Man's name... Oh I'm sorry, perhaps the concept of leaky vaccines are forbidden knowledge to your kind. In that case, try to read about the marek virus and its evolution.
I don't think you have the skills to negotiate anyone. Making a total fool of yourself is more your thing.
You don't think. Of course. Your kind simply gobble up whatever trash so-called 'experts' claim, and then pretend to be better than everyone else.
Perhaps your focus on attaining an amnesty made you miss the fact that I called her a clotblooded murderer scum only after she started behaving like an uppity worm instead of properly apologizing. The fact you try to weasel the word 'vaccine' (it's not) into this entire argument does make it look like you're a clotshot pusher.
Now, I will ask again; are you a clotshot-pusher? A yes or no answer will suffice.
Having gotten everything right, I don't need any. You, on the other hand...
So... you embarrassed yourself totally because she... told you not to embarrass yourself instead of apologizing for nothing?
Not a vaccine! I'm sure you have some blog posts you believe blindly that told you that.
Sorry, I don't speak retard. Define your terms.
I asked for a yes or a no answer. You could have answered 'no', and that would have been the end of that. Instead, your pathetic grousing only marks you guilty, Especially so when you continue to pretend to act that Pfizer, J&J et al's mRNA product is a vaccine, when it's not.
So this must be how trannies believe their own delusions. You were clearly wrong, given your past posts, yet you refuse to acknowledge that. At least porky there did that - until she tried to police speech online.
Maybe it's not clear to you, but I don't care about the opinion of a clotshot pusher.
What a practiced line from a corporate shill, when evidence exists to prove that their so-called vaccines don't even provide the correct threshold of immunization necessary to be called a vaccine. If you are truly remorseful, then go read up on the concept of leaky vaccines.
And I don't negotiate with criminal scum. Enjoy your myocarditis.
No, a meaningless question does not have an answer. Try not speaking Retard next time, and you may receive an answer.
Oh dear, the genius who calls his fellow anti-vaxxers "murderers" thinks that I am GUILTY! Of what, one asks? Some more terms you cannot even define?
Still waiting for you to DEFINITIVELY PROVE your claim by posting a link to some blog post, but you may not even have that.
Then it would be easy for you to show what I was "clearly wrong" about. Be specific. No comments that ironically make you sound like you just had a stroke.
More insults for your fellow anti-vaxxer. Not the brightest bunch.
You meant to say that you don't care about reality.
EVIDENCE EXISTS
Ah, so you're parroting Dr. Robert Malone.
I don't think you have the skills to negotiate anyone. Making a total fool of yourself is more your thing.
You've answered my question quite well with your pitiful nitpicking, clotshot pusher.
Maybe the spike proteins in your brain are disrupting your short-term memories? I asked you whether you were a clotshot pusher or not, and here you are - simply answering my question in a rather amusing manner.
See how you termed that? You're expecting me to post links to "some blog post" as evidence when what I have are scientific resources, investigation results and national statistics proving that the mRNA chems don't even provide immunity and spread protection.
I don't need to post links to some blog post. And besides, your kind just change dictionary definitions for it, then pretend otherwise.
'Comments that ironically make you sound like you just had a stroke' is what happens when you pluck word sequences and ignore my full argument. What a pathetic cope.
That would be you. The fact you're reduced to pushing your own vices on others is further proof that you're just a pathetic corporate shill.
Thank you for acknowledging the fact that the SARS-COV2 virus continues to spread even in the so-called "vaccinated".
Ah, this terror as you speak a "heretical" Bad Man's name... Oh I'm sorry, perhaps the concept of leaky vaccines are forbidden knowledge to your kind. In that case, try to read about the marek virus and its evolution.
You don't think. Of course. Your kind simply gobble up whatever trash so-called 'experts' claim, and then pretend to be better than everyone else.