On principle, I have never blocked or reported anyone until now. It is not in my nature.
But Imp’s act has really degraded since 10/7. Every other word out of his keyboard is “stormfag”. He’s gone from local misogynist rascal to obnoxious forum slider, replying to every comment in some threads just to amplify his visibility (despite the consistent down votes).
Now, whenever I see a post with more then ten comments, I know it’s just Imp sperging out. This deflating experience is probably his actual goal.
Anyways, I’m blocking the retard for now. Gonna see how my forum experience goes without the shit-flinging monkey.
Block only blocks submissions from appearing in the feed, sadly. You'll still see the sperg-outs in other threads.
I can't figure it out but sometimes I still see his comments and other times it hides not only his but ever other comment in the reply thread.
Some time ago the admins did a pole on c/meta and asked if people wanted Block to hide only the blocked user's comment, or every reply to that comment too, and people voted to hide every reply. But to this day I still don't know if it actually works as intended.
Somebody said it works if you come in through the scored site instead of the .win community, don't know if it's true, since I always just use the quick auto fill from win
Maybe, but unless something has changed I stopped using the scored site because I was having a lot of problems with images not loading right.
Publicly announcing who you're blocking is low-T behavior.
Probably.
Anyways.
For the record, admitting to probable low-T behavior is at least mid-T behavior, though.
If enough people here block him maybe he'll fuck off.
Whatever would I do without my daily dose of schizo?!
I dunno, he's kind of like Chris-Chan. Sure he was funny at first, now it's just sad.
We haven't reached the sad stage yet though. That happens when he has a relationship with his mother and I don't know if he likes her since she is also a woman.
He does like her. He's said it multiple times.
Jews always love their Mums. Judaism is the matriarchy behind the downfall of the west
Hmm, I haven't ever considered that. Does that mean Imp was right after all, haha?
I truly believe Imp1 is jewish and is trying to co-opt the MGTOW movement to be anti-white nationalism. It's the only thing that makes sense at this point tbh.
It's the only thing that makes sense given how he spergs out at any question of the juice. Even Rino Neocons don't simp this hard for Israel.
The only woman exempt from his seething vitriol is his mother.
Jew Trait
He gets points to spend in the JIDF Gift Shop. He has his eyes set on a multi-prong dildo/menorah for a Mother's Day gift.
Possibly, although a lot of people just seem really touchy in general, and start freaking out. I doubt all of them Jews. I think Imp honestly believes his rhetoric, though. He might also be a Jew, I don't know, but I'm not sure he's actively trying to coopt anything. He's spreading his message and, yes, he'd like to destroy any "stormcuck" or adjacent organizations, but I think he's a true believer, and the destruction of the stormcucks would just be an added benefit. Destruction of whamen seems to be his genuine primary goal.
His obsession with Nazis is unprecedented though. If Nazis are huge feminists as he suggests then what isn't? That's what I'd like to know. It seems like in Imps's eyes everyone is either a feminist or a tradcuck. Is it possible to be neither and if so, how? Has anyone ever not been tradcucked or feminist, lol...
The thing is, as I discussed in another comment here, Imp's view is very narrow. If you're not explicitly and exclusively an enemy of Women, you're a feminist. In that context it almost makes sense. Everything not hatred of women is a distraction, so if you buy into anything other than pure woman hate, you're carrying water for women.
If you hate women and any other group, you've been tricked, and actually are supporting women by distracting the issue (ironic, coming from Imp.) If you defend men, but also, say, whites, you're 'buying into feminist psyops' or whatever, and are thus an ally of women again.
This is what I'm trying to figure out. Is anyone besides Imp not a feminist or tradcuck?
I once suggested men should enslave women and Imp thinks that's tradcuck. He thinks we ought to have nothing to do with women but he's okay with my taxes going toward supporting women. Makes no sense.
Depends on context. He's a big fan of Milei cracking down on government, wants it to be cut, because he recognizes women get more benefits from taxes.
But, yeah, that's part of the weirdness. He's not even consistent. He basically just wants all women dead, and will say as much. Interacting with women - even enslaving them - would be feminist. Somehow women having no rights is still feminist, because they'd still get to live.
He hates women being educated...but he also hates them not being educated, and thinks it's leeching. He hates women not working, and views it as men slaving away for women...but he also hates women working, and views it as women taking jobs from men. Woman doesn't work? Lazy. Woman works? Victimizing men.
Seriously, it seems like his only solution is, er, a final solution. Everything else is feminist simpery.
He's not even consistent on that. I suggested killing all women and he said that's immoral.
And no, I believe Imp has suggested before that women should do all the work while men do nothing.
There is a total lack of consistency. I don't think he knows what he wants except hating women.
Yup. I never claimed he was consistent. I would never do such a silly thing.
That's the funny/absurd/frustrating part. Even when I mock him, I can't help but think that some of what I'm saying to be mocking is still true. Imp just takes the whole thing too far, and decides its the result of an intentional female-led conspiracy to murder men.
To quote myself mocking Imp, as an example:
Like, that's not (entirely) false. If women aren't working, but are surviving or thriving, someone else is obviously providing for them. That could be the government (largely/net funded by men), or that could be a man. Very rarely it's another woman. And women in the work place do seem to subtract more than they add, you could absolutely argue that's victimizing men.
Again, the issue is where Imp takes it, not what he says. There are plenty of issues with modern women, and modern sexual dynamics. There's totally stuff to call out there. But I don't think all (or even most of, or even a significant portion of) women want to kill all/most men.
Women are flawed, and there's plenty to criticize. But no matter how hard I try, I can't formulate a sensible scenario where Big Whamen is out to genocide all the men. Even if you can imagine that, it falls apart if you give any intelligence to women, since by the argument itself they're seemingly reliant on men. I guess Women would have to be both a murder/suicide cult, if you try to make the Imp scenario work. And it still doesn't, since he views women as extremely calculating, self-serving, and with a strong in-group preference. Which, again, isn't necessarily even wrong.
Basically, Imp is his own worst enemy, which I've said time and time again. He starts with semi-sensible stuff, but always go off the rails to some absurd conclusion that no sane or logical person could agree with.
It's kind of sad; he's got some amount of wisdom to share, but masks it almost completely behind a fairly extreme level of utter lunacy and paranoia.
This is perhaps the best description of impism I have read. Personally, I root for the guy; it's funny watching him lay out this intricate yet uncomplicated world view, in-which women are the root of all evil and everything else works itself out from there. I also find it kind of cathartic to see someone raving about women the way so many feminists do about men.
And his perpetual war with anyone who talks about jews the way he talks about women is hilarious. If he stopped posting, I think I'd miss him. One of the little jokes I say to myself every so often, when I see some egregious feminist shit, is 'Imp was right'.
This thread is great lol
Good luck. I tried that years ago and it turns out that it doesn't actually block him, it just prevents you from getting response notifications because this site is held together with duct tape and paperclips.
That's enough for me
Just give it another few days and he’ll be banned for another month.
The sooner the better.
Disagree completely. We need better tools to manage what we see, not bans on opinions.
The complete reliance people have on others controlling their experiences has been nothing but a cancer.
And if anyone needs an example of this in the worst extreme, look no further than online gaming now compared to 10+ years ago, primarily the gaming that was on PC at that. Look at how what was once dominated with private servers where every group could have their own corner has now been eradicated into an unironically toxic shithole of mixed groups.
Many here would say they hate those that are SocJus inclined, but the issue would be mitigated if they simply stayed in their little corners, and other groups in there. Let skinheads and feminists have their own servers, but don't pretend like they're going to get along via public servers. This is the issue. And then instead of self-moderation (eg, you the end user curating your own life choices including where you spend your time), people are expected to rely on some central authority, namely the developers/publishers, and then wonder why it all ends up so shit.
This isn't limited to the online either. People need to stop looking to rely on others to tell them how to conduct their lives. To stop looking for people to be banned, excluded or punished simply because it doesn't align with them. Whether it's something as relatively small as gaming to something as major as relying on ever growing government, society at large needs to become a lot more independent about how they conduct themselves.
Imp has her little hugbox over in c/feminism and I've never seen anyone here demanding ot to be banned. Problem is, she insists on proselytizing here. Constantly. It's obnoxious and incredibly dumb.
You can also see it in the content-management features of apps like Discord and Slack, which limit what messages the user can block or hide in favor of Reports to a central authority. Slack doesn't even let you block a user. It's all very intentional.
"The system" we're using is inherently against that. We all know this site is held together by duct tape and dreams, but I sometimes wonder if it's not all by design. "Free" message boards and social media aren't here to give us a platform out of the goodness of their heart. They're here for some underlying purpose - aggregating discussions for political propaganda or semantic analysis. Designing an ideal system* that gives each user ultimate control over what they see would limit the "intersecting flow" where the most interesting opinions are tossed out, argued, and potentially can be astroturfed. In other words, while they want to maintain the image of topic-focused boards, they (whoever is funding this) still need a way to inject messaging and measure the collective response.
(*designing such a system is also difficult, but the above reasons explain why nobody prioritizes it)
The janny always doubles the length of any subsequent bans and his last one was already like 95 days, so we'll get a nice half year without the retarded spergout in EVERY. GODDAMN. THREAD. soon. I can't wait.
He's not in a good place, that's for sure. He's so deep in his world view at this point that I don't think he can dig himself out of whatever hole he's in.
He's literally paranoid. He thinks he's the only one who can see women for who they truly are and that everyone else is a complicit actor trying to achieve global feminist domination.
I don't for a second believe he's at all sincere in anything he ever posts here. Framing everything through a global feminist conspiracy always came off as a transparent diversionary tactic, which has only grown in intensity as open criticism of israel and jews has become normalized.
Nail meet Hammer. Spot on. When noticers start noticing the noticed have to point to something else. I am both Penn & Teller however.
He has other hobbies to fulfill him!
He plays Fortnite and as such simps for Epic as his little sub-crusade.
I will say that he seems to genuinely enjoy Forza.
While I only agree with 99.7%* of what the handsome roguish devil imp1 says I will defend to the death his right to say it.
But it's Friday and I'm kinda tired and hungry. And there is those CFB championship games coming up.
I'll see how this plays out in 2024.
*/s
Feminist traitor!
Excellent post lol
Normally I'm content to just downvote retarded comments but the Imp is different because he's very adept at derailing conversations. I think that this subforum would be better off if he were gone permanently, but I'm not a janny so it's not my place to make that call.
Him and Antonio's 20 paragraph argument chains attacking/defending women in a "it's da joooos" thread
I think at this point the proper response is an eye roll. Think if you saw someone raving in the McDonald's parking lot, you'd just ignore and drive away.
The problem is that in this scenario imp is that person coming into the mcdonald's and throwing the trash cans around at the customers and shouting about the evils of electricity.
The dude unironically needs to embrace something akin to 'intersectionality'
Yes feminists are a problem, and women who have embraced modernism too.
But they are not the only problem. Other forces have manipulated them, and been manipulated by them, into creating an enormous and terrible system. Sometimes it is them, other times it involves them. But he sees any women within 5 miles of a problem and it's all blamed on women. He misses the forest for the tree he is tilting at.
He is the polar opposite of an intersectionalist. Even if you believe in his pet project, if you also think groups in addition to men are being oppressed or victimized, and/or groups in addition to women are oppressing or victimizing, you're an out and out enemy, and actually on the side of the female conspiracy.
It's honestly kind of infuriating. He either refuses to acknowledge it, or actually believes, but he claims there's no push against white people, and women or girl are never victimized. One of the grossest things he's ever done is cheer on very young girls getting surgically mutilated by the trans cult. He also believes Rotherham was a hoax, and all the girls were whores.
He's fully on board the pro-trans side too, as he sees it as a way for men to victimize women, and women to victimize themselves. He also viscerally hates anyone who is pro-white, even if they're not anti-anything else.
But, yeah, he won't align with anyone unless they only subscribe to exactly his agenda, and nothing else.
Is he actually an AI attack designed to forum slide/fracture a community by repeating retarded nonsense?
No, he's too consistent and spergy. He also predates the AI boom. Dude's just a true believer.
If he were a true believer, he'd put his ideology above his blood.
You didn't need to publicly announce this.
I mean, I would like to know what he actually wants. The most tangible stuff I got from him was he thinking women should be kept isolated while doing menial work.
And to be fair, the site is more inteligible when he's not around, he's been around for a couple of weeks and this place already devolved into pro-joo/anti-joo shit-slinging
Human extinction to own the wahmens.
Haha tradcuck, no kids or wife for me! More time and money to spend on my funkopops. All women are evil.
That's honestly a more directed argument than a lot of Imp's. He doesn't propose any alternative, not even funkopops.
His end goal is simply destroying or avoiding women. He doesn't hate tradcucks, wives, or kids for any reason other than that it involves women. That's it.
Well, that and he hates "tradcucks" in principle because he views them as traitors, so anything they want is automatically bad too.
His end goal is to desperately try and divert the topic of discussion away from jews, and to a lesser extent faggots and niggers.
I don't think so, as that's kind of newer, at least as a full on obsession. Yeah, he hates anything pro-white, he hates anything anti-Jew, and he's pro-trans, but I really do think his prime passion is the hatred of women. Everything else is secondary.
It's not even worth mocking. It's simply tragic.
Except Israel. Israel deserves to survive despite having women.
It's because the j question is being openly debated here and a few pro j people will constantly go on the attack. Reminds me of Supreme jester or whatever that dudes name was from awhile back.
RealDrJester, the only user I ever blocked.
Ahh ya that guy. I think he was actually Jewish too lol
What ever happened to that annoying fuck, anyway? Was he banned, or did he just finally get fed up and self-exile?
He basically got laughed out of the room. Then came back on a sockpuppet, "MaverickBoobies" IIRC, bit his specific brand of autism was so obvious and unique that he got identified fast, too. He might still be around on another sock and watching himself better now, I'm not 100% sure.
According to another user, he's probably still here with another account, one of the jidfs has the same style of argument and insults
I don't think you can blame Imp for the Islamophiles coming out of the woodwork after the October 7 attack.
I knew I was Avant -Garde. ( I blocked him last week - I don't tolerate Jews or worse, Sayanim)
I'm all for people blocking if they want. Personally I find the antics of the mentally and emotionally damaged interesting.
And banning just turns into a game of sock puppet wack-a-mole.
I usually block until I'm not mad, and then unblock so I can see the dumb shit.
He left it seemed then came back. It's pretty crazy how diligent he is posting the same stuff for so long. He's definitely all in on the woman bad stuff. I won't block him, I'll just continue to ignore it lol.
He didn't leave, he was banned for 90 days.
We talk often here about the necessity of gatekeeping. We didn’t gatekeep our hobbies, and now they are overrun.
How many times must a person demonstrate their commitment to bad faith?
I didn't think he was bad faith, just a retard.
This recent return though has either seen his mind finally snap into madness or actually stop trying to be a reasonable person. Its much worse than it was before.
Yup, it's bizarre. I hate to go there, but I think the others are right, and this is probably "October 7th" related.
But yeah, he used to be crazy, but sometimes make good points, and be entertaining. Now he's just often unpleasant, lashing out at everyone, and whining about the "tradcucks" and the "stormfags" nonstop, sometimes more than he whines about women.
His previous arguments against stormfags and traddies often at least made sense to his worldview. They were either too pro-women or were distractions away from women. And no matter what, it always came back to women.
This current madness has nothing to do with women, like a switch was flipped that made him have to bring the same level of funk to a pro-Jew position without women involved whatsoever.
There are many forms of gatekeeping.
If rules are being consistently broken, ban him.
If not, and he's just being annoying and derailing threads with nonsense, dogpile him.
Eh I'm not in favor of banning because the janny nanny culture is annoying af. I prefer that everyone just gets used to the dumbassery and won't fall into the same mgtow trap he fell into.
Sounds like you've had enough, so block away.
Oh why? He seems to get banned routinely... odd dude
Rule 16 gets enforced rather inconsistently.
Imagine enforcing speech rules on some obscure chat room like this lol.
Cringe, right?
Think of the optics, nyaaaga
FOR FREEEEEEEEEEEE!
I simply ignore his posts and tell him to fuck off if he responds to me and it works.
Good news, OP, now you don't have to.
don't care + didn't ask + L + ratio
An individual person blocking him is just fine; I can easily imagine simply getting fed up with his ad nauseam (((spiels))).
Conversely it's important for those of us who can stand to remain bemusedly within earshot to act out the principle of free speech by pointing and laughing at his hypocrisy, so blatant that it nearly beggars belief, but not trying to silence him because of our collective faith in a level of herd intelligence sufficient to see right through such a pitiful excuse for a special pleading fallacy.
True maybe he got replaced.
It's quite interesting though. While I share the general negative attitude towards women as a whole, what with the inane shenanigans of their kind, the sheer seething hatred Imp has towards women, coupled with his reverence for Bidens Chosen, more or less has to be a clear indicator of his status as a perpetually unfuckable, basement-dwelling untermenschen.
coward
Wait... what? Imp is still around? I had him blocked years ago. I thought he entire community collectively blocked him. What the fuck were you thinking, waiting this long?
The mental gymnastics gizornik went through to avoid saying nazi the last time I said just call us nazi or national socialist if that's what he thinks of us 🤣, I think socialist is his new catch all for the noticers
Which is extremely lazy.
Have any questions about the Jews whatsoever? You must be a lefty socialist!