On principle, I have never blocked or reported anyone until now. It is not in my nature.
But Imp’s act has really degraded since 10/7. Every other word out of his keyboard is “stormfag”. He’s gone from local misogynist rascal to obnoxious forum slider, replying to every comment in some threads just to amplify his visibility (despite the consistent down votes).
Now, whenever I see a post with more then ten comments, I know it’s just Imp sperging out. This deflating experience is probably his actual goal.
Anyways, I’m blocking the retard for now. Gonna see how my forum experience goes without the shit-flinging monkey.
His obsession with Nazis is unprecedented though. If Nazis are huge feminists as he suggests then what isn't? That's what I'd like to know. It seems like in Imps's eyes everyone is either a feminist or a tradcuck. Is it possible to be neither and if so, how? Has anyone ever not been tradcucked or feminist, lol...
The thing is, as I discussed in another comment here, Imp's view is very narrow. If you're not explicitly and exclusively an enemy of Women, you're a feminist. In that context it almost makes sense. Everything not hatred of women is a distraction, so if you buy into anything other than pure woman hate, you're carrying water for women.
If you hate women and any other group, you've been tricked, and actually are supporting women by distracting the issue (ironic, coming from Imp.) If you defend men, but also, say, whites, you're 'buying into feminist psyops' or whatever, and are thus an ally of women again.
This is what I'm trying to figure out. Is anyone besides Imp not a feminist or tradcuck?
I once suggested men should enslave women and Imp thinks that's tradcuck. He thinks we ought to have nothing to do with women but he's okay with my taxes going toward supporting women. Makes no sense.
Depends on context. He's a big fan of Milei cracking down on government, wants it to be cut, because he recognizes women get more benefits from taxes.
But, yeah, that's part of the weirdness. He's not even consistent. He basically just wants all women dead, and will say as much. Interacting with women - even enslaving them - would be feminist. Somehow women having no rights is still feminist, because they'd still get to live.
He hates women being educated...but he also hates them not being educated, and thinks it's leeching. He hates women not working, and views it as men slaving away for women...but he also hates women working, and views it as women taking jobs from men. Woman doesn't work? Lazy. Woman works? Victimizing men.
Seriously, it seems like his only solution is, er, a final solution. Everything else is feminist simpery.
He's not even consistent on that. I suggested killing all women and he said that's immoral.
And no, I believe Imp has suggested before that women should do all the work while men do nothing.
There is a total lack of consistency. I don't think he knows what he wants except hating women.
This is perhaps the best description of impism I have read. Personally, I root for the guy; it's funny watching him lay out this intricate yet uncomplicated world view, in-which women are the root of all evil and everything else works itself out from there. I also find it kind of cathartic to see someone raving about women the way so many feminists do about men.
And his perpetual war with anyone who talks about jews the way he talks about women is hilarious. If he stopped posting, I think I'd miss him. One of the little jokes I say to myself every so often, when I see some egregious feminist shit, is 'Imp was right'.
This thread is great lol