On principle, I have never blocked or reported anyone until now. It is not in my nature.
But Imp’s act has really degraded since 10/7. Every other word out of his keyboard is “stormfag”. He’s gone from local misogynist rascal to obnoxious forum slider, replying to every comment in some threads just to amplify his visibility (despite the consistent down votes).
Now, whenever I see a post with more then ten comments, I know it’s just Imp sperging out. This deflating experience is probably his actual goal.
Anyways, I’m blocking the retard for now. Gonna see how my forum experience goes without the shit-flinging monkey.
That's the funny/absurd/frustrating part. Even when I mock him, I can't help but think that some of what I'm saying to be mocking is still true. Imp just takes the whole thing too far, and decides its the result of an intentional female-led conspiracy to murder men.
To quote myself mocking Imp, as an example:
Like, that's not (entirely) false. If women aren't working, but are surviving or thriving, someone else is obviously providing for them. That could be the government (largely/net funded by men), or that could be a man. Very rarely it's another woman. And women in the work place do seem to subtract more than they add, you could absolutely argue that's victimizing men.
Again, the issue is where Imp takes it, not what he says. There are plenty of issues with modern women, and modern sexual dynamics. There's totally stuff to call out there. But I don't think all (or even most of, or even a significant portion of) women want to kill all/most men.
Women are flawed, and there's plenty to criticize. But no matter how hard I try, I can't formulate a sensible scenario where Big Whamen is out to genocide all the men. Even if you can imagine that, it falls apart if you give any intelligence to women, since by the argument itself they're seemingly reliant on men. I guess Women would have to be both a murder/suicide cult, if you try to make the Imp scenario work. And it still doesn't, since he views women as extremely calculating, self-serving, and with a strong in-group preference. Which, again, isn't necessarily even wrong.
Basically, Imp is his own worst enemy, which I've said time and time again. He starts with semi-sensible stuff, but always go off the rails to some absurd conclusion that no sane or logical person could agree with.
It's kind of sad; he's got some amount of wisdom to share, but masks it almost completely behind a fairly extreme level of utter lunacy and paranoia.