On principle, I have never blocked or reported anyone until now. It is not in my nature.
But Imp’s act has really degraded since 10/7. Every other word out of his keyboard is “stormfag”. He’s gone from local misogynist rascal to obnoxious forum slider, replying to every comment in some threads just to amplify his visibility (despite the consistent down votes).
Now, whenever I see a post with more then ten comments, I know it’s just Imp sperging out. This deflating experience is probably his actual goal.
Anyways, I’m blocking the retard for now. Gonna see how my forum experience goes without the shit-flinging monkey.
The thing is, as I discussed in another comment here, Imp's view is very narrow. If you're not explicitly and exclusively an enemy of Women, you're a feminist. In that context it almost makes sense. Everything not hatred of women is a distraction, so if you buy into anything other than pure woman hate, you're carrying water for women.
If you hate women and any other group, you've been tricked, and actually are supporting women by distracting the issue (ironic, coming from Imp.) If you defend men, but also, say, whites, you're 'buying into feminist psyops' or whatever, and are thus an ally of women again.
This is what I'm trying to figure out. Is anyone besides Imp not a feminist or tradcuck?
I once suggested men should enslave women and Imp thinks that's tradcuck. He thinks we ought to have nothing to do with women but he's okay with my taxes going toward supporting women. Makes no sense.
Depends on context. He's a big fan of Milei cracking down on government, wants it to be cut, because he recognizes women get more benefits from taxes.
But, yeah, that's part of the weirdness. He's not even consistent. He basically just wants all women dead, and will say as much. Interacting with women - even enslaving them - would be feminist. Somehow women having no rights is still feminist, because they'd still get to live.
He hates women being educated...but he also hates them not being educated, and thinks it's leeching. He hates women not working, and views it as men slaving away for women...but he also hates women working, and views it as women taking jobs from men. Woman doesn't work? Lazy. Woman works? Victimizing men.
Seriously, it seems like his only solution is, er, a final solution. Everything else is feminist simpery.
He's not even consistent on that. I suggested killing all women and he said that's immoral.
And no, I believe Imp has suggested before that women should do all the work while men do nothing.
There is a total lack of consistency. I don't think he knows what he wants except hating women.
Yup. I never claimed he was consistent. I would never do such a silly thing.
That's the funny/absurd/frustrating part. Even when I mock him, I can't help but think that some of what I'm saying to be mocking is still true. Imp just takes the whole thing too far, and decides its the result of an intentional female-led conspiracy to murder men.
To quote myself mocking Imp, as an example:
Like, that's not (entirely) false. If women aren't working, but are surviving or thriving, someone else is obviously providing for them. That could be the government (largely/net funded by men), or that could be a man. Very rarely it's another woman. And women in the work place do seem to subtract more than they add, you could absolutely argue that's victimizing men.
Again, the issue is where Imp takes it, not what he says. There are plenty of issues with modern women, and modern sexual dynamics. There's totally stuff to call out there. But I don't think all (or even most of, or even a significant portion of) women want to kill all/most men.
Women are flawed, and there's plenty to criticize. But no matter how hard I try, I can't formulate a sensible scenario where Big Whamen is out to genocide all the men. Even if you can imagine that, it falls apart if you give any intelligence to women, since by the argument itself they're seemingly reliant on men. I guess Women would have to be both a murder/suicide cult, if you try to make the Imp scenario work. And it still doesn't, since he views women as extremely calculating, self-serving, and with a strong in-group preference. Which, again, isn't necessarily even wrong.
Basically, Imp is his own worst enemy, which I've said time and time again. He starts with semi-sensible stuff, but always go off the rails to some absurd conclusion that no sane or logical person could agree with.
It's kind of sad; he's got some amount of wisdom to share, but masks it almost completely behind a fairly extreme level of utter lunacy and paranoia.
This is perhaps the best description of impism I have read. Personally, I root for the guy; it's funny watching him lay out this intricate yet uncomplicated world view, in-which women are the root of all evil and everything else works itself out from there. I also find it kind of cathartic to see someone raving about women the way so many feminists do about men.
And his perpetual war with anyone who talks about jews the way he talks about women is hilarious. If he stopped posting, I think I'd miss him. One of the little jokes I say to myself every so often, when I see some egregious feminist shit, is 'Imp was right'.