Jim Sterling, 2022
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (120)
sorted by:
OK groomer
That's the jist of it.
Filthy fucking disney.
How is the SAR K2, anyway? I saw one at my FLGS recently.
Just like the D&D rainbow hair crowd decided depictions of orcs were actually "coded black" and therefore racist. Self-aware black folks should have paused a moment and said to them: "you see us like that?"
Most of those who did were on the conservative side of 'you ain't black.'
The D&D thing was even weirder when you consider that black people are literally already in the game
Blacks do speak out against this shit all of the time but they're always dismissed as "uncle toms" or "internalized racism". Literally non-blacks telling them to sit down and shut up. 🤣
"We were born this way!"
Sure, okay, so we're just going to stop you from promoting your degeneracy to kids. Since you're born this way, this will have absolutely zero impact on you.
"NOOOOO YOU'RE LITERALLY KILLING US!!"
Nah, the only people who are mad about this kinda shit are those who want to turn your kids into communist revolutionaries (well, that and the useful idiots who passively absorb what they're told). Use CRT to make the black kids hate the white kids and the white kids hate themselves. The white kids who don't get converted by CRT and told that "all their sins can be absolved" by turning into a fag/tranny.
Ummm, no one was associating groomers with the gays until the Alphabet Queers themselves started calling it the "don't say gay" bill.
Everyday I'm moving towards the idea that these people (racial-, sexual-, and faggotry-activists) are pushing for a race war by making their respective groups seem so insufferable that self-respecting normies start to feel they have no choice but to take action against them.
Gays were always associated with pedophilia. In the 70s and 80s the "Gay rights" groups all included NAMBLA and similar other groups. The people who are considered gay "civil rights" icons were all pedos, Harvey Milk, Richard Hays, John Money, etc.
Gays are less than 1% of the population but commit sexual abuse of children at a rate that's 30-40x higher than normal people. The stereotype is just a rational response to observable pattern of behavior
The 70s and 80s also saw a lot of "indoctrination" of younger men by older ones and was considered "the culture" until the 90s and 2000s called it for what it was, abuse.
This is where the gay term, Bears come from. It was referring to larger, older, gay men who had "younger" boyfriends... Much younger.
Yes and no.
Bears are hairy men.
When you live in Denver, you become versed.
Yes but you seem to have gotten to the bottom of the culture.
More like on top of it.
Call Me By Your Name came out (heh) in 2017. It's about an adult faggot fucking a teenager and it was highly celebrated by the faggot community.
This behavior never went away, they just stopped talking about it except when you're meant to celebrate it. When the wrong person talks about it (Milo Yiannowhatever), it's cancel time. When the right person talks about it, it's stunning and brave, bigot.
Oh yeah wasn't saying it ever went away. Just that they called it abuse and for those decades atleast they had to hide the degenerate behaviour of grooming.
Read up on one of the prominent faggot French piece of shit that led to Critical Theory, Michel Foucault.
The prick was so ass-blasted that society wouldn't condone him fucking boys that he came up with a philosophical recipe that led to the poison that is modern critical theory and queer theory.
It was so flagrant that even Cuckopedia still allows a short paragraph describing the fucker's degeneracy.
So 1/40?
13/50 (or whatever it is at) is based on percentages.
So, it would have to be 1/4000
Yes, 40x the rate is 4000%
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
13/50 is read as 13% (black population) do 50% (of the crime).
1/40 would then read as 1% (gay male population) do 40% (of the pederasty)
Don't think those numbers are right though, and this is the best source of numbers I could find. It puts (homo/bi)sexuals at ~16x the abuse rate (100x for teachers) and about a third of the acts. So that would be 2/33; two percent does thirty-three percent
1/4000 doesn't fit the pattern; one percent does four thousand percent?
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
No, 1/40 is correct. 1% does 40%. Like 13/50 is 13% does 50%.
I stand corrected. I just saw 40x and my sleep addled brain jumped right to 4000%. Which obviously makes no sense. They disproportionally commit at 40x the expected rate but are not responsible for 40x the number of offenses committed.
They had plausible deniability until that point. Major corporations and organizations coming out against the Florida law revealed for everyone the link that was merely a poorly kept secret.
this. only alphabet people are equating alphabet people with pedos. the law only prohibits teaching sex to children. any alphabet people who aren't pedos have nothing to worry about.
... and when that action is taken it will be used as justification for the tyranny to come. The victims will cry as they strike back at you.
That's not a problem if normal people have actually made up their minds. The Anti-Groomer bill is actually a great example of action.
I'll have drinks and snacks when you get here. BYOA.
Completely and utterly wrong, it's hilarious how misinformed you are.
Homosexuals have always been into grooming. They used to call it "mentoring." The fags would encourage teenagers to run away from home and would entice them with booze and drugs while teaching them about the gay lifestyle.
I still remember the old /r/atheism threads of fags who would do this openly. It was basically discord grooming before it was cool.
Jim is a tranny now?
And probably a groomer now
He used to be a groomer. He still is, but he used to be, too.
he would be, if it weren't for the fact no children would willingly get near that disgusting fat blob
So you think he'll detrans in the future? That's interesting, I have yet to see any public trans figure walk it back.
Has he cut it off yet? If not, whats he waiting for
41%?
He can't find it
Somehow better looking than his girlfriend/wife(?)
So is the average dog.
Who also has a Y chromosome.
So does he “fight” in the mens or womens division in his sub amateur wrestling promotion….. and are there eyewash stations available for people unaware of what they were about to see.
Yep. It's all kinds of fucked up. Some of his videos feature him dressing up like little school girls and shit.
Something went wrong in his brain. Don't know if he can come back from this.
You know, it would be easier to believe that you weren't a bunch of groomers if you stopped trying to nail yourself to the cross we set up for the perverts who are grooming children. It's like if Florida passed the same law and all the Muslims came out of the woodwork claiming it was Islamophobic.
This is their call to violence. They merely need to frame the situation as good people threatening them. The "words are violence" phenomena resulted in violent situations from antifa groups and because of the framing it was seen as self defense.
I’m so sick of this “not affirming or celebrating my lifestyle 24/7 is literal violence” mentality
Is he holding back his neck fat to take that picture in his profile?
The fact that LGBTQ+ members refuse to separate themselves from proved groomers tells us everything we need to know. Even if it's 0.1% of their group, they should be saying "This is not okay and we don't want them in our group". Until you act against them, we have no choice but to put you in their category.
Seems to me, people who identify as queer are either one of two things, straights desperately seeking attention or degenerate faggots who fully embrace that lifestyle for attention. This is because most LGBT people don't really want to be called a slur that's been used against them their entire lives, and, you know, just want to be left alone.
Considering the kinda people who are filthy degenerates that desperately seek attention are usually the ones promoting shit like pedophilia. I'm going to get some popcorn for this fight.
Disneys are going to find their magical kingdom was all just a fantasy land.
I had a discussion over the weekend with a couple of gay friends (who are completely disgusted with LGB-faggotry; won't even go to pride).
I told them I'm taking back the word "queer" to use as a slur, specifically against people who insist on shoving their faggotry into the public square and they're totally down.
I have a dream, where gays and lesbians, as well as straights, call queers as we see them, and groomers all get the wall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqgoXVB20W4 Begin clip at 1:20
Or, you know... It's a natural response to the LGBT lobby continuously trying to gain more and more opportunities to present sex, kink and perversion to children who are too young to have any need to know about it, and telling those kids to keep it secret from their parents..
Don't want to be called a groomer?
Stop trying implementing institutionalized grooming.
tl;dr version:
Ok, groomer.
terms: acceptable
And?
This needs to be the common response. The evidence is solid, and you won't find many better justifications.
It's very simple: don't groom children and we don't have any beef. Let the children figure this shit out for themselves.
Let me put it in a simple way that he probably will not understand because he is a rabid extremist:
We are calling Regressive Leftists groomers because they are trying to radicalize children into a self-destructive ideology, and several of these extremist bastards are predators anyway, therefore it's ok to put them on the same level of people who trick/intimidate children for the purposes of sexual exploitation.
He will probably just screech "transphobe" and have his few remaining fans who happen to be regressive leftists mass report you if tell him this.
What was it again? Gamers are garbage, gamers are over, we need to start bullying? Where were you when this shit came up? Oh, right: on their side. Fuck of Jim, you will never be a woman.
This shit is why I knew I had to post it here the moment I saw it elsewhere.
OK, Disney.
Chad yes
Hes a groomer and a cuck
Yes, it is a call to violence. Against those who deserve it. I have long said that Jim Sterling is a pedophile, seems like he's happy to confirm it for the rest of us.
This faggot went completely off the deep end. He used to have some good videos on how the gaming industry has become a corporate cesspool of greed mongering, but he's totally lost his fucking mind in the past couple years.
"Ok groomer" is the best internet ops since "It's okay to be white" and you can't convince me otherwise.
This recent uptick in calling groomers "groomers" is goinbg to end in violence.
It's the worst kind of rhetoric designed to make bigots feel justified in assaulting, and potentially killing, groomers.
It's a call to violence and they know it.
Fixed this for him.
From cuck to troon lmao
Everything I hate is racist. Racist should die. Punch a racist. Bye bye job racist.
When is Jim going to join the elite 42% ?
Perhaps when his wife(?) decides it's time to cash in her investment by divorcing him and taking half his stuff for life.
But calling people 'Nazis' and 'racists' is A-okay...
"Stephanie fucking Sterling daughter" doesn't have the same ring to it
Who groomed you, Jim?