Sounds like one of those annoying religions. inherent sin and all that, you're born evil and you're a worthless piece of shit.
At least most of those religions still offer solution and love and kindness if you obey. Feminism wants you to know all of that inherent evil stuff, and then tells you there's nothing you can do about it and the best that can be done is for you to lay down and let your superiors rule you.
This guy gets it. The term is original sin, and feminism swiped it from Christianity and perverted it. It went from "everyone is a sinner so be humble" to "straight white men are sinners and oppressed people's shit doesn't stink so the former should accept any amount of abuse from the latter". Both Christianity and feminism demand unending repentance, but at least Christianity offers reward in the afterlife and if we're being a little more cynical/honest a stable society. Feminism doesn't even offer that. All it promises is eternal misery. The last 60 years of letting the feminists run amok has vindicated the Bible verse "you will know it by its fruits".
But how do we know for sure that only women showed up? Some of those people might have been men. Was everyone there a biologist? With a Ph.D? In biology? With post-doc work in genetics? No? Then how do they even know what a woman is?
Bingo. Between the pics and the replies, nobody wants to date these black women, black men reply giving a variety of reasons for why they don't want to go to a singles event, and then some woke twitter idiot picks it up and generalizes it to all men, and then the daily dot writes a lazy article about the whole thing.
Since a top 20% man wouldn't need to attend an event like this to get his dick wet the guy would be in the bottom 80% in terms of SMV. So he would be rejected by all the women and the women would ask each other where all the good men are.
That's true if and only if the woman he did decide to talk to doesn't reject him. Preselection cuts both ways though. If he gets rejected by one that dooms his chances with the rest.
i went to a charity speed-date-auction event once with work people. never fucking again.
the women are all 35+ year old losers, thinking they're hot shit for scoring a diversity quota job. maxed out on hedonistic consumerism. literally every single one is obese. not a single one is even a 5, and they all act like they're entitled to 10s who are billionaire fitness models and doctors who volunteer at the animal shelter and compose symphonies in their spare time.
it's dating market economics... men are the hunters, the women the hunted. when a woman has to go that far out of her way to get the attention of a guy, it's because she's so ridiculously undesirable and low value that 50%+ of men are constantly, actively, avoiding and ignoring her.
Where are people getting such ideas? I see the most hideous and fat guys with normal-looking women. And yet online I see "top 20% of guys this, top 20% that".
It is a rare couple where the man is more attractive than the women, at least here, and I can speak with some authority on that.
I had a 6 year serious relationship with a woman outside my league. How I got the first date was confidence and persistence. I asked her out 3 times over 2 months. She never gave me a hard "no" or "not interested". She continued to approach me after each try and we enjoyed talking to each other.
Top 20% doesn't only mean looks. It's a success metric. Being attractive is by far the most important, but height, money, clothes (indicator for money), personality, the opinions of other women, etc. all factor into the weighting somewhat. And everybody settles eventually, changing that top 20 to 50 and up. Regarding your specific example I don't think we can compare random people walking down the street to women actively playing the dating game at a singles mixer. (especially upper-middle-class single Black women who hold notoriously high standards for men)
Clearly it is not! It's as if people assume that women are just like men. They really aren't.
And everybody settles eventually, changing that top 20 to 50 and up.
Then that 20% nonsense ends up meaning nothing at all. They try to get the best they can, when they invariably fail, they settle.
Regarding your specific example I don't think we can compare random people walking down the street to women actively playing the dating game at a singles mixer
Those are people who, perhaps for a reason, have not found a guy.
Invite them out on a date, and then ask them in all earnestness: "why do you want to kill me? Why did you create a virus and then a vaccine to kill men?" Maybe you can get some insights into the mechanics of the Sisterhood.
Your definition of "criticism" must be something other than what the rest of the world understands it to be, because it's not applicable to anything in the context of this conversation.
Kind of like Amber Heard's definition of "donated".
I didn't downvote you but I'll give it a go. The 20% refers to what women are actually sexually attracted to, and that largely is based on looks. Due to settling and their desire for a payday they'll betabux men outside that 20%, and for that reason they consider factors other than looks when choosing a betabux. But they won't really be sexually attracted to those men and they'll always resent them for not being the Chad they feel entitled to. They deny these men sex, cuck them, and often trick them into raising a Chad's children if those children weren't already in the picture at the beginning of the relationshit. I'd call it a long term prostitution arrangement but it's even worse than that. A real prostitute would be cheaper, better looking, offer more sexually, and actually hold up her end of the bargain.
You are technically incorrect. The very worst kind of incorrect.
The correct statement is "a single data point is the tool of the scientifically illiterate and a trend does not make".
But multiple singular data points are, indeed, data, and can form trends so long as they're either collected randomly, or the collection bias is declared and acknowledged. All a trend is, is multiple data points. Ask n=1 person what wine they buy to gift at Christmas and it is an anecdote. Ask n=30 people what wine they buy to gift at Christmas and it is a collection of singular data points... And is data to assess.
You are technically incorrect. The very worst kind of incorrect.
Ironic.
The correct statement is "a single data point is the tool of the scientifically illiterate and a trend does not make".
I'm not taking about a single data point, because that would be the very point I'm highlighting about using just one data point to make a statement. I'm talking about all single data points.
It's the downfall of mass corporations and minor individuals alike: The person in charge of marketing says "I like this particular thing, so I assume everyone, even those very different from me, also like that thing."
I'm sure this event was sufficiently advertised in women-only facebook groups, womens' sexual health clinics, and whatnot. And maybe a bit lacking on it at sports bars, mens' barber shops, etc.
I love how this shithole of a website contacted the whiny cunt who did the commentary to the original video. In the words of these women: literally who asked yoiu, bitch? Give the simp more screen time because asking someone who might have some valuable input would cost them money.
This is like the joke about all the 1-900 group sex chat "party" lines back in the day ($10.99/min) being nothing but guys, only with loud black women.
Are we only allowed to meet people in designated times and places now?
That's been the big push for a while now. First it was moved to "only clubs and bars" as the only real acceptable place to approach with intentions. Now its been pushed to OLD and apps to give even more power to women.
Sounds like one of those annoying religions. inherent sin and all that, you're born evil and you're a worthless piece of shit.
At least most of those religions still offer solution and love and kindness if you obey. Feminism wants you to know all of that inherent evil stuff, and then tells you there's nothing you can do about it and the best that can be done is for you to lay down and let your superiors rule you.
This guy gets it. The term is original sin, and feminism swiped it from Christianity and perverted it. It went from "everyone is a sinner so be humble" to "straight white men are sinners and oppressed people's shit doesn't stink so the former should accept any amount of abuse from the latter". Both Christianity and feminism demand unending repentance, but at least Christianity offers reward in the afterlife and if we're being a little more cynical/honest a stable society. Feminism doesn't even offer that. All it promises is eternal misery. The last 60 years of letting the feminists run amok has vindicated the Bible verse "you will know it by its fruits".
i cannot think of a single religion like that
Meanwhile they're still single. lol.
Tick tock, ladies.
I have never seen a more succinct and accurate summary. How did I miss this one until now?
But how do we know for sure that only women showed up? Some of those people might have been men. Was everyone there a biologist? With a Ph.D? In biology? With post-doc work in genetics? No? Then how do they even know what a woman is?
They all announced their pronouns, which is the point where all the men left.
Since there is no such thing as a "woman" none of them should be upset! Any complaints would be transphobic.
The elephant in the room is that they're all black women.
Elephants. There was more than one big butt in that crowd.
In this day and age, you'd be a fool to.
They didn’t trust them then too.
Bingo. Between the pics and the replies, nobody wants to date these black women, black men reply giving a variety of reasons for why they don't want to go to a singles event, and then some woke twitter idiot picks it up and generalizes it to all men, and then the daily dot writes a lazy article about the whole thing.
dating app engagement data shows no one wants to date black women, not even black men.
Black people problems...
Since a top 20% man wouldn't need to attend an event like this to get his dick wet the guy would be in the bottom 80% in terms of SMV. So he would be rejected by all the women and the women would ask each other where all the good men are.
That's true if and only if the woman he did decide to talk to doesn't reject him. Preselection cuts both ways though. If he gets rejected by one that dooms his chances with the rest.
i went to a charity speed-date-auction event once with work people. never fucking again.
the women are all 35+ year old losers, thinking they're hot shit for scoring a diversity quota job. maxed out on hedonistic consumerism. literally every single one is obese. not a single one is even a 5, and they all act like they're entitled to 10s who are billionaire fitness models and doctors who volunteer at the animal shelter and compose symphonies in their spare time.
it's dating market economics... men are the hunters, the women the hunted. when a woman has to go that far out of her way to get the attention of a guy, it's because she's so ridiculously undesirable and low value that 50%+ of men are constantly, actively, avoiding and ignoring her.
Where are people getting such ideas? I see the most hideous and fat guys with normal-looking women. And yet online I see "top 20% of guys this, top 20% that".
It is a rare couple where the man is more attractive than the women, at least here, and I can speak with some authority on that.
All of those women are mid as fuck and disguise it with loads of makeup and art techniques. They're not hot. you're just easily deceived
I'm impressed with recent technology if make-up can make you not fat.
Are you sure they aren't just skinny-fat? Most girls don't work out at all, or just do some mild cardio at best.
That's not entirely true.
I had a 6 year serious relationship with a woman outside my league. How I got the first date was confidence and persistence. I asked her out 3 times over 2 months. She never gave me a hard "no" or "not interested". She continued to approach me after each try and we enjoyed talking to each other.
Top 20% doesn't only mean looks. It's a success metric. Being attractive is by far the most important, but height, money, clothes (indicator for money), personality, the opinions of other women, etc. all factor into the weighting somewhat. And everybody settles eventually, changing that top 20 to 50 and up. Regarding your specific example I don't think we can compare random people walking down the street to women actively playing the dating game at a singles mixer. (especially upper-middle-class single Black women who hold notoriously high standards for men)
lol, really?
Clearly it is not! It's as if people assume that women are just like men. They really aren't.
Then that 20% nonsense ends up meaning nothing at all. They try to get the best they can, when they invariably fail, they settle.
Those are people who, perhaps for a reason, have not found a guy.
I really doubt that.
Is it that different in the US, or do you simply not go outside?
No, most average guys do get women in North America too. Heck, the "top 20%" in North America is just gay anyway.
It's just that here, the people who rail on "women" aren't average. They're mostly bottom 5%.
Even if they are, surely they can just... look around and see that what they claim is not true.
They're paying for it.
Not a perfect Chad? He'd be rejected by every single woman there and the women would bitch about the lack of good men.
That man's name: TheImpossible1
Now I'm wondering if it would be a fun hobby to show up to these things just to reject everyone.
Maybe if one was near me, it would be a fun way to waste a night.
Don't just reject them. Just start talking about Gearheart, the SCUM manifesto, etc.
Invite them out on a date, and then ask them in all earnestness: "why do you want to kill me? Why did you create a virus and then a vaccine to kill men?" Maybe you can get some insights into the mechanics of the Sisterhood.
More likely he'd get maced on the spot as she screams and calls 911.
Probably accurate, they do love lashing out violently to criticism.
You didn't make the point you thought you did.
Your definition of "criticism" must be something other than what the rest of the world understands it to be, because it's not applicable to anything in the context of this conversation.
Kind of like Amber Heard's definition of "donated".
What I mean is that women lash out towards anyone who implies that any of the hate they receive is warranted due to their actions.
Yes I did. You'd just look deranged and even I would mace you and call 911 on you.
Can a downvoter explain why this is at -4?
I didn't downvote you but I'll give it a go. The 20% refers to what women are actually sexually attracted to, and that largely is based on looks. Due to settling and their desire for a payday they'll betabux men outside that 20%, and for that reason they consider factors other than looks when choosing a betabux. But they won't really be sexually attracted to those men and they'll always resent them for not being the Chad they feel entitled to. They deny these men sex, cuck them, and often trick them into raising a Chad's children if those children weren't already in the picture at the beginning of the relationshit. I'd call it a long term prostitution arrangement but it's even worse than that. A real prostitute would be cheaper, better looking, offer more sexually, and actually hold up her end of the bargain.
The 6'7" Omega Male himself?
They'd drool until he started talking.
Alex Stein should have showed up.
No one went because it’s a bunch of black women. Not even black men want black women.
lol that's my thoughts exactly, but I'd throw in liberals, as well, who are just shitty people, in general.
Could you imagine this happening with non-blacks and apolitical (not even Conservative) people? I can't.
Glad to see this happen!
MGTOW is definitely growing thanks to the behavior of modern women.
I don't think this is a trend to be celebrated, though I'll certainly grant there's good reason for its existence.
Just commenting on the username.
Now kissssss 🦖🦖
Good, it's a sign that things are starting to stabilise.
Single [pun intended] data points are tools of the scientifically illiterate and a trend do not make.
You are technically incorrect. The very worst kind of incorrect.
The correct statement is "a single data point is the tool of the scientifically illiterate and a trend does not make".
But multiple singular data points are, indeed, data, and can form trends so long as they're either collected randomly, or the collection bias is declared and acknowledged. All a trend is, is multiple data points. Ask n=1 person what wine they buy to gift at Christmas and it is an anecdote. Ask n=30 people what wine they buy to gift at Christmas and it is a collection of singular data points... And is data to assess.
Ironic.
I'm not taking about a single data point, because that would be the very point I'm highlighting about using just one data point to make a statement. I'm talking about all single data points.
No wonder it concluded with seething about the patriarchy, this is classic violence against wimmin.
Anyone who includes "y'all" 3 times in one sentence needs fired into the sun.
Poison the well enough times and people will learn to avoid it.
Maybe some showed up and just kept on walking? Based on the photos- All i see are entitled ratchety types.. I wouldn't have approached any of them
Checks picture….yeah I can totally see why.
Sounds like someone really dropped the ball on marketing if men didn't show up
It's the downfall of mass corporations and minor individuals alike: The person in charge of marketing says "I like this particular thing, so I assume everyone, even those very different from me, also like that thing."
I'm sure this event was sufficiently advertised in women-only facebook groups, womens' sexual health clinics, and whatnot. And maybe a bit lacking on it at sports bars, mens' barber shops, etc.
I love how this shithole of a website contacted the whiny cunt who did the commentary to the original video. In the words of these women: literally who asked yoiu, bitch? Give the simp more screen time because asking someone who might have some valuable input would cost them money.
This is like the joke about all the 1-900 group sex chat "party" lines back in the day ($10.99/min) being nothing but guys, only with loud black women.
RIP Kevin Samuels
You are to speak to master only when you are spoken to, peasant.
If you look up superiority complex in the dictionary, it would say "see : woman"
That's been the big push for a while now. First it was moved to "only clubs and bars" as the only real acceptable place to approach with intentions. Now its been pushed to OLD and apps to give even more power to women.