-2
icockmyglock -2 points ago +1 / -3

strong policing and incarceration policies work

Of course they work, by violating your rights. If you want to live in a country where you do not have a right to not be searched without probable cause please go live there. This, however, is the US where we do have that right. I'd like to be able to exercise it without police entitlement requiring me to get a lawyer to prove that my rights have been violated after the fact. It's complete and utter bullshit that the default position in this country of rights is that anyone can walk all over them and it's up to me to spend ridiculous amounts of money to lawyer up and prove that my rights were indeed violated.

LE should be terrified of violating my rights. But instead, I have to be fearful of exercising them under penalty of police reprisals.

1
icockmyglock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Discriminatory pricing is discriminatory. You don't support stuff like this because it's going to come with caveat, and if you haven't noticed it's white people getting the shit end of that stick over and over.

2
icockmyglock 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's already race based energy discounts. Gas in my area if $0.40 higher than gas in the hood and has been for the past year. The state and city taxes are the same both areas. I've no idea why the disparity. It could be company pricing for the area and it's always been a little higher in my location that the hood, but nothing like this. I'm assuming it's something to do with the Biden administration.

1
icockmyglock 1 point ago +6 / -5

Stop and frisk is unconstitutional. IDC how effective it is. I'm not submitting to a search when officers have no probable cause.

Besides, cops don't want to go after real criminals anyway.

19
icockmyglock 19 points ago +19 / -0

The unpaid bots effectively squatting? Sure. The paid for bots, part of the marketing firms that pay Reddit? No.

The API change is simply Reddit shaking off the louse that are the freeloaders. That's most of the site and the real content that draws so many people. I think it's a piss poor way to increase monetization, but wtf do I care? I can't wait until Reddit no longer exists.

We all know that free discussion on the net drawing to an end. For most of us it drew to an end around 2014.

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can take the communist out of the communism, but you can never take the commumism out of the communist.

In my former job our new mid level manager was Vietnamese. She put up a wall of shame to shame people who aren't meeting her expectations. The team collapsed when all the talent bailed.

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Raise your hand if you believe covid and the covid vax was a dry run for the real event?

I'm going to pull a number out of my ass on the time it's going to take them to collate the data and scheme a new event.....7 years, in time for 2030?

They already have generational data since they force vaxed people across all age ranges.

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +3 / -0

We've bee fighting for equality for what? 250 years? Tell me something....do you like the country better now or 20 years ago?

Are you sure we're seeking equality? Do you feel more equal? Or are you having to check your white privilege at school? At university? During job searches? At your job? When you apply for home loans? When getting government assistance to open a business?

21
icockmyglock 21 points ago +21 / -0

Injecting drag queens into popular culture is not about their popularity. The adage that what you're seeing from the MSM is what viewers want to see has been debunked for a long time. It was debunked the first time two faggots were injected into a storyline starting in the 60's and 70's. You'd be hard pressed to say that the viewers of the time wanted to see queers.

Injecting drag queens into popular culture is about demoralization.

44
icockmyglock 44 points ago +45 / -1

Bill Cosby denounced black culture. Then California redefined rape making it prosecutable on accusation alone, removed the ability for adults to consent to sex if they blow as little as a 0.08% BAC (one beer), removed the statute of limitations and made it retroactive.

Then they prosecuted and convicted him on the word of a woman that admitted in deposition that she freely took a drug that she didn't know what it was that Cosby offered her. According to her, she asked him what it was. She said he said he didn't know. She took it anyway.

No one is going to denounce black culture ever again.

I've watched reruns of The Cosby Show. I feel bad for what black culture has destroyed. He was their last and only hope to pull themselves out of the jungle.

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Religion doesn't define morality. At best religion elucidates innate morality. There are common moral themes across almost all societies regardless of religion: Don't kill, don't steal, don't in-fight, etc. That's because those amoral behaviors are destructive to a cohesive society.

by folx
1
icockmyglock 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what I never understood about women. If you're obese guy you're supposed to like obese women? Um, no. It's not hypocritical to find attractive women attractive and unattractive women unattractive just because you don't check all the checkboxes for attractiveness.

1
icockmyglock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Nothing gets published in the AUP that hasn't already been reviewed by the legal team and the CIO. And once it got to the CIO and the legal team, it's already been discussed and crafted through a dozen meetings involving at least a dozen subordinates discussing it's merits, the potential to increase revenue, increase the company's social credit and decrease their carbon footprint.

2
icockmyglock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember, in all cases uncontrolled bleeding is temporary.....until it kills you.

4
icockmyglock 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, but drop outs are technically lost revenue. If educators can keep them in the system no matter how much of a failure they are, they keep their revenue flowing.

5
icockmyglock 5 points ago +5 / -0

Who the fuck cares? In season three the plot became homosexuality and interracial relationships.

Maybe, he should blame the writers for the forced interracial plot line that did nothing for the story. Had it really been the 80's and there wouldn't have been an interracial relationship.

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yo! There is already taols ta does dat. beef ahs, man, day're all onlahne, so da ahntel possahbly stahll gets access ta ya orahgahnal text. On da odar ha', I 'as serahous doesubts dat modern OS's doesn't already a' autamatahhaht on da hahpy move da surveahllace dahrectly ahnta ya own system. 'S coo', bro. In odar words, mostly, eeasyghlytahnk ya type, vahew a' lahsten ta ahs recorded, categorahzed a' ahndexed ahn real tahme. What it is, Mama! Don't make me shank ya! Wahndoesws uses a lot of processahng power a' memory. Slap mah fro! Peep this shit! It encrypts da data aht ahs collectahng so ya ca never know what aht ahs collectahng.

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seconded. The series doesn't coalesce until the latter part of season one. That's not to say the rest of the first season isn't enjoyable. It has some hits and misses. However, once you hit the introduction of Scorpius the show is a rollercoaster ride until the end of the series.

My girlfriend and I are watching it now. We're still in the first season. This is her first time watching it since she wasn't alive yet when it air. I haven't seen it since it aired.

6
icockmyglock 6 points ago +6 / -0

This isn't surprising considering the author of the Hellraiser series is a flaming homosexual. The movie series has always been based in homosexual bdsm. Not sure why people are just noticing the faggotry now.

11
icockmyglock 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'll bet $10 that it 'accidentally' gets broken before it's returned.

5
icockmyglock 5 points ago +6 / -1

Reddit is an echo chamber for current globohomo policies. They don't like Waters because Waters is arguing against war....while reddit is pounding the war drums in a very black and white manner: Russia invaded Ukraine, therefore there must be war against Russia. I'd say Redditors are incapable of understanding exactly what they're advocating, but I won't because I don't believe it's organic at all.

You can see the anti-Waters sentiment even here.

5
icockmyglock 5 points ago +5 / -0

A 100% green power grid does not mean service for 100% of the people. What a 100% green power grid means is austerity for those who can't afford their own solar panels, batteries and supplemental generator power, rolling brown outs & blackouts. Essentially, green power shifts more of the cost of power generation onto the individual by creating greater scarcity in publicly generated power. Wind and solar simply cannot meet demand when the sun is down.

Mark my words.

16
icockmyglock 16 points ago +17 / -1

If I were on the jury I wouldn't say he was guilty. He was well within his rights to blow that motherfucker away.

However, jury trials can almost always be overruled by the judge. Or the judge can replace a juror for "reasons". A white guy shoots a black guy in Chicago.......they're going to pull out all the stops.

view more: Next ›