Woman moment
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (103)
sorted by:
Anything that might require heart, soul, genuine effort and talent is basically tertiary to a pair of some woman's feet on twitch.
Not saying this isn't the way of things, you can't fight nature. But women absolutely have it easier. They don't even need real tits.
Who is consuming those sick pictures?
You've been calling out troonery for years. You still think there's a limit to how disgusting internet perverts can get?
Believe it or not, when I joined GG, I supported troonery. I thought it was just messed up people who wanted to be treated like they were women. Then all sorts of crazy demands came along, and I was gradually forced to change my mind.
Not really. But any criticism of thots should be paired with criticism of the men who enable them.
The men ALWAYS GET CRITICIZED. Both leftists and conservatives criticize them. That is a given default dude. The left doesn't want to criticize the women. The right does, but the left and mainstream media doesn't.
That's the reason why we don't even bother mentioning the men. We know it's men enabling them, but it's everything else enabling them. Entertainment, social media, organizations that encourage women who have nothing to contribute to society to get their fake tits out, etc.
If you cut off the supply, the whoring will end, Twitch is refusing to do that.
There were a lot of dumb things many of us supported before we knew better.
I'd like to see a lot more of this though. Women aren't gonna wake up and fix their bad behavior on their own. It's on us as men to exert enough self control to stop enabling said bad behaviors.
Indeed. I have no illusions about the things men enable. You get what you tolerate, and we are a culture that has lost its ability to identify and compartmentalize what it truly values - these things shape us. Laws shape us. Thoughts, words, actions shape us.
We need to reassess ourselves and find ordinance in what we value collectively, pruning them like a bonzai tree of the soul.
This point misses why those men are so broken.
It all goes back to the majority-female school system.
Feminism has to be cut out at the root, and the root is the teaching profession.
Those men are broken due to a long list of disenchantments, but it starts with the village. They've taken that away from us, dissolved the nuclear home, made us perfect strangers to our peers and our countrymen. There is no national identity, no accountability.
The kids have no scaffolding, no ideation of what it means to be a strong or good man. Our schools are incapable of teaching this, they are impersonal and only reflective of the metropolitan liberal doctrines that are meant to shape them into impotent allegria creatures to be milked dry by every corporate angle and institution. We let them raise our kids, we speak an entirely different language from our sons and daughters even though we share the same common tongue. Words are more alive than you know and within language is in everything and all things with language.
So, it starts from the ground up. Feminism, marxism, the institutional left as a whole needs to be pulled off and burned like a tick, but we need to look to and coordinate with ourselves and take responsibility. Weak men who were too middling with their value structure not knowing its worth created this situation, we were then quietly subverted and had decisions made on their behalf. Look at the left and their #solidarity. We shit on them, make fun of how retarded and backwards they are, but they're playing with prison rules - we still think we get to be in the middle and don't know what the fuck is going on while they control the fucking words that come out of our mouths, bad enough, they have a monopoly on your balls too. Get wise. Pick up your nuts and be a good rolemodel, if you can, homeschool, instill virtues of brotherhood, hold eachother accountable and think with your generations in mind.
We have to be our father's reclaimer and our brother's keeper.
Can't afford to be anything else.
You being the greatest example.
Men being thirsty isn't surprising. The problem is too many men are so socially inept and broken these days, they can't find a proper conduit for their thirst in an actual relationship.
I had my fun, grew out of it and I just want to be left alone by them. Something they won't allow because it's against their political views.
https://files.catbox.moe/4cj16k.png
Behold... DER COOMER!
If women accepted for a moment that they have it easier, their entire fragile victim complex would fall apart and with it their minds.
Especially with uncontrollable things like boobs. Not having them is already enough to drive chestlets to madness before the teens end, so if they accept that they literally can turn their life into mega easy mode it would crush their little minds.
For real. It lives with them forever, every day, well past mid-life. It sits in their minds, always. Yeah. It's best they really don't understand the vast gap between them and the lives of women with big tits.
I had an old coworker, who once she divorced her husband was "casually dating" 3 guys a few months later.
Yet any time you talked to her she would whine about how nobody found her attractive because she was barely pushing B cups. It dominated her mind.
Nah, even flat chested girls have plenty of guys who are into that.
When has reality ever factored into women's self perception and worldview?
Finding a woman who's aware of gynocentrism without being a giant tradcon or crazy person is like a fucking unicorn man.
I want to see one of these womanchildren openly admit that they do it on purpose, and if men ogle she's fine with it, but they get offended when they purposefully show their fake tits online and men start ogling, then the next day they continue to do it.
Just admit you're a thot, it makes things easier.
That's the secret captain, these girls are only saying they are aware of it to abuse it still. They are pulling the classic "not like other girls" by prostrating themselves as totes not gonna do that, or gonna do it ironically to stand out among the others. And even then, they are only aware of it in superficial obvious ways, and ignore the mountain of other ways they benefit from it still.
While.. men have to show skill on twitch lol.
This is exactly it.
The top streamers (and earners) on Twitch do tend to be men. They have to put in a great deal of effort, take a great deal of risk (that it will all amount to nothing), and to an extent be lucky.
Feminists like to talk about “the glass ceiling” but rarely do they even acknowledge the crystal floors on which they stand.
same in life, my man. same deal in all things.
...That's more a measure of the person's opinion, than of the community around them. After all, even that one study the leftists love to trot out to showcase women get more sexual comments made about them online showcases that in terms of overall abuse, men receive far more, and in greater severity.
Immediately accuses "the haters" of being incels, proving herself to be a personality-devoid cookie cutter internet attention whore.
Gee, I wonder why someone like her can't break the totally real glass ceiling.
I love how women will lie, to everyone's faces, knowingly, and then turn around and wonder why they are hated.
Woman discovers that all she has to do is be female and show just some prosthetic cleavage, and her audience immediately doubles.
Concludes 'women don't have it easier on twitch'.
Lmao.
COPE.
Depends on whether they're there to play games or to whore themselves.
Both are easier regardless, just in different ways.
For every frothing at the mouth misogynist, there are three dudes who will happily go easy on a girl, carry her to high levels, and be a mentor to help them git gud. Even if the stream is awful, they will still be light hearted about it.
The 'problem' is that the good often outweighs the bad. Like when people on social media say that the one negative comment has more impact than the 100 positive ones.
I'm not even talking about the supposed misogynists. But if you're just a woman playing a game, and some thirsty tard shows up who tells you to show your tits - that's quite gross.
This presupposes that guys don't receive the same types of comments. Not the same flavors, but I can say I've seen numerous friends try the streamer route and end up with those attacks once they go above the 3 viewer (that is 2 bots and their wife) range.
The good massively outweighs the bad for them, they are just so used to the good that they appreciate it less. Like the meme of "guys remembering the one time a girl said they were handsome 8 years ago vs woman recieving her 99th compliment that day" it only has more impact because they are so used to the level of special treatment and soft hands they normally get.
So then it becomes a question of impact versus objective worth. Which if we only measure based on impact then a millionaire losing his car is a bigger problem than a poor man losing his house, and I'm sure you can see the problem doing so.
I see what you're arguing. Let's say a woman wanted to be the next Asmongold. That would be as hard for her as it was for Asmongold.
But then again, if all she wants is the views without the actual "respect", she can just show her tits. Something Zack never had the luxury of doing.
"When the good outweighs the bad" applies only when the bad and the good are of similar qualities.
When "the good" is piles of fucking money, and "the bad" is someone saying they only got the money because they're an overglorified camgirl, it becomes much harder to parse...
But we know the good outweighs the bad, because they keep doing it. If the bad outweighed the good, they'd stop, but their underdressed selves are there on a regular schedule to get those superchats. There is literally zero cost to stopping, there is no cancellation fees, no mandatory contract lengths. The moment the bad outweighs the good, they're gone.
And they're not gone.
But they're at least getting attention rather than rambling to an empty void. they also have guys willingly throwing money at them.
"Women don't have it easier on Twitch"
How in the fuck would you know? This person isn't trans or a male crossdresser, so how in the fuck would they know? This assertion (one that Feminists rely on so very much) comes from the assumption that women know what the male experience is but men cannot possibly know what the female experience is.
But you know how I KNOW women have it easier? Go look at the bottom end of Twitch. You don't even need to look that far to see that any women down there will still have more followers in a far shorter amount of time. You can have guys sitting at a couple hundred followers after doing Twitch regularly for years, but women will be there for a couple months and be about the same level. What's more, they don't even need the cam. They really don't. And I'm not talking about VTuber's, I am solely talking about voice only with maybe a basic avatar.
Women 100% have it easier on Twitch because there is a very real simp culture online, far worse than ever before. And so many women know it. It's why they keep their relationship status a secret or lie and say they're single online (and then call it just their persona). They know they can lead desperate guys on and get tons of cash. And this person is apparently a mod for Amouranth. They 1000% know what they're doing and that it works. Their defence that "weLL EvErYoNe LiKeS BoObS" is just a deflection from the truth that she knows she is playing to.
Are all women like this? Of course not. Does that mean that women have it easy? Also no. But in many places, and Twitch is definitely one of them, women have is easier when compared to men. Anyone who says otherwise is either ignorant or a grifter.
Woah hold up now. Buy a pair of boobs and wear them on stream? What does that mean?
https://thebreastformstore.com/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwn4qWBhCvARIsAFNAMiid1UPuVm6HoJkbUo1HM-YxKy95lyUggDHzIEdf_kZZ1ZuzTio66WQaAlyEEALw_wcB
THEY DO YOU DUMB BITCH.
I don't get watching twitch streamers that have chat open. It's:
Unless it's something like DougDoug's streams where the chat has a direct impact on the gameplay of the player, they otherwise shouldn't be reading chat anyways: Blind playthroughs risk spoilers, PvP risks people giving away strategic info, and it's a distraction to quality gameplay.
In my opinion she's not wrong but not for the reason she think it is, on the entry level yeah women do have it easier should she exploit nerdy young men main weakness..her womenly assets. Problem is once she reaches a certain point, she wont be able to grow and sustain an audience that cant see her beyond her makeup and honkers, and having an entertaining and interesting personality is something women just can't do. There is a reason why the top earners/viewers on this streaming sites are predominantly men, call me sexist but a lot of women beyond their sexuality is simply fucking boring.
A Vykas whore I see
The booba is attractive, but you are selling the hope of fertility. I hope you didn't Covax...
Wait, you can just go out and buy Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer?
Unless it's something like getting borted in China and India.
Yes, and they love to make it harder for everyone else.
I wouldn't say they have it easier, they can just get attention easier, which allows a lot of them to skirt by.
That sounds easier
I don't know, walking through a strange city at night I'd rather be a man than a woman.
Statistically speaking, you'd be in more danger as a male. But you do you, and enjoy the "feeling" over statistical reality.
I'm not sure that's true. Well, it may technically be true, but it's very misleading, as I recall. Men are more often the victims of violence, but it's a very specific subset of men, so it's not fair to apply that to randos walking around at night. Those are two completely different scenarios, and you can't plug one into the other.
Assuming AoV isn't a gangbanger, he may very well be safer as a man walking around a strange neighborhood than he would be as a woman. Gangster on gangster violence drastically skews the perceived statistical danger levels of men, as I recall.
Not saying definitively either way - I haven't looked into it - just saying that statistics can, and often are, very misleading.
You're far more likely to be murdered as a man.
No, seriously, on every you're safer as a woman.
The reason the narrative is pushed is only because people care about "woman in danger" whereas they don't care nearly much about "man murdered".
Agreed. Men are more likely to be murdered or otherwise have street violence committed against them than women are. Those stats are clear.
My point is, what men are those? Is the violence by and large random? Is this representative of your everyday man? Because, from what I recall, it wasn't. The majority of that violence was gang-related. The men affected were mostly involved in that life, not random unaffiliated men.
So, again, I totally agree statistically men are more likely to be murdered or attacked. But is a normal man more likely to be assaulted walking a city at night than a normal woman is? I'm not convinced of that. The stats are largely skewed by young men voluntarily engaging in dangerous shit that leads to them getting attacked.
And, for the record, I'm not 'victim-blaming' or anything. Men have plenty of terrible things done to them by society, and are largely treated badly. I'm not trying to sweep any of that under the rug; men have issues, men can use support and, yes, in many, many ways women have it easier. But I also believe in accuracy, and I don't think what you're implying is an accurate read of the data I've seen. You're not talking men in general, you're talking that specific subset, when it comes to street violence, and that throws off the stats big time.
Women being afraid walking around at night isn't representative of your everyday woman either.
When you break down the stats on assault on women, both simple physical assault and sexual assault, the vast majority are intimate partner violence or otherwise perpetrators the woman knows
Hmm, that's funny.
When a woman gets herself drunk every weekend and one weekend she gets raped, we're supposed to think it's not her fault and there was nothing she could do.
But when a needs money for food and rent, and feels his only worthwhile option is joining a gang, suddenly it's "voluntarily engaging".
Men in the ghetto join gangs because of the same social dynamics that cause men in better areas of town to be almost all of the police, army, and pizza drivers (an occupation more hazardous than being a cop) - women and society push any dangerous or risky work onto men.
Source needed, because this sounds a lot like feminist fantasy.
I know that men are the ones pushed into more dangerous jobs, if we were just talking deaths rather than specifically murders. Which genders is most represented in these fields?
https://www.invictuslawpc.com/most-dangerous-jobs-osha/
There also is the fact that women are more likely to be too scared to walk around at night in a bad neighborhood, whereas I've done it before without second thought.
It's men between 16 and 25 iirc, I remember citing that statistic in a law class and the danger haired thundercunt behind me being pissed that the lecturer backed me up, good times
I really doubt that. Sure, if you look at overall crimes, which includes all the people looking for trouble, but if you're just minding your own business, I'd much rather be a guy than a girl.
Bad argument, girls have never minded their own business
Your incredulity is worthless though. You can choose to doubt it, but it won't change the statistics.
Statistics don't account for who is minding his own business, and who is not.
Why would someone randomly choose to attack me and not a woman?
Cool story bro, don't care. I was only pointing out that your incredulity means jack and shit, and has zero effect on the statistics.
Already addressed your 'statistics' talking point, bruh.
The majority of violence perpetrated against women it's by intimate partners or people otherwise known to the woman.
Men are far more likely to the victim of random assault by strangers
The danger that women face in that situation is a byproduct of their inherent sexual and reproductive value, and that value is precisely why they play on easy mode in countless other situations.
I mean, unless you don't have another option, that's just kind of dumb. I wouldn't want to wander those same areas as a man, although admittedly I'd be under different threats than the woman.
Still, it's just being dumb. Dumb women still have it easier than dumb men, I'd say.
Well, I like to visit places, and make good use of my time.. I do try to avoid unsafe areas as much as possible, but I'm pretty sure I'm safer as someone who can somewhat defend himself and who is not of any interest to rapists.
I thought you once suggested on the subreddit that you're a woman, or did I take that wrong?
You just like to think everyone is a woman, don't you? Kidding but, no, I've never said I'm a woman, and I've said I'm a man multiple times. And I'll state for the record, again: I am a man.
Women can defend themselves, too. Via training and/or carrying firearms or similar. Also, as a man, you're still potentially of interest to muggers and the like, or just hooligans who want to start some shit.
THEY'RE TRYING TO KILL ME! I don't trust you! You're just playacting in order to strike when the time is right!
In all seriousness, interesting how much you still miss despite having to pay close attention to a sub.
I mean... none carry firearms (this is Europe), nor are many capable of any form of serious self-defense.
Of course. But women are targeted by muggers as well, possibly more so because they cannot defend themselves. And they have the added bonus of being targeted by rapists.
Fair enough, I suppose it is different in Europe. Although there's still defensive training.
So you're right, but I am also right; a lot of it comes down to decision making. Are women more vulnerable? I'd generally agree that's fair. But they're most vulnerable when they put themselves in bad situations, and I wouldn't want to do that as a man either. That said, I suppose I would have to agree that, if we start from the assumption that we're putting ourselves in a bad situation, in many (if not most) scenarios, you are still better off being a man. So, fair point.
Europe is importing Muslims and Somalians, so they're gonna have the same problems we do.
I've noticed that the assumption here is that going out at night in the city is basically a death sentence. I guess that is based on the Detroit and Chicago paradigm. I'm not taking crazy risks or anything, but that's precisely because I can defend myself, I'm not a target and in the worst case scenario, I get robbed with a knife.
Ahh, guess you should take it up with your overlords who import 3rd world rapists and murderers and traffickers like God told them to.
Especially if the city is "diverse". But then a man probably isn't going to have a good time doing that either.
How often do you really walk through a strange city at night though?
Comparatively, how often do you have to compete against others for a seat at the table? How often would you like to receive an automatic boost in your position and income for doing nothing of value at all, before you don't care so much about randomly walking around strange cities anymore?
Do they though? I think there are small number of women and blacks who get boosted for their gender and race, and a large number who get screwed over just like the rest of us.
If you're an attractive woman, sure, there are some benefits you can get from that? But to simply assume that female means automatic boost to position and income?
People can always squander their advantages. Tall men are statistically advantaged, but some tall men fail. The advantages will not do everything for you, they just make everything easier.
If you're black and can get halfway decent grades, you will get into a MUCH better college than an equivalent white or asian would. This boosted college in turn opens doors for your employment opportunities, which are ALSO boosted. The fact that most blacks choose not to avail themselves of these benefits is 100% their own fault.
The same is true for women. Plenty of women do not put in the effort to learn how to dress, put on makeup, and stay in decent shape so they can maximize their power over men. All these women are doing is squandering their advantages. If they hard mode it and still succeed, good for them.
This vapid bitch in the OP is already a highly attractive woman by internet standards, when she puts in the effort. She can also look homely when she does not. I'm sure when she started streaming, she thought that just being a decent looking "gamer girl" would mean automatic success and riches. She felt entitled. And then it turned out that even though she has huge advantages, at the BIG TIME, you need to have more, you need to actually be able to make better quality content, which she fails at, so she hit her little "glass ceiling".
Then she decided to cheat and bought a silicone tit mold online and wore it on stream to look MUCH hotter than she actually is, and - GASP - EASY MODE ACTIVATED, TURBO MODE. and so she doubled her subs. A man would have had to actually sit down and think about how to make better content, and then to work on it to slowly build a following. This chick can bypass all that with a little purchase and trickery.
Correct. This is what I always point out to wokies who claim 'discrimination'. Even if it were true that blacks are treated worse by police when they resist arrest, which is dubious at best, that only affects the people who choose to act like that.
Yes, but that was not what I was disputing. I'd rather have more safety than a small chance of being better at whoring myself out on Twitch.
Maybe, but if you were a big tittied hot girl who had to worry about being raped, you have a lot of options available:
buy a gun & get a carry license that is now your recognized Constitutional right
buy a taser and/or pepper spray in those states that won't let you have a gun for some reason
don't walk alone at night in ghetto areas
if you must, get a BF or husband or a simp to at least bodyguard you
I've known a lot of hot women. Almost none of them have actually ever had to worry about any kind of violence, sexual or not. The few girls who did, behaved in ways that brought massively increased risks on themselves. While the risk is not 0 for a normal girl, it's super low, and the perception is much higher than the reality, mostly because the news media LOVES stories about rape and sex crimes, and it's a common trope in fiction. But even with rape, the vast majority of "rape" happens in more "date rape" situations or in relationships. Actual tree jumpers are only a very tiny fraction of rapes.
Men have to worry more about violence even if they aren't gang bangers, because men pick fights with other men. I've had multiple men try to attack me in public throughout my life for whatever bullshit reason. Those men would never do that to a woman because they know it would be guaranteed jail time. My big tiddied GF has never been attacked once in her life.
I don't think women are just at risk in 'ghetto areas'.
And FTR, even tasers and pepperspray are illegal in most European countries.
That's a hassle.
Women were a psyop.
Repeal the 19th.
TBH I figured it was a guy.