Women will do the absolute bare fucking minimum and still complain they're doing too much. Every office job I've had women complained. I've never seen the level of laziness as when women were forced to work for a living. They gave their work to other departments so they had to do nothing but show up and smile and they still acted like they were busting rocks in the gulag.
Can confirm. I started typing out examples but what's the point. We all know how they operate with very few exceptions.
Ever seen those videos where someone sneaks up on their colleagues to scare them? 9/10 times when the target is a women, she's sitting in her office staring at her phone lol
I've known two or three women that were muh gurlboss and actually had good degrees and impressive jobs- they will spend hours on Linkedin and social media taking photos and writing inspirational word salad and after a week or so they quit and either find a man to support them for the rest of their lives or they do OF or some such bullshit. Their parents spent all this money just for a couple weeks.
I've never used the platform, but with the amount of woman on it, how is there not a demand problem? like, they're competing with literal millions of other women, how could even a tenth of them make money?
They don't from what I have read. Only the top percentage makes money. Again, beating on my drum here, pretty sure Only Fans is some sort of money laundering scheme.
In some cases it's side money. Girl charges $100 for a video and some simp pays up. Funny thing is that someone buys it and then shares it anyway. I'd imagine that most of what's posted there ends up in people's hands for free. It makes it more amazing that people can make money.
Women will gas each other up into thinking they're 10s when they're clearly not, which is why everyone thinks they'll be the exception despite that being a mathematical impossibility.
There is a demand problem. VTubing is like this too, tons of college to late 20's aged women enter the VTubing space hoping they could get rich like the big names are.
They don't realize the market is saturated, they have no idea that the content they're pushing out makes them less than federal minimum wage at McDonald's.
It's further proof that Gen Z and Alpha have ZERO understanding of economics and financing. Those nudes don't disappear - they get archived and flee to the recesses of the Internet.
At least with VTubing you're somewhat anonymous behind an avatar, with OnlyFans people will see your beef curtain cunt for years on end.
They don't realize the market is saturated, they have no idea that the content they're pushing out makes them less than federal minimum wage at McDonald's.
This isn't even a woman or Vtuber only problem. There is a huge portion of the population under 35 who all think they can do into some form of content creation and make it their career. I've met dozens of young boys that all wanted to be streamers or Youtube stars, and plenty more 20 somethings uploading weekly for 8 views.
It's the end result of a Developed™, service-based economy where everything is Pajeets automated. Unless you're a nepo-baby, a Zoomer's career path is either retail wagie or "entrepreneur" (read: e-clown or gig shit).
Technically they're not wrong about it being men's fault for not controlling women. If men had simply said "No" when feminists started shrieking, we would not be here.
There is literally nothing women could do if men simply told them, "No".
Women cannot enforce their own ideals, nor can they defend their own rights. Men have to do it for them, and every beta-simp out there who keeps defending bad policies in favour of women are the ones that are truly at fault, as women are too weak to defend their own freedoms.
Who is the government made up of? Are you saying that women have run the government since the dawn of first-world Western nations? That women have been ruling over men this entire time and men have been under the matriarchal rulership since judicial systems have been in place? Are you saying no men have been in positions of power to deny women authority or governance over domestic policies?
This is correct. Violence is the supreme temporal authority. And they're distinctly inferior at it. So called women's rights continue to exist only because they are tolerated.
It may be men's fault for giving women freedom, but it is women's fault for abusing the freedom we gave them. There's no reason to absolve them of accountability.
No one is absolving them of accountability -- but plain and simple, they are not mentally capable enough to responsibly utilise what freedoms they have been allowed to have.
It has been the fault of men to give them their unearned freedoms, and make no mistake about it: NO woman has ever earned her freedom.
This is why every single previous civilisation wisely limited the freedoms of women because they already knew they were not mature nor intelligent enough to utilise the same freedoms as men.
Now everyone is suffering because men continue to refuse to tell women "No!".
I wouldn't agree that nobody is trying to absolve them of accountability, but I do agree it was a mistake for society to grant them the freedom they have today. The "trad man" that OP was mocking is the type of guy who dismisses men's complaints by saying that it's our fault when, individually, we don't actually have the ability to tell women "No".
I think it still rests on the individual man to support policies and other local leaders who need to rise up and defenestrate women of their rights.
You're right that as individuals, the most we can do is tell women within our local vicinity "No!' when it comes to accommodating their tripe.
I do also understand OP's point about the tradcucks who constantly dismiss the issues women bring to the table by putting all the blame on men (this is even a growing trend within some manosphere circles, too).
But, individually, men still need to mobilise (where possible) to deny women leverage (viz., if you're the boss of a business, do not elevate or put a woman in power... ever), or to support/start grassroots committees who aim to re-establish power for men.
There is still an unhealthy amount of blue-pilled men out there who vehemently decry and putdown red pill content or still claim that things like "misandry isn't a problem because men still have institutional power".
These kinds of men are still a large portion of the normie community; and so, women will never be put in their place if these men keep making excuses for them.
I honestly wouldn't mind that chiding half as much if the state wouldn't put you in a federal pound you in the ass prison for attempting said control over women.
I like Jay Dyer but he has this kind of view on things. It's really easy for him to say that when he is already married to a woman who (so far) isn't a psycho, and it is really easy for him to say that when his wealth is largely in Bitcoin and not something the Feds have easy access to.
He put out a video a couple days ago about how even though things are shit and trying to date is a nightmare, we as men have to man up and risk stepping on a nuclear landmine in order to save the west, etc.
Like, that's nice and all. I don't have a problem handling a woman. I however, cannot fend off the entirety of my local police department when she inevitably calls a DV complaint against me when I tell her that she can't spend $20k on a purse or go clubbing when she's married. I cannot survive the SWAT team busting into my house with MP5 SMGs flashbangs, and shotguns, when all I have is a little handgun. I am at the mercy of the law and at the mercy of a gang of men armed with machine guns.
Laws have to change, and more importantly, culture has to change before men are going to be able to be men the way he thinks we need to be. I agree with him that men have to step up, but doing it the way he says right now with the culture we have is just going to put thousands of young men in prison who shouldn't be there.
The real struggle is going to be getting women to pressure and shame other women into not doing shit like false DV claims, but they have been so brainwashed by feminists who think a man glancing in their direction counts as sexual assault that it might not be possible within our lifetimes, if at all.
Reading your comment made me think of the post the other day where it was something like “50% of the Dearborn, Michigan police force is now Muslims” and the police chief is all habdullah praise be in a press conference. On the one hand, that’s a downfall of western civilization. On the other, they might not give a shit about any of the weaponized BS DV claims.
I'm still convinced all these "a huge % of young women do this!" is astroturf to normalize it so a larger percent of them actually do it. Creating a false acceptance so that women will follow the trend.
Even in this video, the math is complete fucking trash.
His "source" from the "Spread Thoughts Team" is obvious AI slop with no sources so I went looking for other sources. Which seems to have been a tweet, but fortunately other people had investigated that tweet.
The data seems to stem from a report by the Washington Examiner, written a year ago, which found that, of the 3 million creators on the platform, 67 percent of revenue goes to Americans.
The outlet then calculated that, if revenue share was taken to be an average per user, 2 million Americans are creators on the platform.
In addition, 70 percent of Americans using the platform are women, the WashingtonExaminer found, meaning 1.4 million American women are OnlyFans creators.
Following along? The 20% comes from:
3 million creators (never asserts if it's adult content or not)
Americans make 67% of the revenue
Assume that means 67% of the creators are Americans. Not that Americans might be more famous, attract other Americans who have more disposable income, or anything like that.
Then assume that the 70% of creators being women is uniform across nationality (probably reasonable)
Get 1,407,000 million "female American creators" on OnlyFans
Add 18-24 years old somewhere along the game of telephone
Have this guy add 42% to that for an even 2m
Then he divides that 2m into what fucking Grok says is the total number of 18-24 women in the US
Proclaims that 1 in 5 American college-age women are "on OnlyFans,"
Claims that is "only the ones who admit it," implying the original claim was some sort of survey instead of assumptions upon assumptions.
Then people will spread this "1 in 5" as a shock stat in horror, signaling to women that it's common place and therefore acceptable.
Only actual data in bold. Absolutely fucking retarded.
Note: Revenue is apparently from 67% US, 16% UK/Europe, and 17% rest of world. So I'm not even sure its 67% American creators or if they applied the subscriber metric to creators. They do seem to be putting on about 1.1M creators/year though.
Fun fact: "Even when excluding top accounts (+$80K monthly revenue), over 70% of total payouts goes to just 10% of creators."
When the stories leave creator vs user vague, I assume there's a swath of women who are using it like Instagram to follow the SFW posts of whoever the TV told them was the hot celeb to watch this month. And probably some who subscribe to either "support their faves" or to check out the "competition."
20% is clearly way higher even if you include women who create an account to "check it out" and never post content. Too many dubious assumptions and data.
Better Bachelor isn't known for making high effort videos. He's no Colttaine.
"The amount of money they [OnlyFans] are making is more than Google..." This is ridiculously untrue.
I agree, but it does not excuse the mistakes in the video. One does not have to exaggerate the dismal state of our society. The truth is horrifying enough.
Him and Rehab Room are efficient at distilling black pills into the normie sphere for how things are actually shaping up in society without the ridiculous grift-culture attached to a lot of red pill content creators.
And feminists wonder why "the patriarchy" kept them from voting as long as possible. When given free reign, they destroy their families, abort their children, vote for open borders and communism, and become prostitutes to one degree or another.
Women will do the absolute bare fucking minimum and still complain they're doing too much. Every office job I've had women complained. I've never seen the level of laziness as when women were forced to work for a living. They gave their work to other departments so they had to do nothing but show up and smile and they still acted like they were busting rocks in the gulag.
Can confirm. I started typing out examples but what's the point. We all know how they operate with very few exceptions.
Ever seen those videos where someone sneaks up on their colleagues to scare them? 9/10 times when the target is a women, she's sitting in her office staring at her phone lol
I've got so many examples I could write volumes.
I've known two or three women that were muh gurlboss and actually had good degrees and impressive jobs- they will spend hours on Linkedin and social media taking photos and writing inspirational word salad and after a week or so they quit and either find a man to support them for the rest of their lives or they do OF or some such bullshit. Their parents spent all this money just for a couple weeks.
My own lazy ass mother is a good example of this.
I've never used the platform, but with the amount of woman on it, how is there not a demand problem? like, they're competing with literal millions of other women, how could even a tenth of them make money?
They don't from what I have read. Only the top percentage makes money. Again, beating on my drum here, pretty sure Only Fans is some sort of money laundering scheme.
The owner is a Ukrainian Jew who donated millions of dollars to Israel. It sounds like a squeaky clean operation to me!
Sqeaky clean, or very well greased
Not clean, but definitely kosher.
Remember how Visa and MasterCard tried to make them ban porn, then one day they suddenly backed down without elaborating?
This was before The Steam/Itch.io porn ban
I wouldn't be surprised, especially given all the stories of it being used as a front for human trafficking, or laundering purchases for CP.
More like a genocide plan.
In some cases it's side money. Girl charges $100 for a video and some simp pays up. Funny thing is that someone buys it and then shares it anyway. I'd imagine that most of what's posted there ends up in people's hands for free. It makes it more amazing that people can make money.
Coomer.party if you ever feel like giving in to lust but arent a dork who will pay.
Yeah yeah maybe it's not for you but just so you know for future reference
Women will gas each other up into thinking they're 10s when they're clearly not, which is why everyone thinks they'll be the exception despite that being a mathematical impossibility.
All women are 10s and most guys are barely even 5s. Duh.
There is a demand problem. VTubing is like this too, tons of college to late 20's aged women enter the VTubing space hoping they could get rich like the big names are.
They don't realize the market is saturated, they have no idea that the content they're pushing out makes them less than federal minimum wage at McDonald's.
It's further proof that Gen Z and Alpha have ZERO understanding of economics and financing. Those nudes don't disappear - they get archived and flee to the recesses of the Internet.
At least with VTubing you're somewhat anonymous behind an avatar, with OnlyFans people will see your beef curtain cunt for years on end.
This isn't even a woman or Vtuber only problem. There is a huge portion of the population under 35 who all think they can do into some form of content creation and make it their career. I've met dozens of young boys that all wanted to be streamers or Youtube stars, and plenty more 20 somethings uploading weekly for 8 views.
It's the end result of a Developed™, service-based economy where everything is
Pajeetsautomated. Unless you're a nepo-baby, a Zoomer's career path is either retail wagie or "entrepreneur" (read: e-clown or gig shit).Most of them make like $5 a month if they're lucky.
Inb4 a good trad man steps up to tell us no guys actually its all men's fault for 1) not controlling the women and 2) only using women for sex.
Technically they're not wrong about it being men's fault for not controlling women. If men had simply said "No" when feminists started shrieking, we would not be here.
There is literally nothing women could do if men simply told them, "No".
Women cannot enforce their own ideals, nor can they defend their own rights. Men have to do it for them, and every beta-simp out there who keeps defending bad policies in favour of women are the ones that are truly at fault, as women are too weak to defend their own freedoms.
Reframing civil rights as the government forcing black people onto white people at gun point was an eye opener for me
Who is the government made up of? Are you saying that women have run the government since the dawn of first-world Western nations? That women have been ruling over men this entire time and men have been under the matriarchal rulership since judicial systems have been in place? Are you saying no men have been in positions of power to deny women authority or governance over domestic policies?
This is correct. Violence is the supreme temporal authority. And they're distinctly inferior at it. So called women's rights continue to exist only because they are tolerated.
It may be men's fault for giving women freedom, but it is women's fault for abusing the freedom we gave them. There's no reason to absolve them of accountability.
No one is absolving them of accountability -- but plain and simple, they are not mentally capable enough to responsibly utilise what freedoms they have been allowed to have.
It has been the fault of men to give them their unearned freedoms, and make no mistake about it: NO woman has ever earned her freedom.
This is why every single previous civilisation wisely limited the freedoms of women because they already knew they were not mature nor intelligent enough to utilise the same freedoms as men.
Now everyone is suffering because men continue to refuse to tell women "No!".
I wouldn't agree that nobody is trying to absolve them of accountability, but I do agree it was a mistake for society to grant them the freedom they have today. The "trad man" that OP was mocking is the type of guy who dismisses men's complaints by saying that it's our fault when, individually, we don't actually have the ability to tell women "No".
This is true to an extent.
I think it still rests on the individual man to support policies and other local leaders who need to rise up and defenestrate women of their rights.
You're right that as individuals, the most we can do is tell women within our local vicinity "No!' when it comes to accommodating their tripe.
I do also understand OP's point about the tradcucks who constantly dismiss the issues women bring to the table by putting all the blame on men (this is even a growing trend within some manosphere circles, too).
But, individually, men still need to mobilise (where possible) to deny women leverage (viz., if you're the boss of a business, do not elevate or put a woman in power... ever), or to support/start grassroots committees who aim to re-establish power for men.
There is still an unhealthy amount of blue-pilled men out there who vehemently decry and putdown red pill content or still claim that things like "misandry isn't a problem because men still have institutional power".
These kinds of men are still a large portion of the normie community; and so, women will never be put in their place if these men keep making excuses for them.
I honestly wouldn't mind that chiding half as much if the state wouldn't put you in a federal pound you in the ass prison for attempting said control over women.
I like Jay Dyer but he has this kind of view on things. It's really easy for him to say that when he is already married to a woman who (so far) isn't a psycho, and it is really easy for him to say that when his wealth is largely in Bitcoin and not something the Feds have easy access to.
He put out a video a couple days ago about how even though things are shit and trying to date is a nightmare, we as men have to man up and risk stepping on a nuclear landmine in order to save the west, etc.
Like, that's nice and all. I don't have a problem handling a woman. I however, cannot fend off the entirety of my local police department when she inevitably calls a DV complaint against me when I tell her that she can't spend $20k on a purse or go clubbing when she's married. I cannot survive the SWAT team busting into my house with MP5 SMGs flashbangs, and shotguns, when all I have is a little handgun. I am at the mercy of the law and at the mercy of a gang of men armed with machine guns.
Laws have to change, and more importantly, culture has to change before men are going to be able to be men the way he thinks we need to be. I agree with him that men have to step up, but doing it the way he says right now with the culture we have is just going to put thousands of young men in prison who shouldn't be there.
The real struggle is going to be getting women to pressure and shame other women into not doing shit like false DV claims, but they have been so brainwashed by feminists who think a man glancing in their direction counts as sexual assault that it might not be possible within our lifetimes, if at all.
Reading your comment made me think of the post the other day where it was something like “50% of the Dearborn, Michigan police force is now Muslims” and the police chief is all habdullah praise be in a press conference. On the one hand, that’s a downfall of western civilization. On the other, they might not give a shit about any of the weaponized BS DV claims.
Well it's mens fault for letting women do what they please
It's the fault of every man who didn't gas the [R16]s before we came to this.
I'm still convinced all these "a huge % of young women do this!" is astroturf to normalize it so a larger percent of them actually do it. Creating a false acceptance so that women will follow the trend.
Even in this video, the math is complete fucking trash.
His "source" from the "Spread Thoughts Team" is obvious AI slop with no sources so I went looking for other sources. Which seems to have been a tweet, but fortunately other people had investigated that tweet.
Following along? The 20% comes from:
Only actual data in bold. Absolutely fucking retarded.
Note: Revenue is apparently from 67% US, 16% UK/Europe, and 17% rest of world. So I'm not even sure its 67% American creators or if they applied the subscriber metric to creators. They do seem to be putting on about 1.1M creators/year though.
Fun fact: "Even when excluding top accounts (+$80K monthly revenue), over 70% of total payouts goes to just 10% of creators."
Also I'm guessing there's a big drop off in numbers of people who sign up but don't actually do anything beyond this.
When the stories leave creator vs user vague, I assume there's a swath of women who are using it like Instagram to follow the SFW posts of whoever the TV told them was the hot celeb to watch this month. And probably some who subscribe to either "support their faves" or to check out the "competition."
Any website has more accounts than users. Especially active ones.
This.
20% is clearly way higher even if you include women who create an account to "check it out" and never post content. Too many dubious assumptions and data.
Better Bachelor isn't known for making high effort videos. He's no Colttaine.
"The amount of money they [OnlyFans] are making is more than Google..." This is ridiculously untrue.
20% even creating an account to check it out and never posting anything is still a horrifying revelation in my book.
I agree, but it does not excuse the mistakes in the video. One does not have to exaggerate the dismal state of our society. The truth is horrifying enough.
You can love women or understand them, not both.
There are days I wish I could go back to not understanding them because I think it'd be nice to fall in love again.
Statistical studies almost exclusively pull from college campuses or their adjacent areas.
So when you hear them, always imagine the population of a random campus and they will make a lot more sense.
Now if you're looking for an LTR you need to avoid:
Feminist
Leftist
Pro BLM
Vaccinated
Porn Star
And with 70% of them being overweight already, the number of candidates gets smaller and smaller by the day.
...Also the "born again virgins/Christians".
Basically they're used up wenches looking for a betabux pay-pig for their retirement plan.
Always good to see Joker here.
Him and Rehab Room are efficient at distilling black pills into the normie sphere for how things are actually shaping up in society without the ridiculous grift-culture attached to a lot of red pill content creators.
This is what a fatherless society looks like
And feminists wonder why "the patriarchy" kept them from voting as long as possible. When given free reign, they destroy their families, abort their children, vote for open borders and communism, and become prostitutes to one degree or another.
They can't even control their feeeeeelings and they want to control society.
I guess sugarbabies.com didn't work out so well for the majority of them?
Sugar babies at least provide a service to the customer beyond pixels on a screen.
Stripper paying for college has an uograde
At this point is just their inner attention whores coming out - regardless if they make money or not.
Even some semi famous athletes that don't need the $ have their OF because they love the attention these simps give them.