The craziest part about the word Holocaust is that the only time it shows up in the Bible it’s to refer to a “burnt offering” of charred flesh and fat offered to YHWH in Genesis.
The Jews have a really fucked up view of God and prophecy. From what I've read, they literally believe that 6,000,000 Jews had to be burnt in a fire to return to the promised land, and apparently they believed they could force the issue.
As a Christian, I'm always skeptical of people who insist that prophecy always has to be taken 100% literally. As though God doesn't love His metaphors and parables when explaining things to us. People who think they can force His hand by playing Magic Spells: Gargoyles Edition are even shadier.
yeah, if God is perfect, then God knows perfectly how to use abstract ideas and nuance. a lot of Christianity in general depends so much on this fact, it's really a shame most either ignore it or completely twist the intended interpretation.
That's literally what makes them j*wish. In Christ, God revealed that a huge chunk of his eternal strategy was a word game to distract the Enemy. The judeans who accepted God's revealed explanation became Christians. The judeans who replied "nuh uh" are the cursed people we suffer under today.
That's interesting, I actually had to look that one up. I don't remember ever seeing the word Holocaust in the Bible, but I only ever read the King James version. But you're right, they do use it in the Catholic translations, specifically when instructing Abraham to offer his son Isaac as a sacrifice. The King James version replaces that term with "burnt offering".
So then how did that term come to be used by jews for that event? Has any Jew actually offered up an explanation? If it's a word.that doesn't even exist outside a few rare contexts, then they had to have chosen it for a reason. In fact that was probably THE reason. Something no infrequently used it's basically a novel word.
'The Jews' use the term Shoah, which means catastrophe. It's historians who use holocaust. Not sure why. Possibly because the bodies were burned afterwards.
Saying anything against the jews is "anti-semitism" but the Semites encompass an entirely different group of peoples. They do not trace lineage to Shem.
Being able to steal history, have everyone just go along with it, and then use that stolen history to create a special class of "hate" is a pretty interesting skill.
It's no different than other favored castes fighting amongst themselves. Not liking sheboons isn't misogyny or racism, it's "misogynoir". Not liking male trannies isn't transphobia or misogyny, it's "transmisogyny". They're just solidifying their place on the pecking order by stacking their victim identities.
Because they serve satan. They are, like their master, liars. Words don't mean anything to these people, they view them as magic spells to make others do what they want.
That's why liberals will happily contradict themselves in a single sentence and act like it's perfectly normal. So soaked are they in lies that they genuinely don't understand what you're upset about.
Because it allows you to speak around an issue instead of directly at it.
When you say antisemitism people are already trained to know "that's bad, this person evil" and you don't have to say anything further. If you had to explain it, then you run the risk of it looking as stupid as it is and not being as effective.
Is it because language is a form of magic and they're casting spells on us?
I mean Kaballah magic must be real, because they would call someone "anti-semite" and poof! they would disappear. But their magical power seems to be waning as of late...
On a more serious note, what you're describing is pretty consistent with general Jewish strategy of marking themselves from everyone else, e.g "Chosen People" status, circumcision, different sets of rules for Jews vs Gentiles, etc. I wonder if Kevin MacDonald wrote anything specifically on your topic?
People don’t tend to do something for thousands of years if it has no effect.
If you were born in a culture without a word for “apple”, you would be fundamentally limited in your ability to cognate on the subject of apples.
If you lived in a world without the word “family”, you would be living in a world without families. If you lived in a world where everything a white person did was “racism”, that too would have a physical effect. Magic is about changing minds.
I wonder if Kevin MacDonald wrote anything specifically on your topic?
Hmm might be worth a search of the Unz Review archives...
In other words, they're not wrong. Most people are NPCs and words are magic spells to reprogram them. We should harness this power for our benefit, but careful not to become the monster ourselves.
Even if you aren't, having words like "racist", "sexist" and "transphobic" in your vocabulary will affect you as well.
Imagine if there were no term for "racism". You would see people favouring their ingroups and just think "of course, why wouldn't they?" If racism is a concept in your head, you automatically have to categorize it as good or bad, rather than just a part of human interaction.
Same with "homosexual", if that term didn't exist we would think of it as a state of being. There would just be hedonistic sex and procreational sex, and they wouldn't be considered victims, they would be considered decadent.
There's heterosexual 'hedonistic' sex, is the thing with that one, and there always will be, unless you magically remove all contraception off the face of the Earth.
what you're describing is pretty consistent with general Jewish strategy of marking themselves from everyone else,
All of 'kosher' is just to prevent Jews from interacting too much with Christians and Muslims and assimilating into the dominant culture. That is where the separation originated: with the Babylonian exile, which in retrospect wasn't serious but it allowed them to build antibodies when living in alien lands was serious.
Since they realised the can't win an open war because they decimated like last time and we aren't talking about the Israelis who at least learnt not to piss of a superpower directly.
The Whites used to appeal to power by authority and order
The Asians more tradition
The Middle East more Faith
And Africa was more Tribal
The Jewish have always been the outcasts from society, never really having a majority country wise till the 20th century. They go more by empathy and victim status especially since WW2 so always have new ways to say they are targeted as unlike the left, they know the same words get boring and less effective with repetition.
Generally if you can shape language to your own moral views you can make it impossible to argue with anything you say. It's an inherently feminine mode of rhetoric.
Different cultures have different ways of mediating disputes, the concept of open and fair debate is actually very unique to WASP cultures. Jailing and executing heretics is far more common throughout history.
Don't forget 'sex change', which became 'gender reassignment surgery', which because 'gender affirmation surgery'. All of them are incorrect, but they become increasingly Orwellian.
The 'isms' are useful for the regime. The pawns of the regime can't really be trusted to refute counter-arguments. But if you equip them with a few choice insults, like racism, Russia, conspiracy theorist, then they can shield themselves off.
Yeah they all coordinate for consistent messaging and language use, we saw that in Journolist. The left really does believe that words are magic spells and changing perception changes reality.
It's a way to attach moral failure to your actions. It's not just you doing something wrong, you're doing the bad thing because you're motivated by evil.
Another example: When a woman criticizes a man, it's feminism. When a man criticizes a woman, it's misogyny.
It's been funny watching them use those words against blacks to no effect. Jews spent the past 20 years indoctrinating blacks with critical race theory, grievance studies, "it's ok to hate your oppressors", etc. Basically teaching blacks to be as indignant as jews, but with the characteristic lack of impulse control. And it's turned against them, lol.
Unique hatred because of success. Everyone is simply jealous of their success, and this has gone throughout history. They get blamed for literally everything, from petty same so financially bancrupting countries, mass migration, and wars. All without evidence. So it stands reason they would have a word to define the unique hatred they receive.
And since you mentioned it, they are also accused of being satanists casting spells. Again without evidence.
All they want to do is love peacefully on their own land and they can't even be allowed to do that without whites interfering.
Trolling? Dude this is what the average normie (including you) would say in response to the rhetorical question in the OP. You’d bring up their historical literacy rates, you’d bring up the historic bans on Christian usury, you’d bring up “middleman minorities are always hated”, etc etc
No one in his right mind says "whites interfering". It's obvious what this guy is, and he's certainly not a defender of the Jews. He's just trying to make cringe arguments in favor of the Jews so these can be knocked down.
You’re right, instead they use phrases like “le pogroms!” and vague gesturing towards claims which emanated exclusively from Bolshevik communists initially. The person who I would expect to phrase that as “whites interfering” is a zionist israeli attempting to astroturf the forum. Some type of “jester”-like entity.
No one but the most whacked out wokies would seriously use that phrase. Maybe it's a little difficult to see a quite obvious satire (though a bad one) from your POV.
I think you’re probably the first forum user to identify this guy as a double agent jew hater, and he himself denies it, with a LONG post history that would back up the position he’s being “genuine” here. Can you point to any other proof he’s actually a double agent? I mean it’s so obvious to you, surely you aren’t basing such an insane accusation on a single comment?
I think you’re probably the first forum user to identify this guy as a double agent jew hater
I'm probably one of the only users here who supports Israel. And it's very easy for me to see that this guy's positions make zero sense. But you, of course, would like to believe that he is legit, so you can say: see, this is what THEY are like.
Can you point to any other proof he’s actually a double agent?
Double agent... way to make being a bad troll sound way more impressive than ti is. Yes, the fact that his positions make no sense as a whole is proof of that. Not to brag about this important and very valuable skill, but I'm also quite good at detecting people who are insincere online.
In this case, there are a couple of red flags. He's very inconsistent. He denounces anti-Semites and 'Islamists' like a mainstream GOPe would, but at the same time, he denounces white people and advocates for 'hate speech' laws. I follow a good number of pro-Israel people who have been rather hypocritical, but none of them are anything like this. This guy talks like he wants to be exposed for being a hypocrite, because he does.
surely you aren’t basing such an insane accusation on a single comment?
Not really insane, but it's not based on a single comment. It's based on many comments.
am I? This is a mainstream position. Most countries recognize the need to protect Jews. They were exiled from over 100 nations for a a reason, and that reason is hate. And as such have codeified laws to protect them. Those laws wouldnt need to exist if whites and their islamist friends weren't always trying to hunt down random Jewish families for the crime of defending themselves.
Nay, son, "whites interfering" is not a mainstream position. It's something someone who doesn't like Jews himself would say.
Those laws wouldnt need to exist if whites and their islamist friends weren't always trying to hunt down random Jewish families
I patrol the homes of nearby Jewish families, quickly sending them a message: "MAN THE LIFEBOAT, THERE'S A WHITE AROUND!" if I spot anyone who dares to be white.
Look, I don't mind your trolling. At least make it good trolling and a credible act. This is just cringe.
The power of words. They influence reality and perception. Look at all the keywords ushered in virtually everything they have subverted. They are all thematically linked.
Spells real just not in the strict sense. But the notion is. You say a series of words and an expected result happens.
But instead of umbada doombada and your book levitates, it's "racism" "supremacy" "equality" and those most suspectable to manipulation are almost hypnotized and react accordingly and predictably.
If I had to guess, it's to promote themselves to a separate special class,above everybody else.
Racism is bad, but antisemitism is super duper extra bad.
Genocide is bad, but the Holocaust was super duper extra bad.
Whatever the topic, having a separate term allows them to make the topic about them. It's narcissism.
The craziest part about the word Holocaust is that the only time it shows up in the Bible it’s to refer to a “burnt offering” of charred flesh and fat offered to YHWH in Genesis.
The Jews have a really fucked up view of God and prophecy. From what I've read, they literally believe that 6,000,000 Jews had to be burnt in a fire to return to the promised land, and apparently they believed they could force the issue.
As a Christian, I'm always skeptical of people who insist that prophecy always has to be taken 100% literally. As though God doesn't love His metaphors and parables when explaining things to us. People who think they can force His hand by playing Magic Spells: Gargoyles Edition are even shadier.
yeah, if God is perfect, then God knows perfectly how to use abstract ideas and nuance. a lot of Christianity in general depends so much on this fact, it's really a shame most either ignore it or completely twist the intended interpretation.
That's literally what makes them j*wish. In Christ, God revealed that a huge chunk of his eternal strategy was a word game to distract the Enemy. The judeans who accepted God's revealed explanation became Christians. The judeans who replied "nuh uh" are the cursed people we suffer under today.
That's interesting, I actually had to look that one up. I don't remember ever seeing the word Holocaust in the Bible, but I only ever read the King James version. But you're right, they do use it in the Catholic translations, specifically when instructing Abraham to offer his son Isaac as a sacrifice. The King James version replaces that term with "burnt offering".
Iirc it is also used to refer to Abel’s offering of the firstling
'Holocaust' is the Greek term for when the whole animal is sacrificed rather than just the bones and the fat.
So then how did that term come to be used by jews for that event? Has any Jew actually offered up an explanation? If it's a word.that doesn't even exist outside a few rare contexts, then they had to have chosen it for a reason. In fact that was probably THE reason. Something no infrequently used it's basically a novel word.
'The Jews' use the term Shoah, which means catastrophe. It's historians who use holocaust. Not sure why. Possibly because the bodies were burned afterwards.
Pulled completely out of my ass, but in one sense they could look at dead Jews as a sacrifice made to earn the formation of Israel. /shrug
So who coined it?
Hi, Dominos? I’d like to order 6,000,000 pizzas over the next 4 years. What’s that you say? There isn’t enoug
"Last year, we sold over 114 million freshly handcrafted pizzas"
Dude we’re obviously talking about their production capacity from the years 1939 to 1943
'Kosher' -> quality of being eaten by the priest class
Saying anything against the jews is "anti-semitism" but the Semites encompass an entirely different group of peoples. They do not trace lineage to Shem.
Being able to steal history, have everyone just go along with it, and then use that stolen history to create a special class of "hate" is a pretty interesting skill.
They cry out as they strike you.
It's no different than other favored castes fighting amongst themselves. Not liking sheboons isn't misogyny or racism, it's "misogynoir". Not liking male trannies isn't transphobia or misogyny, it's "transmisogyny". They're just solidifying their place on the pecking order by stacking their victim identities.
Great examples of the same thing.
We're all people, but they're CHOSEN people.
The US has allies but Israel is our GREATEST ally.
There's lots of countries in the middle east but Israel is "the only democracy in the middle east"
They simultaneously have "only one nation" and are a "nationless people" that have spread to everywhere else in the world.
Because they serve satan. They are, like their master, liars. Words don't mean anything to these people, they view them as magic spells to make others do what they want.
That's why liberals will happily contradict themselves in a single sentence and act like it's perfectly normal. So soaked are they in lies that they genuinely don't understand what you're upset about.
Because it allows you to speak around an issue instead of directly at it.
When you say antisemitism people are already trained to know "that's bad, this person evil" and you don't have to say anything further. If you had to explain it, then you run the risk of it looking as stupid as it is and not being as effective.
Its basic marketing and manipulation techniques.
I mean Kaballah magic must be real, because they would call someone "anti-semite" and poof! they would disappear. But their magical power seems to be waning as of late...
On a more serious note, what you're describing is pretty consistent with general Jewish strategy of marking themselves from everyone else, e.g "Chosen People" status, circumcision, different sets of rules for Jews vs Gentiles, etc. I wonder if Kevin MacDonald wrote anything specifically on your topic?
People don’t tend to do something for thousands of years if it has no effect.
If you were born in a culture without a word for “apple”, you would be fundamentally limited in your ability to cognate on the subject of apples.
If you lived in a world without the word “family”, you would be living in a world without families. If you lived in a world where everything a white person did was “racism”, that too would have a physical effect. Magic is about changing minds.
Hmm might be worth a search of the Unz Review archives...
In other words, they're not wrong. Most people are NPCs and words are magic spells to reprogram them. We should harness this power for our benefit, but careful not to become the monster ourselves.
Even if you aren't, having words like "racist", "sexist" and "transphobic" in your vocabulary will affect you as well.
Imagine if there were no term for "racism". You would see people favouring their ingroups and just think "of course, why wouldn't they?" If racism is a concept in your head, you automatically have to categorize it as good or bad, rather than just a part of human interaction.
Same with "homosexual", if that term didn't exist we would think of it as a state of being. There would just be hedonistic sex and procreational sex, and they wouldn't be considered victims, they would be considered decadent.
Watch what you say and what you hear.
You're right. The golem eats everyone in the end.
There's heterosexual 'hedonistic' sex, is the thing with that one, and there always will be, unless you magically remove all contraception off the face of the Earth.
I wasn't disagreeing with you with my earlier post, merely attempting a joke.
Fair, consider that part addressed to people who can’t fathom the concept of a natural “magic” in our world :)
All of 'kosher' is just to prevent Jews from interacting too much with Christians and Muslims and assimilating into the dominant culture. That is where the separation originated: with the Babylonian exile, which in retrospect wasn't serious but it allowed them to build antibodies when living in alien lands was serious.
When did 'they' use poison against 'their enemies'?
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2019-11-08/ty-article-magazine/.premium/an-eye-for-an-eye-jews-who-sought-to-kill-germans-in-revenge-for-the-holocaust/0000017f-e0d4-d38f-a57f-e6d6c9b30000
OK, so no actual instance, only a 'plan'. And way after kosher rules were developed, so the guy's explanation for kosher makes no sense.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well_poisoning#Medieval_accusations_against_Jews
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well_poisoning#Modern_instances_of_antisemitic_libel
Since they realised the can't win an open war because they decimated like last time and we aren't talking about the Israelis who at least learnt not to piss of a superpower directly.
The Whites used to appeal to power by authority and order
The Asians more tradition
The Middle East more Faith
And Africa was more Tribal
The Jewish have always been the outcasts from society, never really having a majority country wise till the 20th century. They go more by empathy and victim status especially since WW2 so always have new ways to say they are targeted as unlike the left, they know the same words get boring and less effective with repetition.
Generally if you can shape language to your own moral views you can make it impossible to argue with anything you say. It's an inherently feminine mode of rhetoric.
Different cultures have different ways of mediating disputes, the concept of open and fair debate is actually very unique to WASP cultures. Jailing and executing heretics is far more common throughout history.
Don't forget 'sex change', which became 'gender reassignment surgery', which because 'gender affirmation surgery'. All of them are incorrect, but they become increasingly Orwellian.
The 'isms' are useful for the regime. The pawns of the regime can't really be trusted to refute counter-arguments. But if you equip them with a few choice insults, like racism, Russia, conspiracy theorist, then they can shield themselves off.
Or how "white nationalist" suddenly became a stand in for "white supremacist" but they cant be sued for it.
It's not like it's hard to do when you control the media and schools and have zero shame.
Yeah they all coordinate for consistent messaging and language use, we saw that in Journolist. The left really does believe that words are magic spells and changing perception changes reality.
It's a way to attach moral failure to your actions. It's not just you doing something wrong, you're doing the bad thing because you're motivated by evil.
Another example: When a woman criticizes a man, it's feminism. When a man criticizes a woman, it's misogyny.
It's been funny watching them use those words against blacks to no effect. Jews spent the past 20 years indoctrinating blacks with critical race theory, grievance studies, "it's ok to hate your oppressors", etc. Basically teaching blacks to be as indignant as jews, but with the characteristic lack of impulse control. And it's turned against them, lol.
People whose culture is based on being educated and dealing with dense sets of rules tend to find ways around the rules.
they don't have a word for accountability, though
imagine that
like when they say "Don't use Pedophile, Say Rabbi instead"
It may be that they're ramping it up because they've over used all the 'ists and 'phobs.
People just shrug off blurple haired people calling them racist, sexist and all of the many lgbtqia2s+yabbadabbado words for homophobic.
Jokes on them. People aren't getting terribly upset about someone yelling at them about antisemitism either.
well... an entire generation literally has zero experience with basic communism and misapprehends it's sources constantly.
it's communism. it's just basic communism. this is 101 level shit.
Blood libel they murder then eat the children's blood in matza in satanic rituals. That is worse that murder.
Unique hatred because of success. Everyone is simply jealous of their success, and this has gone throughout history. They get blamed for literally everything, from petty same so financially bancrupting countries, mass migration, and wars. All without evidence. So it stands reason they would have a word to define the unique hatred they receive.
And since you mentioned it, they are also accused of being satanists casting spells. Again without evidence.
All they want to do is love peacefully on their own land and they can't even be allowed to do that without whites interfering.
You're laying the trolling on too thick.
Trolling? Dude this is what the average normie (including you) would say in response to the rhetorical question in the OP. You’d bring up their historical literacy rates, you’d bring up the historic bans on Christian usury, you’d bring up “middleman minorities are always hated”, etc etc
No one in his right mind says "whites interfering". It's obvious what this guy is, and he's certainly not a defender of the Jews. He's just trying to make cringe arguments in favor of the Jews so these can be knocked down.
You’re right, instead they use phrases like “le pogroms!” and vague gesturing towards claims which emanated exclusively from Bolshevik communists initially. The person who I would expect to phrase that as “whites interfering” is a zionist israeli attempting to astroturf the forum. Some type of “jester”-like entity.
No one but the most whacked out wokies would seriously use that phrase. Maybe it's a little difficult to see a quite obvious satire (though a bad one) from your POV.
I think you’re probably the first forum user to identify this guy as a double agent jew hater, and he himself denies it, with a LONG post history that would back up the position he’s being “genuine” here. Can you point to any other proof he’s actually a double agent? I mean it’s so obvious to you, surely you aren’t basing such an insane accusation on a single comment?
I'm probably one of the only users here who supports Israel. And it's very easy for me to see that this guy's positions make zero sense. But you, of course, would like to believe that he is legit, so you can say: see, this is what THEY are like.
Double agent... way to make being a bad troll sound way more impressive than ti is. Yes, the fact that his positions make no sense as a whole is proof of that. Not to brag about this important and very valuable skill, but I'm also quite good at detecting people who are insincere online.
In this case, there are a couple of red flags. He's very inconsistent. He denounces anti-Semites and 'Islamists' like a mainstream GOPe would, but at the same time, he denounces white people and advocates for 'hate speech' laws. I follow a good number of pro-Israel people who have been rather hypocritical, but none of them are anything like this. This guy talks like he wants to be exposed for being a hypocrite, because he does.
Not really insane, but it's not based on a single comment. It's based on many comments.
am I? This is a mainstream position. Most countries recognize the need to protect Jews. They were exiled from over 100 nations for a a reason, and that reason is hate. And as such have codeified laws to protect them. Those laws wouldnt need to exist if whites and their islamist friends weren't always trying to hunt down random Jewish families for the crime of defending themselves.
Nay, son, "whites interfering" is not a mainstream position. It's something someone who doesn't like Jews himself would say.
I patrol the homes of nearby Jewish families, quickly sending them a message: "MAN THE LIFEBOAT, THERE'S A WHITE AROUND!" if I spot anyone who dares to be white.
Look, I don't mind your trolling. At least make it good trolling and a credible act. This is just cringe.
It's seems to me we just "interfered" by the tune of 68 billion dollar. Maybe your're right and all interferences should be stopped immediately.
Blame the Jew: verboten bigotry!
Blame whitey: obviously just the truth.
Leftists love making neologisms.
Post Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This doesn't actually do this. Also: no. Language is not magic. No, it's not jews. Yes, it's Leftists. Yes, it's called sophistry.
Magic is real
Magic israel
Israel isreal
Because optics matter.
The power of words. They influence reality and perception. Look at all the keywords ushered in virtually everything they have subverted. They are all thematically linked.
Jews didn't make up the word anti-semitism, early 19th century self-proclaimed anti-semites did.
Spells real just not in the strict sense. But the notion is. You say a series of words and an expected result happens. But instead of umbada doombada and your book levitates, it's "racism" "supremacy" "equality" and those most suspectable to manipulation are almost hypnotized and react accordingly and predictably.