Rhetorical question
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
You're laying the trolling on too thick.
Trolling? Dude this is what the average normie (including you) would say in response to the rhetorical question in the OP. You’d bring up their historical literacy rates, you’d bring up the historic bans on Christian usury, you’d bring up “middleman minorities are always hated”, etc etc
No one in his right mind says "whites interfering". It's obvious what this guy is, and he's certainly not a defender of the Jews. He's just trying to make cringe arguments in favor of the Jews so these can be knocked down.
You’re right, instead they use phrases like “le pogroms!” and vague gesturing towards claims which emanated exclusively from Bolshevik communists initially. The person who I would expect to phrase that as “whites interfering” is a zionist israeli attempting to astroturf the forum. Some type of “jester”-like entity.
No one but the most whacked out wokies would seriously use that phrase. Maybe it's a little difficult to see a quite obvious satire (though a bad one) from your POV.
am I? This is a mainstream position. Most countries recognize the need to protect Jews. They were exiled from over 100 nations for a a reason, and that reason is hate. And as such have codeified laws to protect them. Those laws wouldnt need to exist if whites and their islamist friends weren't always trying to hunt down random Jewish families for the crime of defending themselves.
Nay, son, "whites interfering" is not a mainstream position. It's something someone who doesn't like Jews himself would say.
I patrol the homes of nearby Jewish families, quickly sending them a message: "MAN THE LIFEBOAT, THERE'S A WHITE AROUND!" if I spot anyone who dares to be white.
Look, I don't mind your trolling. At least make it good trolling and a credible act. This is just cringe.