As rates of sexually transmitted infections continue to skyrocket across the United States, a growing number of physicians are prescribing a commonly used antibiotic as a way to prevent chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis infections in gay and bisexual men and transgender women.
In honest words: sexual degenerates are once again raising the cost of healthcare and deviating resources away from useful practices so they can continue being deviants.
One of my buddies in my early 20s was gay. Over drinks one night I said "come on, I gotta know -- how many guys have you been with?" He looked me in the eyes and said "I stopped counting at 100 when I was 16."
My other buddy when I lived in asia was a very shy, quiet, fat and nerdy dude. He used to go to a bathhouse in the Jong-no district of Seoul every weekend and get spitroasted by 6-10 different guys. During the week he would pick up 5-10 more through Grindr.
Just last week I met one of my wife's childhood friends... they come from a conservative country and upbringing (Philippines) -- these are very highly educated professionals at this point in their lives. He dipped on us several times in just a couple days to go suck a dick for 20 mins. Grindr again.
While I am sure there are many gay men who want a long term solid thing (and the data bears this out, believe it or not. Once gay men settle down into a LTR it tends to be the most rock-solid of any pairing, at least in terms of divorce) -- every gay dude I know well is a huge sexual deviant.
Once gay men settle down into a LTR it tends to be the most rock-solid of any pairing, at least in terms of divorce) --
I'm willing to bet this is just because men dislike change and are way less likely to initiate a divorce. I wouldn't give them this stat like it's a virtue or anything, lol.
it's been a long time since I read the study -- and you'll have to forgive me but I don't want to go chase my source for a random internet comment I made -- but if I recall correctly the answer is actually no.
Generally, once gay males decide to commit and be married, it's a solid, monogamous relationship.
I actually misspoke earlier -- there are a couple gay men I know who aren't sexual degenerates. They're so utterly normal I didn't even think about them. One couple has been married about 5 years, the other about 20.
I do believe that homosexuality tends to manifest from some sort of abuse as a child (which is sadly vastly underreported)... but it is an interesting question as to why there exists a minority who don't go on to full-blown sexual deviance.
Interesting. I mean, I have to wonder what monogamous means because technically it's not poly unless you bring someone into the relationship. Sanctioned cheating can technically take place in a monogamous relationship.
I believe truly monogamous gays are out there though. Glenn Greenwald probably left the roadie life once he settled down with his husband. Sad what happened.
Then there are the gays who marry so they can molest children.
While I am sure there are many gay men who want a long term solid thing (and the data bears this out, believe it or not. Once gay men settle down into a LTR it tends to be the most rock-solid of any pairing, at least in terms of divorce)
Casual observation also bears out the fact that gay men will fuck anyone willing until they get old and gross-looking to other gay men. Then they begin looking for LTRs. Much like hetero women, now that I think on it a might.
You may be on to something. The mold-breakers I know were typically very reserved about their sexuality, generally because of their parents (as it should be, really -- why is it ever a topic of conversation?)... but I wonder if there's an aspect of "never fell into that trap" to it, as well.
If there were to be data to back that up, it'd certainly be ironic that keeping your kids in the closet as long as possible will stop them from developing degenerate tendencies.
Yeah, sounds like you keep them under your mattress with all the other things you can go stick up your ass. Not all of us take "trust me, bro" as a source.
Calling it a "disease" is discriminatory towards whores and sluts. Especially since STDs are apparently more common in "certain sections" of the population than others.
Pretentious linguistic experts fellating eachothers.
You can get infected without developping the disease but still transmit the infection to people who will develop the disease.
For the average person, who the fuck cares about that nuance. You got infectious bacteria or parasites in and around your junk, that's disgusting, get that treated and stop being a barebacking whore.
The same reason they changed "homeless" to "unhoused" and "sex change" to "gender affirmation", because normal people inherently understand the older description's meaning.
Because some sexually-transmitted illnesses can't accurately be considered "diseases", but they can accurately be considered "infections". Like saying that not all rectangles are squares. I know that the acronym is minimally less catchy, but I don't believe that this particular aspect is an attempt to encourage degeneracy. We were already calling them STIs when I was in high school, nearly 20 years ago.
Watch the people who were perfectly fine putting the world under house arrest for a bad cold with a good PR team squeal like a pig stuck under a gate at the notion. They tried that with monkeypox and it went over like a lead balloon.
How about you wear a condom at the very least or, even better, try not to fuck first and build a relationship where if you want raw sex and get pregnant, you can look after the child in a loving home than put it in a saw film.
In honest words: sexual degenerates are once again raising the cost of healthcare and deviating resources away from useful practices so they can continue being deviants.
Also, all it's going to do is force the evolution of ATB-resistant strains. Papa Nurgle approves.
Turns out faggotry is a massive problem because they can't not be whores.
I saw a study from like 2007 where straight men at the age of 30 averaged 4 or so sexual partners.
Gay averaged over 60.
And that was when faggotry was not enabled nearly as much
Averaged over 60 is low.
One of my buddies in my early 20s was gay. Over drinks one night I said "come on, I gotta know -- how many guys have you been with?" He looked me in the eyes and said "I stopped counting at 100 when I was 16."
My other buddy when I lived in asia was a very shy, quiet, fat and nerdy dude. He used to go to a bathhouse in the Jong-no district of Seoul every weekend and get spitroasted by 6-10 different guys. During the week he would pick up 5-10 more through Grindr.
Just last week I met one of my wife's childhood friends... they come from a conservative country and upbringing (Philippines) -- these are very highly educated professionals at this point in their lives. He dipped on us several times in just a couple days to go suck a dick for 20 mins. Grindr again.
While I am sure there are many gay men who want a long term solid thing (and the data bears this out, believe it or not. Once gay men settle down into a LTR it tends to be the most rock-solid of any pairing, at least in terms of divorce) -- every gay dude I know well is a huge sexual deviant.
The Jong-no Dong-yes bathhouse?
I'm willing to bet this is just because men dislike change and are way less likely to initiate a divorce. I wouldn't give them this stat like it's a virtue or anything, lol.
Just look at all the stories of women divorcing their partners when they "finally meet the one". Woman are all about "dating upwards".
Lol reading this makes me glad I never bothered and stayed a permavirgin.
Imagine the STD Russian-Roulette.
You're still generally pretty safe having sex as long as you don't involve buttholes.
Are these marriages as open as a block of Swiss cheese or what?
it's been a long time since I read the study -- and you'll have to forgive me but I don't want to go chase my source for a random internet comment I made -- but if I recall correctly the answer is actually no.
Generally, once gay males decide to commit and be married, it's a solid, monogamous relationship.
I actually misspoke earlier -- there are a couple gay men I know who aren't sexual degenerates. They're so utterly normal I didn't even think about them. One couple has been married about 5 years, the other about 20.
I do believe that homosexuality tends to manifest from some sort of abuse as a child (which is sadly vastly underreported)... but it is an interesting question as to why there exists a minority who don't go on to full-blown sexual deviance.
Interesting. I mean, I have to wonder what monogamous means because technically it's not poly unless you bring someone into the relationship. Sanctioned cheating can technically take place in a monogamous relationship.
I believe truly monogamous gays are out there though. Glenn Greenwald probably left the roadie life once he settled down with his husband. Sad what happened.
Then there are the gays who marry so they can molest children.
Casual observation also bears out the fact that gay men will fuck anyone willing until they get old and gross-looking to other gay men. Then they begin looking for LTRs. Much like hetero women, now that I think on it a might.
almonds activated
You may be on to something. The mold-breakers I know were typically very reserved about their sexuality, generally because of their parents (as it should be, really -- why is it ever a topic of conversation?)... but I wonder if there's an aspect of "never fell into that trap" to it, as well.
If there were to be data to back that up, it'd certainly be ironic that keeping your kids in the closet as long as possible will stop them from developing degenerate tendencies.
aids did not stop them.
nothing will.
That's funny. 20 years ago, I saw a bear riding a unicycle while juggling chainsaw while it was beatboxing all of "The Real Slim Shady".
I'm sorry I don't keep lists of studies about faggots being faggots on my phone
Yeah, sounds like you keep them under your mattress with all the other things you can go stick up your ass. Not all of us take "trust me, bro" as a source.
Did it hit close to home? Are you a huge gay whore? Is that why you're mad?
Is that why you're obsessed with thinking about dudes sticking things up their asses?
There's also federal money pushing this. That's why every fourth commercial is actors portraying straight people who "have HIV".
Remember the study of PrePr prescribed guys in Australia? They accrued STDs like boy scout badges once the fear of aids was gone.
Why did things change over the last couple years from STDs to STIs? Is "disease" less politically correct than "infection" for some reason?
Calling it a "disease" is discriminatory towards whores and sluts. Especially since STDs are apparently more common in "certain sections" of the population than others.
53% of black women have herpes
Pretentious linguistic experts fellating eachothers.
You can get infected without developping the disease but still transmit the infection to people who will develop the disease.
For the average person, who the fuck cares about that nuance. You got infectious bacteria or parasites in and around your junk, that's disgusting, get that treated and stop being a barebacking whore.
The same reason they changed "homeless" to "unhoused" and "sex change" to "gender affirmation", because normal people inherently understand the older description's meaning.
Because some sexually-transmitted illnesses can't accurately be considered "diseases", but they can accurately be considered "infections". Like saying that not all rectangles are squares. I know that the acronym is minimally less catchy, but I don't believe that this particular aspect is an attempt to encourage degeneracy. We were already calling them STIs when I was in high school, nearly 20 years ago.
Things were pretty pozzed 20 years ago.
This still seems to me like a strange hill to die on, fighting against a more accurate term.
I'd sooner see the weasels who decided it was "more accurate" covered in honey and left in a fire ant colony than accept their premise.
Are infections not also things to cure? Things widely considered to be harmful and to be avoided?
The term doesn't make it sound "acceptable" to catch. Not any more so than catching a "disease".
I still don't see the issue with this.
We need AIDS 2, except we need it to kill even quicker.
Too bad Monkeypox was about as ''deadly'' as a cold, because it was almost exclusively restricted to turbo-whores doing gay orgies.
Sadly there are collateral victims such as children and dogs that got raped by the above degenerates.
It was so funny watching all coverage of monkeypox immediately stop once kids and dogs started mysteriously developing ass sores.
Honestly I could meet the elites halfway on their depopulation agenda if Bill Gates told me his Thanos virus was just Turbo AIDS.
“There can be only
onenone.”Or, everyone could quit fucking anything and everything that moves.
Side note: anyone else having trouble with archive sites? I can't get through the stupid captcha thing today.
Watch the people who were perfectly fine putting the world under house arrest for a bad cold with a good PR team squeal like a pig stuck under a gate at the notion. They tried that with monkeypox and it went over like a lead balloon.
I figured the owner was fucking around with Brave users again but, can confirm, even with other browsers, also stuck in recaptcha loop
How about you wear a condom at the very least or, even better, try not to fuck first and build a relationship where if you want raw sex and get pregnant, you can look after the child in a loving home than put it in a saw film.
These faggots aren't getting pregnant. Just the clap, the herp, and the hivvy.
Pills, always the solution suggested by the Medical Industry. Never preventative health if possible, because of course that wouldn't make them money.
(There are many doctors that do encourage nutrition and exercise, but when a problem is so rampant or difficult to fix the pill-pushers come out)
Meanwhile, fewer and fewer people are having sex. So the rates of infection must be sky-high among thots and chads.
It's probably driven by fags. The recent advances in AIDS treatment have made it more manageable so they are going buck wild lately.
Maybe some of them got Chlamydia from riding a tractor in their bathing suit.
The messaging going on through porn is doing it's thing exactly as designed.
How about ''stop being a whore and you won't get sexual diseases''.
Also, blanket distribution of pills as a preventive is great way to increase antibiotic resistance.
Zager & Evans, "In The Year 2525" (1969):
Actually all the lyrics are pretty dead on!
Just stop being a whore.
The solutions are simple and well documented.
"Brought to you by Pfizer"
Real talk though, this "pill for an ill" mentality makes me pretty angry.
"Don't make intelligent decisions; just take our medications instead!"
Slaanesh teams up with Nurgle, film at a 11
Fucking degenerate slaaneshi cultists. Purge the heretics.
Or, you know, don't be a whore
From Pox to Monkey to Monke