This just reveals that the whole Syria conflict was about Oil, surprise surprise. That was already sort of figured out years ago regarding the Arab-Turk connections, but now pretty much confirmed.
The timeline makes sense as well:
10/7/2023 - Allow large-scale terrorist attack to succeed, or at least aggravate it with fuck-ups.
10/2023-5/2024 - Spend months grieving and playing the victim card, demanding help and retribution, with muslim-jewish clashing in Western nations while Whites get caught up and punished for it.
Summer 2024 - Bulldoze the Gaza open-air prison, using the terror attack and more Hamas attacks as an excuse
Autumn 2024 - Invade Lebanon to weaken Hezbollah, using the terror attack as an excuse, and therefore the last of Assad's support vanishes
12/8/2024 - End Syrian Civil War swiftly by giving some remnants support and take as much disputed land as possible before Trump is President. Syria gets divided up between Kurds, Turks, et al, maybe some of the old country remains. New oil pipelines get formed and all Israel-aligned parties benefit.
Don't think Israel won't try to take over Lebanon though. They probably want the whole Levant.
Another win that the globalist bankers let go on for 15 years?
The whole point was for the military powers at play here to reap extra benefits and excuses to be funded, while letting refugees invade Europe and other militias fuck up the region more. The Syrian Civil War has no use anymore with Trump coming back into the fold, who would probably be more forceful this time in shutting down the US' illegal presence there. So they just ended it now, like how the Afghanistan pull-out happened after the Potato got into office. Finally having financial control over Syria is the cherry.
They could have just done a 2003 Iraq, without the two decades of lingering, from the beginning if they really wanted to put the Saud oil pipeline through to connect with Turkey and newly formed Kurdistan, and take the Golan Heights, but intentionally chose not to as it would be too obvious of a power grab.
Considering how Korra ruined the franchise, I'm just going to assume the current state of this Avatar world is not going have any of the blame directed towards her. Viewers with brains will know that in reality it should be her fault, but the story won't touch upon it.
The premise will most likely be that a nuclear war or some shit, thanks to the non-benders, caused the world to become like this and girlboss Avatar Korra couldn't do anything about it. The even-darker-skinned disabled girl with god-like powers will need to rebuild humanity.
I'm glad the mask has finally came off from the other group of the MC/Visa duopoly and they're openly admitting that they're engaging in International Economic Terrorism.
This smells like violation of international treaties and the end result here will probably be Japan shunting VISA from the country entirely unless financial zaibatsu like Mitsui and Sumitomo are in on this.
Any alternatives are out of the question though, most Apple Pay style systems are region-locked. JCB already pulled out of the United States before the USA installed those laws for bankers/PPs to apply US law to foreign countries for financial transactions. So Japan will probably become isolationist over this stuff.
If you dig around in any sphere of influence, you'll find at least one pedo.
The downvotes over this are hilarious. You pointed out that there are other studies confirming this issue better, but because you say this particular one is bogus a lot of people reached for that button.
It's only meant for First World nations. That's why they do it.
This transition is going to be Round 2 of supporters not understanding The Art of the Deal. One can put the most extreme ask first to test the waters and then get someone that could still do some (or even most) of what one wants.
Last time Trump wasn't as well-informed of the Beltway Politics and the snakes in the pit, so he made bad picks. This time he probably does know how to play the game better.
The appointment doesn't mean shit if the Senate doesn't allow the appointment.
Probably it's the specific URL being blocked where you're accessing. Public/work (even your own private one) WiFis can log all sites accessed/visited through their access point and can chose to block specific domain URLs, or have a service that automates it
cannot expand my buisness due to... forcing you hiring-laws on me if i go above 30 employees
It's exclusively an EEOC problem? Not the taxes or wage laws?
Their software division is entering the dinosaur stage where it can't innovate anymore or is unwilling to maintain a proper customer base, so the parent megaconglo will just funnel profit from their other pseudo-monopoly subsidiaries to buy already existing products to keep that sector of the business alive.
Happy IMD to you too (☞･ω･)☞
Ukraine Escalation was on my "How they'll fuck with the Trump transition" Bingo card. I'm neither surprised or entirely concerned about this, unless they try a nuclear false-flag.
Question is, does Congress have the nads to sack the Potato's ass before he's punted out of the Oval Office for pulling a stunt like this? Probably not...
Argumentum ad logicam
They claim there's a fallacy in the argument, therefore they claim it's invalid.
mgtow guys complaining about women instead of mgtow guys actually going their own way and doing something else
Because the ones doing it proper usually end up going off the grid or you don't see them posting online often, if ever.
We're reading from those who are complaining about life in probably the only area it can be done anonymously, cyberspace, what people are actually doing in meatspace may be different.
Yeah, it's a big problem if AI is not identifying original research by double-checking the source links. Extremely bad if it's just copy-pasting information from Wiki
There's evidence (Wells' own politics and attitudes) of literary parallels between English colonization/imperialism of the 19th Century and the Martian invasion (superior technology, complete disregard of environment, how the ending comes about), but not of any specific instance, more of a generalization. Goolag probably took different sources with some opinion pieces thrown in, and mushed them together.
It's as dumb as them putting "NO THIS IS NOT RECYCLABLE" on everything.
Used to be if it has a recycle symbol, it could potentially be, based on the number
But clearly too many retards have spawned.
I put this paradox under the banner of logical fallacy.
Since what is described as "tolerance" can be defined by the cultural norms of a certain society, what is marked as "intolerance" is entirely subjective to the society handling said "intolerance". The idea of what qualifies as "intolerance" is not absolutely transferable between societies, and such, no universal definition can exist so long as multiple societies cohabit this planet. With there being no concrete definition between societies, you can never properly define "intolerance", and therefore never be justified in your own intolerance towards "intolerance".
Declaring that some intolerance is necessary opens the door for conflation of what is deemed as intolerance based on other unrelated subjects. A good example of this would be the current year Marxists. According to the history books Nazis are the most recent examples of "intolerance", however these marxists view all forms of anti-neomarxism as akin to Nazism, therefore it's perfectly acceptable to them to be intolerant to people who are against neomarxism, because to them they are no different than "Nazis".
He already fulfilled most of his end of the bargain with his version of God, so it's perfectly okay to abandon relatives if they're being extra or refuse to worship. Such is following a centuries-old book written by Men to the letter.
atheist -> There is no god. Lol I'm smart sCiEnCe RuLeS
anti-theist -> I don't like religion, it doesn't benefit humanity.
These two things aren't alike.
Once again users have gotten lazy about source posting.
I guess the realization caused a conditioned reaction to where he tried to deny it immediately. Sort of like a mental paradox that breaks the psyche.
Didn't he try to end DACA by EO in his first term and then had an injunction thrown against him by a judge, then we found out later that Congress put it in the US law or something in 2015 before he even set foot in the Oval Office?