There was a calculator (I think here) the other day. I showed my gf. I put the minimum of everything as what I am -- she expects at least that much -- and got something like 0.3% of unmarried white men within +/- 5 years of my age -- which is the same as my gf.
Even though I'm over 6'4 the cancer that is modern women's psychology affects everyone. So many women are now unsufferable narcissists that even men like me are disgusted by their personality and they just end up becoming (ex-)slutty cat ladies whose lives revolve around attention seeking on social media.
Women are not capable of running their own lives, and when forced to do so they end up like this and drag the rest of society down with them.
No, imp thinks there's a global female conspiracy, this dude is just recognizing that women are fundamentally illogical, which is a normal understanding of reality.
The 19th amendment accelerated the destruction of the US.
Women are objectively psychologically different from men. Did I say that all women are evil or advocate for class warfare? No, because I'm not an illiterate collectivist. I said the 19th amendment was a bad thing, which is again, observable fact to anyone capable of looking at voting demographics and results from the last hundred years.
Go coom yourself over happy pinwheels in someone else's radius, leftist.
Women are objectively psychologically different from men.
What are your thoughts on the Bell Curve?
anyone capable of looking at voting demographics and results from the last hundred years.
Voting demographics show white women being the second most right-wing group behind only white men. I don't think you want anyone to actually look at that. You want them to believe your lies about it.
Pretty sure I hashed this out with your retarded ass weeks ago and you're coming at me again completely misrepresenting my position after I explained that I have zero problem recognizing trends. I'm just also not a worthless goblinoid who ascribes to auth-left political ideologies.
Go back in your hole wehraboo. You aren't right wing. You aren't conservative.
I vaguely remember you supporting ethnostates in some capacity, which is really strange for someone REEEEing about racial collectivism, but you needed an excuse to support Israel even if it makes no sense.
The comment about women being fundamentally illogical violates the rule because women are capable of logic, even though they may be more emotional than men. While on the other hand, you could claim that all humans are fundamentally non-rational creatures, you can't separate out one particular sex as having a fundamental innate inferiority of cognition, when we can see that their capacity for cognition exists, and that the means of the distribution are closer than the distributions themselves.
I'm 5'11, which is the shortest height for a man. You might be thinking, "no, that's average," but it's not. Guys who are 5'10" or 5'9" are "average," depending on the country. But when you tell people you're 5'11, all they hear is you're not 6 feet.
You see how many of the heights are above 50-70 percent?
I think the filter works by setting a range, some women just set it to 6 feet and then drag the top end to max, as such it doesn't necessarily mean a woman only wants someone that is 7 feet or taller.
My guess is that people are just messing around to see what they can find. When there's a slider, some people have the inclination to move it all the way over.
I'm about one head taller, a little more, than my wife. I think it's a reasonable height differential. Can't imagine, physically, that things work equally well with an "average" heighted 5'4 woman and a 6'6+ foot male.. think that would be rough.
Honestly I don't even get most of it anyways. Date within your ballpark. I don't believe for a damn minute that a slob of a man would feel comfortable dating a model. Why the hell would a midget woman want to date a man who can pick her up like her father did when she was 7
At some point growing up almost every man of below average height has a moment of despair, wondering why his "personality" is so undesirable, until he figures this out.
Ehh. Not true. I dated for years ( I don't anymore) and had success with almost any woman I wanted, and I'm 5'10".
You're probably not as attractive to women as you think. Just manipulate them and get sex and dip. That's what I did. Women are stupid easy to get to put out.
I don't disagree with you that its possible but the numbers are clear. The shorter a man is, the harder he has to work for the same results than if he was taller.
This is just the data for women who specifically set a height filter though right? Which I assume is a lot of them, but it would be good to have the info of how many set the filter
match.com used to make it public. then some guy scraped over 100k profiles in NYC and LA and some shit tier flyover city (like tucson or oklahoma city or something), and posted the results showing that >90% of women universally filtered out men under 6'0". the entire sub on reddit was later banned for wrongthink.
it's pure insanity the way women look at dating apps. 80%+ of women swipe right on the same top 5% of men (or less!), with total disregard for the woman's own self.
i'm well over 6 ft tall, so this is great if you're a guy doing the playboy thing. but these apps are hypergamy engines, turning most women into total whores.
Like the OKCupid study they had to nuke, where men rated women's attractiveness on a bell curve and women rated men on the site as something like 80% of them uglier than average.
they also removed the part of the article about how 80%+ of people who claim they're bi or questioning or poly are simply not. virtually all the guys who say any of that are just gay and not yet ready to come out, and virtually all the girls who say any of that are just straight saying it for fashion. it's easy to measure human behavior.
there have been a number of studies which show that the vast majority of "bi" people only have relationships with one gender. the other gender is just something they've done sex stuff with.
sure. the point of the OKC data was that they actually did a breakdown of who those people claiming to be bi talked to, and what their own gender was. 80% of men claiming to be bi/pan/whatever are just gay men afraid to come out. and 80% of women claiming the same are just straight and doing it for fashion. overall, 80% of people who claim it, are not bi at all. not even sexual experiences.
Yeah that does seem to be the case lol. The funny thing about the hypergamy is that it benefits both parties involved up to a certain point because super hot men are not as discriminating about their sexual partners as super hot women. The man can smash a buffet line of chicks, and the chicks have a semi-realistic chance of getting laid with Adonis at least once. In that respect it's back to polygamous semitic times when one man could have multiple wives and concubines.
Of course it all comes crashing down... later. "Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil." -- Ecclesiastes 8:11
Yeah, I feel like if you're setting a height filter to begin with you're already in the 80th percentile of vapid whores. Maybe some exceptions for heights under, like, five foot three, depending on the height of the woman.
We're basically looking at the height preferences of women you'd never want to talk to let alone marry anyway. Let them die miserable and lonely. It's what they deserve.
I don't know a single woman who wouldn't at least set a minimum height at her own if there was an option to filter. I imagine the number of women without a filter is limited to the handful of women too stupid to navigate the preferences pages correctly.
Dating apps are a hotdog convention. There is a certain type of women who use them, but a lot more men do. Basically, the type of woman who is willing to use dating apps will be spoiled for choices.
My race trends kind of short, which worked out great for me in meeting and marrying a good woman instead of the type of female that this behavior represents.
That's a good way too look at it I suppose aha. Kind of like when being rich, you have to be paranoid that every skank who comes your way is a gold digger.
Over 85% of men in the USA are under 6' tall, with men over 6'2 getting into unicorn territory.
Women want a fucking unicorn.
And ladies, stop comparing this to not wanting to date a fat chick. You are in control of your weight. Men cannot grow taller by choices.
This gives more credence to the notion that the bottom 80% of men are invisible / gross / creepy in the mind of women.
I would love to see this chart overlaid with actual height distributions for men.
Or how tall women think random men are
women want this exactly because of this reason. it cannot be faked or altered. guys who wear those phony height shoes get mocked relentlessly.
There was a calculator (I think here) the other day. I showed my gf. I put the minimum of everything as what I am -- she expects at least that much -- and got something like 0.3% of unmarried white men within +/- 5 years of my age -- which is the same as my gf.
I don't think she cared , though.
Even though I'm over 6'4 the cancer that is modern women's psychology affects everyone. So many women are now unsufferable narcissists that even men like me are disgusted by their personality and they just end up becoming (ex-)slutty cat ladies whose lives revolve around attention seeking on social media.
Women are not capable of running their own lives, and when forced to do so they end up like this and drag the rest of society down with them.
Imp is that you?
No, imp thinks there's a global female conspiracy, this dude is just recognizing that women are fundamentally illogical, which is a normal understanding of reality.
The 19th amendment accelerated the destruction of the US.
Here is what you said when discussing race:
It looks like you're fine doing collectivism as long as it's by sex but not race. I wonder who might be interested in cleaving politics that way.
"We" are white, eh?
Women are objectively psychologically different from men. Did I say that all women are evil or advocate for class warfare? No, because I'm not an illiterate collectivist. I said the 19th amendment was a bad thing, which is again, observable fact to anyone capable of looking at voting demographics and results from the last hundred years.
Go coom yourself over happy pinwheels in someone else's radius, leftist.
What are your thoughts on the Bell Curve?
Voting demographics show white women being the second most right-wing group behind only white men. I don't think you want anyone to actually look at that. You want them to believe your lies about it.
Pretty sure I hashed this out with your retarded ass weeks ago and you're coming at me again completely misrepresenting my position after I explained that I have zero problem recognizing trends. I'm just also not a worthless goblinoid who ascribes to auth-left political ideologies.
Go back in your hole wehraboo. You aren't right wing. You aren't conservative.
I vaguely remember you supporting ethnostates in some capacity, which is really strange for someone REEEEing about racial collectivism, but you needed an excuse to support Israel even if it makes no sense.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This just appears to be a regular insult.
Stormfag debate tactics 101:
And you want to tell us you're not a leftist?
Someone's previous comments condemning identity politics are very relevant to them now endorsing sex-based identity politics.
Nice try, cuck.
The only person playing identity politics in this thread is you. As usual, you gaslight like a leftist too.
Not wanting women to vote because they are women is idpol, moron.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
The comment about women being fundamentally illogical violates the rule because women are capable of logic, even though they may be more emotional than men. While on the other hand, you could claim that all humans are fundamentally non-rational creatures, you can't separate out one particular sex as having a fundamental innate inferiority of cognition, when we can see that their capacity for cognition exists, and that the means of the distribution are closer than the distributions themselves.
...and the logical solution to such a situation is ____
Yeah these hoes already slept with every guy 6'4 on Bumble. That's the problem.
Also hilarious that women complain that men lie about their height. LOL no wonder men lie. They have to in order to get seen at all.
Well, women lie about their age, body count and weight. They're really not in a position to complain.
++billions spent on makeup…
"he lies about his height"
Profile says weight 135 lbs
Women lie about their age worse than men lie about their height.
Women lie about their weight like China lies about COVID.
I'm 5'11, which is the shortest height for a man. You might be thinking, "no, that's average," but it's not. Guys who are 5'10" or 5'9" are "average," depending on the country. But when you tell people you're 5'11, all they hear is you're not 6 feet.
I did fine with dating being under 6 foot, but I had to work for it.
Tall guys could be lazy AF & just get pussy like Doordash.
Online dating for guys who aren't tall and/or male models is a fucking grind.
Yep I'm 5'9 , and everything fits me cuz they design things for the average man.
OTOH my size is usually the sold out one.
Makeup is a lie masking genetic fitness and general health.
Who on Earth sets a filter at 7 foot?
You see how many of the heights are above 50-70 percent?
I think the filter works by setting a range, some women just set it to 6 feet and then drag the top end to max, as such it doesn't necessarily mean a woman only wants someone that is 7 feet or taller.
The Nords?
Yeah, I don't get it. You could probably individually name all the 7 footers in America...
My guess is that people are just messing around to see what they can find. When there's a slider, some people have the inclination to move it all the way over.
Sucks that it isn't, I guess.
As a barely 5 foot woman, I wouldn't want my boyfriend to be two heads taller than me. Some women are just vain.
I'm about one head taller, a little more, than my wife. I think it's a reasonable height differential. Can't imagine, physically, that things work equally well with an "average" heighted 5'4 woman and a 6'6+ foot male.. think that would be rough.
Honestly I don't even get most of it anyways. Date within your ballpark. I don't believe for a damn minute that a slob of a man would feel comfortable dating a model. Why the hell would a midget woman want to date a man who can pick her up like her father did when she was 7
I've seen lots of tiny women that marry giant men. Maybe they're tall chasers, or maybe they just don't care about the height difference.
At some point growing up almost every man of below average height has a moment of despair, wondering why his "personality" is so undesirable, until he figures this out.
Ehh. Not true. I dated for years ( I don't anymore) and had success with almost any woman I wanted, and I'm 5'10".
You're probably not as attractive to women as you think. Just manipulate them and get sex and dip. That's what I did. Women are stupid easy to get to put out.
Yeah but he's still getting filtered if they filter by height.
I don't disagree with you that its possible but the numbers are clear. The shorter a man is, the harder he has to work for the same results than if he was taller.
So you are casting doubt on the accuracy of the graph Bumble published here on its own users?
Every man of height below 6'3" lol.
This is just the data for women who specifically set a height filter though right? Which I assume is a lot of them, but it would be good to have the info of how many set the filter
match.com used to make it public. then some guy scraped over 100k profiles in NYC and LA and some shit tier flyover city (like tucson or oklahoma city or something), and posted the results showing that >90% of women universally filtered out men under 6'0". the entire sub on reddit was later banned for wrongthink.
it's pure insanity the way women look at dating apps. 80%+ of women swipe right on the same top 5% of men (or less!), with total disregard for the woman's own self.
i'm well over 6 ft tall, so this is great if you're a guy doing the playboy thing. but these apps are hypergamy engines, turning most women into total whores.
Like the OKCupid study they had to nuke, where men rated women's attractiveness on a bell curve and women rated men on the site as something like 80% of them uglier than average.
they also removed the part of the article about how 80%+ of people who claim they're bi or questioning or poly are simply not. virtually all the guys who say any of that are just gay and not yet ready to come out, and virtually all the girls who say any of that are just straight saying it for fashion. it's easy to measure human behavior.
there have been a number of studies which show that the vast majority of "bi" people only have relationships with one gender. the other gender is just something they've done sex stuff with.
sure. the point of the OKC data was that they actually did a breakdown of who those people claiming to be bi talked to, and what their own gender was. 80% of men claiming to be bi/pan/whatever are just gay men afraid to come out. and 80% of women claiming the same are just straight and doing it for fashion. overall, 80% of people who claim it, are not bi at all. not even sexual experiences.
Yeah that does seem to be the case lol. The funny thing about the hypergamy is that it benefits both parties involved up to a certain point because super hot men are not as discriminating about their sexual partners as super hot women. The man can smash a buffet line of chicks, and the chicks have a semi-realistic chance of getting laid with Adonis at least once. In that respect it's back to polygamous semitic times when one man could have multiple wives and concubines.
Of course it all comes crashing down... later. "Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil." -- Ecclesiastes 8:11
Yeah, I feel like if you're setting a height filter to begin with you're already in the 80th percentile of vapid whores. Maybe some exceptions for heights under, like, five foot three, depending on the height of the woman.
We're basically looking at the height preferences of women you'd never want to talk to let alone marry anyway. Let them die miserable and lonely. It's what they deserve.
I don't know a single woman who wouldn't at least set a minimum height at her own if there was an option to filter. I imagine the number of women without a filter is limited to the handful of women too stupid to navigate the preferences pages correctly.
This is cope.
I'm in the society of the ceiling touchers, but not that high up. This chart says I should be getting hit on a lot more than I ever do.
Height is just one easily quantifiable metric of many unreasonable standards the average female dating app user demands.
Dating apps are a hotdog convention. There is a certain type of women who use them, but a lot more men do. Basically, the type of woman who is willing to use dating apps will be spoiled for choices.
My race trends kind of short, which worked out great for me in meeting and marrying a good woman instead of the type of female that this behavior represents.
That's a good way too look at it I suppose aha. Kind of like when being rich, you have to be paranoid that every skank who comes your way is a gold digger.
https://igotstandardsbro.com
Granted, I'm a little skeptical of the data that search uses, as it claims I'm in the fucking top 2.2%, but... okay?
And the vast majority won't be happy in those relationships.
Is this the height distribution in the NBA?
I went on a date with this chick who divorced an NBA player.
I asked her a lot about it since mostly when I dated I was trying to gather intel.
Anyway she eventually divorced the guy because he cheated.
She said all the wives know the guys cheat & its this understood thing.
They already had a kid together so she's set for life.
She put on weight & is older now so she couldn't get a BF. Plus she has her expectations set at "NBA player" lol.
Based on NBA demographics, she most likely was also a coal burner.
🤮
Women have no concept of a man’s height
A 6’8” dude is a fucking MONSTER
I cannot imagine most women would actually want that
Ask a woman to hold her hands 8 inches apart and see what happens and you'll understand this.
I haven't used dating apps for years. They're 100% worthless. The women on dating apps are trash and yet think they deserve the top 0.001% of men.
Over 60% are interested in 6 11,,,, like that’s absurdly tall…. You want to have to special order all of his clothes?
Ever see a woman park? I doubt they'll be able to tell the difference.