No, imp thinks there's a global female conspiracy, this dude is just recognizing that women are fundamentally illogical, which is a normal understanding of reality.
The 19th amendment accelerated the destruction of the US.
Women are objectively psychologically different from men. Did I say that all women are evil or advocate for class warfare? No, because I'm not an illiterate collectivist. I said the 19th amendment was a bad thing, which is again, observable fact to anyone capable of looking at voting demographics and results from the last hundred years.
Go coom yourself over happy pinwheels in someone else's radius, leftist.
Women are objectively psychologically different from men.
What are your thoughts on the Bell Curve?
anyone capable of looking at voting demographics and results from the last hundred years.
Voting demographics show white women being the second most right-wing group behind only white men. I don't think you want anyone to actually look at that. You want them to believe your lies about it.
Pretty sure I hashed this out with your retarded ass weeks ago and you're coming at me again completely misrepresenting my position after I explained that I have zero problem recognizing trends. I'm just also not a worthless goblinoid who ascribes to auth-left political ideologies.
Go back in your hole wehraboo. You aren't right wing. You aren't conservative.
The comment about women being fundamentally illogical violates the rule because women are capable of logic, even though they may be more emotional than men. While on the other hand, you could claim that all humans are fundamentally non-rational creatures, you can't separate out one particular sex as having a fundamental innate inferiority of cognition, when we can see that their capacity for cognition exists, and that the means of the distribution are closer than the distributions themselves.
No, imp thinks there's a global female conspiracy, this dude is just recognizing that women are fundamentally illogical, which is a normal understanding of reality.
The 19th amendment accelerated the destruction of the US.
Here is what you said when discussing race:
It looks like you're fine doing collectivism as long as it's by sex but not race. I wonder who might be interested in cleaving politics that way.
"We" are white, eh?
Women are objectively psychologically different from men. Did I say that all women are evil or advocate for class warfare? No, because I'm not an illiterate collectivist. I said the 19th amendment was a bad thing, which is again, observable fact to anyone capable of looking at voting demographics and results from the last hundred years.
Go coom yourself over happy pinwheels in someone else's radius, leftist.
What are your thoughts on the Bell Curve?
Voting demographics show white women being the second most right-wing group behind only white men. I don't think you want anyone to actually look at that. You want them to believe your lies about it.
Pretty sure I hashed this out with your retarded ass weeks ago and you're coming at me again completely misrepresenting my position after I explained that I have zero problem recognizing trends. I'm just also not a worthless goblinoid who ascribes to auth-left political ideologies.
Go back in your hole wehraboo. You aren't right wing. You aren't conservative.
Stormfag debate tactics 101:
And you want to tell us you're not a leftist?
Someone's previous comments condemning identity politics are very relevant to them now endorsing sex-based identity politics.
Nice try, cuck.
The only person playing identity politics in this thread is you. As usual, you gaslight like a leftist too.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
The comment about women being fundamentally illogical violates the rule because women are capable of logic, even though they may be more emotional than men. While on the other hand, you could claim that all humans are fundamentally non-rational creatures, you can't separate out one particular sex as having a fundamental innate inferiority of cognition, when we can see that their capacity for cognition exists, and that the means of the distribution are closer than the distributions themselves.