This is just the data for women who specifically set a height filter though right? Which I assume is a lot of them, but it would be good to have the info of how many set the filter
match.com used to make it public. then some guy scraped over 100k profiles in NYC and LA and some shit tier flyover city (like tucson or oklahoma city or something), and posted the results showing that >90% of women universally filtered out men under 6'0". the entire sub on reddit was later banned for wrongthink.
it's pure insanity the way women look at dating apps. 80%+ of women swipe right on the same top 5% of men (or less!), with total disregard for the woman's own self.
i'm well over 6 ft tall, so this is great if you're a guy doing the playboy thing. but these apps are hypergamy engines, turning most women into total whores.
Like the OKCupid study they had to nuke, where men rated women's attractiveness on a bell curve and women rated men on the site as something like 80% of them uglier than average.
they also removed the part of the article about how 80%+ of people who claim they're bi or questioning or poly are simply not. virtually all the guys who say any of that are just gay and not yet ready to come out, and virtually all the girls who say any of that are just straight saying it for fashion. it's easy to measure human behavior.
there have been a number of studies which show that the vast majority of "bi" people only have relationships with one gender. the other gender is just something they've done sex stuff with.
Yeah that does seem to be the case lol. The funny thing about the hypergamy is that it benefits both parties involved up to a certain point because super hot men are not as discriminating about their sexual partners as super hot women. The man can smash a buffet line of chicks, and the chicks have a semi-realistic chance of getting laid with Adonis at least once. In that respect it's back to polygamous semitic times when one man could have multiple wives and concubines.
Of course it all comes crashing down... later. "Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil." -- Ecclesiastes 8:11
Yeah, I feel like if you're setting a height filter to begin with you're already in the 80th percentile of vapid whores. Maybe some exceptions for heights under, like, five foot three, depending on the height of the woman.
We're basically looking at the height preferences of women you'd never want to talk to let alone marry anyway. Let them die miserable and lonely. It's what they deserve.
I don't know a single woman who wouldn't at least set a minimum height at her own if there was an option to filter. I imagine the number of women without a filter is limited to the handful of women too stupid to navigate the preferences pages correctly.
This is just the data for women who specifically set a height filter though right? Which I assume is a lot of them, but it would be good to have the info of how many set the filter
match.com used to make it public. then some guy scraped over 100k profiles in NYC and LA and some shit tier flyover city (like tucson or oklahoma city or something), and posted the results showing that >90% of women universally filtered out men under 6'0". the entire sub on reddit was later banned for wrongthink.
it's pure insanity the way women look at dating apps. 80%+ of women swipe right on the same top 5% of men (or less!), with total disregard for the woman's own self.
i'm well over 6 ft tall, so this is great if you're a guy doing the playboy thing. but these apps are hypergamy engines, turning most women into total whores.
Like the OKCupid study they had to nuke, where men rated women's attractiveness on a bell curve and women rated men on the site as something like 80% of them uglier than average.
they also removed the part of the article about how 80%+ of people who claim they're bi or questioning or poly are simply not. virtually all the guys who say any of that are just gay and not yet ready to come out, and virtually all the girls who say any of that are just straight saying it for fashion. it's easy to measure human behavior.
there have been a number of studies which show that the vast majority of "bi" people only have relationships with one gender. the other gender is just something they've done sex stuff with.
Yeah that does seem to be the case lol. The funny thing about the hypergamy is that it benefits both parties involved up to a certain point because super hot men are not as discriminating about their sexual partners as super hot women. The man can smash a buffet line of chicks, and the chicks have a semi-realistic chance of getting laid with Adonis at least once. In that respect it's back to polygamous semitic times when one man could have multiple wives and concubines.
Of course it all comes crashing down... later. "Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil." -- Ecclesiastes 8:11
Yeah, I feel like if you're setting a height filter to begin with you're already in the 80th percentile of vapid whores. Maybe some exceptions for heights under, like, five foot three, depending on the height of the woman.
We're basically looking at the height preferences of women you'd never want to talk to let alone marry anyway. Let them die miserable and lonely. It's what they deserve.
I don't know a single woman who wouldn't at least set a minimum height at her own if there was an option to filter. I imagine the number of women without a filter is limited to the handful of women too stupid to navigate the preferences pages correctly.
This is cope.