Female “professional” in an existential crisis after ChatGPT tells them they do make-work in adult day care
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (65)
sorted by:
Jew daycare so White women don’t have kids or something.
CORRECT,
To be fair, "people paying you to do things they don't want to do" describes a fucking huge chunk of jobs.
The real funny part is them getting bent out of shape about it, because their jobs are useless in addition to the other issues. Also, I think it just comes from a basic lack of understanding of how the world works, and a desire to feel more important than they are.
I know my job is being paid to do stuff so other people don't have to. It's still real work, and I don't feel bad about it.
Imagine having an existential crisis because a chatbot told you you're not the protagonist.
This is the lie that most women swallow wholesale to abandon being mothers though. They are sold the emotional appeal of “girlboss” where they are “making a difference” and “changing the world”. This is why so many suffer from main character syndrome and have a savior complex while telling themselves their hedonism is their reward for “making the world a better place”.
Meanwhile the ones that stay home to raise their kids are genuinely making a difference.
I really wish we could get society to stop lying to women about absolutely everything.
to be honest, it doesn't take much.
half of all women want to be a SAHM before having a baby. almost all the rest want to be a SAHM, quit work indefinitely, as soon as they have that first baby. the ones who genuinely want to keep working are <5% of the population. the problem is doubling the labor supply crashed a lot of careers, which forces both parents to work in most cases just to make ends meet.
but so if the guy can cover it, she'll happily quit indefinitely.
Kind of related, and not saying you're implying otherwise, but another huge problem is even among women who want to be SAHM, what percentage of those are eager to have 3+ kids?
One of the more effective ways out of our current predicaments are for solid families and good parents to start having more kids. At bare minimum, that means 3+. The percentage of women, even the "conservative" ones, who are chomping at the bit to have that many kids is very low.
They just want to have one or two kids, "hold serve" in their minds, and be glorified for it forever as if they've fulfilled their sacred duty to society as a woman.
a woman who has not had 3+ children, and doesn't have a medical exuse for not doing so, hasn't fulfilled shit. society should shame them.
every major culture has found invariably that there are both benefits and burdens that come with each sex. women have the social obligation of procreation, will never face destitution, but because they must be derisked, are much less likely to reap the rewards of risk. men have the social obligation of disposability and self sacrifice, and because they risk total ruin, are much more likely to reap the rewards of that risk. and when either side doesn't do their part, they are actively harming society. societies that fail to acknowledge this fall into nihilism and hedonism, and then they collapse or are conquered by societies that observe this.
people can shit on religion all they want, but nothing has ever been stronger at compelling this than religion, particularly christianity and islam.
but you're not wrong... far too many modern women wanting men to keep up men's side of the social contract while women are not keeping up their own. genetic testing shows that <20% of men who have ever lived have successfully procreated, while over 80%+ of women have. and today, we now have a majority of women who are nearing the end of childbearing age and yet have no children, not even a prospective father. so now women are doing to themselves what has previously been done to men. and society will be devastated because of it. even worldbank and JP morgan are ripping them for it because this shit compounds into so many other problems. populations are in massive contraction, which means social programs are mathematically guaranteed to collapse (they all require more aggregate payors by $$$ than payees, and a contracting population means that's upside down). shit, medicare has had massive cuts over the last 17ish years, and yet both medicare and social security collapse in 2033 because women for too many generations stopped having babies.
That would mean doing something about mass media, which we all know, is literally another six gorillion holocausts.
It's wild. There was a story on SSM where a cheating wife literally told herself this to compensate for the guilt she had for cheating on her husband.
In the confession she wrote out (at the behest of her therapist and as a way to try to win back her husband's trust (spoiler: it did not work)) she explained something very similar to that, only in the inverse: that she did good things for her husband as a reward for feeling guilty about cheating on him.
Good. Cheaters should be tarred and feathered both literally and in other ways.
Dude nobody’s suffering. The woman in the post is taking the piss
The entire food industry is "I couldn't be assed to grill up a steak". Nothing wrong with a market of convenience.
The issue is that those jobs only exist because at the time it is cheaper and a more efficient use of the higher ups time to pay someone to do those things. AI in theory will eliminate those jobs because it simply requires them to add up how much of a thing they want and make it into an easily digestible form to make further decisions.
The growth of technology will eventually start to encroach on more and more jobs that are jobs of convenience. It will not start to replace a lot of blue collar work simply due to how much cheaper is will be to have a human pulling levers on a tractor than making specialized guidance software when you could much quicker take out entire data analyst teams with a single ai.
For the AI we have now, you’re right. A human is cheaper and more versatile.
I don’t know how close we are to AGI but when we get that, the math will change. Theoretically, all it takes to teach a “general intelligence” to do a job is the same effort or less that it takes to teach a human.
That means if you have a humanoid robot of the kind that already exist today you can get it to do any job by showing it how to do it, like how you’d show a new employee. Now the question is if the cost of the robot plus electricity over the life of the robot is less than the cost of a person.
Let’s say you pay a human $40k to work on a farm, running a tractor and so on. Maybe the robot costs $100k. Electricity for the whole year is certainly under $5k. So three years with the human costs $120k. Three years with the robot costs $115k.
Four years with the human costs $160k. Four years with the robot costs $120k
We’re all in trouble here. I’m not sure what the solution is. I feel certain the elites are doing this math too and dreaming of a day when both the farm worker and the farm owner/manager are AI and they no longer have to put up with us lowly serfs.
that plus "things they can't do" are literally 100% of jobs.
the issue isn't this though. the issue is that it's manufactured prestige, like when a guy with 2 yachts goes and buys a third. no one needs 3 yachts. it's physically impossible to use 3 yachts. they're doing it to socially signal to others that they can afford to waste money on a third yacht (upkeep alone is extremely expensive).
her job is no different. but instead of a filthy rich guy buying his third yacht to signal how much money he can waste, it's a filthy rich company paying a woman to do fake work to signal how much money they can waste on things like gender representation numbers.
That's the same reason I have staplers in 3 different rooms. It has nothing to do with the ability have access to a stapler while in different places without carrying a stapler around with me. It's entirely to signal that I can afford that third stapler.
i know you're being facetious but staplers are not like yachts. stapler upkeep is marginally zero. boat upkeep is crazy expensive, even if it's not running. it's astronomically cheaper to send your yacht from st james to monaco than having two yachts in st james and monaco. i can at least understand one yacht in pacific/io side, and the other atlantic side, as the major canals/straights really suck, but a third yacht is purely about signaling extreme wealth.
The difference is in employees who know how to add value to the bottom line and those who just know how to do what their professor told them to do 20 years ago.
The first group shows up, adapts themselves to the challenge, handles tasks outside their purview, and always tries to align their output with the needs of the company.
The second group shows up, falls apart at any sign of challenge, loudly refuses to do anything not in their job description, and always tries to pretend that their made up bullshit is the key to the companies success.
The later camp can't handle honest evaluations of their job functions. They think they're bringing "knowledge" or "expertise" into the firm. The first camp has no problem, they understand they're just a body, with a handful of unique experiences that might come in handy.
You even KNOW you're useless yourself, you didn't need the bot to tell you this.
Worse, you're an enabler for spreadsheetophiles. The very worst part of modern corporate culture is the bean counting "data driven" faggots and the MacNamaran leadership style they embody.
You are negative value. You make things worse.
The last time someone made me try to work with an Excel spreadsheet I just automated away the entire process rather learn how to deal with Excel. I dislike Excel spreadsheets that much.
Excel is cancer, it gave me cancer and gives cancer to everyone that uses it
Must be nice. At my job there is a nontrivial portion of work that involves making regular reports for customers out of data that exists in an excel sheet. There is a degree of customization and case-by-case nature to it, but 99% of the logic that goes into the reports could be encapsulated in a relatively simple script.
But IT rules our computers with an iron fist and every time I've suggested they allow me to download python or AHK or something where I could write a script to automate it, it gets shot down in like 2 seconds because of it being a security risk. I get it, most employees couldn't be trusted with shit like that, but there has to be some solution there....
See if you can do it in PowerShell. Not the greatest anything, but it's already there.
You'd need to grab the Import-Excel module, which is going to run into the problem of his IT department being pants-on-head retarded. If this was just a .csv file then yeah native Powershell will absolutely get you there and back with no problems, but building out the com objects from scratch to interact with an Excel spreadsheet is going to be hell on earth for even a seasoned veteran, which is why we all just grab the Import-Excel module rather than reinvent that wheel.
There's always scripting inside Excel with VBA, but I wouldn't wish that on anyone.
They're adding Python to Excel. Not sure when that's rolling out or if it's already here. I try not to interact with Excel if I can help it.
Yeah, that's a good idea. I would have to look into it, as I am not used to working in power shell. Honestly wouldn't surprise me if they had somehow made it impossible for us to open power shell without entering admin credentials though.
They invented “imposter syndrome” as a catch-all defense against the unpleasant realization of their own worthlessness.
A chick I was seeing got upset with me because I didn't ask her repeatedly if she was feeling better when she had a headache so she asked chatgpt if she was wrong feeling that way. Knowing she did that dumb shit I ended it immediately.
I could never spend quality time with someone who regularly uses LLMs in any capacity. The thought of someone using LLMs specifically to manage their relationship with me? Beyond the pale.
Yeah it’s a tool for school or work, not relationship advice.
It's a goddamn chatbot.
Therapist, group chat, ChatGPT, Reddit, one way or another all modern women are outsourcing their relationship decisions to an LLM.
At least she didnt ask reddit
Talking about reddit seriously is big points against her.
Seems more of a case that females are so egotistical they believe they're special and truly impact the world.
Most jobs are "doing something that other people can do, but don't want to or have time."
That's basically how advancing as a society works. Man can't do everything themselves. Not enough time in the day. We all do our own specializations and pay the man to do that which we can't or won't.
Women apparently don't like knowing that they're not super special doing things that no one else can. Funny enough, half the world can't do what they can do naturally, but the jews and feminists have convinced them that being a mother isn't worth it.
It’s more a case of a woman taking the piss and everyone here thinking she’s actually having a crisis lol
Meanwhile, "devops engineer".
Goddamn programmers, man. TEST YOUR FUCKING CODE!
I dunno what to tell you man, it worked when I pushed it :D
In my first job, the developers were so bad at managing memory, and the users so accustomed to the developers giving them whatever they wanted, that we had to make all the devs write batch versions of everything they did.
That way if a user submitted a policy for processing and it was too big to run in a tomcat instance, rather than spending a day investigating how they managed to run themselves out of memory this time, we'd just tell them they had to send that job to batch. It'd go into queue and run on a whole ass IBM z machine.
But you'd be out of work if we did that ;)
We do! It's just difficult for programmers to fathom how creatively retarded end-users can be, so the coverage is lacking. That's why we have you guys as translators <3
"like it's some big discovery"
Lmfap
I hope to High Heaven this is real because LMFAO.
Didn't exactly set the bar high when that's the self definition, and brings up a very salient point about how many job titles now are just waffling.
Tell me more about this butterfly.
KEK <- This one
KEK
KEK
KEK
KEK
The best part is when chat gpt replaces her job entirely
I don't know why people think AI will replace women's daycare jobs.
They already do fuck all and are employed anyway. The purpose of their jobs is not to do things.
They're paid to waste your time and to decrease the White population one way or another.
Because despite jewish tricks margin is still margin. Besides. white women are far gone enough they dont need jobs to piss away their fertility on their own .
The jews won't allow this
They need (White) foids in the workplace so the (((state))) will "educate" her children
Or worst case scenario prevent her from having kids altogether
Right. Her job will simply switch to prompting chatgpt to make spreadsheets, leaving her more time for making tictok videos at the office.
I was a logistics specialist in the Navy. Counting things (inventory) is a basic skill that takes 5 minutes to explain. When to count, what to count, how often to count, that was the hard part that takes training and experience.
LS also does financials (managing the budget of the unit,) shipping and receiving, and a whole host of other stuff.
“Existential crisis” why yall gotta be so dramatic about it lol. It’s just a bit.
Seriously. It rustles my jimmies that do many people can't understand that the post in question is having a laugh about the whole thing, and "existential crisis" is bloody hyperbole like you use in most humor.
Fake. No woman would admit any of this,
In fact, she would demand ChatGPT be banned, hire more foreigners to make sure competition never emerges, and pretend this conversation never took place.
Lol... Women are the #1 posters of their own Ls
Only to delete them when the unanimous verdict is that they are in the wrong, and complain about "incel harassment."
Christ yall are dramatic
literally https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jheYs6cEFZY&t=5s&pp=2AEFkAIB
I mean yea... That's what most Data Analytics do, people get impressed quickly with a super simple not really insightful dashboard with the cool graphics.
Then after that they start asking for absolutely wild shit asking to basically predict the future. Then they go into total bullshittery mode giving the most insightful unactionable answer ever lmao.
It goes zero to Impossible real quick.
Its ironic she says she has a Master's Degree. A true retard, errrrrrr feminist would say its a mistress degree.
And people complain about AI.