I'd take it even further. Anyone who even proposes a bill that is in opposition to the Bill of Rights or attempts to put a restriction on those amendments should be immediately executed. No need for a trial.
The problem with this plan is, who decides you’ve violated the constitution?
If you’re about to say a judge decides, stop and think: what happens when a judge says that Trumps border wall violates the constitution? What happens when a judge says that restricting abortion violates the constitution?
No doubt but the idea of a hate crime goes against everything this country stands for. But like you said when people in power despise the country then it shouldn’t be a surprise
Typical leftists are gonna butt in and say “but…hate speech ISNT free speech”
The first amendment is to protect the government from censoring your speech and punishing you for speaking out. This charge does exactly that and is yet another reason why “hate crimes” as a whole need to be tossed out of every courtroom as it is just politically charged nonsense to punish white people for wrongthink. Burn down a nigger’s home? I believe that’s arson, hate crime should not matter in the eyes of the court as it is protected by the first amendment. You are one hundred percent allowed to hate people. Don’t let the government tell you otherwise.
Also idiots in the replies are conflating and ignoring that there's two specific charges on his police sheet, Disorderly Conduct and Hate Crime. It's possible his behavior could still be considered disorderly conduct, so people are relishing his fine or imprisonment as just desserts while ignoring the fact that hate crime is unconstitutional.
My guess if he appeals is they will only fine him for disorderly and drop the hate crime charge so it can't get overturned. The process is the punishment.
About the only argument against free speech that works is pointing out porn isn’t speech. It is weird that you can’t say nigger but you can post millions of videos available to minors of people fisting each other and even charge the minors for it. Then you prove they’re minors by asking them if they are minors and believing their answer.
Nvm that if "hate speech" means something other than what it appears to mean at face-value, it's a totally arbitrary concept. Clearly it doesn't just mean any speech that expresses hatred, because leftists are some of the most hateful goblins in existence.
SCOTUS has already ruled that "hate speech" laws and government policies of any kind are unconstitutional. These gremlins just do it anyways, because once you're having to fight the system, one tiny little technical error can be used to punish you, even if they can't get you on what they originally tried to nail you for in the beginning. And this kind of fuckery can even include shit like making it impossible to show up to court on time, or requiring you to be in two places at once, or not notifying you of a summons, etc.
There's a reason why the powers that be have made up a false history of lynching that depicts it as just something white people liked to do to black people for funsies. Politicians and their ilk used to be afraid of the rope, it was the people's way of making an example out of bastards that abuse their power, and unlike the guillotine it doesn't represent commie psychosis.
He's going to have to take this to the Supreme Court but he'll be the owner of the most expensive n-word pass, personally signed by Clarence Thomas, if he gets there.
I doubt they would even without a ton of controversy, Matal v. Tam is a case where the Supreme Court UNANIMOUSLY ruled in favor of protecting hate speech. Anyone who gets charged with it deserves to let the court know that they are trying to undermine the constitution and should be disbarred
What I don't understand is why so many fit, accomplished white men choose to protect this worthless ruling class. From glowies to SWAT teams to spec ops, if you pull a 1776 on their asses they got the best of the best risking their lives for the worst of the worst.
There are plenty of better euphemisms. The one above doesn't even register as "jew", it just smacks of immature name calling of political rivals. It's boomer tier faggotry.
In your attempt to adhere to leftist blasphemy laws, you actually ended up mistelling the story. Instead of just typing out "nigger," you type out "N-Word" and therefore make the reader think that the person in question said "N Word" and not "nigger." If you weren't acting like a nigger, your title would convey proper information.
Counties? There is federal hate crime laws, the feds can charge you for it. The feds can tack on hate crimes to a crime you were prosecuted by your state for.
The legal system is acting like a nigger.
Nah, it's acting like a K word
This guy’s been doing some noticing.
It’s certainly run by Niggers now.
He should file for a change of venue under the grounds that "the judge is acting like a nigger".
I hope this gets overturned. Isn’t that the point of the first amendment? How does the concept of a hate crime not go against freedom of speech?
Yes and it does. The legal penalty on government employees for violating the constitution should be public execution.
I'd take it even further. Anyone who even proposes a bill that is in opposition to the Bill of Rights or attempts to put a restriction on those amendments should be immediately executed. No need for a trial.
"Is that your name on the bill? Yes? Guilty"
The problem with this plan is, who decides you’ve violated the constitution?
If you’re about to say a judge decides, stop and think: what happens when a judge says that Trumps border wall violates the constitution? What happens when a judge says that restricting abortion violates the constitution?
The same people who do now: the Supreme Court.
I’d settle for a resignation at least
Public Flogging. These people live with no fear.
Yep, something both physical and humiliating.
The judge was probably "I don't want to hear anything about the 1st amendment in my courtroom!"
I didn’t consider that variable
They still have to prove the disorderly conduct charge.
The process is usually the punishment.
Because he said the wrong thing, duh!
No doubt but the idea of a hate crime goes against everything this country stands for. But like you said when people in power despise the country then it shouldn’t be a surprise
Typical leftists are gonna butt in and say “but…hate speech ISNT free speech”
The first amendment is to protect the government from censoring your speech and punishing you for speaking out. This charge does exactly that and is yet another reason why “hate crimes” as a whole need to be tossed out of every courtroom as it is just politically charged nonsense to punish white people for wrongthink. Burn down a nigger’s home? I believe that’s arson, hate crime should not matter in the eyes of the court as it is protected by the first amendment. You are one hundred percent allowed to hate people. Don’t let the government tell you otherwise.
Also idiots in the replies are conflating and ignoring that there's two specific charges on his police sheet, Disorderly Conduct and Hate Crime. It's possible his behavior could still be considered disorderly conduct, so people are relishing his fine or imprisonment as just desserts while ignoring the fact that hate crime is unconstitutional.
My guess if he appeals is they will only fine him for disorderly and drop the hate crime charge so it can't get overturned. The process is the punishment.
Here is the video of him explaining his version of what happened: https://x.com/leaderoftheUSA/status/1818331662364647607
Disorderly Conduct is one of the catch alls police use to charge people with.
Burn down cities? That's not disorderly.
Say a no-no word? Disorderly conduct!
Honestly though, it’s only the niggers that get disorderly when they hear the word nigger
It looked like a hate crime enhancement to me.
About the only argument against free speech that works is pointing out porn isn’t speech. It is weird that you can’t say nigger but you can post millions of videos available to minors of people fisting each other and even charge the minors for it. Then you prove they’re minors by asking them if they are minors and believing their answer.
Nvm that if "hate speech" means something other than what it appears to mean at face-value, it's a totally arbitrary concept. Clearly it doesn't just mean any speech that expresses hatred, because leftists are some of the most hateful goblins in existence.
Good for him. Take that shit to the Supreme Court and get all hate speech laws tossed from the books.
SCOTUS has already ruled that "hate speech" laws and government policies of any kind are unconstitutional. These gremlins just do it anyways, because once you're having to fight the system, one tiny little technical error can be used to punish you, even if they can't get you on what they originally tried to nail you for in the beginning. And this kind of fuckery can even include shit like making it impossible to show up to court on time, or requiring you to be in two places at once, or not notifying you of a summons, etc.
Like he mentioned, the DA changed the charges on the day the trial was originally set for.
bring back tarring and feathering of uppity prosecutors.
There's a reason why the powers that be have made up a false history of lynching that depicts it as just something white people liked to do to black people for funsies. Politicians and their ilk used to be afraid of the rope, it was the people's way of making an example out of bastards that abuse their power, and unlike the guillotine it doesn't represent commie psychosis.
OP, you can put “nigger” in the title. It’s okay.
It's not just okay, it's your moral duty.
Nigs gonna nog
Joggers gonna jog
He's going to have to take this to the Supreme Court but he'll be the owner of the most expensive n-word pass, personally signed by Clarence Thomas, if he gets there.
That or it'll get shot down with Clarence Thomas as the lone dissenting voice on the court.
I doubt they would even without a ton of controversy, Matal v. Tam is a case where the Supreme Court UNANIMOUSLY ruled in favor of protecting hate speech. Anyone who gets charged with it deserves to let the court know that they are trying to undermine the constitution and should be disbarred
Nigger
N
I
G
G
E
Hwats that schpelll?
Sorry nigger. Free speech is controversial speech..
There shouldn't be any such thing as a "hate" crime. It's either a crime or it isn't.
And since they haven't repealed the 1st amendment (yet) saying anything like this isn't a crime.
This case will be a good test of whether the rule of law still applies.
Is this malicious prosecution?
Meanwhile anyone can scream anything hateful against Whitey and get no issue, even when I report it for hate speech on X.
Destroy the demonrat establishment, their politics, power and all that they hold dear.
You would first have to destroy Big Tech.
Your terms are acceptable.
What I don't understand is why so many fit, accomplished white men choose to protect this worthless ruling class. From glowies to SWAT teams to spec ops, if you pull a 1776 on their asses they got the best of the best risking their lives for the worst of the worst.
You are a child.
You aren't allowed to say "jew" on this board.
There are plenty of better euphemisms. The one above doesn't even register as "jew", it just smacks of immature name calling of political rivals. It's boomer tier faggotry.
Freedom of speech is right. Especially if that someone needs to be told they're acting like a nigger.
There are many people acting like niggers today. It is essential to the fabric of our society that they be made aware of their niggerness.
In your attempt to adhere to leftist blasphemy laws, you actually ended up mistelling the story. Instead of just typing out "nigger," you type out "N-Word" and therefore make the reader think that the person in question said "N Word" and not "nigger." If you weren't acting like a nigger, your title would convey proper information.
Well...was the guy?
Just play the tape of Biden saying ‘we don’t need a nigger mayor’
Remember when they were selling these laws by telling us that nobody would be prosecuted merely for what they say?
As always with leftists, "that won't happen, but when it does happen, it's a good thing."
how will they even charge him without using the n word themselves? hypocrites.
Counties? There is federal hate crime laws, the feds can charge you for it. The feds can tack on hate crimes to a crime you were prosecuted by your state for.
But were they though?
Statistics suggest yes.
Meanwhile my nextdoor neighbor has been yelling the word at my kids as they get the mail. Said kids are Mexican and Brazilian.
I told them to yell back, "Hi Cracker!"
🤢