Imagine Having Such Cognitive Dissonance You Can’t Say Yes Or No
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (46)
sorted by:
We need to accept that certain people are crazy, can't be reasoned with, and are the enemies of humanity. And they feel the same way about us. Furthermore their belief, in their mind, justifies any kind of harm they might do to us or, more likely, allow others to do to us.
One group is going to be in power and have the capability to cause harm to the other group. Do you want the sane to have power over the insane, or the other way around? Nobody having power isn't an option.
I think that making up your own definition for common words and expecting other people to know them is basically the definition of "can't be reasoned with".
I would not put it past them to redefine "murder" just so they can get away with killing people they don't like.
They do this in South Africa, it's called "redistributive justice"
Abortion.
that's a funny way to spell evil.
If you have to define what a man is to know how to respond about a person then word man has no definition. This is philosophy 101. When I say brown no one has to ask what color? When I say man and you say what genetalia ? Then the word has no purpose.
By what do you mean by Brown? Do you discriminate against Brown bodies? Did you ask the person if they identify as Brown? Is Rachael Dolezal Brown? What can Brown do for you?
Once again everything you just said was brown, whether naturally or made. Brown as the description was universal in what it represents.
I don’t understand why you can’t identify as another race. Say a white guy grew up in Japan and wanted to say he was Asian. I’m black but have some European ancestry. So since I have like 2 to 3 percent Scandinavian dna I could say I was Scandinavian. I mean it has more basis in reality than a massing he is a woman
they can't allow transracialism because it undermines WAY too many grifts.
True but by their logic it shouldn’t be. With your one percent African you should be able to get affirmative action. By their logic.
Do you mean "logic" as a series of coherent and thought out principles, or just some crap you can make up as you go along? I need to know how you define this.
True logic can mean anything. Reminds of the humpty dumpy part in Alice’s Adventures through the looking glass
That's where the entire problem lies. And it's on purpose. They say up is down and down is up, then up is sideways and sideways is down, and punish you for not saying what they're saying, WHEN they're saying it. It creates sheep, easily led.
They literally can't tell the truth even by accident
What's brown and sticky?
A stick!
Kamala on a Friday night
I think that was the point.
The best part about this is that they're implying that it's your definition of "man" that needs to be clarified.
They're trying to stuff "cis" and "trans" in your mouth.
That ain't all.
Ah "cis". The slur word freaks use instead of saying normal.
It's all about controlling the language. If you control the language, you win the war.
Back in 2014 when many states were granting civil unions -- basically legally identical to marriage -- to gay couples, why weren't they satisfied? Because it wasn't about rights at all, it was about redefining marriage. They weren't going to be happy until they were allowed to define marriage however they wanted. Now they're doing the same thing with "man" and "woman".
In the end, controlling language is about fooling or coercing you into accepting or rejecting whatever they tell you to accept or reject.
They want to redefine reality
They want 2 + 2 to equal 5.
https://archive.ph/tXrVd
Atlantic: The Hawley-Bridges Exchange Was Not Constructive
The guy is a clear moron, any assumed identity does not take the place of the identity it assumes. There is no trans, it is a pseudo gender. The most a “trans” person can become is a sex doll with free will.
press X
No you don't. It's obvious to anyone with two brain cells that anyone asking that question is asking you to answer it based on how you define "man."
You just don't want to say "yes" because you know it will make you sound as ridiculous as you actually are.
Not a single person has defined a man as a miserable pile of secrets yet? Where's my wineglass, I swear kids these days...
Good grief. The way people twist themselves into knots is absurd. Yes a woman may sincerely believe she is a man, but she is still a woman.
"GOD DAMNIT, JIM. I'M A DOCTOR, NOT A BIOLOGIST!"
Who’s the lunatic in question this time?
Nosering bitch arguing in Congress.
We already defined man, like hundreds of years ago: adult human male. If you want to make up random word definitions, don't act like you've come up with some stunning revelation when you finally resolve the confusion you caused.
Imagine if you asked someone "Would you like a cookie?" and they were like "That depends on what you mean by cookie. Do you mean a small, sweet, baked confection, possibly with chocolat chips? If so, yes. But if you mean a pile of mashed potatoes full of uncooked beans and chicken bones, then no. You need to clarify before we can have a meaningful dialog".
Cause that's exactly how retarded this person sounds.
So they are confused by a man and a woman with deep, destructive mental illness. Fully mind-broken if they actually are confused and are not just lying to promote their agenda.
Internally, I feel like returning to monke.
i feel like committing war crimes.
Well, they can say yes or no. And they're aware that this answer hinges on the linguistic factor of the definition of the word 'man'.
What this person needs to face the music on is that 'internal senses of felt gender' is irrelevant subjective nonsense.
You could have just said Y chromosome
Even if you take the second "definition" (in the loosest and most tautological possible sense of the word)...can you really "feel like a man" if you're, you know, pregnant?
Because the author just said men don't get pregnant.
This bullshit really needs to be shown the door. "A man is someone who feels like a man." Bitch, that's not how anything works.
"An internal sense of felt gender." WTF? The sheer narcissism of this viewpoint is disgusting. "I am X because I believe I am X." This is the sort of delusion mothers have to disabuse their children of.
"Hey Mom! I'm Superman!" goes only so far.