Same here. They don't even try to hide their hypocrisy these days. They are purely operating on friend/enemy distinction. The right needs to wake the fuck up and do the same. Playing by the rules that they set and then ignore themselves is suicidal.
Why is it better to let the aggressor win though? You break the rules, you become an outlaw, the protections you ignored for others are gone from you. It's a simple system, but an effective one. And effective has been something that has been sorely lacking lately. Why not apply it to social etiquette too?
I would dispute that people engaging in bad behavior for its own sake are 'winning'.
I can live with Machiavellianism, meaning engaged in precise cruelty for specific ends, but gloating over someone's death when it does you or your side no good is just stupid..
That said, I'm fine with anyone who demonstrably engaged in this sort of behavior having the same behavior unleashed on him. If this urinalist dies, I'm fine with people dancing on her grace. Not random people of her faction.
This is why I don't care about dabbing all over the stupid lesbian getting herself shot
Just to be clear, I interpreted "don't care" as not trying to scold people for gloating over her self-inflicted misery, rather engaging in it directly.
I'm not going to pretend the sad part was the necessary shooting rather than the brainwashing before hand, and I'm not going to intervene with people who say anything out of pocket.
If social decency is not going to be extended fairly in it's totality then I'm not gonna waste energy to protect someone who did everything possible to take it away from others until it is.
I'm also not going to pretend that someone who goes out and premeditated blocks ICE vehicles with secret whistle signals and doesn't care about crushing them with her car has any plausible deniability that she didn't cheer for something like Charlie Kirk's murder. You have to be deep in that culture to reach that point
You talk about retaliation for real or imagined offenses. But do you think this does the right any good?
Leaving aside the morality. Imp spent a month saying that "Nazis" should be killed. Let's be generous and assume he means actual Nazis. You could say "Nazis want worse for others, and therefore this is not wrong". But they're still human beings. What do you think it does to the people who say something like that? What do you think it normalizes?
You don't need to scold anyone. Nor will I, it's pretty pointless.
I'll say it: Yes, I think this does (not "the right") but Good people, Good. We have to stop apologizing for Good outcomes and the elimination of Bad people and prevention of Bad outcomes. People should be perfectly free to celebrate the advancement of good, and the thwarting of evil.
I'm sick to death of your "polite lie" way of preserving decorum by making everything so fucking grim all of the time. You know where this is all going, I know where this is all going. If we're brave enough to learn to be honest again, quick enough, and make the ascendance of Good a fun process that people want to join, rather than this hand-wringing pathetic sadness thing that you want to make of it, then there's less likelihood that my sons have to die, face-down in a ditch, to get civilization and society patched together again.
This lady would've slit my throat without a moment's hesitation. If I were on her radar, she'd take and trans my kids. She'd do all this with what passes for joy in her wine-and-anti-depressant-ridden what-passes-for-a-heart.
She was a monster doing monster shit, and she died doing monster shit that hurt me and mine. The process of what got her there is sad. The resolution of that cosmic error is a cause for celebration.
It's not a "good outcome" when it makes no difference in the grand scheme of things. In fact, it probably does damage to ICE and the deportation effort, as pathetic as it is.
and make the ascendance of Good a fun process that people want to join
See, a side that celebrates people being shot in the head is not a "fun process that people want to join", but rather something that repels people. Maybe psychopaths and prisoners would like that.
This lady would've slit my throat without a moment's hesitation.
That's what they say about us...
The resolution of that cosmic error is a cause for celebration.
I agree. Especially after Charlie Kirk it’s hypocritical for “our” people to celebrate the deaths of people with different viewpoints.
With that being said, the recent one in Minneapolis is different because she was actively committing a crime. A better comparison imo is Rob Reiner. Yeah he seemed like a jerk as far as his political beliefs were concerned but I won’t celebrate his death.
Am I the only one who remembers that time someone came up with a browser extension that added third party, uncensorable comment sections to shitlib media sites that turned off comments?
It was called Dissenter, made by the folks at Gab. Leftoids got it removed from both the chrome extension store and the firefox store because they didn't like it when you had the ability to side-load clown world emoji comments onto their precious propaganda pieces. "Graffiti" they called it 🤣
Nope. That was the beginning of Gab if I'm not mistaken. The whole Gab saga was a major part of my redpilling experience. Having grown up hearing "build your own" and then watching someone try and get ripped apart by the system in realtime.
It was almost worth trawling Yahoo's TDS-laden frontpage for the comments during Trump's first administration. Now I don't bother, even with comments back on. It's straight to email.
I respect Scott for saying what a lot of people logically thought at the time of the race riots around the country: maybe there was a reason for "white flight" beyond "being racist." I remember watching people walking down a block, casually throwing bricks through windows and it was deemed "mostly peaceful" right around the time that the infamous bar crawl gone wrong members were walking through velvet ropes at the behest of capitol employees and having the single most ordered and weaponless "insurrection" of all time.
I also respect James Watson for saying that genetics influence IQ. The truth doesn't care whether we agree with it. It's absolutely insane we live in a weimar-esque culture where truth is casually disregarded in favor of "political correctness."
The reason they put "political" in front of "political correctness" is because if it was actually correct, we would simply call it correct. Political is merely a synonym for "false" which fits well with politicians seemingly doing nothing but lying all the time.
The infamously biased AP has what amounts to a hit story about the dude even though most of his readers would never have given a shit about his "evil politics."
Some of us have parents and grand parents who built America and fought in wars. Then the young brainwashed gen and 1st generation enjoying the easy life based off what my family built.
Washington Post lead with ‘Dilbert Creator that was canceled for racist comments on a podcast’. I hope when each of them pass away, if they weren’t just forgotten like a fart in the wind, it leads with ‘fake journalist who lied for a living’.
if they weren’t just forgotten like a fart in the wind, it leads with ‘fake journalist who lied for a living’.
You are a kind man.
I'd go with "murderous regime propagandist who manufactured consent for invasions of others countries as well as their own drops dead after plaguing the earth for 69 years"
Guy spent most of his life giving to liberal causes and supporting their message. He starts a little noticing in the last couple of years and he's persona non grata.
Requiescat in Pace, I hope he at least found comfort when he sought Christianity in the end and was able to leave with no regrets.
But these shitstains, I swear they are getting worse. Like the second someone who opposes them on ANYTHING dies, they're IMMEDIATELY dancing on their grave. They deserve no consideration in the future.
I didn’t even want to look for the headlines. RIP. He was a good man and happy that he accepted Christ before he died. Love Dilbert and definitely funny when you work in an office environment. Enjoyed his podcasts and interviews
Eh, I don't consider that very likely. But people on the right are predisposed to believing that, I've been hearing that anyone who took the vaccine will drop dead any moment now for 4 years.
Arguably, only "Trump fan" is editorializing because it reduces a supporter of a political figure (or a former supporter, in case he wanted the Epstien Files releasd) to some sort of fangirl.
The rest seems pretty good to me, and pushing through cancellation I find admirable.
Of course, the whole world is not as familiar with this guy as we are, so they might need some context other than "John Smith Dead At 68".
I just wish journalists reported. The 4th iteration is how a journalist should report. Any conjecture like "disgraced" should be left up to the reader. Journalists like the first should be instantly fired.
Would’ve been less backlash if he simply said he took the vax. Instead he mocked antivax pulled I trust the science and then when wrong did multiple mental backflips to avoid simply saying antivaxers were correct.
This is why I don't care about dabbing all over the stupid lesbian getting herself shot.
Same here. They don't even try to hide their hypocrisy these days. They are purely operating on friend/enemy distinction. The right needs to wake the fuck up and do the same. Playing by the rules that they set and then ignore themselves is suicidal.
I can hate all sides involved. the other bitch should have been shot as well.
Username checks out...
Precisely. We are not human to them. Each death is a triumph. Ask the Virginia AG.
This is why I do care about that. Because I like to fool myself into believing that the right is better.
Why is it better to let the aggressor win though? You break the rules, you become an outlaw, the protections you ignored for others are gone from you. It's a simple system, but an effective one. And effective has been something that has been sorely lacking lately. Why not apply it to social etiquette too?
I would dispute that people engaging in bad behavior for its own sake are 'winning'.
I can live with Machiavellianism, meaning engaged in precise cruelty for specific ends, but gloating over someone's death when it does you or your side no good is just stupid..
That said, I'm fine with anyone who demonstrably engaged in this sort of behavior having the same behavior unleashed on him. If this urinalist dies, I'm fine with people dancing on her grace. Not random people of her faction.
Just to be clear, I interpreted "don't care" as not trying to scold people for gloating over her self-inflicted misery, rather engaging in it directly.
I'm not going to pretend the sad part was the necessary shooting rather than the brainwashing before hand, and I'm not going to intervene with people who say anything out of pocket.
If social decency is not going to be extended fairly in it's totality then I'm not gonna waste energy to protect someone who did everything possible to take it away from others until it is.
I'm also not going to pretend that someone who goes out and premeditated blocks ICE vehicles with secret whistle signals and doesn't care about crushing them with her car has any plausible deniability that she didn't cheer for something like Charlie Kirk's murder. You have to be deep in that culture to reach that point
You talk about retaliation for real or imagined offenses. But do you think this does the right any good?
Leaving aside the morality. Imp spent a month saying that "Nazis" should be killed. Let's be generous and assume he means actual Nazis. You could say "Nazis want worse for others, and therefore this is not wrong". But they're still human beings. What do you think it does to the people who say something like that? What do you think it normalizes?
You don't need to scold anyone. Nor will I, it's pretty pointless.
I'll say it: Yes, I think this does (not "the right") but Good people, Good. We have to stop apologizing for Good outcomes and the elimination of Bad people and prevention of Bad outcomes. People should be perfectly free to celebrate the advancement of good, and the thwarting of evil.
I'm sick to death of your "polite lie" way of preserving decorum by making everything so fucking grim all of the time. You know where this is all going, I know where this is all going. If we're brave enough to learn to be honest again, quick enough, and make the ascendance of Good a fun process that people want to join, rather than this hand-wringing pathetic sadness thing that you want to make of it, then there's less likelihood that my sons have to die, face-down in a ditch, to get civilization and society patched together again.
This lady would've slit my throat without a moment's hesitation. If I were on her radar, she'd take and trans my kids. She'd do all this with what passes for joy in her wine-and-anti-depressant-ridden what-passes-for-a-heart.
She was a monster doing monster shit, and she died doing monster shit that hurt me and mine. The process of what got her there is sad. The resolution of that cosmic error is a cause for celebration.
It's not a "good outcome" when it makes no difference in the grand scheme of things. In fact, it probably does damage to ICE and the deportation effort, as pathetic as it is.
See, a side that celebrates people being shot in the head is not a "fun process that people want to join", but rather something that repels people. Maybe psychopaths and prisoners would like that.
That's what they say about us...
What good has it done?
I agree. Especially after Charlie Kirk it’s hypocritical for “our” people to celebrate the deaths of people with different viewpoints.
With that being said, the recent one in Minneapolis is different because she was actively committing a crime. A better comparison imo is Rob Reiner. Yeah he seemed like a jerk as far as his political beliefs were concerned but I won’t celebrate his death.
I'm glad that the only one on the right apparently celebrating Reiner's death was Trump. Not being sarcastic, I didn't see anyone else.
I really hate Yahoo News. I remember they banned comments for a while. I assumed it was because they got constant pushback
Am I the only one who remembers that time someone came up with a browser extension that added third party, uncensorable comment sections to shitlib media sites that turned off comments?
Got debanked and killed in like a week IIRC
It was called Dissenter, made by the folks at Gab. Leftoids got it removed from both the chrome extension store and the firefox store because they didn't like it when you had the ability to side-load clown world emoji comments onto their precious propaganda pieces. "Graffiti" they called it 🤣
Haha that was it
Brilliant idea, too kek for this world
Yeah, I remember.
Nope. That was the beginning of Gab if I'm not mistaken. The whole Gab saga was a major part of my redpilling experience. Having grown up hearing "build your own" and then watching someone try and get ripped apart by the system in realtime.
Similar to Parler
Now that you mention it i vaguely remember hearing about it
I have to use ghost archive with their site, because it will just keep things going in circles. Really annoying
I had my email address there for years, before the big security leak made me leave.
I can confirm the comments were, more often than not, surprisingly right-wing.
This is almost certainly why the comments got shut down.
It was almost worth trawling Yahoo's TDS-laden frontpage for the comments during Trump's first administration. Now I don't bother, even with comments back on. It's straight to email.
I respect Scott for saying what a lot of people logically thought at the time of the race riots around the country: maybe there was a reason for "white flight" beyond "being racist." I remember watching people walking down a block, casually throwing bricks through windows and it was deemed "mostly peaceful" right around the time that the infamous bar crawl gone wrong members were walking through velvet ropes at the behest of capitol employees and having the single most ordered and weaponless "insurrection" of all time.
I also respect James Watson for saying that genetics influence IQ. The truth doesn't care whether we agree with it. It's absolutely insane we live in a weimar-esque culture where truth is casually disregarded in favor of "political correctness."
The reason they put "political" in front of "political correctness" is because if it was actually correct, we would simply call it correct. Political is merely a synonym for "false" which fits well with politicians seemingly doing nothing but lying all the time.
The infamously biased AP has what amounts to a hit story about the dude even though most of his readers would never have given a shit about his "evil politics."
Some of us have parents and grand parents who built America and fought in wars. Then the young brainwashed gen and 1st generation enjoying the easy life based off what my family built.
Those are some of the mild ones
Check out some journo classics like Controversial comic strip creator who begged Trump to save his life dies
Washington Post lead with ‘Dilbert Creator that was canceled for racist comments on a podcast’. I hope when each of them pass away, if they weren’t just forgotten like a fart in the wind, it leads with ‘fake journalist who lied for a living’.
You are a kind man.
I'd go with "murderous regime propagandist who manufactured consent for invasions of others countries as well as their own drops dead after plaguing the earth for 69 years"
Liberals: Someone we don't like died, we have to include what offended us in their eulogy
Guy spent most of his life giving to liberal causes and supporting their message. He starts a little noticing in the last couple of years and he's persona non grata.
The heretic is more hated than the enemy.
RIP, sad to see him go. He had a long and public fight with cancer.
R.I.P. Scott Adams.
And the media treated the austere religious scholar al-Baghdadi better.
Cause they treat their friends better than their enemies.
Just another reminder that you really don't hate them enough.
I don't think it is possible to hate them enough, come to think of it.
MSM: Someone died, but don't worry- he didn't share your views so he wasn't really human
Requiescat in Pace, I hope he at least found comfort when he sought Christianity in the end and was able to leave with no regrets.
But these shitstains, I swear they are getting worse. Like the second someone who opposes them on ANYTHING dies, they're IMMEDIATELY dancing on their grave. They deserve no consideration in the future.
I didn’t even want to look for the headlines. RIP. He was a good man and happy that he accepted Christ before he died. Love Dilbert and definitely funny when you work in an office environment. Enjoyed his podcasts and interviews
https://i.imgur.com/P2O240n.png
RIP
If you die and the libtard media has anything positive to say about you, then you failed at life.
did he died of suddenly?
I don't think they officially announced it, but he had terminal prostate cancer
Well, considering that it's a right-wing figure who died, it was either the vaccine or MURDER!!!!
He doesn't seem to have been murdered, so it must have been the vaccine. Like that Diamond and Pearl lady who died because others took the vaccine.
He's not a right-wing figure though.
I mean, support Trump, say to get away from black people, pretty right-wing.
He didn't always support Trump, as if Trump is right wing.
Well, I don't think so, but he's widely considered right-wing.
He actually said the vaccine killed him, he thought his prostate cancer was exacerbated by it.
Episode 1995 EXCERPT - AntiVaxxers Win https://youtu.be/C41GCgyG4mI?si=ux2GRF6hij9LLpVh
Eh, I don't consider that very likely. But people on the right are predisposed to believing that, I've been hearing that anyone who took the vaccine will drop dead any moment now for 4 years.
Of course the top article was written by a morbidly obese thing with a surname Edel, chances are the rest are all fat women of the same ilk
Such a sad state of affairs where the people he made fun of for years happily dance on his grave as a win.
People Magazine wins the scum of the earth award with the now deleted tweet:
https://archive.is/UeOKh
"Scott Adams, Disgraced Dilbert Creator, Dies at 68"
Boston Globe called him racist :
https://x.com/lucythegreat123/status/2011136391758107078
People magazine victoria Edel calls him racist : (but later changed it)
https://x.com/kevinvdahlgren/status/2011125364374814826
That Edel woman has her X protected, of course.
Just to be clear: you're saying only the first one is really bad, right? I actually quite like the second one.
It's from People's Magazine, as someone later on here commented. Yahoo just gets content from other sites and publishes it.
I don't know why any of the editorial comments were necessary.
Arguably, only "Trump fan" is editorializing because it reduces a supporter of a political figure (or a former supporter, in case he wanted the Epstien Files releasd) to some sort of fangirl.
The rest seems pretty good to me, and pushing through cancellation I find admirable.
Of course, the whole world is not as familiar with this guy as we are, so they might need some context other than "John Smith Dead At 68".
Dilbert creator is all that's needed for a headline.
Their loaded language has made legacy media damn near unreadable recently.
Block all of it out. It's all trash anyways.
It was announced by his first wife.
His money-grabbing wife had disappeared?
pretty young to die at that age
did he suddenly or did Mossad use one of their heart attack guns on this once kosher good goy because he said something mean about their bioweapon?
Justin Trudeau and Crooked Hillary are disgraced, Justin especially. Will she write the same headline when he dies?
One of the classics, in his honor.
I just wish journalists reported. The 4th iteration is how a journalist should report. Any conjecture like "disgraced" should be left up to the reader. Journalists like the first should be instantly fired.
This right here is why you should NEVER get involved with cults!
It never does end well.
Would’ve been less backlash if he simply said he took the vax. Instead he mocked antivax pulled I trust the science and then when wrong did multiple mental backflips to avoid simply saying antivaxers were correct.