Arguably, only "Trump fan" is editorializing because it reduces a supporter of a political figure (or a former supporter, in case he wanted the Epstien Files releasd) to some sort of fangirl.
The rest seems pretty good to me, and pushing through cancellation I find admirable.
Of course, the whole world is not as familiar with this guy as we are, so they might need some context other than "John Smith Dead At 68".
Just to be clear: you're saying only the first one is really bad, right? I actually quite like the second one.
It's from People's Magazine, as someone later on here commented. Yahoo just gets content from other sites and publishes it.
I don't know why any of the editorial comments were necessary.
Arguably, only "Trump fan" is editorializing because it reduces a supporter of a political figure (or a former supporter, in case he wanted the Epstien Files releasd) to some sort of fangirl.
The rest seems pretty good to me, and pushing through cancellation I find admirable.
Of course, the whole world is not as familiar with this guy as we are, so they might need some context other than "John Smith Dead At 68".
Dilbert creator is all that's needed for a headline.