If you're talking about the video I posted, she's one of several that I saw confirming this. I only posted it because it's very short and is right to the point.
EDIT - if you're talking about the charges themselves, as I explained in another post, domestic battery doesn't necessarily involve his wife, just a family member. It could have been a parent, a brother, a cousin, anyone who is family would fall under the umbrella of "domestic."
The only people who disagree are simpcels and other females.
Anyone who's ever been in a relationship or marriage knows exactly how bitches get sometimes. If you've never wanted to at least hit a bitch, you're lying.
"Confirming" is not proving. I could go to the red light district and pay a couple of hookers to say they saw you fellating horses with Tim Walz and either one of them would be "one of several I saw confirming this".
Not for nothing, but women will always agree with each other, especially when there are accusations of domestic violence.
Additionally, they view disagreeing with them as violence.
Listened to this guy for years until I became aware of what a total faggot he is. All his bullshit with his owl demon Solas was the tipping point for me. I also noticed that he was getting some facts wrong in stories I was well informed about, and I realized there is absolutely no reason to listen to this fucking sperg.
I guess he got arrested in Louisiana, so I don’t think he assaulted his parents.
It sounds like u/BlisteringCold took that to the conclusion of “he’s not reliable,” though. It would only be Gell-Mann Amnesia if he’d failed to make that connection.
Are you sure? The original formulation of the term sounds like he’s talking about the trustworthiness of a specific source, given how he likens it to an individual continuously lying and uses “the newspaper” rather than “a newspaper.”
Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them.
In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.
That is the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. I'd point out it does not operate in other arenas of life. In ordinary life, if somebody consistently exaggerates or lies to you, you soon discount everything they say. In court, there is the legal doctrine of falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, which means untruthful in one part, untruthful in all. But when it comes to the media, we believe against evidence that it is probably worth our time to read other parts of the paper. When, in fact, it almost certainly isn't. The only possible explanation for our behavior is amnesia.
It’s not necessarily bad to apply the principle everywhere, but strictly speaking, that’s not the phenomenon it refers to.
But still overseen and endorsed by the same editorial board. We happily say “The NYT/CNN/MSNBC/etc.” sucks, and while we also call out individual anchors and writers for sucking in specific ways, it’s understood that each organization as a whole suffers collective failings.
It's conditional upon a person knowing anything. They have to be familiar with some sort of field in order to see when the journos get something wrong.
Most people are so damn retarded that they have expertise nowhere.
We instinctively seek out the simplest and most confirming answer to all things presented to us, so that way our brain can say "case closed" and not have to expend effort on it. Its how stereotypes are formed, its how memes work, etc.
So unless you are actively forcing yourself to question everything presented to you, especially things you agree with, you will end up falling for the trap again.
He's particularly bad when it comes to anything international, but he's more accurate than a lot of sources when it comes to domestic issues, so you could do worse.
You can be arrested just for making a woman "feel" unsafe. The police response is to remove the man by default. They can also withhold the reason for the arrest, leaving the man with no response but to blame the woman (often they are threatened with charges themselves if they don't turn their husband in.)
Maybe, then again, Styx isn't exactly the same kind of target that Crowder was. I must have missed it, but I guess he had a video a few days ago where he looked very drunk, so maybe alcohol played a part in whatever happened. I don't know, I'm going to wait until more information comes out before forming a complete opinion so I guess we'll see.
I saw it, it was the presidential debate, he looked drunk but if that's him drunk he seems more hansy than violent so this 'domestic battery' seems more for unwanted attention than anything violent.
Unlike Rakita, he hasn't shown any signs of a full breakdown.
He probably did something like "punch a pillow in front of a woman" or the dreaded "threw a cup at a wall" or the absolutely nefarious "physically stopped a woman from hitting him and pushed her out of the house." I'll wait for details, thanks.
I think styx is a degen with retarded beliefs, an even more retarded spirituality, and most assuredly at least one drug addiction, but that still doesn't mean any of us should just take something like this at face value. It's literally domestic abuse to grab a hysterical woman and carry her outside, for instance.
For those wondering, domestic battery doesn't mean he abused his wife or something like that, it's a battery charge that involves family members, so I'm guessing that he got into a spat with one of his parents, since I believe he was living with them after separating from his wife. I could be entirely wrong though, so don't take what I'm saying as gospel. I'm just guessing.
As much as I dislike Warwick, he actually does a much better job than most content creators of keeping his private life separate from his online persona, so he'll likely never address this in a video or livestream, and hopefully the dramafag brigade can resist the urge to go full basement-dwelling Kiwifarmer on him.
It depends. When he got married to that Dutch woman and moved to the Netherlands to be with her he was pretty open about it. When he moved back to the States leaving his wife and kid behind in the Netherlands he was much less open about it (I think there was something about a drug dealer threatening him on the street)
I have a similar opinion of him as I had of John McAfee: "trouble somehow manages to follow him wherever he goes"
Edgy Satanist might not be wholesome good boy? I am shocked by this mind blowing revelation!
I don't believe women on principle, especially about abuse, but anyone who officially goes by anything666 is a cringe fag who helped our society lose its religion and end up in a place where women have such unbridled power.
Guy has over half a million YT subs and still cant make bail and needs a public defender? Thats a bit pathetic. Styx really has been on quite the slide since about 2020.
You can get your lawyer to represent you at a bail hearing. I mean I think it's a good idea. But they do assign you somebody. So you don't have to.
If your family calls the lawyer right away (good luck getting phone calls in jail), he can just zoom into a hearing. They are doing all these remotely. Since covid.
He's based in Vermont. It looks like this happened in New Orleans, so even if he has a lawyer on retainer back home he'd still get a Public Defender in LA until he can find local counsel.
He's a right-wing/libertarian commentator. I held off on watching him for a long time because of the name as well, but he's a pretty decent commentator, especially if you enjoy shorter to the point videos.
Domestic battery can involve literally anything including poking someone.
He's out already so I'm going with a case of "Gotta arrest someone" type deal untill proven otherwise.
Re his accuracy, he primarily works from tips and provides opinions. That's a take it or leave it type of deal. Just admit that you don't like him because he's a weirdo.
If you're talking about the video I posted, she's one of several that I saw confirming this. I only posted it because it's very short and is right to the point.
EDIT - if you're talking about the charges themselves, as I explained in another post, domestic battery doesn't necessarily involve his wife, just a family member. It could have been a parent, a brother, a cousin, anyone who is family would fall under the umbrella of "domestic."
#YesAllWomen
And if there's incontrovertible that she's telling the truth I'm assuming she deserved it unless there's incontrovertible proof that she didn't.
The only people who disagree are simpcels and other females.
Anyone who's ever been in a relationship or marriage knows exactly how bitches get sometimes. If you've never wanted to at least hit a bitch, you're lying.
"Confirming" is not proving. I could go to the red light district and pay a couple of hookers to say they saw you fellating horses with Tim Walz and either one of them would be "one of several I saw confirming this".
Not for nothing, but women will always agree with each other, especially when there are accusations of domestic violence.
Additionally, they view disagreeing with them as violence.
Don't forget it's also election season and he says a lot of wrongthink.
His defense should be "look at my bird chest, I can barely lift my arms!"
So THAT's why he didn't wear a shirt for years.
Listened to this guy for years until I became aware of what a total faggot he is. All his bullshit with his owl demon Solas was the tipping point for me. I also noticed that he was getting some facts wrong in stories I was well informed about, and I realized there is absolutely no reason to listen to this fucking sperg. I guess he got arrested in Louisiana, so I don’t think he assaulted his parents.
The Gell-Mann Amnesia effect strikes again.
It sounds like u/BlisteringCold took that to the conclusion of “he’s not reliable,” though. It would only be Gell-Mann Amnesia if he’d failed to make that connection.
It's the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect if he doesn't apply the concept to EVERY person on Youtube, TV, radio, newspapers, everything.
Are you sure? The original formulation of the term sounds like he’s talking about the trustworthiness of a specific source, given how he likens it to an individual continuously lying and uses “the newspaper” rather than “a newspaper.”
It’s not necessarily bad to apply the principle everywhere, but strictly speaking, that’s not the phenomenon it refers to.
You turn the page and the article is written by someone else.
But still overseen and endorsed by the same editorial board. We happily say “The NYT/CNN/MSNBC/etc.” sucks, and while we also call out individual anchors and writers for sucking in specific ways, it’s understood that each organization as a whole suffers collective failings.
You are not understanding the effect if you still go to some other source and trust them. All sources are wrong.
I still don’t understand how a person can learn about it and then still trust any mainstream news source.
It's conditional upon a person knowing anything. They have to be familiar with some sort of field in order to see when the journos get something wrong.
Most people are so damn retarded that they have expertise nowhere.
Because the human brain is a complex, lazy organ.
We instinctively seek out the simplest and most confirming answer to all things presented to us, so that way our brain can say "case closed" and not have to expend effort on it. Its how stereotypes are formed, its how memes work, etc.
So unless you are actively forcing yourself to question everything presented to you, especially things you agree with, you will end up falling for the trap again.
He's particularly bad when it comes to anything international, but he's more accurate than a lot of sources when it comes to domestic issues, so you could do worse.
Valid point. He's a fairly private guy so something tells me we might not ever learn the 100% truth on this.
Guys, remember that story where Amazon's new "AI" was just a bunch of Pajeets randomly trying to answer questions? No reason, just asking.
Here's Vee talking about it
To be honest my suspicion on if the charges are valid are razor thin, especially after how they tried to get Crowder with the same kind of claims.
You can be arrested just for making a woman "feel" unsafe. The police response is to remove the man by default. They can also withhold the reason for the arrest, leaving the man with no response but to blame the woman (often they are threatened with charges themselves if they don't turn their husband in.)
Maybe, then again, Styx isn't exactly the same kind of target that Crowder was. I must have missed it, but I guess he had a video a few days ago where he looked very drunk, so maybe alcohol played a part in whatever happened. I don't know, I'm going to wait until more information comes out before forming a complete opinion so I guess we'll see.
I saw it, it was the presidential debate, he looked drunk but if that's him drunk he seems more hansy than violent so this 'domestic battery' seems more for unwanted attention than anything violent.
Unlike Rakita, he hasn't shown any signs of a full breakdown.
He probably did something like "punch a pillow in front of a woman" or the dreaded "threw a cup at a wall" or the absolutely nefarious "physically stopped a woman from hitting him and pushed her out of the house." I'll wait for details, thanks.
Could be - but he's apparently been having a booze problem for a while and it's been getting worse. Some of it was on stream.
I think styx is a degen with retarded beliefs, an even more retarded spirituality, and most assuredly at least one drug addiction, but that still doesn't mean any of us should just take something like this at face value. It's literally domestic abuse to grab a hysterical woman and carry her outside, for instance.
Was he shirtless at the time of the arrest?
For those wondering, domestic battery doesn't mean he abused his wife or something like that, it's a battery charge that involves family members, so I'm guessing that he got into a spat with one of his parents, since I believe he was living with them after separating from his wife. I could be entirely wrong though, so don't take what I'm saying as gospel. I'm just guessing.
If the cops get called to a domestic situation they have to arrest somebody if there's any evidence at all.
"He raised his voice and I felt threatened" --> arrest.
Then the DA sees there's not enough evidence for a trial and says "sign this saying you're really really sorry and you can go".
They have to arrest somebody period, in some states, if called on a domestic. It's a policy to keep them from having to come back.
As much as I dislike Warwick, he actually does a much better job than most content creators of keeping his private life separate from his online persona, so he'll likely never address this in a video or livestream, and hopefully the dramafag brigade can resist the urge to go full basement-dwelling Kiwifarmer on him.
It depends. When he got married to that Dutch woman and moved to the Netherlands to be with her he was pretty open about it. When he moved back to the States leaving his wife and kid behind in the Netherlands he was much less open about it (I think there was something about a drug dealer threatening him on the street)
I have a similar opinion of him as I had of John McAfee: "trouble somehow manages to follow him wherever he goes"
UPDATE - Styx himself has posted a video about the event.
https://youtu.be/II8p9HzMLU8?si=_lQOdjysgx2SLhQ-
As sean connery once said. If you tried everything sometimes a backhanded smack is necessary.
Edgy Satanist might not be wholesome good boy? I am shocked by this mind blowing revelation!
I don't believe women on principle, especially about abuse, but anyone who officially goes by anything666 is a cringe fag who helped our society lose its religion and end up in a place where women have such unbridled power.
The public court record is here.
Bail set at $7,500. Court considers there to be probable cause and has made a domestic protected order.
Guy has over half a million YT subs and still cant make bail and needs a public defender? Thats a bit pathetic. Styx really has been on quite the slide since about 2020.
Looks like they just give you a public defender while you are in jail so they don't have delays while people look for a lawyer in the Yellow Pages.
He could have paid bail and be out by now, they aren't going to update this record.
You can get your lawyer to represent you at a bail hearing. I mean I think it's a good idea. But they do assign you somebody. So you don't have to.
If your family calls the lawyer right away (good luck getting phone calls in jail), he can just zoom into a hearing. They are doing all these remotely. Since covid.
He's based in Vermont. It looks like this happened in New Orleans, so even if he has a lawyer on retainer back home he'd still get a Public Defender in LA until he can find local counsel.
Is that a lolcow or something? I've never heard of that wretched handle before.
I have no idea who "Styxhexenhammer666" is and given the cringe the nick inspires I'm OK with that.
That said - I think that woman's voice gave me ear cancer.
He's a right-wing/libertarian commentator. I held off on watching him for a long time because of the name as well, but he's a pretty decent commentator, especially if you enjoy shorter to the point videos.
Thank you, handshake. I really like watchinig you call people names in other comments.
If you care about any of this, you might be a faggot.
Domestic battery can involve literally anything including poking someone.
He's out already so I'm going with a case of "Gotta arrest someone" type deal untill proven otherwise.
Re his accuracy, he primarily works from tips and provides opinions. That's a take it or leave it type of deal. Just admit that you don't like him because he's a weirdo.
To be fair, any woman who chooses a screen name with the word Hammer in it should come off as an instant red flag.
I don't think you're in any danger of being married to a woman.
Excuse me? I'm not one of the spammers.
Well, at this point we don't know what was said anymore, so it's a moot point.
Was the comment removed?
Are you still able to see it?
Yea I can it was this.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Stop feeding the troll you idiot.
Wouldn't you fit in better on reddit?
What do you IDF homos call this one? An association op?
Pedo pajeedo
Pedjeeto
Stop.
You win nothing.
You have convinced zero people to see things your way.
Your time should be put to better use elsewhere.
"Space we can recover; time never." Napoleon