It's funny that they talk about improving men's economic position to make them more "marriageable". The ones with good economic positions have the most to lose if they get divorce raped, so they have even less incentive to marry.
This is true. For tax reasons but maybe also general liability which includes divorce rape it is starting to make sense to just hide assets/remain poor on paper.
As said many times, the whole 'you can a 6'5 rich muscular husband without bringing anything to the table because of a one-night stand you had once' is really biting them in the ass hard later in life.
Coupled with women making dating so toxic and dangerous that a foreign woman saying she's marrying for the green card only is not only more honest but less likely to lose you everything, western women have priced themselves off the market. The only ones that are willing to date them ARE the ones likely to disappear like a fart in the wind than commit.
You think any guy who actually comes close to their criteria is going to want anything to do with these gold digging sociopaths?
That's what I've been saying. The guys they actually want for marriage have every reason to head for the hills when the topic comes up because they're one divorce rape away from losing everything.
Do you watch Taskmaster in the UK? Last weeks episode had them driving. 2 of the women were told they should NEVER get a license whilst the third already had a license that took her ...... 14 years to get
Never, never underestimate the power of men wanting to get their dicks wet in strange.
Even smart men, even successful men, even family men, even billionaire "high-quality" men.
To quote from one with who describes the Vogue article (I could not bring myself to read it):
1
Sánchez uses a mug Bezos got her from Amazon, with the words “Woke up sexy as hell again” splashed across the side.” (In another life, Jeff Bezos was a TJ Maxx mom.)
2
“… The phrase “Love you to space and back,” a favorite saying between Sánchez and Bezos, embroidered in her lilting cursive.”
3
“‘I made her vulnerable and soft,’ says Bezos with more than a hint of pride.” (Reader, I gagged (derogatory).)
The ultrarich people, many of them sign prenuptial agreements. Hugh Heffner the 70yo Playboy owner, he always signed pre-nups when he married and the 20yo girls marrying him were ok with it because he always conceded a couple million dollars in case of divorce, this wasn´t too much for him but it made the girls he married instant millionaires. I will be surprised if Bezos hasn´t got a pre-nup.
I known foreign women wanting to marry a foreigner for the visa but none of them is willing to settle for an average guy, they also want the guy to have money in addition to his nationality, if they guy is a waiter or trucker or something un-glamorous they aren´t going to marry him.
They are worse than the local women because if a guy is well-off why would he want to go abroad to find a prostitute marrying him for money when he can find a local prostitute that shares the same language and values. I don´t agree that foreign women are willing to marry for the visa and nothing else, they also expect the guy to have money and a house.
Sarah Camino had been in a relationship for two years when she found out she was pregnant. The father ... had been using drugs lately and had been fired from his last four jobs; when she ventured that she was scared she might wind up raising the child alone, he got defensive and walked out.
Ms. Camino, a beautician and hospitality worker, checks all the boxes of the demographic that has been targeted for advice in recent months by an array of columnists and authors who have argued for the promotion and prioritizing of marriage, sometimes for the sake of overall happiness but more often for the sake of children’s well-being. She’s a 37-year-old single mother without a college
degree. ... She had planned to stay with the father, but that’s not how it happened. “I didn’t think he was going to leave me like this,” she said.
You gotta love how the women they're using as examples chose tingles above all else and now bring nothing but some deadbeat's bastard offspring to the table. Maybe asking men what dating is like would prove more illuminating than listening to the usual complaints from entitled roasties. And FFS 2 parent households do better because the biological father is around. Getting some cuck to come in and pay the bills doesn't replace that, and bringing in people who are not biologically related entails all kinds of risks.
The last person she went out with ghosted her, disappearing without warning after four months of dating. “There are women that are just out here trying, and the men aren’t ready,” she told me. “They don’t care, most of them.” Who, exactly, is Ms. Camino supposed to marry?
A male who's willing to raise her bastard kid and put up with the fact that she's 37? Those exist, they're just not the 6' 4'' rich male model that feminism told her is her birthright. The guys she's going after are out of her league because she feels entitled to the kind of gigachad who blew her back out when she 20.
But what was once dismissed as the complaint of picky women is now supported by a raft of data. The same pundits plugging marriage also bemoan the crisis among men and boys, what has come to be known as male drift — men turning away from college, dropping out of the work force or failing to look after their health. Ms. Kearney, for example, acknowledges that improving men’s economic position, especially men without college degrees, is an important step toward making them more attractive partners.
No, it's still picky women. There are plenty of good men with careers who get passed over for not being in the top 5% in terms of physical attributes. By the time those guys show up on women's radar the women are like the two featured in this article: ran through whores looking for a retirement plan. Men with careers don't want that because they know it's divorce rape waiting to happen.
it seems that by the time men begin dating, they are relatively “limited in their ability and willingness to be fully emotionally present and available,”
Again, once they start selecting for emotional availability they'll get it. But the 5% of guys they're fighting over don't need to put up with that crap to get women, and it doesn't do jack shit for the other 95%.
When she asks her male friends to set her up with their friends, they consistently tell her that no one they know would be good enough for her. “It’s like, how bad are you guys?” she marvels.
I'm marveling at how retarded this bitch is. It's obvious that they're just soothing her ego to avoid unnecessary drama. The real reason is that they know that she's an entitled roastie who will reject anyone they set her up with for "not being good enough" so they avoid wasting their male friends' time.
men turning away from college, dropping out of the work force or failing to look after their health
Men being turned away from college, disincentivized and put last in every application criteria (especially if white). Being pushed out of the work force by HR goons and diversity criteria, while the work pool is deliberately destroyed by the globalists who crow abut turning the US into a service based economy. Illegal immigration is destroying shit too. Failing to look after their health - absurd broken medical system combined with depression because of the above.
Ignorant cuntery at it's best. Men ruined, women most affected.
Looking at the scholarships, funds, and bursaries... Seems like the group that has the 60% share of college population (women) gets all of them.
Looking at the social clubs, activist clubs, and hobby clubs... Seems like the group that has the 60% share of college population (women) gets all of them.
Looking at the sexual health services, mental health services, and general wellness care... Seems like the group that has the 60% share of college population (women) gets all of them.
The person quoted there is so dishonest. It's not "turning away from them", it's "has been turned away BY them". Colleges have said "go away, we do not want your kind 'round these parts.", and men, being logical and rational creatures, acknowledged it and moved on.
Good luck with that one, the moment others realise sodomy laws often include oral the quicker you'll see a new law drawn up which will then be eviscerated while the ink is still wet.
Weren't feminists arguing that marriage was an outdated, patriarchal social construct? Wouldn't they consider this a good thing? Why aren't they being consulted for this article?
They only feel that way about parts that benefited men, which is why they've spent the last 50 years getting rid of those. Feminists are just fine with the part where she gets all his resources.
Feminism never hated the concept of marriage. They just want to be married to the State. It's the best way to live off men's money without any of the responsibilities. No-fault divorce-rape laws also are in place so that women can hop to their "real" Husband anytime they want.
Millennial women argued this relentlessly from 2000-2020 while they were riding the cock train. Then they woke up around 36 or so and realized how fucked their prospects were.
Then they woke up around 36 or so and realized how fucked their prospects were.
I have a college ex who spent her twenties in Miami riding the carousel, and who has now in her thirties moved back to the city where we went to college to date college guys. And she complains about "not finding anybody to settle down with her." Um, bitch? Do you even know how many times your odometer has rolled over?
It is 100% men's fault, but not for the reasons the author thinks.
Women have not been allowed to choose their mates freely for 5000 years. They do not have the evolutionary skills for it. Leave them up to their own devices they pick the worst losers possible, or they delay choosing until it's too late.
When marriage is a handshake between father and groom, society will return.
Gotta love how the opening example fails to note any irresponsibility on the part of the woman dating and fucking a dude who was clearly a drug addict. And also failing to even bother using proper protection.
Love these articles where they just ignore the elephant in the room that especially college "educated" women are just too picky and toxic and will end up with lots of cats.
Rich dudes arent gonna marry a woman that has blue hair, is fat, tattooed up, noses with septums and feminist. Its women's own fault they do these things to themselves that make them poor marriage material. Women seems to think they deserve rich chads and overrate/over value themselves.
Sarah Camino had been in a relationship for two years when she found out she was pregnant. The father, whom she met while they were both working at a restaurant in Times Square, was initially excited. But he had been using drugs lately and had been fired from his last four jobs; when she ventured that she was scared she might wind up raising the child alone, he got defensive and walked out.
Feels like there's to groups of women that end up here - attractive women who self-sabotage themselves into sleeping with guys with poor impulse, and their opposite, unattractive women who go for guys with poor impulse control because of a lack of options. Opposite ends of the spectrum but they end up at the same place.
BTW it always bugs me that every time there's a news article about problems with dating and relationships, it always focuses on the woman's plight, never the man's. Where's our representation, leftists?
Why not blame it on women instigating 80% of all divorces?
Why should men suffer 95% of all workplace injuries and deaths only to be abandoned when he can’t support the leach?
It's funny that they talk about improving men's economic position to make them more "marriageable". The ones with good economic positions have the most to lose if they get divorce raped, so they have even less incentive to marry.
This is true. For tax reasons but maybe also general liability which includes divorce rape it is starting to make sense to just hide assets/remain poor on paper.
As said many times, the whole 'you can a 6'5 rich muscular husband without bringing anything to the table because of a one-night stand you had once' is really biting them in the ass hard later in life.
Coupled with women making dating so toxic and dangerous that a foreign woman saying she's marrying for the green card only is not only more honest but less likely to lose you everything, western women have priced themselves off the market. The only ones that are willing to date them ARE the ones likely to disappear like a fart in the wind than commit.
That's what I've been saying. The guys they actually want for marriage have every reason to head for the hills when the topic comes up because they're one divorce rape away from losing everything.
Look at the rates of 'transition therapy', all I need to say on that one..
The movie Sleepaway Camp was supposed to be a cautionary horror movie, unfortunately they have used it as an instruction manual.
Do you watch Taskmaster in the UK? Last weeks episode had them driving. 2 of the women were told they should NEVER get a license whilst the third already had a license that took her ...... 14 years to get
https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/2699859-cowboy-jeff-bezos-2023-vogue-photoshoot
A picture is sometimes worth a thousand words.
Never, never underestimate the power of men wanting to get their dicks wet in strange.
Even smart men, even successful men, even family men, even billionaire "high-quality" men.
To quote from one with who describes the Vogue article (I could not bring myself to read it):
1
Sánchez uses a mug Bezos got her from Amazon, with the words “Woke up sexy as hell again” splashed across the side.” (In another life, Jeff Bezos was a TJ Maxx mom.)
2
“… The phrase “Love you to space and back,” a favorite saying between Sánchez and Bezos, embroidered in her lilting cursive.”
3
“‘I made her vulnerable and soft,’ says Bezos with more than a hint of pride.” (Reader, I gagged (derogatory).)
https://colormeloverly.substack.com/p/not-this-fake-normalcy-from-mr-and
The ultrarich people, many of them sign prenuptial agreements. Hugh Heffner the 70yo Playboy owner, he always signed pre-nups when he married and the 20yo girls marrying him were ok with it because he always conceded a couple million dollars in case of divorce, this wasn´t too much for him but it made the girls he married instant millionaires. I will be surprised if Bezos hasn´t got a pre-nup.
Hugh Hefner had strong prenuptial agreement
https://www.ciancilaw.com/blog/reports-hugh-hefner-had-strong-prenuptial-agreem/
I known foreign women wanting to marry a foreigner for the visa but none of them is willing to settle for an average guy, they also want the guy to have money in addition to his nationality, if they guy is a waiter or trucker or something un-glamorous they aren´t going to marry him.
They are worse than the local women because if a guy is well-off why would he want to go abroad to find a prostitute marrying him for money when he can find a local prostitute that shares the same language and values. I don´t agree that foreign women are willing to marry for the visa and nothing else, they also expect the guy to have money and a house.
You gotta love how the women they're using as examples chose tingles above all else and now bring nothing but some deadbeat's bastard offspring to the table. Maybe asking men what dating is like would prove more illuminating than listening to the usual complaints from entitled roasties. And FFS 2 parent households do better because the biological father is around. Getting some cuck to come in and pay the bills doesn't replace that, and bringing in people who are not biologically related entails all kinds of risks.
A male who's willing to raise her bastard kid and put up with the fact that she's 37? Those exist, they're just not the 6' 4'' rich male model that feminism told her is her birthright. The guys she's going after are out of her league because she feels entitled to the kind of gigachad who blew her back out when she 20.
No, it's still picky women. There are plenty of good men with careers who get passed over for not being in the top 5% in terms of physical attributes. By the time those guys show up on women's radar the women are like the two featured in this article: ran through whores looking for a retirement plan. Men with careers don't want that because they know it's divorce rape waiting to happen.
Again, once they start selecting for emotional availability they'll get it. But the 5% of guys they're fighting over don't need to put up with that crap to get women, and it doesn't do jack shit for the other 95%.
I'm marveling at how retarded this bitch is. It's obvious that they're just soothing her ego to avoid unnecessary drama. The real reason is that they know that she's an entitled roastie who will reject anyone they set her up with for "not being good enough" so they avoid wasting their male friends' time.
Men being turned away from college, disincentivized and put last in every application criteria (especially if white). Being pushed out of the work force by HR goons and diversity criteria, while the work pool is deliberately destroyed by the globalists who crow abut turning the US into a service based economy. Illegal immigration is destroying shit too. Failing to look after their health - absurd broken medical system combined with depression because of the above.
Ignorant cuntery at it's best. Men ruined, women most affected.
It's ALWAYS about them
Looking at the scholarships, funds, and bursaries... Seems like the group that has the 60% share of college population (women) gets all of them.
Looking at the social clubs, activist clubs, and hobby clubs... Seems like the group that has the 60% share of college population (women) gets all of them.
Looking at the sexual health services, mental health services, and general wellness care... Seems like the group that has the 60% share of college population (women) gets all of them.
The person quoted there is so dishonest. It's not "turning away from them", it's "has been turned away BY them". Colleges have said "go away, we do not want your kind 'round these parts.", and men, being logical and rational creatures, acknowledged it and moved on.
No.
Excellent analysis.
Eliminate divorce, reinstate adultery and sodomy laws.
And make them capital offenses. The Muslims are right about women and fags.
That would be the same group that rapes boys for cultural reasons, right? The enemy of your enemy is not your friend.
I didn't say they're my friend, I said they're right about 2 things.
They do, but they also control their women.
that seems to be a specifically afghan problem.
Logical fallacy.
Good luck with that one, the moment others realise sodomy laws often include oral the quicker you'll see a new law drawn up which will then be eviscerated while the ink is still wet.
Just go back to homosexuality as a mental illness, then we're all set.
Ah, bitter single mothers: the demographic that demands you put in the effort now to make up for their lack of effort earlier on in their lives.
Weren't feminists arguing that marriage was an outdated, patriarchal social construct? Wouldn't they consider this a good thing? Why aren't they being consulted for this article?
They only feel that way about parts that benefited men, which is why they've spent the last 50 years getting rid of those. Feminists are just fine with the part where she gets all his resources.
Feminism never hated the concept of marriage. They just want to be married to the State. It's the best way to live off men's money without any of the responsibilities. No-fault divorce-rape laws also are in place so that women can hop to their "real" Husband anytime they want.
Millennial women argued this relentlessly from 2000-2020 while they were riding the cock train. Then they woke up around 36 or so and realized how fucked their prospects were.
I have a college ex who spent her twenties in Miami riding the carousel, and who has now in her thirties moved back to the city where we went to college to date college guys. And she complains about "not finding anybody to settle down with her." Um, bitch? Do you even know how many times your odometer has rolled over?
The difference is that the feminist approach to marriage is entirely based on exploiting the man.
Yeah, it's totally the guys that are the problem here...
I wish the media would ask men about their experiences for once, if only to witness the shitstorm it would generate.
That is precisely why they never will.
Anytime someone does and gets a little too popular, the false-rape accusations pop up like magic to help SHUT IT DOWN.
USA, circa 2030, colourised
Inaccurate. Everyone in the picture is white.
Kek
lifts safety cover off detonator "YOU'LL NEVER FUCK ME ALIVE, BLUE BOYS!"
So they know plenty of good men, are actually befriending them, and every single one of them are already married or related to these women?
Yeah right. This is the biggest self report in the article.
Excellent points all around.
Me: Why are you unmarried and single [at 36]?
Woman: I don’t know!
Me: Thinking Oh yes you do.
Is this a parody article?
Women brought it upon themselves
It is 100% men's fault, but not for the reasons the author thinks.
Women have not been allowed to choose their mates freely for 5000 years. They do not have the evolutionary skills for it. Leave them up to their own devices they pick the worst losers possible, or they delay choosing until it's too late.
When marriage is a handshake between father and groom, society will return.
Gotta love how the opening example fails to note any irresponsibility on the part of the woman dating and fucking a dude who was clearly a drug addict. And also failing to even bother using proper protection.
To be fair, she could have been such an unbearable bitch he became a drug addict
Love these articles where they just ignore the elephant in the room that especially college "educated" women are just too picky and toxic and will end up with lots of cats.
Rich dudes arent gonna marry a woman that has blue hair, is fat, tattooed up, noses with septums and feminist. Its women's own fault they do these things to themselves that make them poor marriage material. Women seems to think they deserve rich chads and overrate/over value themselves.
I love these articles because this site fucking calls out Western women for the trash they are.
This is exactly what I expected...
Feels like there's to groups of women that end up here - attractive women who self-sabotage themselves into sleeping with guys with poor impulse, and their opposite, unattractive women who go for guys with poor impulse control because of a lack of options. Opposite ends of the spectrum but they end up at the same place.
Alpha fucks, beta bucks.
Where's The Imp when you need him?
The article screams of alpha fucks, beta bucks.
BTW it always bugs me that every time there's a news article about problems with dating and relationships, it always focuses on the woman's plight, never the man's. Where's our representation, leftists?
Book recommendation: The Rational Male, Rolo Tomassi