Wow, that's so fucking tame, too. Especially by Imp's standards. How does banning someone for almost two months for saying women are stealing wealth make this a better place?
Civilization is in collapse because retards are taking over, and those retards are able to hold it together because they never (well, hardly ever) punch left.
We can each have disagreements while holding on to the big picture. Regardless of how you feel about feminism as an ideal, you can't deny it's being used to attack society under the guise of attacking men protecting women.
We have holocaust deniers on the board, people regularly make references to all black people being criminal and there's no shortage of serious comments about transsexuals.
I'd expect Dom to draw the line at those, not western women. I guess the holy cow of feminism has left us all scarred with some innate level of programming. All the while, on most social media, they can say whatever they want about men and then proclaim "Well, if you're not like that, you shouldn't be offended! Clearly we are only talking about the bad men!"
What the hell are you talking about? Dom has thrown out tons of bans for race stuff and especially anti-Jewish stuff. I don't think he considers trans to be an identity at all.
This forum isn't high enough traffic to justify banning people for milquetoast shit like that even if he can be annoying. Let people downvote his comments if it truly is that bad.
This forum's traffic is almost entirely him spamming when not banned. His posting activity has been audited several times now and he's so obviously the single most active poster on the site, something like 50+ posts a day, [wait that should be "comments" because he's pedantic enough about the specific terminology KiA2 uses 🙄], that people have difficulty even coming up with who might be second most active.
Okay? Point is, his activity is far from rising to the level of clogging up the board. And even if he's a meme, it's not like he never has worthwhile comments. People can and do downvote him if his comments are retarded.
I think its not because of what he said.. and more like its the only thing he says. Its spam at this point where every post he makes is about women being evil or bad. Even if its not related to women, its about women lol.
Perhaps it was targeted at him, but the ban reason was what he said. It's an 'identity attack.' I just find that retarded, no matter how annoying I find Imp's obsession to be.
Downvote and move on, but I don't believe it should be banworthy.
It's double the last ban, is that really so hard for people to notice?
Essence of the enforcement is "Stop doing the same stupid shit over and over" and yet he can't, even with the timeouts doubling each time. Most people with half a brain would figure this out and maybe, just maybe actually try something else than repeatedly banging the same rocks together.
It's still a fucking stupid rule, that's all I'm saying. Imp's annoying but he, or I, or anyone, should be allowed to say such mild things, even if they are incorrect. I don't think it's a mod's job to enforce that sort of nonsense. As I said in another comment, downvote and move on, if you don't think it adds anything.
He lasted a whole 2 days before doing the exact same thing he's been banned for in the past multiple times now. This being 2 days after coming off a 24 day ban, which isnt even his first 24 day ban, so it's not been doubling exactly as the above puts it but is still following that pattern of increasing durations.
However he doesn't seem to be capable of learning to not sperg out all the fucking time or not reply to every topic that gets posted or keep making absolute statements that are piss easy to disprove while claiming to "always be right".
It's the kind of idiotic behaviour I expect from a toddler.
It is a stupid rule, but you accomplish nothing by getting yourself banned over and over by it. The same way as well, everytime.
I've posted much more hateful shit than he does on the reg, I'm just able to contain my spaghetti enough to not sound like a frothing loon and I've not been hit by it once.
I don't really care so much what he says. He makes this place more lively, and if he goes off the rails enough I can just ignore him and not read his comments / posts. My experience on this site is never lesser from his presence, even if he's going off-topic. It is however lesser whenever he's banned.
It's not like he's posting 27 different things and replying to every comment. This place isn't so active that his presence (or lack thereof) goes unnoticed. It takes very little scrolling to get to yesterday's (or even last week's) discussions.
My experience on this site is never lesser from his presence, even if he's going off-topic
Probably because he is banned constantly, because he used to spam fill the place with his posts and basically clog the entire front page with his anti-woman things (that often made no sense) and then argue with everyone who asked what the fuck he was talking about.
He has gotten considerably better at this, probably because he has gotten banned so much, but some of us remember a time when he did actively drag down the place with spam.
I've been lurking here for a long time. Probably about as long as you, given our similar account ages.At this point I can almost feel the change when he's banned; the site just feels lesser. Then I go and check and yep, he's banned. Usually for several days at that point.
At no point in my years lurking here have I felt like he's making the place worse. Quite the opposite, despite disagreeing with much of what he says. r14 already keeps him in check well enough, and anyone who can't stand his measly 5 posts per day can just block him.
This is including his time on KIA2 back on reddit as well, where he was at his most "I need to help wake people up" innocent phase. He, among a few others, back then and the early days here had to be told directly to stop posting because of the clog and its why the rule was introduced in the first place.
I do think he is making the place worse, but not from a technical standpoint, just pure ideological. Because I've spent longer than he has been alive working at anti-feminism and misogyny, and he is actively making the cause worse by coming across as a histrionic lunatic and making actual points disagreeable simply because he said them.
He is a funny little ha ha retard man, but people only make exceptions for him because of his mascot notoriety. No one is whining about guys like DrJester disappearing or being banned, despite them being just as vocal and everywhere during their time.
Regardless, I don't think he should be banned no matter my thoughts and the rules are mostly retarded. I just don't think he makes anything better either.
Is that really his fault though? I feel like the site is just bad at searching. Reddit has the same problem. I can't find shit in the other communities. Heck, sometimes I can't even find things that I literally saw the day before.
Just because a woman seems sane when you first meet her, doesn't mean that she'll act the same way 5 or 10 years down the line.
If the post's title is accurate, then that means that only moronic men will ever get married. All the sane ones will either keep them as girlfriends and never more, or if they become allowed to kill someone with an unsubstantiated claim of abuse like married women, then MGTOW will really be the only logical path forward. Alimony/child support and child custody laws in the West already makes this seem like the most compelling choice, without even mentioning how unpleasant and entitled women have become.
I would put 'sane' in the same category as stable, as it's easy to fake that. I'm going by which ones are more inclined to want a relationship than be a virtuous bitch. You can tell which ones they are by who the feminists/leftists target most:
Mothers: easy first, everything from abortion, you need a successful career to be fulfilled is designed to target women more focused on having kids
Housewives: bit like the above but more dismissive that women would prefer a more submissive role in the relationship
Religious: telling them that they're beliefs are backwards to targeting them directly.
Tomboys: more insidious as I've noticed they've been targeting them more with the LGBT specifically trans stuff than have women more inclined to men's behaviour but remain a woman
There isn't a united women's front to just screw over men, like everything leftist there one that says it speaks for all while trying to silence dissenters.
I hate this shit. Murder is murder. If you defend yourself from active abuse, that's one thing. But legally encouraging people sneak up and kill your husband in cold blood is evil. What a sick joke.
It does bring up some interesting questions, though. Like, are women and men different? What is a woman, UK? If "transwomen are women" and "transmen are men," if a man pretending to be a woman kills a woman pretending to be a man, is that stunning and brave, or is it misogyny, or is transphobia? Same for if a lesbian or gay man kill their spouse.
Leads to all sorts of interesting hypotheticals, but I'm assuming with near certainty this will just work out as 'fuck you, go die, men.'
The problem with Leftist word games becoming common place over the years is we can't have words mean things anymore. Something can't be bad except in specific rare circumstances, it has to always be bad.
So a defensive kill can't be murder that's completely justified and excused, because murder is bad. So now they won't call it murder and instead make a whole new word and change how its treated entirely.
The state wants the victim to self support because it is cheaper for the state. Since you can't tell that class of people to be responsible for themselves, as it is political suicide and they are to be infantilized at every turn, the next best thing is to mass house them as prisoners. I imagine 10 women to a cellblock is cheaper than putting each of them up in a halfway home with a food benefits card.
So the choices are put up with it, or do a murder. Minimizing the sentence for such is how they can make it feasible.
Hm. So her options were to leave or kill her husband, she chose premeditated homicide instead of being an adult, and the system is now coddling her murder. I anticipate "Sally's law" will only apply to female defendants, yes? Total accident they used her first name instead of her last, I'm sure.
The british justice system might be the most cucked one in the world. Everytime I hear of a woman getting away with a crime, or punishing men for bullshit, it comes from there.
Is the Imp banned today?
Wow, that's so fucking tame, too. Especially by Imp's standards. How does banning someone for almost two months for saying women are stealing wealth make this a better place?
Are you joking?
Banning imp for literally any reason, including made up ones, de-shittifies this forum immensely.
Don't be a pussy.
'Bad moderation is fine if it hits people I don't like.'
Again, how is saying women steal wealth a bannable offense? Do you really want so little speech, just to keep big bad Imp away?
This kind of liberal lack of pattern recognition is why our civilization is in the process of collapse.
Rules themselves are insufficient for a society. Rules require a people. Good people produce good societies. Good societies keep out bad people.
Note this in no way is a defense of Dom specifically or jannies broadly.
> bad people
> some guy just speaking his mind
Come on.
Civilization is in collapse because retards are taking over, and those retards are able to hold it together because they never (well, hardly ever) punch left.
We can each have disagreements while holding on to the big picture. Regardless of how you feel about feminism as an ideal, you can't deny it's being used to attack society under the guise of
attacking menprotecting women.We have holocaust deniers on the board, people regularly make references to all black people being criminal and there's no shortage of serious comments about transsexuals.
I'd expect Dom to draw the line at those, not western women. I guess the holy cow of feminism has left us all scarred with some innate level of programming. All the while, on most social media, they can say whatever they want about men and then proclaim "Well, if you're not like that, you shouldn't be offended! Clearly we are only talking about the bad men!"
What the hell are you talking about? Dom has thrown out tons of bans for race stuff and especially anti-Jewish stuff. I don't think he considers trans to be an identity at all.
Good societies manage bad people by having fair and sensible laws that naturally discourage or punish bad people.
Rule 16 was, is, and always will be retarded.
This forum isn't high enough traffic to justify banning people for milquetoast shit like that even if he can be annoying. Let people downvote his comments if it truly is that bad.
It wouldn't be a problem at all if this site's block feature actually worked.
This forum's traffic is almost entirely him spamming when not banned. His posting activity has been audited several times now and he's so obviously the single most active poster on the site, something like 50+ posts a day, [wait that should be "comments" because he's pedantic enough about the specific terminology KiA2 uses 🙄], that people have difficulty even coming up with who might be second most active.
Okay? Point is, his activity is far from rising to the level of clogging up the board. And even if he's a meme, it's not like he never has worthwhile comments. People can and do downvote him if his comments are retarded.
"the JIDF wants the last large online refuges for their enemies to be clean and free of JIDF influences!"
because massilia is a massive faggot is why.
He's living proof that you can take the mod off reddit, but you'll never take the reddit out of the mod.
I think its not because of what he said.. and more like its the only thing he says. Its spam at this point where every post he makes is about women being evil or bad. Even if its not related to women, its about women lol.
Perhaps it was targeted at him, but the ban reason was what he said. It's an 'identity attack.' I just find that retarded, no matter how annoying I find Imp's obsession to be.
Downvote and move on, but I don't believe it should be banworthy.
It's double the last ban, is that really so hard for people to notice?
Essence of the enforcement is "Stop doing the same stupid shit over and over" and yet he can't, even with the timeouts doubling each time. Most people with half a brain would figure this out and maybe, just maybe actually try something else than repeatedly banging the same rocks together.
It's still a fucking stupid rule, that's all I'm saying. Imp's annoying but he, or I, or anyone, should be allowed to say such mild things, even if they are incorrect. I don't think it's a mod's job to enforce that sort of nonsense. As I said in another comment, downvote and move on, if you don't think it adds anything.
He lasted a whole 2 days before doing the exact same thing he's been banned for in the past multiple times now. This being 2 days after coming off a 24 day ban, which isnt even his first 24 day ban, so it's not been doubling exactly as the above puts it but is still following that pattern of increasing durations.
However he doesn't seem to be capable of learning to not sperg out all the fucking time or not reply to every topic that gets posted or keep making absolute statements that are piss easy to disprove while claiming to "always be right".
It's the kind of idiotic behaviour I expect from a toddler.
It is a stupid rule, but you accomplish nothing by getting yourself banned over and over by it. The same way as well, everytime.
I've posted much more hateful shit than he does on the reg, I'm just able to contain my spaghetti enough to not sound like a frothing loon and I've not been hit by it once.
How is that attacking an entire identity group as inferior or conspiring?
Sure, Imp does that all the time, but this is a bad call. Saying 'X group does Y' implies behavioral trends, not conspiracy.
#freetheimp #fuckjannies
We need a rule 16b. If the "offense" comes from imp, ban the person complaining about imp instead.
I just want him to keep his sperging on topic instead of derailing every single thread.
I don't really care so much what he says. He makes this place more lively, and if he goes off the rails enough I can just ignore him and not read his comments / posts. My experience on this site is never lesser from his presence, even if he's going off-topic. It is however lesser whenever he's banned.
It's not like he's posting 27 different things and replying to every comment. This place isn't so active that his presence (or lack thereof) goes unnoticed. It takes very little scrolling to get to yesterday's (or even last week's) discussions.
Probably because he is banned constantly, because he used to spam fill the place with his posts and basically clog the entire front page with his anti-woman things (that often made no sense) and then argue with everyone who asked what the fuck he was talking about.
He has gotten considerably better at this, probably because he has gotten banned so much, but some of us remember a time when he did actively drag down the place with spam.
I've been lurking here for a long time. Probably about as long as you, given our similar account ages.At this point I can almost feel the change when he's banned; the site just feels lesser. Then I go and check and yep, he's banned. Usually for several days at that point.
At no point in my years lurking here have I felt like he's making the place worse. Quite the opposite, despite disagreeing with much of what he says. r14 already keeps him in check well enough, and anyone who can't stand his measly 5 posts per day can just block him.
This is including his time on KIA2 back on reddit as well, where he was at his most "I need to help wake people up" innocent phase. He, among a few others, back then and the early days here had to be told directly to stop posting because of the clog and its why the rule was introduced in the first place.
I do think he is making the place worse, but not from a technical standpoint, just pure ideological. Because I've spent longer than he has been alive working at anti-feminism and misogyny, and he is actively making the cause worse by coming across as a histrionic lunatic and making actual points disagreeable simply because he said them.
He is a funny little ha ha retard man, but people only make exceptions for him because of his mascot notoriety. No one is whining about guys like DrJester disappearing or being banned, despite them being just as vocal and everywhere during their time.
Regardless, I don't think he should be banned no matter my thoughts and the rules are mostly retarded. I just don't think he makes anything better either.
His spamming of various topics on a daily basis has effectively astroturfed several search strings of anyone is trying to look up other topics.
Curiously the topics that are now harder to find are also ones Imp has been known to defend despite the obvious issues associated with them.
Is that really his fault though? I feel like the site is just bad at searching. Reddit has the same problem. I can't find shit in the other communities. Heck, sometimes I can't even find things that I literally saw the day before.
Can men do that for years of nagging and emotional manipulation?
This'll just mean that only the stable women who aren't feminists will get married, anyone else isn't unless the man wants to commit suicide by bitch.
Just because a woman seems sane when you first meet her, doesn't mean that she'll act the same way 5 or 10 years down the line.
If the post's title is accurate, then that means that only moronic men will ever get married. All the sane ones will either keep them as girlfriends and never more, or if they become allowed to kill someone with an unsubstantiated claim of abuse like married women, then MGTOW will really be the only logical path forward. Alimony/child support and child custody laws in the West already makes this seem like the most compelling choice, without even mentioning how unpleasant and entitled women have become.
The state will step in to make common-law marriage more and more… well, common.
“You’ve dated for five years? You’re married.”
I would put 'sane' in the same category as stable, as it's easy to fake that. I'm going by which ones are more inclined to want a relationship than be a virtuous bitch. You can tell which ones they are by who the feminists/leftists target most:
Mothers: easy first, everything from abortion, you need a successful career to be fulfilled is designed to target women more focused on having kids
Housewives: bit like the above but more dismissive that women would prefer a more submissive role in the relationship
Religious: telling them that they're beliefs are backwards to targeting them directly.
Tomboys: more insidious as I've noticed they've been targeting them more with the LGBT specifically trans stuff than have women more inclined to men's behaviour but remain a woman
There isn't a united women's front to just screw over men, like everything leftist there one that says it speaks for all while trying to silence dissenters.
My sister was talking about cars with friends in Seattle and they all thought she was trans because of it.
It's a logical choice for an individual to make but at scale it is complete society collapse followed by extinction.
Society needs to collapse. Its rotten to the core. May something better rise from its ashes
Then how do good men have families and offspring so the world isn't over run by simps?
Also like he said they are stretching common law "marriage" wider in countries like the UK.
Just wait until this backfires on the mudslimes
Law only applies to women abused by white men since only white men are capable of abuse as per intersectionality guide. Voila.
I hate this shit. Murder is murder. If you defend yourself from active abuse, that's one thing. But legally encouraging people sneak up and kill your husband in cold blood is evil. What a sick joke.
It does bring up some interesting questions, though. Like, are women and men different? What is a woman, UK? If "transwomen are women" and "transmen are men," if a man pretending to be a woman kills a woman pretending to be a man, is that stunning and brave, or is it misogyny, or is transphobia? Same for if a lesbian or gay man kill their spouse.
Leads to all sorts of interesting hypotheticals, but I'm assuming with near certainty this will just work out as 'fuck you, go die, men.'
The problem with Leftist word games becoming common place over the years is we can't have words mean things anymore. Something can't be bad except in specific rare circumstances, it has to always be bad.
So a defensive kill can't be murder that's completely justified and excused, because murder is bad. So now they won't call it murder and instead make a whole new word and change how its treated entirely.
The state wants the victim to self support because it is cheaper for the state. Since you can't tell that class of people to be responsible for themselves, as it is political suicide and they are to be infantilized at every turn, the next best thing is to mass house them as prisoners. I imagine 10 women to a cellblock is cheaper than putting each of them up in a halfway home with a food benefits card.
So the choices are put up with it, or do a murder. Minimizing the sentence for such is how they can make it feasible.
That sounds like an honest question, citizen. You got a license for that?
Hm. So her options were to leave or kill her husband, she chose premeditated homicide instead of being an adult, and the system is now coddling her murder. I anticipate "Sally's law" will only apply to female defendants, yes? Total accident they used her first name instead of her last, I'm sure.
Lordy. Just another thing to point to when you hear "where have all the good men gone" / "why are men avoiding getting married" wails.
Muslims on the other hand remain free to abuse White Christian citizens going for a walk.
The british justice system might be the most cucked one in the world. Everytime I hear of a woman getting away with a crime, or punishing men for bullshit, it comes from there.
So.. amoranth can kill her husband for making her be a cam whore?? Lawl....
I am sure this system of incentives won't have any negative consequences for society.
And I assume turn abouts fair play? (lol)