Just because a woman seems sane when you first meet her, doesn't mean that she'll act the same way 5 or 10 years down the line.
If the post's title is accurate, then that means that only moronic men will ever get married. All the sane ones will either keep them as girlfriends and never more, or if they become allowed to kill someone with an unsubstantiated claim of abuse like married women, then MGTOW will really be the only logical path forward. Alimony/child support and child custody laws in the West already makes this seem like the most compelling choice, without even mentioning how unpleasant and entitled women have become.
I would put 'sane' in the same category as stable, as it's easy to fake that. I'm going by which ones are more inclined to want a relationship than be a virtuous bitch. You can tell which ones they are by who the feminists/leftists target most:
Mothers: easy first, everything from abortion, you need a successful career to be fulfilled is designed to target women more focused on having kids
Housewives: bit like the above but more dismissive that women would prefer a more submissive role in the relationship
Religious: telling them that they're beliefs are backwards to targeting them directly.
Tomboys: more insidious as I've noticed they've been targeting them more with the LGBT specifically trans stuff than have women more inclined to men's behaviour but remain a woman
There isn't a united women's front to just screw over men, like everything leftist there one that says it speaks for all while trying to silence dissenters.
Can men do that for years of nagging and emotional manipulation?
This'll just mean that only the stable women who aren't feminists will get married, anyone else isn't unless the man wants to commit suicide by bitch.
Just because a woman seems sane when you first meet her, doesn't mean that she'll act the same way 5 or 10 years down the line.
If the post's title is accurate, then that means that only moronic men will ever get married. All the sane ones will either keep them as girlfriends and never more, or if they become allowed to kill someone with an unsubstantiated claim of abuse like married women, then MGTOW will really be the only logical path forward. Alimony/child support and child custody laws in the West already makes this seem like the most compelling choice, without even mentioning how unpleasant and entitled women have become.
The state will step in to make common-law marriage more and more… well, common.
“You’ve dated for five years? You’re married.”
I would put 'sane' in the same category as stable, as it's easy to fake that. I'm going by which ones are more inclined to want a relationship than be a virtuous bitch. You can tell which ones they are by who the feminists/leftists target most:
Mothers: easy first, everything from abortion, you need a successful career to be fulfilled is designed to target women more focused on having kids
Housewives: bit like the above but more dismissive that women would prefer a more submissive role in the relationship
Religious: telling them that they're beliefs are backwards to targeting them directly.
Tomboys: more insidious as I've noticed they've been targeting them more with the LGBT specifically trans stuff than have women more inclined to men's behaviour but remain a woman
There isn't a united women's front to just screw over men, like everything leftist there one that says it speaks for all while trying to silence dissenters.
My sister was talking about cars with friends in Seattle and they all thought she was trans because of it.
It's a logical choice for an individual to make but at scale it is complete society collapse followed by extinction.
Society needs to collapse. Its rotten to the core. May something better rise from its ashes
Then how do good men have families and offspring so the world isn't over run by simps?
Also like he said they are stretching common law "marriage" wider in countries like the UK.